Let V be a vector space over K; conditions 1-8 below are those of that definition, and we use the field axioms in K.
Claim 1. Condition 3 provides an element 0Vβ with v+0Vβ=v for every vβV. If 0β²βV also satisfies v+0β²=v for every vβV, then
0β²=0β²+0Vβ=0Vβ+0β²=0Vβ,
using the property of 0Vβ at v=0β², condition 2, and the property of 0β² at v=0Vβ.
Claim 2. Let vβV. Condition 4 provides wβV with v+w=0Vβ. If wβ²βV also satisfies v+wβ²=0Vβ, then, using conditions 3, 1 and 2,
w=w+0Vβ=w+(v+wβ²)=(w+v)+wβ²=(v+w)+wβ²=0Vβ+wβ²=wβ²+0Vβ=wβ².
Claim 3. Since 0+0=0 in K, condition 8 gives 0v+0v=(0+0)v=0v. Adding the additive inverse β(0v) of 0v, which exists by condition 4 and is unique by claim 2, to both sides and using conditions 1 and 3,
0v=0v+0Vβ=0v+(0v+(β(0v)))=(0v+0v)+(β(0v))=0v+(β(0v))=0Vβ.
Claim 4. Since 0Vβ+0Vβ=0Vβ by condition 3, condition 7 gives Ξ»0Vβ+Ξ»0Vβ=Ξ»(0Vβ+0Vβ)=Ξ»0Vβ, and the cancellation of claim 3, applied with Ξ»0Vβ in place of 0v, gives Ξ»0Vβ=0Vβ.
Claim 5. By conditions 6 and 8 and claim 3,
v+(β1)v=1v+(β1)v=(1+(β1))v=0v=0Vβ,
so (β1)v is an additive inverse of v, and by the uniqueness in claim 2 it equals βv.
Claim 6. Suppose Ξ»v=0Vβ and Ξ»ξ =0. Then Ξ» has a multiplicative inverse Ξ»β1 in K, and by conditions 6 and 5 and claim 4,
v=1v=(Ξ»β1Ξ»)v=Ξ»β1(Ξ»v)=Ξ»β10Vβ=0Vβ.
Hence Ξ»=0 or v=0Vβ.