TheoremBase

Proof

All references to numbered claims below are to Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field unless another item is named. Unfolding dRd_{\mathbb{R}}, continuity of a map h:A→Rh:A\to\mathbb{R} at xx relative to AA says: for every ε\varepsilon with 0<ε0<\varepsilon there is δ\delta with 0<δ0<\delta such that every z∈Az\in A with d(x,z)<δd(x,z)<\delta satisfies ∣h(z)−h(x)∣<ε|h(z)-h(x)|<\varepsilon.

Claim 1. Let 0<ε0<\varepsilon, and let δ\delta be as provided by continuity of ff at xx relative to AA for this ε\varepsilon. For z∈Az\in A with d(x,z)<δd(x,z)<\delta, claim 7 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives

∣∣f(z)∣−∣f(x)∣∣≤∣f(z)−f(x)∣,\bigl||f(z)|-|f(x)|\bigr|\le|f(z)-f(x)|,

and ∣f(z)−f(x)∣<ε|f(z)-f(x)|<\varepsilon, so claim 2 gives ∣∣f∣(z)−∣f∣(x)∣<ε\bigl||f|(z)-|f|(x)\bigr|<\varepsilon.

A common choice of δ\delta for claims 2 and 3. Let 0<ε0<\varepsilon. Continuity of ff and of gg at xx relative to AA gives δ1\delta_1 and δ2\delta_2, both positive, such that d(x,z)<δ1d(x,z)<\delta_1 implies ∣f(z)−f(x)∣<ε|f(z)-f(x)|<\varepsilon and d(x,z)<δ2d(x,z)<\delta_2 implies ∣g(z)−g(x)∣<ε|g(z)-g(x)|<\varepsilon, for z∈Az\in A. By claim 9 there is δ\delta with δ≤δ1\delta\le\delta_1, δ≤δ2\delta\le\delta_2 and δ\delta equal to δ1\delta_1 or to δ2\delta_2; in either case 0<δ0<\delta. Fix z∈Az\in A with d(x,z)<δd(x,z)<\delta. By claim 2 both ∣f(z)−f(x)∣<ε|f(z)-f(x)|<\varepsilon and ∣g(z)−g(x)∣<ε|g(z)-g(x)|<\varepsilon hold, so claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives

−ε<f(z)−f(x)<ε,−ε<g(z)−g(x)<ε.-\varepsilon<f(z)-f(x)<\varepsilon,\qquad -\varepsilon<g(z)-g(x)<\varepsilon .

Adding f(x)f(x), respectively g(x)g(x), and using claim 1 together with the field identities for sums and differences, this says

f(x)−ε<f(z)<f(x)+ε,g(x)−ε<g(z)<g(x)+ε.f(x)-\varepsilon<f(z)<f(x)+\varepsilon,\qquad g(x)-\varepsilon<g(z)<g(x)+\varepsilon .

Claim 2. Write m=max⁡{f(z),g(z)}m=\max\{f(z),g(z)\} and m′=max⁡{f(x),g(x)}m'=\max\{f(x),g(x)\}. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements we have f(x)≤m′f(x)\le m' and g(x)≤m′g(x)\le m', so adding ε\varepsilon gives f(x)+ε≤m′+εf(x)+\varepsilon\le m'+\varepsilon and g(x)+ε≤m′+εg(x)+\varepsilon\le m'+\varepsilon. With the bounds above and claim 2 we get f(z)<m′+εf(z)<m'+\varepsilon and g(z)<m′+εg(z)<m'+\varepsilon. By claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Maximum of Two Elements the element mm equals f(z)f(z) or g(z)g(z), so in either case m<m′+εm<m'+\varepsilon. Exchanging the roles of zz and xx in this argument, and using the bounds f(z)−ε<f(x)f(z)-\varepsilon<f(x) and g(z)−ε<g(x)g(z)-\varepsilon<g(x), which follow from the displayed inequalities by claim 1, gives m′<m+εm'<m+\varepsilon.

Adding −m′-m' to m<m′+εm<m'+\varepsilon and simplifying by claim 3 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field gives m−m′<εm-m'<\varepsilon. Adding −m-m to m′<m+εm'<m+\varepsilon likewise gives m′−m<εm'-m<\varepsilon; by claim 6 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field we have m′−m=−(m−m′)m'-m=-(m-m'), so claim 4 turns this into −ε<m−m′-\varepsilon<m-m'. Hence −ε<m−m′<ε-\varepsilon<m-m'<\varepsilon, and claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives ∣m−m′∣<ε|m-m'|<\varepsilon, that is, ∣max⁡{f,g}(z)−max⁡{f,g}(x)∣<ε\bigl|\max\{f,g\}(z)-\max\{f,g\}(x)\bigr|<\varepsilon.

Claim 3. Write n=min⁡{f(z),g(z)}n=\min\{f(z),g(z)\} and n′=min⁡{f(x),g(x)}n'=\min\{f(x),g(x)\}. By claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements we have n′≤f(x)n'\le f(x) and n′≤g(x)n'\le g(x), so adding −ε-\varepsilon gives n′−ε≤f(x)−εn'-\varepsilon\le f(x)-\varepsilon and n′−ε≤g(x)−εn'-\varepsilon\le g(x)-\varepsilon. With the bounds f(x)−ε<f(z)f(x)-\varepsilon<f(z) and g(x)−ε<g(z)g(x)-\varepsilon<g(z) and claim 2 we get n′−ε<f(z)n'-\varepsilon<f(z) and n′−ε<g(z)n'-\varepsilon<g(z). By claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Minimum of Two Elements the element nn equals f(z)f(z) or g(z)g(z), so n′−ε<nn'-\varepsilon<n in either case. Exchanging the roles of zz and xx gives n−ε<n′n-\varepsilon<n'.

Adding ε\varepsilon and then −n′-n' to n′−ε<nn'-\varepsilon<n, and simplifying as in claim 2, gives n′−n<εn'-n<\varepsilon; likewise n−n′<εn-n'<\varepsilon. By claim 6 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field and claim 4, the first of these reads −ε<n−n′-\varepsilon<n-n'. Hence claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives ∣n−n′∣<ε|n-n'|<\varepsilon, that is, ∣min⁡{f,g}(z)−min⁡{f,g}(x)∣<ε\bigl|\min\{f,g\}(z)-\min\{f,g\}(x)\bigr|<\varepsilon.

Claim 4. If ff and gg are continuous on AA, they are continuous at every point of AA relative to AA, so claims 1, 2 and 3 apply at every such point; hence ∣f∣|f|, max⁡{f,g}\max\{f,g\} and min⁡{f,g}\min\{f,g\} are continuous on AA.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…