TheoremBase

Proof of Continuity of the Absolute Value, Maximum and Minimum of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space

lemmalem:absolute-value-max-min-continuous-real-metric-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: First published version: reverse triangle inequality for the absolute value, and the attainment-plus-bound argument for the maximum and minimum.

Proof

All references to numbered claims below are to Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field unless another item is named. Unfolding dRd_{\mathbb{R}}, continuity of a map h:ARh:A\to\mathbb{R} at xx relative to AA says: for every ε\varepsilon with 0<ε0<\varepsilon there is δ\delta with 0<δ0<\delta such that every zAz\in A with d(x,z)<δd(x,z)<\delta satisfies h(z)h(x)<ε|h(z)-h(x)|<\varepsilon.

Claim 1. Let 0<ε0<\varepsilon, and let δ\delta be as provided by continuity of ff at xx relative to AA for this ε\varepsilon. For zAz\in A with d(x,z)<δd(x,z)<\delta, claim 7 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives

f(z)f(x)f(z)f(x),\bigl||f(z)|-|f(x)|\bigr|\le|f(z)-f(x)|,

and f(z)f(x)<ε|f(z)-f(x)|<\varepsilon, so claim 2 gives f(z)f(x)<ε\bigl||f|(z)-|f|(x)\bigr|<\varepsilon.

A common choice of δ\delta for claims 2 and 3. Let 0<ε0<\varepsilon. Continuity of ff and of gg at xx relative to AA gives δ1\delta_1 and δ2\delta_2, both positive, such that d(x,z)<δ1d(x,z)<\delta_1 implies f(z)f(x)<ε|f(z)-f(x)|<\varepsilon and d(x,z)<δ2d(x,z)<\delta_2 implies g(z)g(x)<ε|g(z)-g(x)|<\varepsilon, for zAz\in A. By claim 9 there is δ\delta with δδ1\delta\le\delta_1, δδ2\delta\le\delta_2 and δ\delta equal to δ1\delta_1 or to δ2\delta_2; in either case 0<δ0<\delta. Fix zAz\in A with d(x,z)<δd(x,z)<\delta. By claim 2 both f(z)f(x)<ε|f(z)-f(x)|<\varepsilon and g(z)g(x)<ε|g(z)-g(x)|<\varepsilon hold, so claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives

ε<f(z)f(x)<ε,ε<g(z)g(x)<ε.-\varepsilon<f(z)-f(x)<\varepsilon,\qquad -\varepsilon<g(z)-g(x)<\varepsilon .

Adding f(x)f(x), respectively g(x)g(x), and using claim 1 together with the field identities for sums and differences, this says

f(x)ε<f(z)<f(x)+ε,g(x)ε<g(z)<g(x)+ε.f(x)-\varepsilon<f(z)<f(x)+\varepsilon,\qquad g(x)-\varepsilon<g(z)<g(x)+\varepsilon .

Claim 2. Write m=max{f(z),g(z)}m=\max\{f(z),g(z)\} and m=max{f(x),g(x)}m'=\max\{f(x),g(x)\}. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements we have f(x)mf(x)\le m' and g(x)mg(x)\le m', so adding ε\varepsilon gives f(x)+εm+εf(x)+\varepsilon\le m'+\varepsilon and g(x)+εm+εg(x)+\varepsilon\le m'+\varepsilon. With the bounds above and claim 2 we get f(z)<m+εf(z)<m'+\varepsilon and g(z)<m+εg(z)<m'+\varepsilon. By claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements the element mm equals f(z)f(z) or g(z)g(z), so in either case m<m+εm<m'+\varepsilon. Exchanging the roles of zz and xx in this argument, and using the bounds f(z)ε<f(x)f(z)-\varepsilon<f(x) and g(z)ε<g(x)g(z)-\varepsilon<g(x), which follow from the displayed inequalities by claim 1, gives m<m+εm'<m+\varepsilon.

Adding m-m' to m<m+εm<m'+\varepsilon and simplifying by claim 3 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field gives mm<εm-m'<\varepsilon. Adding m-m to m<m+εm'<m+\varepsilon likewise gives mm<εm'-m<\varepsilon; by claim 6 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field we have mm=(mm)m'-m=-(m-m'), so claim 4 turns this into ε<mm-\varepsilon<m-m'. Hence ε<mm<ε-\varepsilon<m-m'<\varepsilon, and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives mm<ε|m-m'|<\varepsilon, that is, max{f,g}(z)max{f,g}(x)<ε\bigl|\max\{f,g\}(z)-\max\{f,g\}(x)\bigr|<\varepsilon.

Claim 3. Write n=min{f(z),g(z)}n=\min\{f(z),g(z)\} and n=min{f(x),g(x)}n'=\min\{f(x),g(x)\}. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements we have nf(x)n'\le f(x) and ng(x)n'\le g(x), so adding ε-\varepsilon gives nεf(x)εn'-\varepsilon\le f(x)-\varepsilon and nεg(x)εn'-\varepsilon\le g(x)-\varepsilon. With the bounds f(x)ε<f(z)f(x)-\varepsilon<f(z) and g(x)ε<g(z)g(x)-\varepsilon<g(z) and claim 2 we get nε<f(z)n'-\varepsilon<f(z) and nε<g(z)n'-\varepsilon<g(z). By claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements the element nn equals f(z)f(z) or g(z)g(z), so nε<nn'-\varepsilon<n in either case. Exchanging the roles of zz and xx gives nε<nn-\varepsilon<n'.

Adding ε\varepsilon and then n-n' to nε<nn'-\varepsilon<n, and simplifying as in claim 2, gives nn<εn'-n<\varepsilon; likewise nn<εn-n'<\varepsilon. By claim 6 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field and claim 4, the first of these reads ε<nn-\varepsilon<n-n'. Hence claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives nn<ε|n-n'|<\varepsilon, that is, min{f,g}(z)min{f,g}(x)<ε\bigl|\min\{f,g\}(z)-\min\{f,g\}(x)\bigr|<\varepsilon.

Claim 4. If ff and gg are continuous on AA, they are continuous at every point of AA relative to AA, so claims 1, 2 and 3 apply at every such point; hence f|f|, max{f,g}\max\{f,g\} and min{f,g}\min\{f,g\} are continuous on AA.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…