TheoremBase

Change of variables for the diagonal map deltandelta_n identifies the rescaled Gaussian head, and the head-tail synthesis lemma reconstructs the Gaussian. Since the tail lives on vectors whose first n coordinates vanish, the head map inverts the extension almost everywhere; with Tonelli-Fubini and data processing this gives marginals, moments, densities and entropies. The score is tested on cylindrical functions (Euclidean score for k <= n, zero Gaussian score for k > n), and an optimal coupling lifted with a common tail bounds the noise distance.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Throughout, n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} is fixed and the notation is that of A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation; Rn×X\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X carries B(Rn)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X), its Borel σ\sigma-algebra by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §tails, and Ln\mathcal{L}^{n} denotes Lebesgue measure on B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), written λd\lambda_{d} with d=nd=n in Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward. Push-forwards are the image measures of claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, and integrals against them are computed by claim 2 of that lemma, which we call the transfer formula. Composites of measurable maps are measurable, preimages composing (Measurable Function and Real-Valued Measurable Function); for the same reason (T∘S)#ν=T#(S#ν)(T\circ S)_{\#}\nu=T_{\#}(S_{\#}\nu) whenever SS and TT are measurable and composable. Densities are those of The Radon-Nikodym Theorem for a Finite Measure and a Sigma-Finite Measure, and Uniqueness of Densities, and ϕ(s)=slog⁡s\phi(s)=s\log s is the function used in Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy.

Step 0 (Preliminaries). (P1) For u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} put δn−1(u)=(a11/2u1,…,an1/2un)\delta_{n}^{-1}(u)=(a_{1}^{1/2}u_{1},\dots,a_{n}^{1/2}u_{n}); since ak1/2ak−1/2=1a_{k}^{1/2}a_{k}^{-1/2}=1, this is the inverse map of the bijection δn\delta_{n} of A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §heads. With the synthesis map pn∗p_{n}^{*} of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates, the map Ψn\Psi_{n} of A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §tails reads

Ψn(u,w)=pn∗(δn−1(u))+w(u∈Rn, w∈X),\Psi_{n}(u,w)=p_{n}^{*}\bigl(\delta_{n}^{-1}(u)\bigr)+w\qquad(u\in\mathbb{R}^{n},\ w\in X),

and, by linearity of the inner product and orthonormality of (ek)k∈N(e_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}}, its coordinates are Ψn(u,w)k=ak1/2uk+wk\Psi_{n}(u,w)_{k}=a_{k}^{1/2}u_{k}+w_{k} for k∈[n]k\in[n] and Ψn(u,w)k=wk\Psi_{n}(u,w)_{k}=w_{k} for k>nk>n. The map Ψn\Psi_{n} is Borel by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §borel.

(P2) The maps pnp_{n} and pn∗p_{n}^{*} are linear, pn(pn∗(y))=yp_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(y))=y for y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n} by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, and Qnx=x−pn∗(pn(x))Q_{n}x=x-p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x)) by Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates. Hence QnQ_{n} is linear, pn(Qnx)=pn(x)−pn(x)=0p_{n}(Q_{n}x)=p_{n}(x)-p_{n}(x)=0 for x∈Xx\in X, and Qn(pn∗(y))=pn∗(y)−pn∗(y)=0Q_{n}(p_{n}^{*}(y))=p_{n}^{*}(y)-p_{n}^{*}(y)=0 for y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. Let X0={w∈X:pn(w)=0}X_{0}=\{w\in X:p_{n}(w)=0\}, a Borel set as the preimage under the Borel map pnp_{n} (Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity) of the Borel set {0}\{0\} (Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §finite-sets). For w∈X0w\in X_{0} one has wk=0w_{k}=0 for k∈[n]k\in[n] and Qnw=w−pn∗(0)=wQ_{n}w=w-p_{n}^{*}(0)=w. Since Qnx∈X0Q_{n}x\in X_{0} for every x∈Xx\in X, we get Qn(Qnx)=QnxQ_{n}(Q_{n}x)=Q_{n}x and τn(X0)=γc(Qn−1(X0))=γc(X)=1\tau_{n}(X_{0})=\gamma_{c}(Q_{n}^{-1}(X_{0}))=\gamma_{c}(X)=1, so τn(X∖X0)=0\tau_{n}(X\setminus X_{0})=0.

(P3) For u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and w∈Xw\in X, (P1) and (P2) give Qn(Ψn(u,w))=QnwQ_{n}(\Psi_{n}(u,w))=Q_{n}w and pn(Ψn(u,w))=δn−1(u)+pn(w)p_{n}(\Psi_{n}(u,w))=\delta_{n}^{-1}(u)+p_{n}(w). Since rn=δn∘pnr_{n}=\delta_{n}\circ p_{n} by A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §heads, for every u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and w∈X0w\in X_{0}

rn(Ψn(u,w))=u,Qn(Ψn(u,w))=w.r_{n}\bigl(\Psi_{n}(u,w)\bigr)=u,\qquad Q_{n}\bigl(\Psi_{n}(u,w)\bigr)=w .

(P4) Let (Y,Y)(Y,\mathcal{Y}) be a measurable space (below it is (Rn,B(Rn))(\mathbb{R}^{n},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})), except in Step 12, where it is (Rn+n,B(Rn+n))(\mathbb{R}^{n+n},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n+n}))), let α\alpha be a probability measure on Y\mathcal{Y} and β\beta one on B(X)\mathcal{B}(X); being finite they are σ\sigma-finite, and by Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure α⊗β\alpha\otimes\beta is the only measure on Y⊗B(X)\mathcal{Y}\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) with (α⊗β)(A×B)=α(A)β(B)(\alpha\otimes\beta)(A\times B)=\alpha(A)\beta(B) for all A∈YA\in\mathcal{Y}, B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X). We call this the rectangle principle: a measure on that σ\sigma-algebra taking these values on rectangles is α⊗β\alpha\otimes\beta. The coordinate projections prY\mathrm{pr}_{Y} and prX\mathrm{pr}_{X} of Y×XY\times X are measurable by claim 5 of Sections of Product-Measurable Sets and Maps Are Measurable, and Insertion Maps into Products Are Measurable, and (prY)#(α⊗β)=α(\mathrm{pr}_{Y})_{\#}(\alpha\otimes\beta)=\alpha, (prX)#(α⊗β)=β(\mathrm{pr}_{X})_{\#}(\alpha\otimes\beta)=\beta, since (α⊗β)(A×X)=α(A)β(X)=α(A)(\alpha\otimes\beta)(A\times X)=\alpha(A)\beta(X)=\alpha(A) and (α⊗β)(Y×B)=α(Y)β(B)=β(B)(\alpha\otimes\beta)(Y\times B)=\alpha(Y)\beta(B)=\beta(B); for Y=RnY=\mathbb{R}^{n} we write prRn\mathrm{pr}_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} for prY\mathrm{pr}_{Y}. The set Y×(X∖X0)Y\times(X\setminus X_{0}) has (α⊗τn)(\alpha\otimes\tau_{n})-measure α(Y) τn(X∖X0)=0\alpha(Y)\,\tau_{n}(X\setminus X_{0})=0 by (P2); thus a property holding at every (y,w)∈Y×X(y,w)\in Y\times X with w∈X0w\in X_{0} holds (α⊗τn)(\alpha\otimes\tau_{n})-almost everywhere.

(P5) Let α,α′\alpha,\alpha' be probability measures on B(Rn)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and β,β′\beta,\beta' probability measures on B(X)\mathcal{B}(X), let ff be a density of α′\alpha' with respect to α\alpha and gg a density of β′\beta' with respect to β\beta. Then F(u,w)=f(u)g(w)F(u,w)=f(u)g(w) is a density of α′⊗β′\alpha'\otimes\beta' with respect to α⊗β\alpha\otimes\beta. Indeed, FF is nonnegative and measurable, as the product (claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions) of f∘prRnf\circ\mathrm{pr}_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} and g∘prXg\circ\mathrm{pr}_{X}; let ν\nu be the measure with density FF with respect to α⊗β\alpha\otimes\beta (claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables). For a rectangle A×BA\times B, Tonelli's theorem, applied to the nonnegative measurable function 1A×BF\mathbf{1}_{A\times B}F, gives

ν(A×B)=∫Rn1A(u)f(u)(∫X1B g dβ)α(du)=∫Rn1A(u)f(u) β′(B) α(du)=β′(B)∫Rn1A f dα=α′(A) β′(B):\nu(A\times B)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\mathbf{1}_{A}(u)f(u)\Bigl(\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{B}\,g\,d\beta\Bigr)\alpha(du)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\mathbf{1}_{A}(u)f(u)\,\beta'(B)\,\alpha(du)=\beta'(B)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\mathbf{1}_{A}\,f\,d\alpha=\alpha'(A)\,\beta'(B):

the inner integral is β′(B)\beta'(B) because gg is a density of β′\beta' with respect to β\beta; the constant β′(B)∈[0,1]\beta'(B)\in[0,1] is taken out of the outer integral by the homogeneity of the integral of nonnegative functions (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative); and ∫1Af dα=α′(A)\int\mathbf{1}_{A}f\,d\alpha=\alpha'(A) because ff is a density of α′\alpha' with respect to α\alpha. So ν=α′⊗β′\nu=\alpha'\otimes\beta' by the rectangle principle. The constant function 11 is a density of every probability measure with respect to itself.

(P6) Let N,n′∈NN,n'\in\mathbb{N}, ψ∈Cb1(RN)\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{N}) (Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded), and let A:Rn′→RNA:\mathbb{R}^{n'}\to\mathbb{R}^{N} have components A(u)j=sj+βjujA(u)_{j}=s_{j}+\beta_{j}u_{j} for j≤min⁡(n′,N)j\le\min(n',N) and A(u)j=sjA(u)_{j}=s_{j} for n′<j≤Nn'<j\le N, with real constants sj,βjs_{j},\beta_{j}. Then ψ∘A∈Cb1(Rn′)\psi\circ A\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n'}), with ∂k(ψ∘A)(u)=βk ∂kψ(A(u))\partial_{k}(\psi\circ A)(u)=\beta_{k}\,\partial_{k}\psi(A(u)) for k≤min⁡(n′,N)k\le\min(n',N) and ∂k(ψ∘A)(u)=0\partial_{k}(\psi\circ A)(u)=0 for N<k≤n′N<k\le n'. Indeed, Rn′\mathbb{R}^{n'} and RN\mathbb{R}^{N} are open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous. For j∈[N]j\in[N] the component AjA_{j} has the form u↦q(j)⋅u+sju\mapsto q^{(j)}\cdot u+s_{j}, where q(j)∈Rn′q^{(j)}\in\mathbb{R}^{n'} is βj\beta_{j} times the jj-th standard basis vector of Rn′\mathbb{R}^{n'} if j≤min⁡(n′,N)j\le\min(n',N), and q(j)=0q^{(j)}=0 if j>n′j>n'. By Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class C2C^2, Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §quadratic, applied in dimension n′n' with M=0n′M=0_{n'}, q=q(j)q=q^{(j)} and c=sjc=s_{j}, the function AjA_{j} is of class C2C^{2} on Rn′\mathbb{R}^{n'} with gradient q(j)q^{(j)} at every point; hence it is of class C1C^{1} on Rn′\mathbb{R}^{n'} by claim 2 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous, and by Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set its partial derivatives are the entries of q(j)q^{(j)}: ∂kAj(u)=βj\partial_{k}A_{j}(u)=\beta_{j} if k=j≤min⁡(n′,N)k=j\le\min(n',N), and ∂kAj(u)=0\partial_{k}A_{j}(u)=0 otherwise. Since clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set is a condition on each coordinate function separately, AA is of class C1C^{1} on Rn′\mathbb{R}^{n'}; and ψ\psi, read as a map into R1\mathbb{R}^{1} by clause 3 there, is of class C1C^{1} on RN\mathbb{R}^{N}. Claim 1 of A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k, with U=Rn′U=\mathbb{R}^{n'}, V=RNV=\mathbb{R}^{N}, F=AF=A, G=ψG=\psi and p=1p=1, gives for k∈[n′]k\in[n'] and u∈Rn′u\in\mathbb{R}^{n'}

∂k(ψ∘A)(u)=∑l=1N∂lψ(A(u)) ∂kAl(u),\partial_{k}(\psi\circ A)(u)=\sum_{l=1}^{N}\partial_{l}\psi\bigl(A(u)\bigr)\,\partial_{k}A_{l}(u),

in which every term with l≠kl\ne k vanishes, and the term with l=kl=k, present only when k≤Nk\le N, equals βk ∂kψ(A(u))\beta_{k}\,\partial_{k}\psi(A(u)); so the sum is βk ∂kψ(A(u))\beta_{k}\,\partial_{k}\psi(A(u)) for k≤min⁡(n′,N)k\le\min(n',N) and 00 for N<k≤n′N<k\le n'. Claim 2 of A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k, with order 11, shows that ψ∘A\psi\circ A is of class C1C^{1} on Rn′\mathbb{R}^{n'}. Finally, if b0b_{0} bounds ∣ψ∣|\psi| and bkb_{k} bounds ∣∂kψ∣|\partial_{k}\psi| for k∈[N]k\in[N] (Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded), then b0b_{0} bounds ∣ψ∘A∣|\psi\circ A|, and ∣βk∣ bk|\beta_{k}|\,b_{k}, respectively 00, bounds ∣∂k(ψ∘A)∣|\partial_{k}(\psi\circ A)|; so ψ∘A∈Cb1(Rn′)\psi\circ A\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n'}).

Step 1 (Claim 1). The components u↦ak−1/2uku\mapsto a_{k}^{-1/2}u_{k} of δn\delta_{n} and u↦ak1/2uku\mapsto a_{k}^{1/2}u_{k} of δn−1\delta_{n}^{-1} are of the form u↦q⋅uu\mapsto q\cdot u, with q∈Rnq\in\mathbb{R}^{n} equal to ak−1/2a_{k}^{-1/2}, respectively ak1/2a_{k}^{1/2}, times the kk-th standard basis vector. The set Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} is open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous. By Quadratic and Affine Functions of Class C2C^2, Translation, and Quadratic Perturbation of Semiconvexity §quadratic, applied with M=0nM=0_{n}, this qq and c=0c=0, these components are of class C2C^{2} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with constant gradient qq, hence of class C1C^{1} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} by claim 2 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous; by Gradient of a Real-Valued Function on a Euclidean Open Set the entries of the gradient are the partial derivatives, so the partial derivative of the kk-th component of δn\delta_{n} with respect to the jj-th variable is ak−1/2a_{k}^{-1/2} if j=kj=k and 00 otherwise, and likewise for δn−1\delta_{n}^{-1} with ak1/2a_{k}^{1/2}. As clause 1 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set is a condition on each coordinate function, δn\delta_{n} and δn−1\delta_{n}^{-1} are of class C1C^{1} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}. So the Jacobian matrix of δn\delta_{n} at every point is the diagonal matrix DD with diagonal entries a1−1/2,…,an−1/2a_{1}^{-1/2},\dots,a_{n}^{-1/2}, and that of δn−1\delta_{n}^{-1} at every point is the diagonal matrix D′D' with diagonal entries a11/2,…,an1/2a_{1}^{1/2},\dots,a_{n}^{1/2}. The matrix DD is symmetric, x⋅(Dx)=∑k=1nak−1/2xk2>0x\cdot(Dx)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{-1/2}x_{k}^{2}>0 for x≠0x\ne0, so DD is positive definite (Symmetric, Positive Semidefinite, and Positive Definite Real Matrices), and DD′=D′D=InDD'=D'D=I_{n}, so D′D' is the inverse matrix of DD (Inverse Matrix and Invertible Real Square Matrix). Thus Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward applies to F=δnF=\delta_{n}; by its claim 1 δn\delta_{n} and δn−1\delta_{n}^{-1} are Borel, and det⁡D=∏k=1nak−1/2\det D=\prod_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{-1/2} by claim 1 of The Determinant of a Triangular Matrix is the Product of its Diagonal Entries, a diagonal matrix being lower triangular.

Since rn=δn∘pnr_{n}=\delta_{n}\circ p_{n} and (pn)#γc=γc(n)(p_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(n)}} by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure, we have (rn)#γc=(δn)#γc(n)(r_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=(\delta_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c^{(n)}}. The measure γc(n)\gamma_{c^{(n)}} has the density ρc(n)\rho_{c^{(n)}} with respect to Ln\mathcal{L}^{n} by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure (read with nn for dd, Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §truncations). By Change of Variables for the Lebesgue Integral under a Continuously Differentiable Bijection of Euclidean Space with Symmetric Positive Definite Jacobian Matrix, and the Density of a Push-Forward §densities, the function y↦ρc(n)(δn−1(y))/det⁡Dy\mapsto\rho_{c^{(n)}}(\delta_{n}^{-1}(y))/\det D is a density of (δn)#γc(n)(\delta_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c^{(n)}} with respect to Ln\mathcal{L}^{n}. We compute it with The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §density and The Diagonal Gaussian Density on Euclidean Space and Its Notation §scaling. For y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and x=δn−1(y)x=\delta_{n}^{-1}(y), xk2/ck=akyk2/ck=yk2/(ck/ak)x_{k}^{2}/c_{k}=a_{k}y_{k}^{2}/c_{k}=y_{k}^{2}/(c_{k}/a_{k}), so ∣x∣c(n)2=∣y∣c~(n)2|x|^{2}_{c^{(n)}}=|y|^{2}_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}. Next, 1/det⁡D=∏k=1nak1/2=exp⁡(∑k=1nlog⁡ak1/2)1/\det D=\prod_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{1/2}=\exp\bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}\log a_{k}^{1/2}\bigr) and

Zc(n)−∑k=1nlog⁡ak1/2=∑k=1nlog⁡(κckak1/2)=∑k=1nlog⁡(κck/ak)=Zc~(n),Z_{c^{(n)}}-\sum_{k=1}^{n}\log a_{k}^{1/2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\log\Bigl(\frac{\kappa\sqrt{c_{k}}}{a_{k}^{1/2}}\Bigr)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\log\Bigl(\kappa\sqrt{c_{k}/a_{k}}\Bigr)=Z_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}},

by the identities exp⁡(s+t)=exp⁡(s)exp⁡(t)\exp(s+t)=\exp(s)\exp(t) (claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function), exp⁡(log⁡t)=t\exp(\log t)=t and log⁡(st)=log⁡s+log⁡t\log(st)=\log s+\log t (The Natural Logarithm); from the last, log⁡(s/t)=log⁡s−log⁡t\log(s/t)=\log s-\log t for s,t>0s,t>0, since log⁡(s/t)+log⁡t=log⁡((s/t)t)=log⁡s\log(s/t)+\log t=\log((s/t)t)=\log s, and from the first, by induction on the number of summands, exp⁡(∑k=1nxk)=∏k=1nexp⁡(xk)\exp\bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}x_{k}\bigr)=\prod_{k=1}^{n}\exp(x_{k}) for real x1,…,xnx_{1},\dots,x_{n}; and ck/ak1/2=ck/ak\sqrt{c_{k}}/a_{k}^{1/2}=\sqrt{c_{k}/a_{k}}, both sides being nonnegative with square ck/akc_{k}/a_{k} (Existence and Uniqueness of the Nonnegative Square Root). Hence

ρc(n)(δn−1(y))det⁡D=exp⁡(−12∣y∣c~(n)2−Zc(n)+∑k=1nlog⁡ak1/2)=ρc~(n)(y).\frac{\rho_{c^{(n)}}(\delta_{n}^{-1}(y))}{\det D}=\exp\Bigl(-\tfrac12|y|^{2}_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}-Z_{c^{(n)}}+\sum_{k=1}^{n}\log a_{k}^{1/2}\Bigr)=\rho_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}(y).

So for every B∈B(Rn)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), (δn)#γc(n)(B)=∫1B ρc~(n) dLn=γ~n(B)(\delta_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c^{(n)}}(B)=\int\mathbf{1}_{B}\,\rho_{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}\,d\mathcal{L}^{n}=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}(B) by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on Euclidean Space §measure, that is,

(rn)#γc=(δn)#γc(n)=γ~n.(r_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=(\delta_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c^{(n)}}=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}.

Finally γc∈P2(X)\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by Moments of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space: Coordinate Covariances, Finite Second Moment, and Exponential Moments of the Squared Norm §moment, so γ~n=(rn)#γc∈P2(Rn)\tilde{\gamma}_{n}=(r_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space §head. Nothing in this step depended on the particular nn; so for every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}, δm\delta_{m} and δm−1\delta_{m}^{-1} are Borel and (rm)#γc=(δm)#γc(m)=γ~m(r_{m})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=(\delta_{m})_{\#}\gamma_{c^{(m)}}=\tilde{\gamma}_{m}.

Step 2 (Claim 2). Let Δn:Rn×X→Rn×X\Delta_{n}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X\to\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X, Δn(u,w)=(δn(u),w)\Delta_{n}(u,w)=(\delta_{n}(u),w). Its components δn∘prRn\delta_{n}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} and prX\mathrm{pr}_{X} are measurable (Step 1 and (P4)), so Δn\Delta_{n} is measurable by claim 1 of Pairings into a Product, the Graph of a Measurable Map, and Couplings Concentrated on a Graph, applied with Y=RnY=\mathbb{R}^{n} and Z=XZ=X. For rectangles, Δn−1(A×B)=δn−1(A)×B\Delta_{n}^{-1}(A\times B)=\delta_{n}^{-1}(A)\times B, so by Step 1

(Δn)#(γc(n)⊗τn)(A×B)=γc(n)(δn−1(A)) τn(B)=γ~n(A) τn(B),(\Delta_{n})_{\#}(\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes\tau_{n})(A\times B)=\gamma_{c^{(n)}}(\delta_{n}^{-1}(A))\,\tau_{n}(B)=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}(A)\,\tau_{n}(B),

and the rectangle principle (P4) gives (Δn)#(γc(n)⊗τn)=γ~n⊗τn(\Delta_{n})_{\#}(\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes\tau_{n})=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n}. By (P1), Ψn(Δn(u,w))=pn∗(δn−1(δn(u)))+w=pn∗(u)+w=Φn(u,w)\Psi_{n}(\Delta_{n}(u,w))=p_{n}^{*}(\delta_{n}^{-1}(\delta_{n}(u)))+w=p_{n}^{*}(u)+w=\Phi_{n}(u,w), with Φn\Phi_{n} the map of Head and Tail of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space are Independent. Since τn=(Qn)#γc\tau_{n}=(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} (A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §tails), The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension, the composition rule for push-forwards and Head and Tail of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space are Independent §synthesis give

En(γ~n)=(Ψn)#(γ~n⊗τn)=(Ψn)#((Δn)#(γc(n)⊗τn))=(Ψn∘Δn)#(γc(n)⊗τn)=(Φn)#(γc(n)⊗τn)=(Φn)#(γc(n)⊗(Qn)#γc)=γc.E_{n}(\tilde{\gamma}_{n})=(\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n})=(\Psi_{n})_{\#}\bigl((\Delta_{n})_{\#}(\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes\tau_{n})\bigr)=(\Psi_{n}\circ\Delta_{n})_{\#}(\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes\tau_{n})=(\Phi_{n})_{\#}(\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes\tau_{n})=(\Phi_{n})_{\#}\bigl(\gamma_{c^{(n)}}\otimes(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}\bigr)=\gamma_{c}.

Step 3 (Claim 3). Let λ∈P(Rn)\lambda\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and B∈B(Rn)B\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), and let G=Ψn−1(rn−1(B))G=\Psi_{n}^{-1}(r_{n}^{-1}(B)), a measurable set since rnr_{n} is Borel (Lifting Euclidean Tangent Fields of the Rescaled Head to Noise Tangent Fields on a Hilbert Space §head). By (P3), G∩(Rn×X0)=B×X0G\cap(\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X_{0})=B\times X_{0}, and the rest of GG lies in the (λ⊗τn)(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})-null set Rn×(X∖X0)\mathbb{R}^{n}\times(X\setminus X_{0}) of (P4). Hence

(rn)#En(λ)(B)=(λ⊗τn)(G)=(λ⊗τn)(B×X0)=λ(B) τn(X0)=λ(B).(r_{n})_{\#}E_{n}(\lambda)(B)=(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})(G)=(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})(B\times X_{0})=\lambda(B)\,\tau_{n}(X_{0})=\lambda(B).

Step 4 (Claim 4). By (P3), Qn∘Ψn=Qn∘prXQ_{n}\circ\Psi_{n}=Q_{n}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{X} on Rn×X\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X. Hence, by The Gaussian-Tail Extension of a Probability Measure on the Rescaled Head §extension, the composition rule for push-forwards, (P4) and (P2),

(Qn)#En(λ)=(Qn∘Ψn)#(λ⊗τn)=(Qn∘prX)#(λ⊗τn)=(Qn)#((prX)#(λ⊗τn))=(Qn)#τn=(Qn∘Qn)#γc=(Qn)#γc=τn.(Q_{n})_{\#}E_{n}(\lambda)=(Q_{n}\circ\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})=(Q_{n}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{X})_{\#}(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})=(Q_{n})_{\#}\bigl((\mathrm{pr}_{X})_{\#}(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})\bigr)=(Q_{n})_{\#}\tau_{n}=(Q_{n}\circ Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\tau_{n}.

Step 5 (Claim 5). Let λ∈P2(Rn)\lambda\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). For (u,w)∈Rn×X(u,w)\in\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X, (P1), the triangle inequality and ∣pn∗(y)∣=∥y∥|p_{n}^{*}(y)|=\lVert y\rVert (Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity) give ∣Ψn(u,w)∣≤∥δn−1(u)∥+∣w∣|\Psi_{n}(u,w)|\le\lVert\delta_{n}^{-1}(u)\rVert+|w|, and ∥δn−1(u)∥2=∑k=1nakuk2≤aˉ∥u∥2\lVert\delta_{n}^{-1}(u)\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}u_{k}^{2}\le\bar{a}\lVert u\rVert^{2} with aˉ\bar{a} of Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §weights; since (s+t)2≤2s2+2t2(s+t)^{2}\le2s^{2}+2t^{2},

∣Ψn(u,w)∣2≤2aˉ∥u∥2+2∣w∣2.|\Psi_{n}(u,w)|^{2}\le2\bar{a}\lVert u\rVert^{2}+2|w|^{2}.

By the transfer formula, monotonicity and additivity of the integral of nonnegative functions (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative), and the transfer formula again with the projections of (P4),

M2(En(λ))=∫∣Ψn∣2 d(λ⊗τn)≤2aˉ∫Rn∥u∥2 λ(du)+2∫X∣w∣2 τn(dw),M_{2}(E_{n}(\lambda))=\int|\Psi_{n}|^{2}\,d(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})\le2\bar{a}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\lVert u\rVert^{2}\,\lambda(du)+2\int_{X}|w|^{2}\,\tau_{n}(dw),

with M2M_{2} of The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §moment; here x↦∣x∣2x\mapsto|x|^{2} on XX is Borel by The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment, so ∣Ψn∣2|\Psi_{n}|^{2} and (u,w)↦∣w∣2(u,w)\mapsto|w|^{2} are measurable as composites with the measurable maps Ψn\Psi_{n} and prX\mathrm{pr}_{X}, and u↦∥u∥2u\mapsto\lVert u\rVert^{2} on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions, so (u,w)↦∥u∥2(u,w)\mapsto\lVert u\rVert^{2} is measurable as its composite with prRn\mathrm{pr}_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}. The first integral is finite as λ∈P2(Rn)\lambda\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) (The Second Moment of a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space); the second equals ∫∣Qnx∣2 γc(dx)≤M2(γc)<∞\int|Q_{n}x|^{2}\,\gamma_{c}(dx)\le M_{2}(\gamma_{c})<\infty, by the transfer formula, ∣Qnx∣≤∣x∣|Q_{n}x|\le|x| (Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity) and γc∈P2(X)\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X). So En(λ)∈P2(X)E_{n}(\lambda)\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by The Second Moment of a Borel Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space and the Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment §space.

Step 6 (Claim 6). Let ff be a density of λ\lambda with respect to γ~n\tilde{\gamma}_{n}. Then f∘rnf\circ r_{n} is Borel and nonnegative. By (P5), with α=γ~n\alpha=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}, α′=λ\alpha'=\lambda, β=β′=τn\beta=\beta'=\tau_{n} and g=1g=1, the function (u,w)↦f(u)(u,w)\mapsto f(u) is a density of λ⊗τn\lambda\otimes\tau_{n} with respect to γ~n⊗τn\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n}. Let B∈B(X)B\in\mathcal{B}(X). For w∈X0w\in X_{0}, (P3) gives 1B(Ψn(u,w))f(u)=(1B⋅(f∘rn))(Ψn(u,w))\mathbf{1}_{B}(\Psi_{n}(u,w))f(u)=\bigl(\mathbf{1}_{B}\cdot(f\circ r_{n})\bigr)(\Psi_{n}(u,w)), so the two sides agree (γ~n⊗τn)(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n})-almost everywhere by (P4). Hence, by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison, the transfer formula and Step 2,

En(λ)(B)=∫1B(Ψn(u,w)) f(u) (γ~n⊗τn)(du dw)=∫(1B⋅(f∘rn))∘Ψn d(γ~n⊗τn)=∫X1B (f∘rn) dγc.E_{n}(\lambda)(B)=\int\mathbf{1}_{B}(\Psi_{n}(u,w))\,f(u)\,(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n})(du\,dw)=\int\bigl(\mathbf{1}_{B}\cdot(f\circ r_{n})\bigr)\circ\Psi_{n}\,d(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n})=\int_{X}\mathbf{1}_{B}\,(f\circ r_{n})\,d\gamma_{c}.

So f∘rnf\circ r_{n} is a density of En(λ)E_{n}(\lambda) with respect to γc\gamma_{c}.

Step 7 (Claim 7). Suppose first that λ\lambda has finite relative entropy with respect to γ~n\tilde{\gamma}_{n}, with a density ff such that ϕ∘f\phi\circ f is integrable with respect to γ~n\tilde{\gamma}_{n}. By Step 6, f∘rnf\circ r_{n} is a density of En(λ)E_{n}(\lambda) with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, and ϕ∘(f∘rn)=(ϕ∘f)∘rn\phi\circ(f\circ r_{n})=(\phi\circ f)\circ r_{n}. Since (rn)#γc=γ~n(r_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\tilde{\gamma}_{n} (Step 1), the transfer formula shows that (ϕ∘f)∘rn(\phi\circ f)\circ r_{n} is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} with ∫(ϕ∘f)∘rn dγc=∫ϕ∘f dγ~n\int(\phi\circ f)\circ r_{n}\,d\gamma_{c}=\int\phi\circ f\,d\tilde{\gamma}_{n}. By Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy, En(λ)E_{n}(\lambda) has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c} and H(En(λ) ∣ γc)=H(λ ∣ γ~n)H(E_{n}(\lambda)\,|\,\gamma_{c})=H(\lambda\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n}). Conversely, suppose En(λ)E_{n}(\lambda) has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}. By Relative Entropy on a Measurable Space: the Gibbs Inequality, the Variational Criterion and Formula, the Entropy Inequality, Small Sets and Data Processing §data-processing with the Borel map T=rnT=r_{n}, the measure (rn)#En(λ)(r_{n})_{\#}E_{n}(\lambda), which is λ\lambda by Step 3, has finite relative entropy with respect to (rn)#γc(r_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c}, which is γ~n\tilde{\gamma}_{n} by Step 1. The equality of the two entropies then follows from the first part.

Step 8 (Claim 8). As recorded in claim 8, γ~n⊗σ\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\sigma is the product measure of Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure, a probability measure since (γ~n⊗σ)(Rn×X)=γ~n(Rn) σ(X)=1(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\sigma)(\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X)=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\,\sigma(X)=1; so (P4) and (P5) apply to it. Let fσf_{\sigma} be a density of σ\sigma with respect to τn\tau_{n} with ϕ∘fσ\phi\circ f_{\sigma} integrable with respect to τn\tau_{n}. By (P5), with α=α′=γ~n\alpha=\alpha'=\tilde{\gamma}_{n}, f=1f=1, β=τn\beta=\tau_{n}, β′=σ\beta'=\sigma and g=fσg=f_{\sigma}, the function F=fσ∘prXF=f_{\sigma}\circ\mathrm{pr}_{X} is a density of γ~n⊗σ\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\sigma with respect to γ~n⊗τn\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n}. Since ϕ∘F=(ϕ∘fσ)∘prX\phi\circ F=(\phi\circ f_{\sigma})\circ\mathrm{pr}_{X} and (prX)#(γ~n⊗τn)=τn(\mathrm{pr}_{X})_{\#}(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n})=\tau_{n} by (P4), the transfer formula shows that ϕ∘F\phi\circ F is integrable with respect to γ~n⊗τn\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n} with integral ∫ϕ∘fσ dτn\int\phi\circ f_{\sigma}\,d\tau_{n}. So, on the measurable space (Rn×X,B(Rn)⊗B(X))(\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X,\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X)), γ~n⊗σ\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\sigma has finite relative entropy with respect to γ~n⊗τn\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n} and H(γ~n⊗σ ∣ γ~n⊗τn)=H(σ ∣ τn)H(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\sigma\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n})=H(\sigma\,|\,\tau_{n}) (Relative Entropy of Probability Measures §relative-entropy). By Relative Entropy on a Measurable Space: the Gibbs Inequality, the Variational Criterion and Formula, the Entropy Inequality, Small Sets and Data Processing §data-processing with the Borel map T=ΨnT=\Psi_{n}, and since (Ψn)#(γ~n⊗τn)=En(γ~n)=γc(\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n})=E_{n}(\tilde{\gamma}_{n})=\gamma_{c} by Step 2, the measure (Ψn)#(γ~n⊗σ)(\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\sigma) has finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c} and

H((Ψn)#(γ~n⊗σ) ∣ γc)≤H(γ~n⊗σ ∣ γ~n⊗τn)=H(σ ∣ τn).H\bigl((\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\sigma)\,\big|\,\gamma_{c}\bigr)\le H(\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\sigma\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n}\otimes\tau_{n})=H(\sigma\,|\,\tau_{n}).

Step 9 (Claim 9). Let μ∈P(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X) have finite relative entropy with respect to γc\gamma_{c}, and let m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}. By Relative Entropy of the Finite-Dimensional Projections of Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space: Monotonicity and Approximation §projections, applied with γ=γc\gamma=\gamma_{c}, for which (pm)#γc=γc(m)(p_{m})_{\#}\gamma_{c}=\gamma_{c^{(m)}} by Diagonal Gaussian Measures on a Hilbert Space §measure, the measure (pm)#μ(p_{m})_{\#}\mu has finite relative entropy with respect to γc(m)\gamma_{c^{(m)}}. By Step 1 at level mm, δm\delta_{m} and δm−1\delta_{m}^{-1} are Borel and (δm)#γc(m)=γ~m(\delta_{m})_{\#}\gamma_{c^{(m)}}=\tilde{\gamma}_{m}, hence also (δm−1)#γ~m=γc(m)(\delta_{m}^{-1})_{\#}\tilde{\gamma}_{m}=\gamma_{c^{(m)}}; moreover μ~m=(rm)#μ=(δm)#((pm)#μ)\tilde{\mu}_{m}=(r_{m})_{\#}\mu=(\delta_{m})_{\#}((p_{m})_{\#}\mu) and so (δm−1)#μ~m=(pm)#μ(\delta_{m}^{-1})_{\#}\tilde{\mu}_{m}=(p_{m})_{\#}\mu. By Relative Entropy on a Measurable Space: the Gibbs Inequality, the Variational Criterion and Formula, the Entropy Inequality, Small Sets and Data Processing §data-processing with T=δmT=\delta_{m}, μ~m\tilde{\mu}_{m} has finite relative entropy with respect to γ~m\tilde{\gamma}_{m} and H(μ~m ∣ γ~m)≤H((pm)#μ ∣ γc(m))H(\tilde{\mu}_{m}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{m})\le H((p_{m})_{\#}\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c^{(m)}}); by the same claim with T=δm−1T=\delta_{m}^{-1}, H((pm)#μ ∣ γc(m))≤H(μ~m ∣ γ~m)H((p_{m})_{\#}\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c^{(m)}})\le H(\tilde{\mu}_{m}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{m}). Hence H(μ~m ∣ γ~m)=H((pm)#μ ∣ γc(m))H(\tilde{\mu}_{m}\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{m})=H((p_{m})_{\#}\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c^{(m)}}) for every mm, and by Relative Entropy of the Finite-Dimensional Projections of Borel Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space: Monotonicity and Approximation §limit, again with γ=γc\gamma=\gamma_{c}, this sequence is nondecreasing and converges to H(μ ∣ γc)H(\mu\,|\,\gamma_{c}).

Step 10 (Claim 10). Let λ\lambda and g1,…,gng_{1},\dots,g_{n} be as in claim 10 and put μ=En(λ)\mu=E_{n}(\lambda), which lies in P2(X)\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) by Step 5. The integrals and inner products of L2(λ)L^{2}(\lambda) and L2(μ)L^{2}(\mu) are computed on representatives (The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Functions is a Real Hilbert Space §inner-product).

(a) Square-integrability. For k∈[n]k\in[n], gk∘rng_{k}\circ r_{n} is Borel, and by the transfer formula and Step 3, ∫(ak−1/2gk∘rn)2 dμ=ak−1∫gk2 dλ<∞\int(a_{k}^{-1/2}g_{k}\circ r_{n})^{2}\,d\mu=a_{k}^{-1}\int g_{k}^{2}\,d\lambda<\infty. If gk′g'_{k} is another Borel representative, then {gk∘rn≠gk′∘rn}=rn−1({gk≠gk′})\{g_{k}\circ r_{n}\ne g'_{k}\circ r_{n}\}=r_{n}^{-1}(\{g_{k}\ne g'_{k}\}) has μ\mu-measure λ({gk≠gk′})=0\lambda(\{g_{k}\ne g'_{k}\})=0 by Step 3. So the class ζk∈L2(μ)\zeta_{k}\in L^{2}(\mu) of ak−1/2(gk∘rn)a_{k}^{-1/2}(g_{k}\circ r_{n}) is well defined; put ζk=0\zeta_{k}=0 for k>nk>n. It remains to show, for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} and every φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X), that ⟨ζk,φ⟩L2(μ)=∫hk dμ\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}=\int h_{k}\,d\mu, where hk(x)=xkφ(x)/ck−∂kφ(x)h_{k}(x)=x_{k}\varphi(x)/c_{k}-\partial_{k}\varphi(x); then μ\mu has the relative score (ζk)k∈N(\zeta_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} by The Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §score.

(b) Setup. Fix φ∈FCb1(X)\varphi\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with a representation (N,ψ)(N,\psi), so ψ∈Cb1(RN)\psi\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{N}) and φ=ψ∘pN\varphi=\psi\circ p_{N}; let K≥0K\ge0 bound ∣φ∣|\varphi| (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §bounded-borel). By Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial, ∂kφ=(∂kψ)∘pN\partial_{k}\varphi=(\partial_{k}\psi)\circ p_{N} for k≤Nk\le N and ∂kφ=0\partial_{k}\varphi=0 for k>Nk>N. The function hkh_{k} is Borel (the coordinate x↦xkx\mapsto x_{k} is continuous by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, φ\varphi and ∂kφ\partial_{k}\varphi are Borel by Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §bounded-borel, and Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions applies) and is integrable with respect to μ\mu, as recorded in The Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space; by the transfer formula hk∘Ψnh_{k}\circ\Psi_{n} is integrable with respect to λ⊗τn\lambda\otimes\tau_{n} and ∫hk dμ=∫hk∘Ψn d(λ⊗τn)\int h_{k}\,d\mu=\int h_{k}\circ\Psi_{n}\,d(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n}).

(c) The sections φw\varphi_{w}. For w∈Xw\in X let Aw:Rn→RNA_{w}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R}^{N} have jj-th component Ψn(u,w)j\Psi_{n}(u,w)_{j}, that is, u↦aj1/2uj+wju\mapsto a_{j}^{1/2}u_{j}+w_{j} for j≤min⁡(n,N)j\le\min(n,N) and the constant wjw_{j} for n<j≤Nn<j\le N (P1); thus pN(Ψn(u,w))=Aw(u)p_{N}(\Psi_{n}(u,w))=A_{w}(u), and φw(u):=φ(Ψn(u,w))=ψ(Aw(u))\varphi_{w}(u):=\varphi(\Psi_{n}(u,w))=\psi(A_{w}(u)). By (P6), with n′=nn'=n, sj=wjs_{j}=w_{j} and βj=aj1/2\beta_{j}=a_{j}^{1/2}, we have φw=ψ∘Aw∈Cb1(Rn)\varphi_{w}=\psi\circ A_{w}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), with ∂kφw(u)=ak1/2∂kψ(Aw(u))\partial_{k}\varphi_{w}(u)=a_{k}^{1/2}\partial_{k}\psi(A_{w}(u)) for k≤min⁡(n,N)k\le\min(n,N) and ∂kφw(u)=0\partial_{k}\varphi_{w}(u)=0 for N<k≤nN<k\le n. With the formula for ∂kφ\partial_{k}\varphi in (b), in all cases

∂kφw(u)=ak1/2 (∂kφ)(Ψn(u,w))(k∈[n], u∈Rn).\partial_{k}\varphi_{w}(u)=a_{k}^{1/2}\,(\partial_{k}\varphi)\bigl(\Psi_{n}(u,w)\bigr)\qquad(k\in[n],\ u\in\mathbb{R}^{n}).

(d) The case k∈[n]k\in[n]. For w∈X0w\in X_{0} we have wk=0w_{k}=0 (P2), so Ψn(u,w)k=ak1/2uk\Psi_{n}(u,w)_{k}=a_{k}^{1/2}u_{k}, and with (c) and ak1/2/ck=ak−1/2/c~ka_{k}^{1/2}/c_{k}=a_{k}^{-1/2}/\tilde{c}_{k}, where c~k=ck/ak\tilde{c}_{k}=c_{k}/a_{k} is the kk-th entry of c~(n)\tilde{c}^{(n)},

hk(Ψn(u,w))=ak−1/2(ukc~k φw(u)−∂kφw(u))(u∈Rn, w∈X0).h_{k}\bigl(\Psi_{n}(u,w)\bigr)=a_{k}^{-1/2}\Bigl(\frac{u_{k}}{\tilde{c}_{k}}\,\varphi_{w}(u)-\partial_{k}\varphi_{w}(u)\Bigr)\qquad(u\in\mathbb{R}^{n},\ w\in X_{0}).

By Fubini's theorem, integrating first in uu, there is a τn\tau_{n}-null set N1∈B(X)N_{1}\in\mathcal{B}(X) off which u↦hk(Ψn(u,w))u\mapsto h_{k}(\Psi_{n}(u,w)) is λ\lambda-integrable, and ∫hk dμ=∫XI dτn\int h_{k}\,d\mu=\int_{X}I\,d\tau_{n}, where I(w)=∫hk(Ψn(u,w)) λ(du)I(w)=\int h_{k}(\Psi_{n}(u,w))\,\lambda(du) off N1N_{1} and I=0I=0 on N1N_{1}. Apply Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions with d=nd=n, the variance vector c~(n)\tilde{c}^{(n)} and ν=λ\nu=\lambda, which lies in P2(Rn)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) and has finite Fisher information relative to γ~n\tilde{\gamma}_{n}: by Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions §agreement the component (ζλc~(n))k(\zeta^{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}_{\lambda})_{k}, of which gkg_{k} is a representative, satisfies the identity of Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions §componentwise for every function in Cb1(Rn)C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), in particular for φw\varphi_{w}. Hence for w∈X0∖N1w\in X_{0}\setminus N_{1}

I(w)=ak−1/2∫Rn(ukc~kφw(u)−∂kφw(u))λ(du)=ak−1/2∫Rngk(u) φ(Ψn(u,w)) λ(du)=:J(w).I(w)=a_{k}^{-1/2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Bigl(\frac{u_{k}}{\tilde{c}_{k}}\varphi_{w}(u)-\partial_{k}\varphi_{w}(u)\Bigr)\lambda(du)=a_{k}^{-1/2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g_{k}(u)\,\varphi(\Psi_{n}(u,w))\,\lambda(du)=:J(w).

Now let G(u,w)=ak−1/2gk(u)φ(Ψn(u,w))G(u,w)=a_{k}^{-1/2}g_{k}(u)\varphi(\Psi_{n}(u,w)), measurable on Rn×X\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X. Since ∣G(u,w)∣≤ak−1/2K∣gk(u)∣≤ak−1/2K(1+gk(u)2)/2|G(u,w)|\le a_{k}^{-1/2}K|g_{k}(u)|\le a_{k}^{-1/2}K(1+g_{k}(u)^{2})/2, monotonicity of the integral and the transfer formula along prRn\mathrm{pr}_{\mathbb{R}^{n}} (P4) give ∫∣G∣ d(λ⊗τn)≤ak−1/2K(1+∫gk2 dλ)/2<∞\int|G|\,d(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})\le a_{k}^{-1/2}K(1+\int g_{k}^{2}\,d\lambda)/2<\infty, so GG is integrable. By Fubini's theorem again, there is a τn\tau_{n}-null set N2N_{2} off which u↦G(u,w)u\mapsto G(u,w) is λ\lambda-integrable (so J(w)J(w) is defined), and ∫G d(λ⊗τn)=∫XJ′ dτn\int G\,d(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})=\int_{X}J'\,d\tau_{n} with J′=JJ'=J off N2N_{2} and J′=0J'=0 on N2N_{2}. The functions II and J′J' agree on X0∖(N1∪N2)X_{0}\setminus(N_{1}\cup N_{2}), whose complement is τn\tau_{n}-null by (P2) and The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §null-union; so ∫hk dμ=∫G d(λ⊗τn)\int h_{k}\,d\mu=\int G\,d(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n}) by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison. Finally, by (P3), G=(ak−1/2(gk∘rn) φ)∘ΨnG=\bigl(a_{k}^{-1/2}(g_{k}\circ r_{n})\,\varphi\bigr)\circ\Psi_{n} at every (u,w)(u,w) with w∈X0w\in X_{0}, hence (λ⊗τn)(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})-almost everywhere (P4); by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison and the transfer formula,

∫Xhk dμ=∫Xak−1/2(gk∘rn) φ dμ=⟨ζk,φ⟩L2(μ).\int_{X}h_{k}\,d\mu=\int_{X}a_{k}^{-1/2}(g_{k}\circ r_{n})\,\varphi\,d\mu=\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}.

(e) The case k>nk>n. Fix u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n} and let Bu:RN→RNB_{u}:\mathbb{R}^{N}\to\mathbb{R}^{N} have jj-th component the constant aj1/2uja_{j}^{1/2}u_{j} for j≤min⁡(n,N)j\le\min(n,N) and y↦yjy\mapsto y_{j} for n<j≤Nn<j\le N. For x∈Xx\in X, Qnx∈X0Q_{n}x\in X_{0} and (Qnx)j=xj−pn∗(pn(x))j=xj(Q_{n}x)_{j}=x_{j}-p_{n}^{*}(p_{n}(x))_{j}=x_{j} for j>nj>n (P2), so by (P1) Ψn(u,Qnx)j=aj1/2uj\Psi_{n}(u,Q_{n}x)_{j}=a_{j}^{1/2}u_{j} for j≤nj\le n and Ψn(u,Qnx)j=xj\Psi_{n}(u,Q_{n}x)_{j}=x_{j} for j>nj>n. Hence pN(Ψn(u,Qnx))=Bu(pN(x))p_{N}(\Psi_{n}(u,Q_{n}x))=B_{u}(p_{N}(x)) and

φu(x):=φ(Ψn(u,Qnx))=(ψ∘Bu)(pN(x)).\varphi^{u}(x):=\varphi\bigl(\Psi_{n}(u,Q_{n}x)\bigr)=(\psi\circ B_{u})\bigl(p_{N}(x)\bigr).

By (P6), with n′=Nn'=N, sj=aj1/2ujs_{j}=a_{j}^{1/2}u_{j} and βj=0\beta_{j}=0 for j≤min⁡(n,N)j\le\min(n,N), and sj=0s_{j}=0 and βj=1\beta_{j}=1 for n<j≤Nn<j\le N, we have ψ∘Bu∈Cb1(RN)\psi\circ B_{u}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{N}) with ∂k(ψ∘Bu)=(∂kψ)∘Bu\partial_{k}(\psi\circ B_{u})=(\partial_{k}\psi)\circ B_{u} for n<k≤Nn<k\le N; so φu∈FCb1(X)\varphi^{u}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with representation (N,ψ∘Bu)(N,\psi\circ B_{u}) (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical). For k>nk>n, Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial applied to φu\varphi^{u} and to φ\varphi gives ∂kφu(x)=∂kψ(Bu(pN(x)))=(∂kφ)(Ψn(u,Qnx))\partial_{k}\varphi^{u}(x)=\partial_{k}\psi(B_{u}(p_{N}(x)))=(\partial_{k}\varphi)(\Psi_{n}(u,Q_{n}x)) if k≤Nk\le N, and both sides vanish if k>Nk>N; also xk=Ψn(u,Qnx)kx_{k}=\Psi_{n}(u,Q_{n}x)_{k}. Therefore

hk(Ψn(u,Qnx))=xkck φu(x)−∂kφu(x)(x∈X).h_{k}\bigl(\Psi_{n}(u,Q_{n}x)\bigr)=\frac{x_{k}}{c_{k}}\,\varphi^{u}(x)-\partial_{k}\varphi^{u}(x)\qquad(x\in X).

By The Relative Score on a Hilbert Space: the Gaussian Measure Has Score Zero, and the Score as a Square-Integrable Field in the Weighted Sequence Space §gaussian, γc∈P2(X)\gamma_{c}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(X) has a relative score with respect to γc\gamma_{c} whose components are all zero; by The Relative Score with Respect to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §score applied to γc\gamma_{c} and φu\varphi^{u}, the right-hand side is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} with integral ⟨0,φu⟩L2(γc)=0\langle0,\varphi^{u}\rangle_{L^{2}(\gamma_{c})}=0. The function w↦hk(Ψn(u,w))w\mapsto h_{k}(\Psi_{n}(u,w)) is Borel (claim 3 of Sections of Product-Measurable Sets and Maps Are Measurable, and Insertion Maps into Products Are Measurable), so by the transfer formula with τn=(Qn)#γc\tau_{n}=(Q_{n})_{\#}\gamma_{c} it is τn\tau_{n}-integrable with ∫Xhk(Ψn(u,w)) τn(dw)=0\int_{X}h_{k}(\Psi_{n}(u,w))\,\tau_{n}(dw)=0, for every u∈Rnu\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. By Fubini's theorem, integrating first in ww, ∫hk dμ=∫hk∘Ψn d(λ⊗τn)=0=⟨ζk,φ⟩L2(μ)\int h_{k}\,d\mu=\int h_{k}\circ\Psi_{n}\,d(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})=0=\langle\zeta_{k},\varphi\rangle_{L^{2}(\mu)}.

By (d) and (e), μ=En(λ)\mu=E_{n}(\lambda) has the relative score (ζk)k∈N(\zeta_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} with respect to γc\gamma_{c} described in claim 10.

Step 11 (Claim 11). In the situation of Step 10, for k∈[n]k\in[n] the transfer formula and Step 3 give

ak∥ζk∥L2(μ)2=ak ak−1∫X(gk∘rn)2 dμ=∫Rngk2 dλ=∥(ζλc~(n))k∥L2(λ)2,a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2}=a_{k}\,a_{k}^{-1}\int_{X}(g_{k}\circ r_{n})^{2}\,d\mu=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g_{k}^{2}\,d\lambda=\bigl\lVert(\zeta^{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}_{\lambda})_{k}\bigr\rVert_{L^{2}(\lambda)}^{2},

and ak∥ζk∥L2(μ)2=0a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2}=0 for k>nk>n. So the partial sums of the series ∑k=1∞ak∥ζk∥L2(μ)2\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k}\lVert\zeta_{k}\rVert_{L^{2}(\mu)}^{2} are constant from the index nn on; the series converges, μ\mu has finite Fisher information relative to γc\gamma_{c} with weights aa (Weight Sequences and the Weighted Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space §information), and by Finite Fisher Information Relative to a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on Euclidean Space as Componentwise Integration by Parts against Bounded C^1 Functions §agreement

Ia(En(λ) ∣ γc)=∑k=1n∥(ζλc~(n))k∥L2(λ)2=I(λ ∣ γ~n).\mathcal{I}_{a}(E_{n}(\lambda)\,|\,\gamma_{c})=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\bigl\lVert(\zeta^{\tilde{c}^{(n)}}_{\lambda})_{k}\bigr\rVert_{L^{2}(\lambda)}^{2}=\mathcal{I}(\lambda\,|\,\tilde{\gamma}_{n}).

Step 12 (Claim 12). (a) A coupling. Let λ,λ′∈P2(Rn)\lambda,\lambda'\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}). By Existence of an Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment (with m=nm=n) there is a coupling π∈P(Rn+n)\pi\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{n+n}) of λ\lambda and λ′\lambda' with quadratic cost I(π)=W2(λ,λ′)2I(\pi)=W_{2}(\lambda,\lambda')^{2}. Let pr1,pr2:Rn+n→Rn\mathrm{pr}_{1},\mathrm{pr}_{2}:\mathbb{R}^{n+n}\to\mathbb{R}^{n} be the Borel projections of Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §projections, and equip Rn+n×X\mathbb{R}^{n+n}\times X with B(Rn+n)⊗B(X)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{n+n})\otimes\mathcal{B}(X) and the product measure π⊗τn\pi\otimes\tau_{n} (Existence and Uniqueness of the Product Measure). For i=1,2i=1,2 let Li(z,w)=(pri(z),w)L_{i}(z,w)=(\mathrm{pr}_{i}(z),w), a measurable map into Rn×X\mathbb{R}^{n}\times X by claim 1 of Pairings into a Product, the Graph of a Measurable Map, and Couplings Concentrated on a Graph and claim 5 of Sections of Product-Measurable Sets and Maps Are Measurable, and Insertion Maps into Products Are Measurable. Since L1−1(A×B)=pr1−1(A)×BL_{1}^{-1}(A\times B)=\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(A)\times B has (π⊗τn)(\pi\otimes\tau_{n})-measure π(pr1−1(A))τn(B)=λ(A)τn(B)\pi(\mathrm{pr}_{1}^{-1}(A))\tau_{n}(B)=\lambda(A)\tau_{n}(B), the rectangle principle (P4) gives (L1)#(π⊗τn)=λ⊗τn(L_{1})_{\#}(\pi\otimes\tau_{n})=\lambda\otimes\tau_{n}, and likewise (L2)#(π⊗τn)=λ′⊗τn(L_{2})_{\#}(\pi\otimes\tau_{n})=\lambda'\otimes\tau_{n}. Let S=Ψn∘L1S=\Psi_{n}\circ L_{1} and T=Ψn∘L2T=\Psi_{n}\circ L_{2}, measurable maps into XX; the map (S,T)(S,T) into X×XX\times X is measurable by Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §pairing, and Π=(S,T)#(π⊗τn)∈P(X×X)\Pi=(S,T)_{\#}(\pi\otimes\tau_{n})\in\mathcal{P}(X\times X). With the coordinate maps π1,π2\pi_{1},\pi_{2} of Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §pairs,

(π1)#Π=S#(π⊗τn)=(Ψn)#(λ⊗τn)=En(λ),(π2)#Π=En(λ′),(\pi_{1})_{\#}\Pi=S_{\#}(\pi\otimes\tau_{n})=(\Psi_{n})_{\#}(\lambda\otimes\tau_{n})=E_{n}(\lambda),\qquad(\pi_{2})_{\#}\Pi=E_{n}(\lambda'),

so Π\Pi is a coupling of En(λ)E_{n}(\lambda) and En(λ′)E_{n}(\lambda').

(b) Its noise cost. For (z,w)∈Rn+n×X(z,w)\in\mathbb{R}^{n+n}\times X put t=pr2(z)−pr1(z)t=\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z). By (P1), T(z,w)−S(z,w)=h:=∑k=1nak1/2tkekT(z,w)-S(z,w)=h:=\sum_{k=1}^{n}a_{k}^{1/2}t_{k}e_{k}, whose coordinates are hk=ak1/2tkh_{k}=a_{k}^{1/2}t_{k} for k∈[n]k\in[n] and hk=0h_{k}=0 for k>nk>n. So the terms ak−1hk2a_{k}^{-1}h_{k}^{2} equal tk2t_{k}^{2} for k∈[n]k\in[n] and 00 for k>nk>n; the series ∑kak−1hk2\sum_{k}a_{k}^{-1}h_{k}^{2} converges with sum ∥t∥2\lVert t\rVert^{2}, so h∈Xah\in X^{a} and ∣h∣a2=∥t∥2|h|_{a}^{2}=\lVert t\rVert^{2} by The Noise Space of a Weight Sequence on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §space and The Noise Space of a Weight Sequence on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §inner-product. Hence (S,T)(z,w)(S,T)(z,w) lies in the set DaD_{a} of The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §pairs for every (z,w)(z,w), and ca((S,T)(z,w))=∣h∣a2=∥pr1(z)−pr2(z)∥2c_{a}((S,T)(z,w))=|h|_{a}^{2}=\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert^{2} by the definition of cac_{a} and nan_{a} there and in The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §borel. Therefore Π(Da)=(π⊗τn)(Rn+n×X)=1\Pi(D_{a})=(\pi\otimes\tau_{n})(\mathbb{R}^{n+n}\times X)=1, and by the transfer formula (once along (S,T)(S,T), once along the projection onto Rn+n\mathbb{R}^{n+n}, whose image of π⊗τn\pi\otimes\tau_{n} is π\pi by (P4) with Y=Rn+nY=\mathbb{R}^{n+n}; the function z↦∥pr1(z)−pr2(z)∥2z\mapsto\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert^{2} on Rn+n\mathbb{R}^{n+n} is Borel by Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions) and Couplings of Two Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Their Quadratic Cost §cost,

∫X×Xca dΠ=∫∥pr1(z)−pr2(z)∥2 (π⊗τn)(dz dw)=∫Rn+n∥pr1(z)−pr2(z)∥2 π(dz)=I(π)=W2(λ,λ′)2<∞.\int_{X\times X}c_{a}\,d\Pi=\int\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert^{2}\,(\pi\otimes\tau_{n})(dz\,dw)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n+n}}\lVert\mathrm{pr}_{1}(z)-\mathrm{pr}_{2}(z)\rVert^{2}\,\pi(dz)=I(\pi)=W_{2}(\lambda,\lambda')^{2}<\infty .

So Π∈Πa(En(λ),En(λ′))\Pi\in\Pi^{a}(E_{n}(\lambda),E_{n}(\lambda')) with noise cost Ia(Π)=W2(λ,λ′)2I^{a}(\Pi)=W_{2}(\lambda,\lambda')^{2} (Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §finite, Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §cost, Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §couplings), and the ordered pair (En(λ),En(λ′))(E_{n}(\lambda),E_{n}(\lambda')) is noise-connected (Couplings of Finite Noise Cost and Their Noise Cost §connected).

(c) Conclusion. Applying (a) and (b) with λ′\lambda' replaced by γ~n\tilde{\gamma}_{n}, which lies in P2(Rn)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) by Step 1 and satisfies En(γ~n)=γc=ρE_{n}(\tilde{\gamma}_{n})=\gamma_{c}=\rho by Step 2 and A Diagonal Gaussian Reference Measure on the Noise Wasserstein Space, Rescaled Heads and Gaussian Tails: Standing Notation §gaussian, the pair (En(λ),ρ)(E_{n}(\lambda),\rho) is noise-connected, so En(λ)∈PρaE_{n}(\lambda)\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho} by The Measures Noise-Connected to the Reference Measure §space; likewise En(λ′)∈PρaE_{n}(\lambda')\in\mathcal{P}^{a}_{\rho}. Since (En(λ),En(λ′))(E_{n}(\lambda),E_{n}(\lambda')) is noise-connected, The Noise Wasserstein Distance §distance gives Wa(En(λ),En(λ′))2≤Ia(Π)=W2(λ,λ′)2W_{a}(E_{n}(\lambda),E_{n}(\lambda'))^{2}\le I^{a}(\Pi)=W_{2}(\lambda,\lambda')^{2}, and as both distances are nonnegative,

Wa(En(λ),En(λ′))≤W2(λ,λ′).W_{a}\bigl(E_{n}(\lambda),E_{n}(\lambda')\bigr)\le W_{2}(\lambda,\lambda').

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…