Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. The rules for adding inequalities, for multiplying them by nonnegative or positive real numbers, and for handling absolute values, from Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, are used without further mention; so are the facts that a square of a real number is nonnegative (claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field) and that for nonnegative reals a,b one has a<b, a≤b, a=b exactly when a2<b2, a2≤b2, a2=b2 respectively (claims 1, 2 and 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field).
Step 0 (Notation and preliminary facts). Fix the data of the statement: the penalty pair (D,DΣ,E,Σ), the reals λ0,θ,κ with 0<λ0, 0<θ≤1, 0≤κ, the function g, the operator F, and a real number C as in (Growth).
(0.1) Inner product spaces. For ν∈P2(Rd) the space L2(ν;Rd), with inner product ⟨⋅,⋅⟩ν and norm ∥⋅∥ν, is a real Hilbert space by Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §fields, in particular a real inner product space; its norm satisfies ∥x∥ν2=⟨x,x⟩ν by Real Inner Product Space §norm, and ∥x∥ν2=∫Rd∥x∥2dν for a representative x, by the formula for the norm in Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §fields. Inner products are symmetric by condition (a) of Real Inner Product Space §inner-product; bilinearity, homogeneity of the norm and the expansion of ∥x±y∥ν2 are Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear, Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §expansion; and ∣⟨x,y⟩ν∣≤∥x∥ν∥y∥ν by The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space. For ν∈DΣ the score Σ(ν) lies in L2(ν;Rd) by Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §pair, and E(ν) is a real number because DΣ⊆D.
(0.2) The constant C is nonnegative. By Penalty Pairs on the Wasserstein Space: the Penalty, Its Score, and Their Domains §nonempty there is μ0∈DΣ⊆D. Its second moment is a nonnegative real number, so (Growth) gives 0≤M2(μ0)≤C(1+∣E(μ0)∣). If C<0, then, as 0<1+∣E(μ0)∣, we would get C(1+∣E(μ0)∣)<0, a contradiction. Hence 0≤C.
(0.3) A bound for g. By (Running cost) and Bounded Real-Valued Function on a Set, fix a real Mg≥0 with ∣g(μ)∣≤Mg for every μ∈P2(Rd).
(0.4) Traces. Let βd=∑k=1d1 be the real number of The Trace as a Sum of Quadratic Forms, its Monotonicity and a Norm Bound for p=d; it satisfies 1≤βd as recorded there, and ∣trZ∣≤βd∥Z∥ for every Z∈S(d) by The Trace as a Sum of Quadratic Forms, its Monotonicity and a Norm Bound §norm-bound. Differences and scalar multiples of members of S(d) lie in S(d) by claim 1 of The Positive Semidefinite Ordering is a Partial Order Compatible with the Linear Structure, and the trace is linear, tr(aM+bN)=atrM+btrN, by claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Trace; in particular tr(Y±δH)=trY±δtrH and tr(Y−Y′)=trY−trY′. We write h(μ)=trHE(μ) for μ∈D; by (Growth) and (0.2), ∣h(μ)∣≤C(1+∣E(μ)∣).
(0.5) Elementary inequalities in δ. Let δ∈R with 0<δ<1. Then 0<θδ≤δ<1, because 0<θ≤1. Consequently 0<1+θδ, 0≤1−θδ≤1, 2δ+2θδ2>0, 2δ−2θδ2=2δ(1−θδ)≥0, and δ−2θδ2=δ−2δθδ≥2δ>0. For real p,s one has 2ps≤p2+s2, since 0≤(p−s)2=p2−2ps+s2.
(0.6) Expanded form of the shifts. Let (ν,q)∈V(DΣ), r∈R, Y∈S(d), δ>0, and write σ=Σ(ν). By The Bundle of Vector Fields over a Set of Measures, Second-Order Equation Operators on the Wasserstein Space, and Their Delta-Shifts §shifted, the formula of The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Common Noise and a Penalty Drift on the Wasserstein Space §operator, linearity of the trace (0.4), and ⟨σ,q±δσ⟩ν=⟨σ,q⟩ν±δ∥σ∥ν2 (0.1),
Fδ−(ν,r,q,Y)=λ0r+λ0δE(ν)−2κtrY−2κδh(ν)+2θ∥q+δσ∥ν2+⟨σ,q⟩ν+δ∥σ∥ν2−g(ν),(0a)
Fδ+(ν,r,q,Y)=λ0r−λ0δE(ν)−2κtrY+2κδh(ν)+2θ∥q−δσ∥ν2+⟨σ,q⟩ν−δ∥σ∥ν2−g(ν).(0c)
Expanding ∥q±δσ∥ν2=∥q∥ν2±2δ⟨σ,q⟩ν+δ2∥σ∥ν2 by (0.1) gives
Fδ−(ν,r,q,Y)=λ0r+λ0δE(ν)−2κtrY−2κδh(ν)+2θ∥q∥ν2+(1+θδ)⟨σ,q⟩ν+(δ+2θδ2)∥σ∥ν2−g(ν),(0b)
Fδ+(ν,r,q,Y)=λ0r−λ0δE(ν)−2κtrY+2κδh(ν)+2θ∥q∥ν2+(1−θδ)⟨σ,q⟩ν−(δ−2θδ2)∥σ∥ν2−g(ν).(0d)
Step 1 (Local strict properness). Let R>0, (ν,q)∈V(DΣ), Y∈S(d) and −R≤s≤r≤R. By the formula of The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi Equation with Common Noise and a Penalty Drift on the Wasserstein Space §operator all terms other than λ0r and λ0s cancel, so F(ν,r,q,Y)−F(ν,s,q,Y)=λ0(r−s). Hence the positive real λ0 is a properness constant for F at R, for every R>0, and F is locally strictly proper.
Step 2 (Shift-coercivity). Let δ,R∈R with 0<δ<1 and 0<R. Put
A=2λ0R+2κβdR+2κC(1+R)+Mg+2R2,B=R+2A+2δR2,Cδ,R=1+δ4(R+B);
these are nonnegative reals by (0.2) and (0.3). We show that Cδ,R is a score bound for F at (δ,R).
Let ξ=(ν,r,q,Y) and η=(ν′,r′,q′,Y′) be R-bounded test data with Fδ−(ξ)−Fδ+(η)<R. By Test Data for an Intrinsic Second-Order Equation Operator on the Wasserstein Space and the Admissible Sets §admissible every member of Sδ,R− is such a ξ for some η, and every member of Sδ,R+ is such an η for some ξ; so it suffices to show s≤Cδ,R and s′≤Cδ,R, where s=∥Σ(ν)∥ν and s′=∥Σ(ν′)∥ν′. R-boundedness gives ∣r∣,∣r′∣<R, ∣E(ν)∣,∣E(ν′)∣<R, ∥q∥ν,∥q′∥ν′<R and ∥Y∥,∥Y′∥<R.
Lower bound for Fδ−(ξ). In (0a) we have λ0r≥−λ0R; λ0δE(ν)≥−λ0δ∣E(ν)∣≥−λ0R as δ<1; −2κtrY≥−2κβd∥Y∥≥−2κβdR by (0.4); −2κδh(ν)≥−2κ∣h(ν)∣≥−2κC(1+R) by (0.4); 2θ∥q+δΣ(ν)∥ν2≥0; ⟨Σ(ν),q⟩ν≥−sR by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality of (0.1); and −g(ν)≥−Mg. Hence, since δs2≥2δs2,
Fδ−(ξ) ≥ δs2−Rs−A ≥ φ(s)−A,where φ(x)=2δx2−Rx (x∈R).
Upper bound for Fδ+(η). In (0d) we have λ0r′≤λ0R; −λ0δE(ν′)≤λ0R; −2κtrY′≤2κβdR; 2κδh(ν′)≤2κC(1+R); 2θ∥q′∥ν′2≤2R2 as θ≤1; (1−θδ)⟨Σ(ν′),q′⟩ν′≤(1−θδ)s′R≤Rs′ by Cauchy-Schwarz and (0.5); −(δ−2θδ2)s′2≤−2δs′2 by (0.5); and −g(ν′)≤Mg. Hence Fδ+(η)≤A−φ(s′).
Conclusion. For every real x, 0≤2δ(x−δR)2=φ(x)+2δR2, so φ(x)≥−2δR2. From the two bounds, φ(s)+φ(s′)−2A≤Fδ−(ξ)−Fδ+(η)<R, hence φ(s)<R+2A−φ(s′)≤B and likewise φ(s′)<B. Now let x≥0 with φ(x)<B, and suppose x>Cδ,R. Then x>1, x>δ4R and x>δ4B, all three numbers being at most Cδ,R. The second gives Rx<4δx2, so φ(x)>4δx2; the first gives x2>x, so 4δx2>4δx; and the third gives 4δx>B. Thus φ(x)>B, a contradiction. Hence x≤Cδ,R; applied to x=s and x=s′ this proves the claim. As δ,R were arbitrary, F satisfies the shift-coercivity condition.
Step 3 (An estimate along a coupling). Claim. Let ν′,ν∈P2(Rd), π∈Π(ν′,ν), a,b∈L2(ν′;Rd), c∈L2(ν;Rd), and let ρ>0 with ∥a∥ν′≤ρ. Write K for the cross pairing and D=∫Rd+d∥b(x)−c(y)∥2π(dz) for the discrepancy, a nonnegative real by The Discrepancy of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling of Their Base Measures §well-defined. Then
(⟨a,b⟩ν′−K(a,c,π))2≤ρ2D.
Proof. Put β=⟨a,b⟩ν′−K(a,c,π) and let t∈R. The field ta+b lies in L2(ν′;Rd), and its discrepancy with c along π is nonnegative by The Discrepancy of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling of Their Base Measures §well-defined. By The Cross Pairing of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling §polarisation that discrepancy equals ∥ta+b∥ν′2−2K(ta+b,c,π)+∥c∥ν2; by (0.1), ∥ta+b∥ν′2=t2∥a∥ν′2+2t⟨a,b⟩ν′+∥b∥ν′2; by The Cross Pairing of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling §linear, K(ta+b,c,π)=tK(a,c,π)+K(b,c,π); and by The Cross Pairing of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling §polarisation again, ∥b∥ν′2−2K(b,c,π)+∥c∥ν2=D. Therefore
0≤t2∥a∥ν′2+2tβ+D≤t2ρ2+2tβ+Dfor every t∈R.
With t=−βρ−2 this reads 0≤β2ρ−2−2β2ρ−2+D=D−β2ρ−2, and multiplying by ρ2>0 gives the claim.
Consequence. If, for every n∈N, νn′∈P2(Rd), πn∈Π(νn′,ν), an,bn∈L2(νn′;Rd) with ∥an∥νn′≤ρ, and the discrepancies Dn of bn and c along πn converge to 0, then βn=⟨an,bn⟩νn′−K(an,c,πn) converges to 0: given ε>0 choose N with Dn<ε2ρ−2 for n≥N; then ∣βn∣2=βn2≤ρ2Dn<ε2 (claim 1 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field), so ∣βn∣<ε.
Step 4 (Shift-semicontinuity). Let δ,R∈R with 0<δ<1 and 0<R, let ξn=(νn,rn,qn,Yn) (n∈N) and ξ=(ν,r,q,Y) be test data, and let (πn) be couplings such that (ξn) converges to ξ along (πn) with score bounded by R. Write σn=Σ(νn), σ=Σ(ν), and Kn(a,c)=K(a,c,πn). By that clause: every ξn is R-bounded, so ∣E(νn)∣<R and ∥qn∥νn<R; ∥σn∥νn≤R; (πn) is a sequence of couplings of vanishing cost, limI(πn)=0; (qn) converges strongly to q, i.e. the discrepancies Dn of qn and q along πn converge to 0; (σn) converges weakly to σ, i.e. limKn(σn,w)=⟨σ,w⟩ν for every w∈L2(ν;Rd); rn→r; and Yn→Y in the metric dS(d)(Z,Z′)=∥Z−Z′∥ of Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §matrices. Limits of sums, products and scalar multiples of convergent real sequences are computed by Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences.
(4.1) W2(νn,ν)→0. By The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance on Euclidean Space §distance, W2(νn,ν)2≤I(πn). Given ε>0, choose N with I(πn)<ε2 for n≥N; then W2(νn,ν)2<ε2, so W2(νn,ν)<ε. The distance is symmetric by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §metric, so also W2(ν,νn)<ε for n≥N.
(4.2) Convergent terms. (a) trYn→trY, because ∣trYn−trY∣=∣tr(Yn−Y)∣≤βd∥Yn−Y∥ by (0.4), and ∥Yn−Y∥→0. (b) h(νn)→h(ν): put R′=R+∣E(ν)∣>0 and DR′={μ∈D:∣E(μ)∣≤R′}, which contains ν and every νn. By (Hessian continuity) the restriction of h to DR′ is continuous at ν relative to DR′: for ε>0 there is γ>0 with ∣h(μ)−h(ν)∣<ε whenever μ∈DR′ and W2(ν,μ)<γ; by (4.1) this applies to μ=νn for all large n. (c) g(νn)→g(ν): by (Running cost) and Uniformly Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces, for ε>0 there is γ>0 with ∣g(μ)−g(μ′)∣<ε whenever W2(μ,μ′)<γ, the metric on R being that of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line; apply (4.1). (d) ∥qn∥νn2→∥q∥ν2: by the consequence in Step 3 with ρ=R, an=bn=qn, c=q, the numbers βn=∥qn∥νn2−Kn(qn,q) tend to 0; by The Cross Pairing of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling §polarisation, Dn=∥qn∥νn2−2Kn(qn,q)+∥q∥ν2=2βn−∥qn∥νn2+∥q∥ν2, so ∥qn∥νn2=2βn−Dn+∥q∥ν2→∥q∥ν2. (e) ⟨σn,qn⟩νn→⟨σ,q⟩ν: by the consequence in Step 3 with ρ=R, an=σn, bn=qn, c=q, the difference ⟨σn,qn⟩νn−Kn(σn,q) tends to 0, and Kn(σn,q)→⟨σ,q⟩ν by weak convergence with w=q.
(4.3) Lower semicontinuous terms. (a) For every ε>0 there is N with E(νn)>E(ν)−ε for n≥N: by (Semicontinuity) and Lower Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space, E is lower semicontinuous at ν∈D relative to D, which gives γ>0 with E(ν)−ε<E(μ) for μ∈D with W2(ν,μ)<γ; apply (4.1), as νn∈DΣ⊆D. (b) For every ε>0 there is N with ∥σn∥νn2>∥σ∥ν2−ε for n≥N: by The Cross Pairing of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling §polarisation and The Discrepancy of Two Square-Integrable Vector Fields Along a Coupling of Their Base Measures §well-defined, 0≤∥σn∥νn2−2Kn(σn,σ)+∥σ∥ν2, so ∥σn∥νn2≥2Kn(σn,σ)−∥σ∥ν2; the right side converges to 2∥σ∥ν2−∥σ∥ν2=∥σ∥ν2 by weak convergence with w=σ, so it exceeds ∥σ∥ν2−ε for large n.
(4.4) The lower shift. By (0b), Fδ−(ξn)=un+vn and Fδ−(ξ)=u+v, where
un=λ0rn−2κtrYn−2κδh(νn)+2θ∥qn∥νn2+(1+θδ)⟨σn,qn⟩νn−g(νn),vn=λ0δE(νn)+(δ+2θδ2)∥σn∥νn2,
and u,v are the same expressions at ξ. By (4.2) and the limit laws, un→u. Let k=λ0δ+δ+2θδ2+1>0. Given ε>0, (4.3) applied with εk−1 gives, for large n, vn≥v−(λ0δ+δ+2θδ2)εk−1≥v−ε, the coefficients being nonnegative by (0.5). Now let c∈R be such that for every ε>0 there is N with Fδ−(ξn)≤c+ε for n≥N. Fix ε>0 and choose n so large that Fδ−(ξn)≤c+ε, ∣un−u∣<ε and vn≥v−ε (the largest of three thresholds). Then
Fδ−(ξ)=u+v<un+ε+vn+ε=Fδ−(ξn)+2ε≤c+3ε.
As ε>0 is arbitrary, Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-above gives Fδ−(ξ)≤c.
(4.5) The upper shift. By (0d), Fδ+(ξn)=un′−vn′ and Fδ+(ξ)=u′−v′, where
un′=λ0rn−2κtrYn+2κδh(νn)+2θ∥qn∥νn2+(1−θδ)⟨σn,qn⟩νn−g(νn),vn′=λ0δE(νn)+(δ−2θδ2)∥σn∥νn2,
and u′,v′ are the same expressions at ξ. As in (4.4), un′→u′, and, the coefficients λ0δ and δ−2θδ2 being nonnegative by (0.5), for every ε>0 we have vn′≥v′−ε for large n. Let c∈R be such that for every ε>0 there is N with c−ε≤Fδ+(ξn) for n≥N. Fix ε>0 and choose n so large that c−ε≤Fδ+(ξn), ∣un′−u′∣<ε and vn′≥v′−ε. Then
c−ε≤un′−vn′<u′+ε−v′+ε=Fδ+(ξ)+2ε,
so c−3ε≤Fδ+(ξ), and Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-below gives c≤Fδ+(ξ).
By (4.4) and (4.5), F is shift-semicontinuous at (δ,R); as δ,R were arbitrary, F satisfies the shift-semicontinuity condition.
Step 5 (Second-order structure at uniquely mapped pairs). Let T={t∈R:0≤t}. The pair (ω1,ω2) below is chosen first; it depends only on g,λ0,κ,θ,C, and we show it is a second-order structure pair for F at R for every positive R.
(5.1) The modulus ω1. For s∈T let G(s)={∣g(μ′)−g(ν′)∣:μ′,ν′∈P2(Rd), W2(μ′,ν′)2≤s}. It contains 0=∣g(μ0)−g(μ0)∣, with μ0 from (0.2), since W2(μ0,μ0)=0 by The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §metric; and it is bounded above by 2Mg by (0.3). Hence ω1(s)=supG(s) is defined by The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §bounds, and 0≤ω1(s) because ω1(s) is an upper bound of G(s)∋0 (Upper Bound and Least Upper Bound). Given ε>0, uniform continuity of g (Uniformly Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces) gives γ>0 with ∣g(μ′)−g(ν′)∣<ε whenever W2(μ′,ν′)<γ. Put γ1=γ2/4>0. If t∈T and t≤γ1, every element of G(t) comes from μ′,ν′ with W2(μ′,ν′)2≤(γ/2)2, so W2(μ′,ν′)≤γ/2<γ and the element is <ε; thus ε is an upper bound of G(t) and ω1(t)≤ε, the supremum being the least upper bound. So ω1 is a modulus of continuity, and by construction ∣g(μ′)−g(ν′)∣≤ω1(s) whenever W2(μ′,ν′)2≤s.
(5.2) The function ω2. For t∈T and real α>1 put ω2(t,α)=(λ0+κC+4Cθ2α2)t. For each α>1 the coefficient is nonnegative by (0.2), so t↦ω2(t,α) is a modulus of continuity by Linear Moduli of Continuity §modulus.
(5.3) The inequality. Let R>0, and let α,δ,μ,ν,S,S′,r,X,Y be as in The Second-Order Structure Condition at Uniquely Mapped Pairs on the Wasserstein Space §pair: 1<α, 0<δ<1, μ,ν∈DΣ with both ordered pairs (μ,ν) and (ν,μ) uniquely mapped, S an optimal map from μ to ν and S′ one from ν to μ, r∈[−R,R], and (X,Y) admitted at α. (The condition δ(∣E(μ)∣+∣E(ν)∣)≤R will not be needed.) Write W=W2(μ,ν), σ=Σ(μ)∈L2(μ;Rd), τ=Σ(ν)∈L2(ν;Rd), a=α(id−S)∈L2(μ;Rd), b=α(S′−id)=−α(id−S′)∈L2(ν;Rd), e=∣E(μ)∣+∣E(ν)∣ and t=δ(e+1), and let Δ be the difference Fδ−(μ,r,a,X)−Fδ+(ν,r,b,Y) to be bounded below.
Norms of the displacements. By The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §cost, ∥id−S∥μ2=W2 and ∥id−S′∥ν2=W2(ν,μ)2=W2 (symmetry, The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §metric); hence ∥id−S∥μ=∥id−S′∥ν=W and, by homogeneity (0.1) with ∣α∣=α, ∥a∥μ=∥b∥ν=αW.
A bound on W2. By Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures §map, S#μ=ν, so ∥S∥μ2=∫Rd∥S∥2dμ=M2(ν) by The Optimal Map as a Square-Integrable Vector Field: Integrability, Transport Cost and Uniqueness of the Class §square-integrable and (0.1); and ∥id∥μ2=M2(μ) by Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients §identity. The parallelogram law Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §parallelogram gives W2=∥id−S∥μ2≤∥id−S∥μ2+∥id+S∥μ2=2M2(μ)+2M2(ν), and (Growth) yields W2≤2C(2+e). Since 2+e≤2(1+e), we get δW2≤2Cδ(2+e)≤4Ct.
Expansion of Δ. Subtracting (0c) at (ν,r,b,Y) from (0a) at (μ,r,a,X), the terms λ0r cancel and
Δ=λ0δ(E(μ)+E(ν))+2κ(trY−trX)−2κδ(h(μ)+h(ν))+2θ(∥a+δσ∥μ2−∥b−δτ∥ν2)+(⟨σ,a⟩μ−⟨τ,b⟩ν)+δ∥σ∥μ2+δ∥τ∥ν2+g(ν)−g(μ).
By (0.1), ∥a+δσ∥μ2=∥a∥μ2+2δ⟨a,σ⟩μ+δ2∥σ∥μ2 and ∥b−δτ∥ν2=∥b∥ν2−2δ⟨b,τ⟩ν+δ2∥τ∥ν2; as ∥a∥μ2=∥b∥ν2=α2W2,
2θ(∥a+δσ∥μ2−∥b−δτ∥ν2)=θδ⟨a,σ⟩μ+θδ⟨b,τ⟩ν+2θδ2∥σ∥μ2−2θδ2∥τ∥ν2.
Bounds for the individual terms. (i) Monotonicity of the score: the pair is displacement convex by (Convexity), i.e. 0-displacement convex, so A λ-Displacement Convex Penalty Pair Has a λ-Monotone Score Along Optimal Couplings §mapped with λ=0 gives 0≤⟨σ,id−S⟩μ+⟨τ,id−S′⟩ν. By bilinearity (0.1), ⟨σ,a⟩μ−⟨τ,b⟩ν=α(⟨σ,id−S⟩μ+⟨τ,id−S′⟩ν)≥0. (ii) Traces: X⪯Y by The Second-Order Structure Condition at Optimally Coupled Pairs on the Lift of the Wasserstein Space §admitted, the ordering being that of Wasserstein Spaces, Random Vectors, Vector Fields and Symmetric Matrices in Every Dimension: Standing Notation §matrices, so trX≤trY by The Trace as a Sum of Quadratic Forms, its Monotonicity and a Norm Bound §monotone and 2κ(trY−trX)≥0. (iii) Cross terms: by Cauchy-Schwarz (0.1) and (0.5) with p=∥σ∥μ, s=θαW,
θδ⟨a,σ⟩μ≥−θδαW∥σ∥μ=−2δ2ps≥−2δ∥σ∥μ2−2δθ2α2W2,
and in the same way θδ⟨b,τ⟩ν≥−2δ∥τ∥ν2−2δθ2α2W2. (iv) Collecting the score terms: the coefficient of ∥σ∥μ2 becomes δ+2θδ2−2δ=2δ+2θδ2 and that of ∥τ∥ν2 becomes δ−2θδ2−2δ=2δ(1−θδ), both nonnegative by (0.5), so these terms are ≥0; the remaining contribution is −θ2α2δW2≥−4Cθ2α2t. (v) Penalty terms: λ0δ(E(μ)+E(ν))≥−λ0δe≥−λ0t. (vi) Hessian terms: by (0.4), −2κδ(h(μ)+h(ν))≥−2κδC(2+e)≥−κCt. (vii) Running cost: W2≤αW2≤αW2+α−1, as 1<α, 0≤W2 and 0<α−1 (claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); so (5.1) with s=αW2+α−1 gives g(ν)−g(μ)≥−∣g(μ)−g(ν)∣≥−ω1(αW2+α−1).
Adding (i)-(vii) to the expansion of Δ,
−ω1(αW2(μ,ν)2+α−1)−ω2(δ(∣E(μ)∣+∣E(ν)∣+1),α)≤Fδ−(μ,r,α(id−S),X)−Fδ+(ν,r,α(S′−id),Y).
Hence (ω1,ω2) is a second-order structure pair for F at every R>0, and F satisfies the second-order structure condition at uniquely mapped pairs.
Steps 1, 2, 4 and 5 together prove the conclusion of the statement.