Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Preliminaries. By The Constant Tuple on L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) : Coordinates, Projection, Tail Form, and Translation-Closed Preimages §tuple the tuple γ \gamma γ is orthonormal, so Coordinate Maps of a Finite Orthonormal Tuple: Forms, the Tail Form, and Quadratic Test Functions and Compression of a Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Form along an Orthonormal Tuple apply to it as described in the statement. By The Constant Tuple on L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) : Coordinates, Projection, Tail Form, and Translation-Closed Preimages §coordinates the map Λ ♯ \Lambda^{\sharp} Λ ♯ determined by γ \gamma γ satisfies Λ ♯ a = c a \Lambda^{\sharp}a=c_{a} Λ ♯ a = c a for every a ∈ R d a\in\mathbb{R}^{d} a ∈ R d . By Translations on a Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Constant Classes, Law Invariance, the Translation Derivative and the Translation Hessian §constants we have, for all a , b ∈ R d a,b\in\mathbb{R}^{d} a , b ∈ R d and every t ∈ R t\in\mathbb{R} t ∈ R ,
c a + c b = c a + b , t c a = c t a , ∥ c a ∥ L 2 = ∥ a ∥ , c_{a}+c_{b}=c_{a+b},\qquad t\,c_{a}=c_{ta},\qquad\lVert c_{a}\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert a\rVert, c a + c b = c a + b , t c a = c t a , ∥ c a ∥ L 2 = ∥ a ∥ ,
and for each Z ∈ L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) Z\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) Z ∈ L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) the map J Z : R d → L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) J_{Z}:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) J Z : R d → L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) with J Z ( a ) = Z + c a J_{Z}(a)=Z+c_{a} J Z ( a ) = Z + c a is continuous and satisfies J Z ( 0 R d ) = Z J_{Z}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}})=Z J Z ( 0 R d ) = Z . Taking t = − 1 t=-1 t = − 1 in the second identity and then using the first, c z − c w = c z + c − w = c z − w c_{z}-c_{w}=c_{z}+c_{-w}=c_{z-w} c z − c w = c z + c − w = c z − w for all z , w ∈ R d z,w\in\mathbb{R}^{d} z , w ∈ R d , the identity z − w = z + ( − 1 ) w z-w=z+(-1)w z − w = z + ( − 1 ) w in R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d being that of Euclidean Space R n \mathbb{R}^n R n is a Real Vector Space ; hence ∥ c z − c w ∥ L 2 = ∥ z − w ∥ \lVert c_{z}-c_{w}\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert z-w\rVert ∥ c z − c w ∥ L 2 = ∥ z − w ∥ . Finally ∥ e i ∥ = 1 \lVert e_{i}\rVert=1 ∥ e i ∥ = 1 for i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] by Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §basis , so ∥ c e i ∥ L 2 = 1 \lVert c_{e_{i}}\rVert_{L^{2}}=1 ∥ c e i ∥ L 2 = 1 .
Proof of clause 1. Let Φ ∈ C 2 ( L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) ) \Phi\in C^{2}(L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d})) Φ ∈ C 2 ( L 2 ( Ω ; R d )) . By The Classes C 1 C^1 C 1 and C 2 C^2 C 2 on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §c2 the function Φ \Phi Φ is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 , has a second derivative at every point, and its Hessian map is continuous into ( S y m , d S y m ) (\mathrm{Sym},d_{\mathrm{Sym}}) ( Sym , d Sym ) . The first of these is property (a) of Lifted Test Functions on the Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors and Their Translation Hessians §test .
Fix Z ∈ L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) Z\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) Z ∈ L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) and write ϕ = ϕ Z \phi=\phi_{Z} ϕ = ϕ Z for the function ϕ ( a ) = Φ ( Z + c a ) \phi(a)=\Phi(Z+c_{a}) ϕ ( a ) = Φ ( Z + c a ) on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d . By Translations on a Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Constant Classes, Law Invariance, the Translation Derivative and the Translation Hessian §derivative the function ϕ \phi ϕ is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d and
∂ i ϕ ( a ) = ⟨ D Φ ( Z + c a ) , c e i ⟩ L 2 ( a ∈ R d , i ∈ [ d ] ) . \partial_{i}\phi(a)=\bigl\langle D\Phi(Z+c_{a}),c_{e_{i}}\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}}\qquad(a\in\mathbb{R}^{d},\ i\in[d]). ∂ i ϕ ( a ) = ⟨ D Φ ( Z + c a ) , c e i ⟩ L 2 ( a ∈ R d , i ∈ [ d ]) .
The second partial derivatives. Fix i , j ∈ [ d ] i,j\in[d] i , j ∈ [ d ] and a ∈ R d a\in\mathbb{R}^{d} a ∈ R d , and write x = Z + c a x=Z+c_{a} x = Z + c a and b = D 2 Φ ( x ) ∈ S y m b=D^{2}\Phi(x)\in\mathrm{Sym} b = D 2 Φ ( x ) ∈ Sym . Let ε ∈ R \varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} ε ∈ R be positive. Since L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) is open in itself and Φ \Phi Φ is differentiable at every one of its points, The Second Derivative and the Hessian on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §expansion provides a positive ρ ∈ R \rho\in\mathbb{R} ρ ∈ R such that all W , Y ∈ L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) W,Y\in L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d}) W , Y ∈ L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) with ∥ W ∥ L 2 < ρ \lVert W\rVert_{L^{2}}<\rho ∥ W ∥ L 2 < ρ satisfy
∣ ⟨ D Φ ( x + W ) − D Φ ( x ) , Y ⟩ L 2 − b ( W , Y ) ∣ ≤ ε ∥ W ∥ L 2 ∥ Y ∥ L 2 . \bigl|\bigl\langle D\Phi(x+W)-D\Phi(x),Y\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}}-b(W,Y)\bigr|\ \le\ \varepsilon\,\lVert W\rVert_{L^{2}}\lVert Y\rVert_{L^{2}} . ⟨ D Φ ( x + W ) − D Φ ( x ) , Y ⟩ L 2 − b ( W , Y ) ≤ ε ∥ W ∥ L 2 ∥ Y ∥ L 2 .
Let s ∈ R s\in\mathbb{R} s ∈ R satisfy 0 < ∣ s ∣ < ρ 0<|s|<\rho 0 < ∣ s ∣ < ρ and put W = c s e j W=c_{s e_{j}} W = c s e j and Y = c e i Y=c_{e_{i}} Y = c e i . Then ∥ W ∥ L 2 = ∥ s e j ∥ = ∣ s ∣ ∥ e j ∥ = ∣ s ∣ < ρ \lVert W\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert s e_{j}\rVert=|s|\,\lVert e_{j}\rVert=|s|<\rho ∥ W ∥ L 2 = ∥ s e j ∥ = ∣ s ∣ ∥ e j ∥ = ∣ s ∣ < ρ by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on R n \mathbb{R}^n R n , and ∥ Y ∥ L 2 = 1 \lVert Y\rVert_{L^{2}}=1 ∥ Y ∥ L 2 = 1 . Moreover x + W = Z + c a + c s e j = Z + c a + s e j x+W=Z+c_{a}+c_{se_{j}}=Z+c_{a+se_{j}} x + W = Z + c a + c s e j = Z + c a + s e j , so that by the formula for ∂ i ϕ \partial_{i}\phi ∂ i ϕ displayed above and by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear ,
⟨ D Φ ( x + W ) − D Φ ( x ) , c e i ⟩ L 2 = ∂ i ϕ ( a + s e j ) − ∂ i ϕ ( a ) . \bigl\langle D\Phi(x+W)-D\Phi(x),c_{e_{i}}\bigr\rangle_{L^{2}}=\partial_{i}\phi(a+se_{j})-\partial_{i}\phi(a). ⟨ D Φ ( x + W ) − D Φ ( x ) , c e i ⟩ L 2 = ∂ i ϕ ( a + s e j ) − ∂ i ϕ ( a ) .
Also W = c s e j = s c e j W=c_{se_{j}}=s\,c_{e_{j}} W = c s e j = s c e j , so b ( W , Y ) = s b ( c e j , c e i ) b(W,Y)=s\,b(c_{e_{j}},c_{e_{i}}) b ( W , Y ) = s b ( c e j , c e i ) by the homogeneity of b b b in its first argument, Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §form . The displayed estimate therefore reads
∣ ∂ i ϕ ( a + s e j ) − ∂ i ϕ ( a ) − s b ( c e j , c e i ) ∣ ≤ ε ∣ s ∣ , \bigl|\partial_{i}\phi(a+se_{j})-\partial_{i}\phi(a)-s\,b(c_{e_{j}},c_{e_{i}})\bigr|\ \le\ \varepsilon\,|s| , ∂ i ϕ ( a + s e j ) − ∂ i ϕ ( a ) − s b ( c e j , c e i ) ≤ ε ∣ s ∣ ,
and dividing by the positive number ∣ s ∣ |s| ∣ s ∣ (claims 4 and 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ) and using claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ,
∣ ∂ i ϕ ( a + s e j ) − ∂ i ϕ ( a ) s − b ( c e j , c e i ) ∣ ≤ ε whenever 0 < ∣ s ∣ < ρ . \left|\frac{\partial_{i}\phi(a+se_{j})-\partial_{i}\phi(a)}{s}-b(c_{e_{j}},c_{e_{i}})\right|\ \le\ \varepsilon\qquad\text{whenever }0<|s|<\rho . s ∂ i ϕ ( a + s e j ) − ∂ i ϕ ( a ) − b ( c e j , c e i ) ≤ ε whenever 0 < ∣ s ∣ < ρ .
Here ε \varepsilon ε was an arbitrary positive real number; applying what precedes to ε 2 \tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} 2 ε , which is positive and satisfies ε 2 < ε \tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}<\varepsilon 2 ε < ε by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , we obtain for every positive ε \varepsilon ε a positive ρ \rho ρ such that the left-hand side above is strictly less than ε \varepsilon ε whenever 0 < ∣ s ∣ < ρ 0<|s|<\rho 0 < ∣ s ∣ < ρ . That is the statement that the limit defining the partial derivative of ∂ i ϕ \partial_{i}\phi ∂ i ϕ with respect to the j j j th variable at a a a exists and equals b ( c e j , c e i ) b(c_{e_{j}},c_{e_{i}}) b ( c e j , c e i ) . In the notation of clause 4 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set ,
∂ j ∂ i ϕ ( a ) = ( D 2 Φ ( Z + c a ) ) ( c e j , c e i ) = ( ( D 2 Φ ( Z + c a ) ) ♭ ) j i \partial_{j}\partial_{i}\phi(a)=\bigl(D^{2}\Phi(Z+c_{a})\bigr)(c_{e_{j}},c_{e_{i}})=\Bigl(\bigl(D^{2}\Phi(Z+c_{a})\bigr)^{\flat}\Bigr)_{ji} ∂ j ∂ i ϕ ( a ) = ( D 2 Φ ( Z + c a ) ) ( c e j , c e i ) = ( ( D 2 Φ ( Z + c a ) ) ♭ ) ji
by Compression of a Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Form along an Orthonormal Tuple §compression , the j j j th and i i i th components of γ \gamma γ being c e j c_{e_{j}} c e j and c e i c_{e_{i}} c e i .
Continuity. The map a ↦ Z + c a a\mapsto Z+c_{a} a ↦ Z + c a is continuous, being J Z J_{Z} J Z ; the Hessian map D 2 Φ D^{2}\Phi D 2 Φ is continuous into ( S y m , d S y m ) (\mathrm{Sym},d_{\mathrm{Sym}}) ( Sym , d Sym ) ; and the map S y m → R \mathrm{Sym}\to\mathbb{R} Sym → R with value c ( c e j , c e i ) c(c_{e_{j}},c_{e_{i}}) c ( c e j , c e i ) at c c c is continuous, since ∣ c ( c e j , c e i ) − c ′ ( c e j , c e i ) ∣ ≤ ∥ c − c ′ ∥ |c(c_{e_{j}},c_{e_{i}})-c'(c_{e_{j}},c_{e_{i}})|\le\lVert c-c'\rVert ∣ c ( c e j , c e i ) − c ′ ( c e j , c e i ) ∣ ≤ ∥ c − c ′ ∥ for c , c ′ ∈ S y m c,c'\in\mathrm{Sym} c , c ′ ∈ Sym by Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity §continuity together with ∥ c e j ∥ L 2 = ∥ c e i ∥ L 2 = 1 \lVert c_{e_{j}}\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert c_{e_{i}}\rVert_{L^{2}}=1 ∥ c e j ∥ L 2 = ∥ c e i ∥ L 2 = 1 . By claim 3 of Semicontinuity and Continuity Under Composition with a Continuous Map , applied twice, the composite a ↦ ∂ j ∂ i ϕ ( a ) a\mapsto\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\phi(a) a ↦ ∂ j ∂ i ϕ ( a ) is continuous at every point of R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d .
Conclusion of clause 1. Each ∂ i ϕ \partial_{i}\phi ∂ i ϕ is continuous at every point of R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d , because ϕ \phi ϕ is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 (clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set ), and by the two paragraphs above each of its partial derivatives exists at every point and is continuous there. Hence each ∂ i ϕ \partial_{i}\phi ∂ i ϕ is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d , and ϕ \phi ϕ is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 on R d \mathbb{R}^{d} R d by clauses 2 and 3 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set . As Z Z Z was arbitrary, Φ \Phi Φ is twice continuously differentiable along translations at every point, that is twice continuously differentiable along translations , which is property (b) of Lifted Test Functions on the Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors and Their Translation Hessians §test . So Φ \Phi Φ is a lifted test function.
Finally, by Lifted Test Functions on the Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors and Their Translation Hessians §hessian and Hessian Matrix of a C^2 Function the entry of H Φ ( Z ) = D 2 ϕ Z ( 0 R d ) H_{\Phi}(Z)=D^{2}\phi_{Z}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}) H Φ ( Z ) = D 2 ϕ Z ( 0 R d ) in row i i i and column j j j is ∂ i ∂ j ϕ ( 0 R d ) \partial_{i}\partial_{j}\phi(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}) ∂ i ∂ j ϕ ( 0 R d ) . Applying the computation above with the roles of i i i and j j j exchanged and with a = 0 R d a=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}} a = 0 R d , so that Z + c 0 R d = Z Z+c_{0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}}=Z Z + c 0 R d = Z by Translations on a Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Constant Classes, Law Invariance, the Translation Derivative and the Translation Hessian §constants , this entry equals ( ( D 2 Φ ( Z ) ) ♭ ) i j \bigl((D^{2}\Phi(Z))^{\flat}\bigr)_{ij} ( ( D 2 Φ ( Z ) ) ♭ ) ij . Two real d × d d\times d d × d matrices with the same entries are equal by Real Matrix and the Set of Real Matrices , so H Φ ( Z ) = ( D 2 Φ ( Z ) ) ♭ H_{\Phi}(Z)=(D^{2}\Phi(Z))^{\flat} H Φ ( Z ) = ( D 2 Φ ( Z ) ) ♭ .
Proof of clause 2. Assume the quadruple is approximable by test data from above and let ε ∈ R \varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} ε ∈ R be positive. By Quadruple Approximable by Test Data on a Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §above there are Y ∈ A Y\in A Y ∈ A and φ ∈ C 2 ( L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) ) \varphi\in C^{2}(L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d})) φ ∈ C 2 ( L 2 ( Ω ; R d )) such that w − φ w-\varphi w − φ has a local maximum at Y Y Y relative to A A A and
∥ Y − X ˉ ∥ L 2 < ε , ∣ w ( Y ) − w ( X ˉ ) ∣ < ε , ∥ D φ ( Y ) − p ∥ L 2 < ε , ∥ D 2 φ ( Y ) − B ∥ < ε . \lVert Y-\bar{X}\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon,\quad\bigl|w(Y)-w(\bar{X})\bigr|<\varepsilon,\quad\lVert D\varphi(Y)-p\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon,\quad\bigl\lVert D^{2}\varphi(Y)-\mathbb{B}\bigr\rVert<\varepsilon . ∥ Y − X ˉ ∥ L 2 < ε , w ( Y ) − w ( X ˉ ) < ε , ∥ D φ ( Y ) − p ∥ L 2 < ε , D 2 φ ( Y ) − B < ε .
By clause 1 the function Φ = φ \Phi=\varphi Φ = φ is a lifted test function with H φ ( Y ) = ( D 2 φ ( Y ) ) ♭ H_{\varphi}(Y)=(D^{2}\varphi(Y))^{\flat} H φ ( Y ) = ( D 2 φ ( Y ) ) ♭ . By Compression of a Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Form along an Orthonormal Tuple §algebra , applied to the sum of D 2 φ ( Y ) − B D^{2}\varphi(Y)-\mathbb{B} D 2 φ ( Y ) − B and B \mathbb{B} B and to the scalar multiple of B \mathbb{B} B by − 1 -1 − 1 ,
( D 2 φ ( Y ) ) ♭ − B ♭ = ( D 2 φ ( Y ) − B ) ♭ , ∥ ( D 2 φ ( Y ) − B ) ♭ ∥ ≤ ∥ D 2 φ ( Y ) − B ∥ < ε , \bigl(D^{2}\varphi(Y)\bigr)^{\flat}-\mathbb{B}^{\flat}=\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(Y)-\mathbb{B}\bigr)^{\flat},
\qquad
\bigl\lVert\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(Y)-\mathbb{B}\bigr)^{\flat}\bigr\rVert\le\bigl\lVert D^{2}\varphi(Y)-\mathbb{B}\bigr\rVert<\varepsilon , ( D 2 φ ( Y ) ) ♭ − B ♭ = ( D 2 φ ( Y ) − B ) ♭ , ( D 2 φ ( Y ) − B ) ♭ ≤ D 2 φ ( Y ) − B < ε ,
the differences of matrices and of forms being those of Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §matrices and Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §identity . The four displayed inequalities of the clause therefore hold with Φ = φ \Phi=\varphi Φ = φ . The case from below is the same argument with Quadruple Approximable by Test Data on a Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §below and a local minimum in place of a local maximum.
Proof of clause 3. We prove (a); part (b) is the same argument with − g -g − g in place of g g g , with Quadruple Approximable by Test Data on a Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §below in place of Quadruple Approximable by Test Data on a Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §above , and with local minima in place of local maxima.
By Affine and Quadratic Functions on a Real Hilbert Space are of Class C 2 C^2 C 2 §quadratic , read with 2 μ 2\mu 2 μ in place of the number written α \alpha α there and with q q q in place of y 0 y_{0} y 0 , the function g g g , whose value at Z Z Z is 2 μ 2 ∥ Z − q ∥ L 2 2 \tfrac{2\mu}{2}\lVert Z-q\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2} 2 2 μ ∥ Z − q ∥ L 2 2 , belongs to C 2 ( L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) ) C^{2}(L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d})) C 2 ( L 2 ( Ω ; R d )) with D g ( Z ) = 2 μ ( Z − q ) Dg(Z)=2\mu(Z-q) D g ( Z ) = 2 μ ( Z − q ) and D 2 g ( Z ) = 2 μ I D^{2}g(Z)=2\mu I D 2 g ( Z ) = 2 μ I for every Z Z Z .
Let ε ∈ R \varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} ε ∈ R be positive and choose a positive ε ′ ∈ R \varepsilon'\in\mathbb{R} ε ′ ∈ R with
ε ′ ≤ 1 , ε ′ ≤ ε , ( 1 + 2 ∣ μ ∣ ) ε ′ ≤ ε , ε ′ + ∣ μ ∣ ε ′ ( 2 ∥ X ˉ − q ∥ L 2 + 1 ) ≤ ε , \varepsilon'\le1,\qquad\varepsilon'\le\varepsilon,\qquad(1+2|\mu|)\,\varepsilon'\le\varepsilon,\qquad\varepsilon'+|\mu|\,\varepsilon'\bigl(2\lVert\bar{X}-q\rVert_{L^{2}}+1\bigr)\le\varepsilon , ε ′ ≤ 1 , ε ′ ≤ ε , ( 1 + 2∣ μ ∣ ) ε ′ ≤ ε , ε ′ + ∣ μ ∣ ε ′ ( 2 ∥ X ˉ − q ∥ L 2 + 1 ) ≤ ε ,
which is possible because each of the four right-hand sides is positive and each left-hand side is a nonnegative multiple of ε ′ \varepsilon' ε ′ (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field selects the least of four positive candidates). By Quadruple Approximable by Test Data on a Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §above applied to w − g w-g w − g with ε ′ \varepsilon' ε ′ there are Y ∈ A Y\in A Y ∈ A and φ ∈ C 2 ( L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) ) \varphi\in C^{2}(L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d})) φ ∈ C 2 ( L 2 ( Ω ; R d )) such that ( w − g ) − φ (w-g)-\varphi ( w − g ) − φ has a local maximum at Y Y Y relative to A A A and
∥ Y − X ˉ ∥ L 2 < ε ′ , ∣ ( w − g ) ( Y ) − ( w − g ) ( X ˉ ) ∣ < ε ′ , ∥ D φ ( Y ) − p ∥ L 2 < ε ′ , ∥ D 2 φ ( Y ) − B ∥ < ε ′ . \lVert Y-\bar{X}\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon',\quad\bigl|(w-g)(Y)-(w-g)(\bar{X})\bigr|<\varepsilon',\quad\lVert D\varphi(Y)-p\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon',\quad\bigl\lVert D^{2}\varphi(Y)-\mathbb{B}\bigr\rVert<\varepsilon' . ∥ Y − X ˉ ∥ L 2 < ε ′ , ( w − g ) ( Y ) − ( w − g ) ( X ˉ ) < ε ′ , ∥ D φ ( Y ) − p ∥ L 2 < ε ′ , D 2 φ ( Y ) − B < ε ′ .
Put ψ = φ + g \psi=\varphi+g ψ = φ + g . By Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §sum , ψ ∈ C 2 ( L 2 ( Ω ; R d ) ) \psi\in C^{2}(L^{2}(\Omega;\mathbb{R}^{d})) ψ ∈ C 2 ( L 2 ( Ω ; R d )) with D ψ ( Y ) = D φ ( Y ) + 2 μ ( Y − q ) D\psi(Y)=D\varphi(Y)+2\mu(Y-q) D ψ ( Y ) = D φ ( Y ) + 2 μ ( Y − q ) and D 2 ψ ( Y ) = D 2 φ ( Y ) + 2 μ I D^{2}\psi(Y)=D^{2}\varphi(Y)+2\mu I D 2 ψ ( Y ) = D 2 φ ( Y ) + 2 μ I . The value of w − ψ w-\psi w − ψ at Z ∈ A Z\in A Z ∈ A is ( w ( Z ) − g ( Z ) ) − φ ( Z ) (w(Z)-g(Z))-\varphi(Z) ( w ( Z ) − g ( Z )) − φ ( Z ) , that is the value of ( w − g ) − φ (w-g)-\varphi ( w − g ) − φ at Z Z Z ; hence w − ψ w-\psi w − ψ has a local maximum at Y Y Y relative to A A A .
It remains to bound the four quantities. First ∥ Y − X ˉ ∥ L 2 < ε ′ ≤ ε \lVert Y-\bar{X}\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon'\le\varepsilon ∥ Y − X ˉ ∥ L 2 < ε ′ ≤ ε . Secondly, write s = ∥ Y − q ∥ L 2 s=\lVert Y-q\rVert_{L^{2}} s = ∥ Y − q ∥ L 2 and t = ∥ X ˉ − q ∥ L 2 t=\lVert\bar{X}-q\rVert_{L^{2}} t = ∥ X ˉ − q ∥ L 2 . By The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §reverse-triangle , ∣ s − t ∣ ≤ ∥ Y − X ˉ ∥ L 2 < ε ′ |s-t|\le\lVert Y-\bar{X}\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon' ∣ s − t ∣ ≤ ∥ Y − X ˉ ∥ L 2 < ε ′ , so s ≤ t + ε ′ s\le t+\varepsilon' s ≤ t + ε ′ and s + t ≤ 2 t + ε ′ ≤ 2 t + 1 s+t\le2t+\varepsilon'\le2t+1 s + t ≤ 2 t + ε ′ ≤ 2 t + 1 by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and ε ′ ≤ 1 \varepsilon'\le1 ε ′ ≤ 1 ; therefore, by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and the identity s 2 − t 2 = ( s − t ) ( s + t ) s^{2}-t^{2}=(s-t)(s+t) s 2 − t 2 = ( s − t ) ( s + t ) of claim 4 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field ,
∣ g ( Y ) − g ( X ˉ ) ∣ = ∣ μ ∣ ∣ s − t ∣ ( s + t ) ≤ ∣ μ ∣ ε ′ ( 2 t + 1 ) , \bigl|g(Y)-g(\bar{X})\bigr|=|\mu|\,|s-t|\,(s+t)\le|\mu|\,\varepsilon'\,(2t+1), g ( Y ) − g ( X ˉ ) = ∣ μ ∣ ∣ s − t ∣ ( s + t ) ≤ ∣ μ ∣ ε ′ ( 2 t + 1 ) ,
the factors ∣ s − t ∣ |s-t| ∣ s − t ∣ and s + t s+t s + t being nonnegative (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ). Since w ( Z ) = ( w − g ) ( Z ) + g ( Z ) w(Z)=(w-g)(Z)+g(Z) w ( Z ) = ( w − g ) ( Z ) + g ( Z ) for Z ∈ A Z\in A Z ∈ A , claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives
∣ w ( Y ) − w ( X ˉ ) ∣ ≤ ∣ ( w − g ) ( Y ) − ( w − g ) ( X ˉ ) ∣ + ∣ g ( Y ) − g ( X ˉ ) ∣ < ε ′ + ∣ μ ∣ ε ′ ( 2 ∥ X ˉ − q ∥ L 2 + 1 ) ≤ ε . \bigl|w(Y)-w(\bar{X})\bigr|\le\bigl|(w-g)(Y)-(w-g)(\bar{X})\bigr|+\bigl|g(Y)-g(\bar{X})\bigr|<\varepsilon'+|\mu|\,\varepsilon'\,\bigl(2\lVert\bar{X}-q\rVert_{L^{2}}+1\bigr)\le\varepsilon . w ( Y ) − w ( X ˉ ) ≤ ( w − g ) ( Y ) − ( w − g ) ( X ˉ ) + g ( Y ) − g ( X ˉ ) < ε ′ + ∣ μ ∣ ε ′ ( 2 ∥ X ˉ − q ∥ L 2 + 1 ) ≤ ε .
Thirdly, D ψ ( Y ) − ( p + 2 μ ( X ˉ − q ) ) = ( D φ ( Y ) − p ) + 2 μ ( Y − X ˉ ) D\psi(Y)-\bigl(p+2\mu(\bar{X}-q)\bigr)=\bigl(D\varphi(Y)-p\bigr)+2\mu\,(Y-\bar{X}) D ψ ( Y ) − ( p + 2 μ ( X ˉ − q ) ) = ( D φ ( Y ) − p ) + 2 μ ( Y − X ˉ ) , so by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §triangle and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity ,
∥ D ψ ( Y ) − ( p + 2 μ ( X ˉ − q ) ) ∥ L 2 ≤ ∥ D φ ( Y ) − p ∥ L 2 + 2 ∣ μ ∣ ∥ Y − X ˉ ∥ L 2 < ( 1 + 2 ∣ μ ∣ ) ε ′ ≤ ε . \bigl\lVert D\psi(Y)-\bigl(p+2\mu(\bar{X}-q)\bigr)\bigr\rVert_{L^{2}}\le\lVert D\varphi(Y)-p\rVert_{L^{2}}+2|\mu|\,\lVert Y-\bar{X}\rVert_{L^{2}}<(1+2|\mu|)\,\varepsilon'\le\varepsilon . D ψ ( Y ) − ( p + 2 μ ( X ˉ − q ) ) L 2 ≤ ∥ D φ ( Y ) − p ∥ L 2 + 2∣ μ ∣ ∥ Y − X ˉ ∥ L 2 < ( 1 + 2∣ μ ∣ ) ε ′ ≤ ε .
Fourthly, D 2 ψ ( Y ) − ( B + 2 μ I ) = D 2 φ ( Y ) − B D^{2}\psi(Y)-(\mathbb{B}+2\mu I)=D^{2}\varphi(Y)-\mathbb{B} D 2 ψ ( Y ) − ( B + 2 μ I ) = D 2 φ ( Y ) − B by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §identity , so its norm is less than ε ′ ≤ ε \varepsilon'\le\varepsilon ε ′ ≤ ε . Finally the value recorded by the quadruple is correct, since ( w − g ) ( X ˉ ) + g ( X ˉ ) = w ( X ˉ ) (w-g)(\bar{X})+g(\bar{X})=w(\bar{X}) ( w − g ) ( X ˉ ) + g ( X ˉ ) = w ( X ˉ ) . As ε \varepsilon ε was an arbitrary positive real number, ( X ˉ , w ( X ˉ ) , p + 2 μ ( X ˉ − q ) , B + 2 μ I ) \bigl(\bar{X},w(\bar{X}),p+2\mu(\bar{X}-q),\mathbb{B}+2\mu I\bigr) ( X ˉ , w ( X ˉ ) , p + 2 μ ( X ˉ − q ) , B + 2 μ I ) is approximable by test data from above for w w w on A A A .
Proof of clause 4. Let z , w ∈ R d z,w\in\mathbb{R}^{d} z , w ∈ R d . By Compression of a Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Form along an Orthonormal Tuple §compression and Λ ♯ a = c a \Lambda^{\sharp}a=c_{a} Λ ♯ a = c a ,
z ⋅ ( X ♭ z ) = X ( c z , c z ) , w ⋅ ( Y ♭ w ) = Y ( c w , c w ) . z\cdot\bigl(\mathbb{X}^{\flat}z\bigr)=\mathbb{X}(c_{z},c_{z}),\qquad w\cdot\bigl(\mathbb{Y}^{\flat}w\bigr)=\mathbb{Y}(c_{w},c_{w}). z ⋅ ( X ♭ z ) = X ( c z , c z ) , w ⋅ ( Y ♭ w ) = Y ( c w , c w ) .
Applying the hypothesis with Z = c z Z=c_{z} Z = c z and W = c w W=c_{w} W = c w and using ∥ c z ∥ L 2 = ∥ z ∥ \lVert c_{z}\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert z\rVert ∥ c z ∥ L 2 = ∥ z ∥ , ∥ c w ∥ L 2 = ∥ w ∥ \lVert c_{w}\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert w\rVert ∥ c w ∥ L 2 = ∥ w ∥ and ∥ c z − c w ∥ L 2 = ∥ z − w ∥ \lVert c_{z}-c_{w}\rVert_{L^{2}}=\lVert z-w\rVert ∥ c z − c w ∥ L 2 = ∥ z − w ∥ from the preliminaries,
− 3 α ( ∥ z ∥ 2 + ∥ w ∥ 2 ) ≤ z ⋅ ( X ♭ z ) − w ⋅ ( Y ♭ w ) ≤ 3 α ∥ z − w ∥ 2 . -3\alpha\bigl(\lVert z\rVert^{2}+\lVert w\rVert^{2}\bigr)\ \le\ z\cdot\bigl(\mathbb{X}^{\flat}z\bigr)-w\cdot\bigl(\mathbb{Y}^{\flat}w\bigr)\ \le\ 3\alpha\lVert z-w\rVert^{2}. − 3 α ( ∥ z ∥ 2 + ∥ w ∥ 2 ) ≤ z ⋅ ( X ♭ z ) − w ⋅ ( Y ♭ w ) ≤ 3 α ∥ z − w ∥ 2 .
By Compression of a Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Form along an Orthonormal Tuple §algebra the compression is order-preserving, so X ⪯ Y \mathbb{X}\preceq\mathbb{Y} X ⪯ Y gives X ♭ ⪯ Y ♭ \mathbb{X}^{\flat}\preceq\mathbb{Y}^{\flat} X ♭ ⪯ Y ♭ , and it does not increase the norm, so ∥ X ♭ ∥ ≤ ∥ X ∥ ≤ 6 α \lVert\mathbb{X}^{\flat}\rVert\le\lVert\mathbb{X}\rVert\le6\alpha ∥ X ♭ ∥ ≤ ∥ X ∥ ≤ 6 α and ∥ Y ♭ ∥ ≤ 6 α \lVert\mathbb{Y}^{\flat}\rVert\le6\alpha ∥ Y ♭ ∥ ≤ 6 α by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field . These are exactly the four requirements of The Second-Order Structure Condition at Optimally Coupled Pairs on the Lift of the Wasserstein Space §admitted , so ( X ♭ , Y ♭ ) (\mathbb{X}^{\flat},\mathbb{Y}^{\flat}) ( X ♭ , Y ♭ ) is admitted at α \alpha α . The two identities ( X + t N ) ♭ = X ♭ (\mathbb{X}+tN)^{\flat}=\mathbb{X}^{\flat} ( X + tN ) ♭ = X ♭ and ( Y + t N ) ♭ = Y ♭ (\mathbb{Y}+tN)^{\flat}=\mathbb{Y}^{\flat} ( Y + tN ) ♭ = Y ♭ are Compression of a Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Form along an Orthonormal Tuple §tail .
Proof of clause 5. Throughout, ∥ X n ∥ ≤ 6 α \lVert\mathbb{X}_{n}\rVert\le6\alpha ∥ X n ∥ ≤ 6 α and ∥ Y n ∥ ≤ 6 α \lVert\mathbb{Y}_{n}\rVert\le6\alpha ∥ Y n ∥ ≤ 6 α for every n n n , by The Second-Order Structure Condition at Optimally Coupled Pairs on the Lift of the Wasserstein Space §admitted .
(a) By Limits and Bounded Sequences of Symmetric Real Matrices §compactness , read with d d d in place of the dimension written n n n there and with R = 6 α R=6\alpha R = 6 α , there are a strictly increasing φ 1 : N → N \varphi_{1}:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N} φ 1 : N → N and X ∈ S ( d ) \mathbb{X}\in\mathcal{S}(d) X ∈ S ( d ) such that the sequence whose k k k -th term is X φ 1 ( k ) \mathbb{X}_{\varphi_{1}(k)} X φ 1 ( k ) converges to X \mathbb{X} X . The sequence whose k k k -th term is Y φ 1 ( k ) \mathbb{Y}_{\varphi_{1}(k)} Y φ 1 ( k ) lies in S ( d ) \mathcal{S}(d) S ( d ) and is bounded in norm by 6 α 6\alpha 6 α , so the same clause provides a strictly increasing φ 2 : N → N \varphi_{2}:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N} φ 2 : N → N and Y ∈ S ( d ) \mathbb{Y}\in\mathcal{S}(d) Y ∈ S ( d ) such that the sequence whose k k k -th term is Y φ 1 ( φ 2 ( k ) ) \mathbb{Y}_{\varphi_{1}(\varphi_{2}(k))} Y φ 1 ( φ 2 ( k )) converges to Y \mathbb{Y} Y . Put φ = φ 1 ∘ φ 2 \varphi=\varphi_{1}\circ\varphi_{2} φ = φ 1 ∘ φ 2 , which is strictly increasing and indexes a subsequence of the original sequences by A Subsequence of a Subsequence is a Subsequence ; the sequence whose k k k -th term is X φ ( k ) \mathbb{X}_{\varphi(k)} X φ ( k ) is a subsequence of a sequence converging to X \mathbb{X} X and therefore converges to X \mathbb{X} X by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit .
(b) Let z , w ∈ R d z,w\in\mathbb{R}^{d} z , w ∈ R d . By Limits and Bounded Sequences of Symmetric Real Matrices §quadratic-form the sequences whose n n n -th terms are z ⋅ ( X n z ) z\cdot(\mathbb{X}_{n}z) z ⋅ ( X n z ) and w ⋅ ( Y n w ) w\cdot(\mathbb{Y}_{n}w) w ⋅ ( Y n w ) converge to z ⋅ ( X z ) z\cdot(\mathbb{X}z) z ⋅ ( X z ) and to w ⋅ ( Y w ) w\cdot(\mathbb{Y}w) w ⋅ ( Y w ) , so by Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences the sequence of their differences converges to z ⋅ ( X z ) − w ⋅ ( Y w ) z\cdot(\mathbb{X}z)-w\cdot(\mathbb{Y}w) z ⋅ ( X z ) − w ⋅ ( Y w ) . Every term of that sequence lies between − 3 α ( ∥ z ∥ 2 + ∥ w ∥ 2 ) -3\alpha(\lVert z\rVert^{2}+\lVert w\rVert^{2}) − 3 α (∥ z ∥ 2 + ∥ w ∥ 2 ) and 3 α ∥ z − w ∥ 2 3\alpha\lVert z-w\rVert^{2} 3 α ∥ z − w ∥ 2 , so by Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences , applied to the constant sequences with these two values, so does its limit. Next, X n ⪯ Y n \mathbb{X}_{n}\preceq\mathbb{Y}_{n} X n ⪯ Y n for every n n n gives X ⪯ Y \mathbb{X}\preceq\mathbb{Y} X ⪯ Y by Limits and Bounded Sequences of Symmetric Real Matrices §closed . Finally let ξ ∈ R d \xi\in\mathbb{R}^{d} ξ ∈ R d satisfy ∥ ξ ∥ ≤ 1 \lVert\xi\rVert\le1 ∥ ξ ∥ ≤ 1 . By claim 2 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix and claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field ,
∣ ξ ⋅ ( X n ξ ) ∣ ≤ ∥ X n ∥ ∥ ξ ∥ 2 ≤ 6 α ( n ∈ N ) . \bigl|\xi\cdot(\mathbb{X}_{n}\xi)\bigr|\le\lVert\mathbb{X}_{n}\rVert\,\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}\le6\alpha\qquad(n\in\mathbb{N}). ξ ⋅ ( X n ξ ) ≤ ∥ X n ∥ ∥ ξ ∥ 2 ≤ 6 α ( n ∈ N ) .
The sequence whose n n n -th term is ξ ⋅ ( X n ξ ) \xi\cdot(\mathbb{X}_{n}\xi) ξ ⋅ ( X n ξ ) converges to ξ ⋅ ( X ξ ) \xi\cdot(\mathbb{X}\xi) ξ ⋅ ( X ξ ) , and the sequence of absolute values converges to ∣ ξ ⋅ ( X ξ ) ∣ |\xi\cdot(\mathbb{X}\xi)| ∣ ξ ⋅ ( X ξ ) ∣ because ∣ ∣ r ∣ − ∣ r ′ ∣ ∣ ≤ ∣ r − r ′ ∣ \bigl||r|-|r'|\bigr|\le|r-r'| ∣ r ∣ − ∣ r ′ ∣ ≤ ∣ r − r ′ ∣ for real r , r ′ r,r' r , r ′ by claim 7 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field ; hence ∣ ξ ⋅ ( X ξ ) ∣ ≤ 6 α |\xi\cdot(\mathbb{X}\xi)|\le6\alpha ∣ ξ ⋅ ( X ξ ) ∣ ≤ 6 α by Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences . Thus 6 α 6\alpha 6 α is an upper bound of the set whose supremum is ∥ X ∥ \lVert\mathbb{X}\rVert ∥ X ∥ in Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix , so ∥ X ∥ ≤ 6 α \lVert\mathbb{X}\rVert\le6\alpha ∥ X ∥ ≤ 6 α ; the same argument gives ∥ Y ∥ ≤ 6 α \lVert\mathbb{Y}\rVert\le6\alpha ∥ Y ∥ ≤ 6 α . The four requirements of The Second-Order Structure Condition at Optimally Coupled Pairs on the Lift of the Wasserstein Space §admitted hold, so ( X , Y ) (\mathbb{X},\mathbb{Y}) ( X , Y ) is admitted at α \alpha α .