TheoremBase

Proof of Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine

theoremthm:sine-cosine-calculus-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 27,140 chars · 40 deps · depth 16 Reason: First publication. Weierstrass M-test with the trigonometric majorants for uniform convergence and the tail bound; the local uniform-limit lemma on $[-R,R]$ with $R=1+|x_0|$ for continuity; termwise integration against both parts of the fundamental theorem of calculus for the derivatives, the cosine case using the index shift and the antiderivative $-c_{k+1}$ of $\sigma_k$.

Uniform convergence comes from the Weierstrass M-test with the trigonometric majorants; continuity follows from the local uniform-limit lemma on [R,R][-R,R] with R=1+x0R=1+|x_0|; the derivatives are obtained by termwise integration of the series against the fundamental theorem of calculus, the cosine case using the index shift.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement; it is applied to the data named at the point of use. Write SS for the successor map of the natural numbers, so that 2k+1=S(2k)2k+1=S(2k) for kNk\in\mathbb{N} by Iterated Powers, Factorials, and Convergence of the Series of Powers over Factorials §powers, and write id\mathrm{id} for the function from R\mathbb{R} to R\mathbb{R} with id(x)=x\mathrm{id}(x)=x. The families (ck)kN(c_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and (σk)kN(\sigma_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} of the statement are sequences in the set of functions from R\mathbb{R} to R\mathbb{R}. Write γ,η:RR\gamma,\eta:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} for the two functions named in clause 1 of the statement, γ(x)=cosx1\gamma(x)=\cos x-1 and η(x)=sinxx\eta(x)=\sin x-x, and (pm)mN(p_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}}, (qm)mN(q_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} for the partial sums of (ck)kN(c_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and of (σk)kN(\sigma_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, so that pm(x)=k=1mck(x)p_{m}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{m}c_{k}(x) and qm(x)=k=1mσk(x)q_{m}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{m}\sigma_{k}(x); by The Real Sine and Cosine Functions §cosine and The Real Sine and Cosine Functions §sine the series k=1ck(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}(x) and k=1σk(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(x) converge, with sums γ(x)\gamma(x) and η(x)\eta(x), for every xRx\in\mathbb{R}. Every subset of R\mathbb{R} carries the metric dRd_{\mathbb{R}}, and every point of the interval R\mathbb{R} is an interior point of it by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line and Their Interior Points §whole-line. Constant multiples, sums and products of functions are formed pointwise, as in the statements of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space and Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives. Those two items state their hypotheses for a pair of functions; in every application below in which only one function is named, the second function required by their hypotheses is taken to be that same function, so that the hypotheses are met and the conclusions drawn about a constant multiple, and about a constant function, are available. Natural numbers occur below both as exponents and as elements of R\mathbb{R}; in the latter role they are always read through the canonical map. Finally, 22 denotes the natural number 1+11+1.

Claim 0 (a cancellation identity). Let v,wv,w be nonzero real numbers. Then vw0vw\neq0 and w(vw)1=v1w(vw)^{-1}=v^{-1}.

That vw0vw\neq0 is claim 3 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, read contrapositively. Using commutativity and associativity of multiplication in the field R\mathbb{R},

(w(vw)1)(vw)=w((vw)1(vw))=w,v1(vw)=(v1v)w=w.\bigl(w(vw)^{-1}\bigr)(vw)=w\bigl((vw)^{-1}(vw)\bigr)=w, \qquad v^{-1}(vw)=(v^{-1}v)w=w .

Hence (w(vw)1)(vw)=v1(vw)\bigl(w(vw)^{-1}\bigr)(vw)=v^{-1}(vw), and multiplying both sides by (vw)1(vw)^{-1} gives w(vw)1=v1w(vw)^{-1}=v^{-1}.

Claim 1 (absolute values of the terms). For every kNk\in\mathbb{N} and every xRx\in\mathbb{R},

ck(x)=x2k(2k)!,σk(x)=x2k+1(2k+1)!.|c_{k}(x)|=\frac{|x|^{2k}}{(2k)!}, \qquad |\sigma_{k}(x)|=\frac{|x|^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!}.

By claim 1 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field one has 010\le1, so 1=1|1|=1 by Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives 1=1|-1|=1; hence (1)k=1k=1k=1|(-1)^{k}|=|-1|^{k}=1^{k}=1, using cn=cn|c^{n}|=|c|^{n} from Iterated Powers, Factorials, and Convergence of the Series of Powers over Factorials §powers and claim 2 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field. The factorials (2k)!(2k)! and (2k+1)!(2k+1)! are positive, hence nonzero and invertible, by Iterated Powers, Factorials, and Convergence of the Series of Powers over Factorials §factorial; for a positive real ww one has w=w|w|=w by Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field gives ww1=ww1=1=1|w|\,|w^{-1}|=|w\,w^{-1}|=|1|=1, whence w1=w1|w^{-1}|=w^{-1}. Applying claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field twice more, together with xn=xn|x^{n}|=|x|^{n}, yields the two identities.

Claim 2 (clause 1 of the statement). Let RR be a positive real number.

Since 0<R0<R, claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives R<0-R<0, and 0R0\le R, so claim 2 of that lemma gives R<R-R<R; thus [R,R][-R,R] is the closed interval determined by R-R and RR, and it is an interval by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line and Their Interior Points §closed-interval.

Let x[R,R]x\in[-R,R], that is RxR-R\le x\le R. By claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field this gives xR|x|\le R, and 0x0\le|x| by claim 1 of that lemma. Hence claim 5 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field gives xnRn|x|^{n}\le R^{n} for every nNn\in\mathbb{N}. The inverse of the positive number (2k)!(2k)! is positive by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, hence nonnegative, so claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives

x2k((2k)!)1R2k((2k)!)1,|x|^{2k}\bigl((2k)!\bigr)^{-1}\le R^{2k}\bigl((2k)!\bigr)^{-1},

which with Claim 1 gives ck(x)R2k/(2k)!|c_{k}(x)|\le R^{2k}/(2k)!; in the same way σk(x)R2k+1/(2k+1)!|\sigma_{k}(x)|\le R^{2k+1}/(2k+1)!.

Put Mk=R2k/(2k)!M_{k}=R^{2k}/(2k)! and Nk=R2k+1/(2k+1)!N_{k}=R^{2k+1}/(2k+1)! for kNk\in\mathbb{N}. Since 0<R0<R gives 0R0\le R, Iterated Powers, Factorials, and Convergence of the Series of Powers over Factorials §trigonometric, applied with A=RA=R, gives 0Mk0\le M_{k} and 0Nk0\le N_{k} for every kk, and the convergence of k=1Mk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{k} and of k=1Nk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}N_{k}; these are the two infinite series appearing in the tail bounds of clause 1.

Now apply The Weierstrass M-Test with D=RD=\mathbb{R}, S=[R,R]S=[-R,R], the sequence (ck)kN(c_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, the majorant sequence (Mk)kN(M_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and the function f=γf=\gamma. Its hypotheses hold: 0Mk0\le M_{k}, the series k=1Mk\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{k} converges, ck(x)Mk|c_{k}(x)|\le M_{k} for every kNk\in\mathbb{N} and every x[R,R]x\in[-R,R] as just shown, and γ(x)=cosx1=k=1ck(x)\gamma(x)=\cos x-1=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}(x) for every xRx\in\mathbb{R} by The Real Sine and Cosine Functions §cosine, hence in particular for every x[R,R]x\in[-R,R]. Clause The Weierstrass M-Test §uniform gives that k=1ck\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k} converges uniformly to γ\gamma on [R,R][-R,R], and clause The Weierstrass M-Test §tail gives

γ(x)pm(x)k=1Mkk=1mMk|\gamma(x)-p_{m}(x)|\le\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}M_{k}-\sum_{k=1}^{m}M_{k}

for every mNm\in\mathbb{N} and every x[R,R]x\in[-R,R]; since γ(x)=cosx1\gamma(x)=\cos x-1, this is the first tail bound. The same argument with the sequence (σk)kN(\sigma_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, the majorants (Nk)kN(N_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and the function f=ηf=\eta, using The Real Sine and Cosine Functions §sine, gives the remaining assertions of clause 1.

Claim 3 (the terms and the partial sums are continuous on R\mathbb{R}). Let kNk\in\mathbb{N}. By Continuity of the Identity Map, of Powers, and of Polynomial Functions on a Subset of the Real Line §powers, applied with E=RE=\mathbb{R} and the exponent 2k2k, the map xx2kx\mapsto x^{2k} is continuous on R\mathbb{R}. The function ckc_{k} is the constant multiple of that map by the real number (1)k((2k)!)1(-1)^{k}\bigl((2k)!\bigr)^{-1}, hence continuous on R\mathbb{R} by claims 4 and 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space, applied with (X,d)=(R,dR)(X,d)=(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), A=RA=\mathbb{R} and both of the functions named there taken to be that power map. The same argument with the exponent 2k+12k+1 shows that σk\sigma_{k} is continuous on R\mathbb{R}.

By Series of Real-Valued Functions and Their Partial Sums §partial-sums, pm(x)=k=1mck(x)p_{m}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{m}c_{k}(x) for xRx\in\mathbb{R}. Claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums gives k=11ak=a1\sum_{k=1}^{1}a_{k}=a_{1} and k=1S(m)ak=(k=1mak)+aS(m)\sum_{k=1}^{S(m)}a_{k}=\bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{m}a_{k}\bigr)+a_{S(m)}, so p1=c1p_{1}=c_{1} and pS(m)=pm+cS(m)p_{S(m)}=p_{m}+c_{S(m)} as functions on R\mathbb{R}. Since c1c_{1} is continuous on R\mathbb{R}, and since claims 2 and 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space show that pm+cS(m)p_{m}+c_{S(m)} is continuous on R\mathbb{R} whenever pmp_{m} is, the principle of induction, applied to the set of those mNm\in\mathbb{N} for which pmp_{m} is continuous on R\mathbb{R}, gives that pmp_{m} is continuous on R\mathbb{R} for every mNm\in\mathbb{N}. The same argument applies to (qm)mN(q_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}}.

Claim 4 (clause 2 of the statement). Let x0Rx_{0}\in\mathbb{R} and put R=1+x0R=1+|x_{0}|.

By claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, 0x00\le|x_{0}|, and 0<10<1 by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; claim 3 of that lemma, applied with 0<10<1 and 0x00\le|x_{0}|, gives 0=0+0<1+x0=R0=0+0<1+|x_{0}|=R, so RR is positive.

The ball of radius 11 about x0x_{0} lies in [R,R][-R,R]. Let yy belong to the open ball BdR(x0,1)B_{d_{\mathbb{R}}}(x_{0},1), that is yx0<1|y-x_{0}|<1. By claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, y=(yx0)+x0yx0+x0|y|=|(y-x_{0})+x_{0}|\le|y-x_{0}|+|x_{0}|. Since yx0<1|y-x_{0}|<1 we have yx01|y-x_{0}|\le1, hence 01yx00\le1-|y-x_{0}| by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; as

(1+x0)(yx0+x0)=1yx0,\bigl(1+|x_{0}|\bigr)-\bigl(|y-x_{0}|+|x_{0}|\bigr)=1-|y-x_{0}|,

that same claim gives yx0+x0R|y-x_{0}|+|x_{0}|\le R. Writing u=(yx0+x0)yu=\bigl(|y-x_{0}|+|x_{0}|\bigr)-|y| and v=R(yx0+x0)v=R-\bigl(|y-x_{0}|+|x_{0}|\bigr), both nonnegative by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, claim 2 of that lemma gives 0u+v=Ry0\le u+v=R-|y|, so yR|y|\le R by claim 3 again. By claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field this means RyR-R\le y\le R, that is y[R,R]y\in[-R,R]. Thus [R,R][-R,R] contains every point of BdR(x0,1)B_{d_{\mathbb{R}}}(x_{0},1) that lies in R\mathbb{R}.

Continuity. By Claim 2, applied with this RR, the series k=1ck\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k} converges uniformly to γ\gamma on [R,R][-R,R], which by Series of Real-Valued Functions and Their Partial Sums §uniform says that (pm)mN(p_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} converges uniformly to γ\gamma on [R,R][-R,R]. By Claim 3 each pmp_{m} is continuous at x0x_{0} relative to R\mathbb{R}. Apply Continuity and Uniform Continuity of a Uniform Limit of Real-Valued Functions §local with (X,dX)=(R,dR)(X,d_{X})=(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), A=RA=\mathbb{R}, the sequence (pm)mN(p_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}}, the function γ\gamma, the point x0x_{0}, the radius r=1r=1 and the set [R,R][-R,R]: it gives that γ\gamma is continuous at x0x_{0} relative to R\mathbb{R}. In the same way, using the sequence (qm)mN(q_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} and the function η\eta, the function η\eta is continuous at x0x_{0} relative to R\mathbb{R}.

Since cos=γ+b\cos=\gamma+b, where bb is the function on R\mathbb{R} with constant value 11, claims 1 and 2 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space show that cos\cos is continuous at x0x_{0} relative to R\mathbb{R}. Since sin=η+id\sin=\eta+\mathrm{id} and id\mathrm{id} is continuous on R\mathbb{R} by Continuity of the Identity Map, of Powers, and of Polynomial Functions on a Subset of the Real Line §identity, claim 2 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space shows that sin\sin is continuous at x0x_{0} relative to R\mathbb{R}. As x0Rx_{0}\in\mathbb{R} was arbitrary, γ\gamma, η\eta, cos\cos and sin\sin are continuous on R\mathbb{R}, which is clause 2.

Claim 5 (clause 3 of the statement). By claim 4 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, 0n=00^{n}=0 for every nNn\in\mathbb{N}, so claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field gives ck(0)=(1)k0((2k)!)1=0c_{k}(0)=(-1)^{k}\cdot0\cdot\bigl((2k)!\bigr)^{-1}=0 and, in the same way, σk(0)=0\sigma_{k}(0)=0, for every kNk\in\mathbb{N}.

By claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, p1(0)=c1(0)=0p_{1}(0)=c_{1}(0)=0 and pS(m)(0)=pm(0)+cS(m)(0)=pm(0)+0p_{S(m)}(0)=p_{m}(0)+c_{S(m)}(0)=p_{m}(0)+0, so the principle of induction, applied to the set of those mNm\in\mathbb{N} with pm(0)=0p_{m}(0)=0, gives pm(0)=0p_{m}(0)=0 for every mNm\in\mathbb{N}. The sequence (pm(0))mN(p_{m}(0))_{m\in\mathbb{N}} is therefore constant with value 00 and converges to 00 by Constant Sequences and Index-Shifted Sequences of Real Numbers §constant; by Series of Real Numbers §convergent this says k=1ck(0)=0\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}(0)=0. Hence cos0=1+0=1\cos0=1+0=1 by The Real Sine and Cosine Functions §cosine. The same argument with (qm)mN(q_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} gives k=1σk(0)=0\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(0)=0 and, by The Real Sine and Cosine Functions §sine, sin0=0+0=0\sin0=0+0=0.

Claim 6 (clause 4 of the statement). Let xRx\in\mathbb{R} and kNk\in\mathbb{N}. By Iterated Powers, Factorials, and Convergence of the Series of Powers over Factorials §powers, (x)2k=x2k(-x)^{2k}=x^{2k} and (x)2k+1=x2k+1(-x)^{2k+1}=-x^{2k+1}; hence ck(x)=ck(x)c_{k}(-x)=c_{k}(x), and claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field gives σk(x)=(1)σk(x)\sigma_{k}(-x)=(-1)\sigma_{k}(x).

The sequences (ck(x))kN(c_{k}(-x))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and (ck(x))kN(c_{k}(x))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} are equal, so the series k=1ck(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}(-x) and k=1ck(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}(x) have the same sum, and The Real Sine and Cosine Functions §cosine gives

cos(x)=1+k=1ck(x)=1+k=1ck(x)=cosx.\cos(-x)=1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}(-x)=1+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}(x)=\cos x .

The series k=1σk(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(x) converges by The Real Sine and Cosine Functions §sine. Apply Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity with λ=1\lambda=-1 to the sequence (σk(x))kN(\sigma_{k}(x))_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, taking the companion sequence named in that clause to be (σk(x))kN(\sigma_{k}(x))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} itself, whose series converges: the series k=1(1)σk(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(-1)\sigma_{k}(x) converges with sum k=1σk(x)-\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(x). Hence

sin(x)=(x)+k=1σk(x)=xk=1σk(x)=(x+k=1σk(x))=sinx.\sin(-x)=(-x)+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(-x)=-x-\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(x)=-\Bigl(x+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(x)\Bigr)=-\sin x .

Claim 7 (antiderivatives of the terms). Let kNk\in\mathbb{N} and t0Rt_{0}\in\mathbb{R}, and write ck+1-c_{k+1} for the constant multiple of ck+1c_{k+1} by 1-1. Then σk\sigma_{k} is differentiable at t0t_{0} with derivative ck(t0)c_{k}(t_{0}), and ck+1-c_{k+1} is differentiable at t0t_{0} with derivative σk(t0)\sigma_{k}(t_{0}).

First assertion. Since 2k+1=S(2k)2k+1=S(2k), claim 1 of Derivative of a Polynomial Function on the Real Line, applied with I=RI=\mathbb{R} and m=2km=2k, gives that the map tt2k+1t\mapsto t^{2k+1} is differentiable at t0t_{0} with derivative (2k+1)t02k(2k+1)\,t_{0}^{2k}, the factor 2k+12k+1 being read in R\mathbb{R} through the canonical map. The factorial (2k+1)!(2k+1)! is positive, hence nonzero, by Iterated Powers, Factorials, and Convergence of the Series of Powers over Factorials §factorial, and σk\sigma_{k} is the constant multiple of that map by (1)k((2k+1)!)1(-1)^{k}\bigl((2k+1)!\bigr)^{-1}; so claim 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, applied on the interval R\mathbb{R} at its interior point t0t_{0} with both of the functions named there taken to be that power map, gives that σk\sigma_{k} is differentiable at t0t_{0} with derivative

(1)k((2k+1)!)1(2k+1)t02k.(-1)^{k}\bigl((2k+1)!\bigr)^{-1}(2k+1)\,t_{0}^{2k}.

By Recursion for the Factorial of a Natural Number §recursion, applied with n=2kn=2k, one has (2k+1)!=(2k+1)(2k)!(2k+1)!=(2k+1)\cdot(2k)!; the canonical image of 2k+12k+1 is positive, hence nonzero, by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field, and (2k)!(2k)! is nonzero. Since multiplication in R\mathbb{R} is commutative, (2k+1)!=(2k)!(2k+1)(2k+1)!=(2k)!\,(2k+1), so Claim 0, applied with w=2k+1w=2k+1 and v=(2k)!v=(2k)!, gives (2k+1)((2k+1)!)1=((2k)!)1(2k+1)\bigl((2k+1)!\bigr)^{-1}=\bigl((2k)!\bigr)^{-1}, so the displayed derivative equals ck(t0)c_{k}(t_{0}).

Second assertion. Write j=2k+1j=2k+1. We first check that 2(k+1)=j+12(k+1)=j+1. By Iterated Powers, Factorials, and Convergence of the Series of Powers over Factorials §powers, applied to the natural number k+1k+1, one has 2(k+1)=(k+1)+(k+1)2(k+1)=(k+1)+(k+1); by claims 3 and 4 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers, addition on N\mathbb{N} being associative and commutative, (k+1)+(k+1)=(k+k)+(1+1)(k+1)+(k+1)=(k+k)+(1+1); and k+k=2kk+k=2k by Iterated Powers, Factorials, and Convergence of the Series of Powers over Factorials §powers. Hence, associating once more,

2(k+1)=2k+(1+1)=(2k+1)+1=j+1.2(k+1)=2k+(1+1)=(2k+1)+1=j+1 .

By claim 1 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers, k+1=S(k)k+1=S(k) and j+1=S(j)j+1=S(j). Hence claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field gives (1)k+1=(1)k(1)(-1)^{k+1}=(-1)^{k}(-1), so claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field gives

ck+1(t)=(1)k(1)tj+1(j+1)!=(1)ktj+1(j+1)!(tR).-c_{k+1}(t)=-\frac{(-1)^{k}(-1)\,t^{\,j+1}}{(j+1)!}=\frac{(-1)^{k}\,t^{\,j+1}}{(j+1)!} \qquad(t\in\mathbb{R}).

Claim 1 of Derivative of a Polynomial Function on the Real Line, applied with I=RI=\mathbb{R} and m=jm=j, gives that ttj+1t\mapsto t^{\,j+1} is differentiable at t0t_{0} with derivative (j+1)t0j(j+1)\,t_{0}^{\,j}, the factor j+1j+1 again read in R\mathbb{R} through the canonical map; so claim 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, with both of the functions named there taken to be that power map, gives that ck+1-c_{k+1} is differentiable at t0t_{0} with derivative (1)k((j+1)!)1(j+1)t0j(-1)^{k}\bigl((j+1)!\bigr)^{-1}(j+1)\,t_{0}^{\,j}. By Recursion for the Factorial of a Natural Number §recursion, applied with n=jn=j, one has (j+1)!=(j+1)j!(j+1)!=(j+1)\cdot j!, which by commutativity is j!(j+1)j!\,(j+1); both factors are nonzero, the first by Iterated Powers, Factorials, and Convergence of the Series of Powers over Factorials §factorial and the second by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field, so Claim 0 with w=j+1w=j+1 and v=j!v=j! gives (j+1)((j+1)!)1=(j!)1(j+1)\bigl((j+1)!\bigr)^{-1}=(j!)^{-1}. Since j=2k+1j=2k+1, the derivative equals (1)kt02k+1/(2k+1)!=σk(t0)(-1)^{k}t_{0}^{2k+1}/(2k+1)!=\sigma_{k}(t_{0}).

Claim 8 (termwise integration). Let RR be a positive real number, let J=[R,R]J=[-R,R], and let uJu\in J with R<u-R<u. Write Ruh(t)dt\int_{-R}^{u}h(t)\,dt for the Riemann integral on [R,u][-R,u] of the restriction of a function h:RRh:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} to [R,u][-R,u], which exists whenever that restriction is continuous on [R,u][-R,u], by A Continuous Function on a Closed Interval is Riemann Integrable §integrable. Then

Ruγ(t)dt=η(u)η(R),Ruη(t)dt=(c1(u)γ(u))(c1(R)γ(R)).\int_{-R}^{u}\gamma(t)\,dt=\eta(u)-\eta(-R), \qquad \int_{-R}^{u}\eta(t)\,dt=\bigl(c_{1}(u)-\gamma(u)\bigr)-\bigl(c_{1}(-R)-\gamma(-R)\bigr).

Put K=[R,u]K=[-R,u]. Since R,uJ-R,u\in J and Ru-R\le u, Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line and Their Interior Points §closed-subinterval gives KJK\subseteq J, and by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line and Their Interior Points §closed-interval KK is an interval every point of which strictly between R-R and uu is an interior point of KK. By Claims 3 and 4 and claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, the restrictions to KK of ckc_{k}, σk\sigma_{k}, γ\gamma and η\eta are continuous on KK.

The first identity. By Claim 2, (pm)mN(p_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} converges uniformly to γ\gamma on JJ, so Continuity and Uniform Continuity of a Uniform Limit of Real-Valued Functions §subset, applied with A=RA=\mathbb{R}, S=JS=J and T=KT=K, gives that it converges uniformly to γ\gamma on KK. The defining condition of Pointwise and Uniform Convergence of a Sequence of Real-Valued Functions §uniform constrains only the values of the functions at points of KK, and those values are unchanged by restriction to KK; moreover the mm-th partial sum of (ckK)kN(c_{k}|_{K})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} takes at xKx\in K the value k=1mck(x)=pm(x)\sum_{k=1}^{m}c_{k}(x)=p_{m}(x), so it is pmKp_{m}|_{K}. Hence the series k=1ckK\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}|_{K} converges uniformly to γK\gamma|_{K} on KK in the sense of Series of Real-Valued Functions and Their Partial Sums §uniform, read with D=S=KD=S=K.

Therefore Linearity of the Riemann Integral of Continuous Functions, and Passage to a Uniform Limit §series, applied with [a,b]=K[a,b]=K, the sequence (ckK)kN(c_{k}|_{K})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and the function γK\gamma|_{K}, gives that k=1Ruck(t)dt\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\int_{-R}^{u}c_{k}(t)\,dt converges with

k=1Ruck(t)dt=Ruγ(t)dt.\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\int_{-R}^{u}c_{k}(t)\,dt=\int_{-R}^{u}\gamma(t)\,dt .

By Claim 7 and claim 2 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, σkK\sigma_{k}|_{K} is differentiable at each point tt of KK strictly between R-R and uu, with derivative ck(t)c_{k}(t) there, and σkK\sigma_{k}|_{K} is continuous on KK; so Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II, on a Closed Real Interval, applied on KK with f=ckKf=c_{k}|_{K} and F=σkKF=\sigma_{k}|_{K}, gives Ruck(t)dt=σk(u)σk(R)\int_{-R}^{u}c_{k}(t)\,dt=\sigma_{k}(u)-\sigma_{k}(-R).

The series k=1σk(u)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(u) and k=1σk(R)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(-R) converge by The Real Sine and Cosine Functions §sine. By Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity, applied with λ=1\lambda=-1 to the sequence (σk(R))kN(\sigma_{k}(-R))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and with companion sequence (σk(u))kN(\sigma_{k}(u))_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, the series k=1(1)σk(R)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}(-1)\sigma_{k}(-R) converges with sum k=1σk(R)-\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(-R); the additive part of that clause, applied to the sequences (σk(u))kN(\sigma_{k}(u))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and ((1)σk(R))kN((-1)\sigma_{k}(-R))_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, then gives

k=1(σk(u)σk(R))=k=1σk(u)k=1σk(R)=η(u)η(R),\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\bigl(\sigma_{k}(u)-\sigma_{k}(-R)\bigr)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(u)-\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(-R)=\eta(u)-\eta(-R),

because η(x)=sinxx=k=1σk(x)\eta(x)=\sin x-x=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\sigma_{k}(x) by The Real Sine and Cosine Functions §sine. This proves the first identity.

The second identity. The same argument, with (σk)kN(\sigma_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in place of (ck)kN(c_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, (qm)mN(q_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}} in place of (pm)mN(p_{m})_{m\in\mathbb{N}}, η\eta in place of γ\gamma, and the antiderivative ck+1-c_{k+1} of σk\sigma_{k} supplied by Claim 7 in place of σk\sigma_{k}, applies here as well. The one hypothesis that is not merely a relabelling is the continuity of the new antiderivative: ck+1c_{k+1} is continuous on R\mathbb{R} by Claim 3, applied to the natural number k+1k+1, hence so is ck+1-c_{k+1} by claim 4 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space with both of the functions named there taken to be ck+1c_{k+1}, and therefore the restriction of ck+1-c_{k+1} to KK is continuous on KK by claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative. The argument thus gives that k=1(ck+1(u)+ck+1(R))\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\bigl(-c_{k+1}(u)+c_{k+1}(-R)\bigr) converges with

k=1(ck+1(u)+ck+1(R))=Ruη(t)dt.\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\bigl(-c_{k+1}(u)+c_{k+1}(-R)\bigr)=\int_{-R}^{u}\eta(t)\,dt .

Fix xRx\in\mathbb{R}. The series k=1ck(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}(x) converges by The Real Sine and Cosine Functions §cosine, so Shifting the Index of a Series of Real Numbers §shift, applied to the sequence (ck(x))kN(c_{k}(x))_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, gives that k=1ck+1(x)\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k+1}(x) converges with

γ(x)=k=1ck(x)=c1(x)+k=1ck+1(x),sok=1ck+1(x)=γ(x)c1(x).\gamma(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}(x)=c_{1}(x)+\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k+1}(x), \qquad\text{so}\qquad \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k+1}(x)=\gamma(x)-c_{1}(x).

Applying Elementary Properties of Series of Real Numbers §linearity exactly as above, with λ=1\lambda=-1 on the sequence (ck+1(u))kN(c_{k+1}(u))_{k\in\mathbb{N}} and companion (ck+1(R))kN(c_{k+1}(-R))_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, gives

Ruη(t)dt=(γ(u)c1(u))+(γ(R)c1(R)),\int_{-R}^{u}\eta(t)\,dt=-\bigl(\gamma(u)-c_{1}(u)\bigr)+\bigl(\gamma(-R)-c_{1}(-R)\bigr),

which is the second identity.

Claim 9 (clause 5 of the statement). Let x0Rx_{0}\in\mathbb{R}, put R=1+x0R=1+|x_{0}|, which is positive by Claim 4, and put J=[R,R]J=[-R,R].

Since 0<10<1 and x0x0|x_{0}|\le|x_{0}|, claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0+x0<1+x00+|x_{0}|<1+|x_{0}|, that is x0<R|x_{0}|<R; by claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field this means R<x0<R-R<x_{0}<R, so x0x_{0} is an interior point of JJ by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line and Their Interior Points §closed-interval. Moreover {yR:yx0<1}J\{y\in\mathbb{R}:|y-x_{0}|<1\}\subseteq J by the inclusion established in Claim 4.

The derivative of sin\sin. By Claim 4 and claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, γJ\gamma|_{J} is continuous on JJ, so Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part I, on a Closed Real Interval, applied on JJ with f=γJf=\gamma|_{J}, defines G:JRG:J\to\mathbb{R} by G(u)=Ruγ(t)dtG(u)=\int_{-R}^{u}\gamma(t)\,dt for uJu\in J, with G(R)=0G(-R)=0 by its clause 1, and gives by its clause 3 that GG is differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative γ(x0)\gamma(x_{0}).

By Claim 8, G(u)=η(u)η(R)G(u)=\eta(u)-\eta(-R) for every uJu\in J with R<u-R<u; the same identity holds at u=Ru=-R, both sides being 00. Hence ηJ=G+e\eta|_{J}=G+e, where ee is the function on JJ with constant value η(R)\eta(-R). By claims 1 and 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, applied on the interval JJ at its interior point x0x_{0}, the function ηJ\eta|_{J} is differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative γ(x0)+0=γ(x0)\gamma(x_{0})+0=\gamma(x_{0}).

By claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, x1=xx^{1}=x for every xRx\in\mathbb{R}, so idJ\mathrm{id}|_{J} is the restriction to JJ of the map xx1x\mapsto x^{1} and is therefore differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative 11, by claim 1 of Derivative of a Polynomial Function on the Real Line applied with I=JI=J. Since sinJ=ηJ+idJ\sin|_{J}=\eta|_{J}+\mathrm{id}|_{J}, claim 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives gives that sinJ\sin|_{J} is differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative γ(x0)+1=cosx0\gamma(x_{0})+1=\cos x_{0}.

Finally apply Differentiability at an Interior Point is a Local Property §local, taking the interval called II there to be JJ, the interval called JJ there to be R\mathbb{R}, the function to be sin\sin, and the radius to be 11: the hypotheses hold because x0x_{0} is an interior point of JJ and of R\mathbb{R} and because {yR:yx0<1}J\{y\in\mathbb{R}:|y-x_{0}|<1\}\subseteq J. Hence sin\sin is differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative cosx0\cos x_{0}.

The derivative of cos\cos. By Claim 4 and claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative, ηJ\eta|_{J} is continuous on JJ, so Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part I, on a Closed Real Interval, applied on JJ with f=ηJf=\eta|_{J}, defines H:JRH:J\to\mathbb{R} by H(u)=Ruη(t)dtH(u)=\int_{-R}^{u}\eta(t)\,dt, with H(R)=0H(-R)=0, and gives that HH is differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative η(x0)\eta(x_{0}). By Claim 8, H(u)=(c1(u)γ(u))(c1(R)γ(R))H(u)=\bigl(c_{1}(u)-\gamma(u)\bigr)-\bigl(c_{1}(-R)-\gamma(-R)\bigr) for every uJu\in J with R<u-R<u, and the same identity holds at u=Ru=-R, both sides being 00. Rearranging,

γJ=c1J+(1)H+e,\gamma|_{J}=c_{1}|_{J}+(-1)H+e',

where ee' is the function on JJ with constant value (c1(R)γ(R))-\bigl(c_{1}(-R)-\gamma(-R)\bigr).

We compute the derivative of c1Jc_{1}|_{J} at x0x_{0}. The exponent occurring in c1c_{1} is the natural number written 2k2k with k=1k=1, which by Iterated Powers, Factorials, and Convergence of the Series of Powers over Factorials §powers is 121\cdot2; and

12=1S(1)=11+1=1+1=2,1\cdot2=1\cdot S(1)=1\cdot1+1=1+1=2,

by clauses 3 and 4 of Natural Numbers and claim 1 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers. Moreover (1)1=1(-1)^{1}=-1 by claim 1 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field, and Recursion for the Factorial of a Natural Number §recursion, applied with n=1n=1, gives 2!=(1+1)!=(1+1)1!=21=22!=(1+1)!=(1+1)\cdot1!=2\cdot1=2, the value 1!=11!=1 being the other assertion of that lemma and the factor 1+11+1 being read in R\mathbb{R} through the canonical map. Hence c1(x)=x221c_{1}(x)=-x^{2}\cdot2^{-1} for xRx\in\mathbb{R}. Claim 1 of Derivative of a Polynomial Function on the Real Line, applied with I=JI=J and m=1m=1, gives that the restriction to JJ of xxS(1)=x2x\mapsto x^{S(1)}=x^{2} is differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative 2x01=2x02\,x_{0}^{1}=2x_{0}, the factor 22 being read in R\mathbb{R} through the canonical map; so claim 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, with the constant 21-2^{-1} and with both of the functions named there taken to be that restriction, gives that c1Jc_{1}|_{J} is differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative 212x0=x0-2^{-1}\cdot2x_{0}=-x_{0}.

Applying claims 1 and 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives to the displayed decomposition of γJ\gamma|_{J}, that function is differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative

x0+(1)η(x0)+0=x0(sinx0x0)=sinx0.-x_{0}+(-1)\eta(x_{0})+0=-x_{0}-\bigl(\sin x_{0}-x_{0}\bigr)=-\sin x_{0}.

Since cosJ=γJ+b\cos|_{J}=\gamma|_{J}+b with bb the function on JJ with constant value 11, claims 1 and 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives give that cosJ\cos|_{J} is differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative sinx0-\sin x_{0}; and Differentiability at an Interior Point is a Local Property §local, applied exactly as above with the function cos\cos, gives that cos\cos is differentiable at x0x_{0} with derivative sinx0-\sin x_{0}.

As x0Rx_{0}\in\mathbb{R} was arbitrary, clause 5 follows, and the proof is complete.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…