TheoremBase

Proof of Pullback by a Smooth Map Commutes with the Exterior Derivative

theoremthm:pullback-commutes-exterior-derivative-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Initial published proof that pullback commutes with the exterior derivative, including inline Schwarz symmetry; approved by Aaron after referencing pass.

Proof

Step 0 (symmetry of mixed partials). Let WβŠ†RmW\subseteq\mathbb{R}^m be open, g:Wβ†’Rg:W\to\mathbb{R} a smooth map, and i,ji,j indices. For a∈Wa\in W and small h,k>0h,k>0 consider

Ξ”(h,k)=g(a+hei+kej)βˆ’g(a+hei)βˆ’g(a+kej)+g(a),\Delta(h,k)=g(a+he_i+ke_j)-g(a+he_i)-g(a+ke_j)+g(a),

where ei,eje_i,e_j are standard basis vectors. Applying the mean value theorem first in the eie_i-variable and then in the eje_j-variable gives Ξ”(h,k)=hkβ€‰βˆ‚jβˆ‚ig(ΞΎ)\Delta(h,k)=hk\,\partial_j\partial_i g(\xi) for some ΞΎ\xi in the rectangle spanned by the four points; applying it in the other order gives Ξ”(h,k)=hkβ€‰βˆ‚iβˆ‚jg(Ξ·)\Delta(h,k)=hk\,\partial_i\partial_j g(\eta) similarly. Letting (h,k)β†’(0,0)(h,k)\to(0,0) and using continuity of the second partial derivatives yields βˆ‚jβˆ‚ig=βˆ‚iβˆ‚jg\partial_j\partial_i g=\partial_i\partial_j g on WW.

Step 1 (pullback of a decomposable form). A straightforward induction from Wedge Product of Differential Forms on Euclidean Space and Associativity of the Wedge Product of Differential Forms on Euclidean Space, using Sign of a Permutation, shows that for 11-forms Ξ±1,…,Ξ±k\alpha_1,\dots,\alpha_k and vectors v1,…,vkv_1,\dots,v_k,

(Ξ±1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§Ξ±k)x(v1,…,vk)=det⁑[(Ξ±r)x(vs)]r,s,(\alpha_1\wedge\cdots\wedge\alpha_k)_x(v_1,\dots,v_k)=\det\bigl[(\alpha_r)_x(v_s)\bigr]_{r,s},

with the determinant of the kΓ—kk\times k matrix indicated. Write F=(F1,…,Fm)F=(F_1,\dots,F_m) in components; each FiF_i is a smooth 00-form on UU and its exterior derivative is dFi=βˆ‘l=1nβˆ‚Fiβˆ‚xldxldF_i=\sum_{l=1}^{n}\frac{\partial F_i}{\partial x_l}dx_l. For a C1C^1 function a:Vβ†’Ra:V\to\mathbb{R} and increasing indices i1<β‹―<iki_1<\cdots<i_k, I claim

Fβˆ—(a dyi1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dyik)=(a∘F) dFi1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dFik.F^{*}\bigl(a\,dy_{i_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dy_{i_k}\bigr)=(a\circ F)\,dF_{i_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dF_{i_k}.

Indeed, by Pullback of a Differential Form by a C^1 Map the left side at xx on (v1,…,vk)(v_1,\dots,v_k) equals a(F(x))a(F(x)) times the value of dyi1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dyikdy_{i_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dy_{i_k} on the matrix-vector products JF(x)v1,…,JF(x)vkJ_F(x)v_1,\dots,J_F(x)v_k; by the determinant identity this is a(F(x))det⁑[(JF(x)vs)ir]a(F(x))\det\bigl[(J_F(x)v_s)_{i_r}\bigr], and (JF(x)vs)ir=βˆ‘lβˆ‚Firβˆ‚xl(x)(vs)l=(dFir)x(vs)(J_F(x)v_s)_{i_r}=\sum_l \frac{\partial F_{i_r}}{\partial x_l}(x)(v_s)_l=(dF_{i_r})_x(v_s), which is the right side by the same determinant identity.

By Coordinate Expansion of Differential Forms on Euclidean Open Sets, Ο‰=βˆ‘IaI dyi1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dyik\omega=\sum_I a_I\,dy_{i_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dy_{i_k} over increasing multi-indices I=(i1,…,ik)I=(i_1,\dots,i_k), and the pullback is additive in Ο‰\omega directly from Pullback of a Differential Form by a C^1 Map; hence

Fβˆ—Ο‰=βˆ‘I(aI∘F) dFi1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dFik.F^{*}\omega=\sum_I (a_I\circ F)\,dF_{i_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dF_{i_k}.

Evaluating on basis vectors ej1,…,ejke_{j_1},\dots,e_{j_k} (increasing JJ) and using the uniqueness in Coordinate Expansion of Differential Forms on Euclidean Open Sets, the coefficient of Fβˆ—Ο‰F^{*}\omega on dxj1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dxjkdx_{j_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_{j_k} is

cJ=βˆ‘I(aI∘F) MI,J,MI,J=det⁑[βˆ‚Firβˆ‚xjs]r,s.c_J=\sum_I (a_I\circ F)\,M_{I,J},\qquad M_{I,J}=\det\Bigl[\frac{\partial F_{i_r}}{\partial x_{j_s}}\Bigr]_{r,s}.

Each aI∘Fa_I\circ F is C1C^1 by the chain rule (using C^1 Maps on Euclidean Open Sets are Differentiable), each MI,JM_{I,J} is obtained from the smooth partial derivatives of FF by finitely many sums and products via Determinant of a Real Square Matrix, and products and sums of C1C^1 functions are C1C^1 by Products and Quotients of C^k Real-Valued Maps on Euclidean Open Sets Are C^k; hence Fβˆ—Ο‰F^{*}\omega is a C1C^1 differential kk-form.

Step 2 (the case k=0k=0). For a C1C^1 function b:Vβ†’Rb:V\to\mathbb{R}, Fβˆ—(db)=d(b∘F)F^{*}(db)=d(b\circ F): at xx on a vector vv, the left side is βˆ‘jβˆ‚bβˆ‚yj(F(x))(JF(x)v)j=βˆ‘j,lβˆ‚bβˆ‚yj(F(x))βˆ‚Fjβˆ‚xl(x)vl\sum_j \frac{\partial b}{\partial y_j}(F(x))(J_F(x)v)_j=\sum_{j,l}\frac{\partial b}{\partial y_j}(F(x))\frac{\partial F_j}{\partial x_l}(x)v_l, which equals d(b∘F)x(v)d(b\circ F)_x(v) by the chain rule.

Step 3 (conclusion). Compute d(Fβˆ—Ο‰)d(F^{*}\omega) from Exterior Derivative of a C^1 Differential Form on a Euclidean Open Set:

d(Fβˆ—Ο‰)=βˆ‘Jβˆ‘l=1nβˆ‚cJβˆ‚xl dxl∧dxj1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dxjk.d(F^{*}\omega)=\sum_J\sum_{l=1}^{n}\frac{\partial c_J}{\partial x_l}\,dx_l\wedge dx_{j_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_{j_k}.

Expand βˆ‚cJβˆ‚xl\frac{\partial c_J}{\partial x_l} by the product rule for partial derivatives (the one-dimensional product rule applied to each coordinate slice): the terms in which the derivative falls on aI∘Fa_I\circ F combine, by Step 2 and the two determinant identities of Step 1, into exactly the coordinate expansion of

Fβˆ—(dΟ‰)=βˆ‘Iβˆ‘j=1m(βˆ‚aIβˆ‚yj∘F) dFj∧dFi1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dFik,F^{*}(d\omega)=\sum_I\sum_{j=1}^{m}\Bigl(\frac{\partial a_I}{\partial y_j}\circ F\Bigr)\,dF_j\wedge dF_{i_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dF_{i_k},

which is the pullback of dΟ‰d\omega by Step 1 applied to the expansion of dΟ‰d\omega. The remaining terms carry a derivative of an entry of MI,JM_{I,J}, i.e. a second partial βˆ‚2Firβˆ‚xlβˆ‚xjs\frac{\partial^2 F_{i_r}}{\partial x_l\partial x_{j_s}}; summed against dxl∧dxj1βˆ§β‹―βˆ§dxjkdx_l\wedge dx_{j_1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dx_{j_k} these assemble into expressions of the form d(dFi)∧(remainingΒ factors)d\bigl(dF_{i}\bigr)\wedge(\text{remaining factors}), whose coefficients are antisymmetric in the pair of differentiation indices by Permutation Rule for Wedge Products of Coordinate 1-Forms while the second partials are symmetric in that pair by Step 0; hence each such sum vanishes. Therefore d(Fβˆ—Ο‰)=Fβˆ—(dΟ‰)d(F^{*}\omega)=F^{*}(d\omega). β– \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…