TheoremBase

Proof

Order arithmetic is that of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, absolute values have the properties of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and 2=1+12=1+1. Note that dR(f(z),f(x))=∣f(z)−f(x)∣d_{\mathbb{R}}(f(z),f(x))=|f(z)-f(x)| throughout.

If KK is empty, take θ=1\theta=1, which is positive by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; the assertion holds vacuously. So assume KK is nonempty.

Let η∈R\eta\in\mathbb{R} with 0<η0<\eta and put η′=η⋅2−1\eta'=\eta\cdot 2^{-1}, so that 0<η′0<\eta' and η′+η′=η\eta'+\eta'=\eta by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Step 1 (a cover indexed by pairs). For x∈Kx\in K let

Gx={τ∈R:0<τ, and every z∈Ω with d(x,z)<τ satisfies ∣f(z)−f(x)∣<η′}.G_{x}=\{\tau\in\mathbb{R}: 0<\tau\text{, and every }z\in\Omega\text{ with }d(x,z)<\tau\text{ satisfies }|f(z)-f(x)|<\eta'\}.

Since x∈K⊆Ωx\in K\subseteq\Omega and ff is continuous at xx relative to Ω\Omega, that definition applied with η′\eta' provides an element of GxG_{x}; hence GxG_{x} is nonempty.

Let I={(x,τ):x∈K and τ∈Gx}I=\{(x,\tau): x\in K\text{ and }\tau\in G_{x}\}, and for i=(x,τ)∈Ii=(x,\tau)\in I put Wi=Bd(x,τ⋅2−1)W_{i}=B_{d}(x,\tau\cdot 2^{-1}), the open ball of centre xx and radius τ⋅2−1\tau\cdot 2^{-1}, which is positive by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Then (Wi)i∈I(W_{i})_{i\in I} is a family of subsets of XX, each WiW_{i} is open in (X,d)(X,d) by Open Ball in a Metric Space is Open, and every x∈Kx\in K lies in W(x,τ)W_{(x,\tau)} for any τ∈Gx\tau\in G_{x}, because d(x,x)=0<τ⋅2−1d(x,x)=0<\tau\cdot 2^{-1} by condition 2 of Metric Space. Hence (Wi)i∈I(W_{i})_{i\in I} is an open cover of KK in XX.

Step 2 (a finite subcover and a uniform radius). Since KK is compact in XX, Compact Subset Criterion via Open Covers in the Ambient Space provides a finite subset J⊆IJ\subseteq I with K⊆⋃j∈JWjK\subseteq\bigcup_{j\in J}W_{j}. As KK is nonempty and a union indexed by the empty set is empty, JJ is nonempty. By Finite Set the set JJ therefore has nn elements for some natural number nn; fix a bijection β:[n]→J\beta:[n]\to J from the initial segment [n][n] onto JJ, and for k∈[n]k\in[n] write β(k)=(wk,τk)\beta(k)=(w_{k},\tau_{k}).

Let cc be the nn-tuple in R\mathbb{R} with components ck=−(τk⋅2−1)c_{k}=-(\tau_{k}\cdot 2^{-1}). By Greatest Element of a Finite Family in a Totally Ordered Set, applied to the totally ordered set R\mathbb{R}, there is j∈[n]j\in[n] with ck≤cjc_{k}\le c_{j} for every k∈[n]k\in[n]; by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field this says

τj⋅2−1≤τk⋅2−1for every k∈[n].\tau_{j}\cdot 2^{-1}\le\tau_{k}\cdot 2^{-1}\qquad\text{for every }k\in[n].

Put θ=τj⋅2−1\theta=\tau_{j}\cdot 2^{-1}; then 0<θ0<\theta by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and θ≤τ⋅2−1\theta\le\tau\cdot 2^{-1} for every pair (w,τ)∈J(w,\tau)\in J, since β\beta is onto JJ.

Step 3 (the estimate). Let x∈Kx\in K and let z∈Ωz\in\Omega satisfy d(x,z)<θd(x,z)<\theta. By Step 2 there is j∈Jj\in J with x∈Wjx\in W_{j}; write j=(w,τ)j=(w,\tau), so that w∈Kw\in K, τ∈Gw\tau\in G_{w} and d(w,x)<τ⋅2−1d(w,x)<\tau\cdot 2^{-1}.

By condition 4 of Metric Space and claims 3 and 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

d(w,z)≤d(w,x)+d(x,z)<τ⋅2−1+θ≤τ⋅2−1+τ⋅2−1=τ,d(w,z)\le d(w,x)+d(x,z)<\tau\cdot 2^{-1}+\theta\le\tau\cdot 2^{-1}+\tau\cdot 2^{-1}=\tau ,

the last equality by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Since z∈Ωz\in\Omega and τ∈Gw\tau\in G_{w}, this gives ∣f(z)−f(w)∣<η′|f(z)-f(w)|<\eta'.

Likewise d(w,x)<τ⋅2−1<τd(w,x)<\tau\cdot 2^{-1}<\tau by claim 8, so d(w,x)<τd(w,x)<\tau by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; and x∈K⊆Ωx\in K\subseteq\Omega, so ∣f(x)−f(w)∣<η′|f(x)-f(w)|<\eta'.

Finally, by claims 5 and 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

∣f(z)−f(x)∣=∣(f(z)−f(w))+(f(w)−f(x))∣≤∣f(z)−f(w)∣+∣f(w)−f(x)∣<η′+η′=η.|f(z)-f(x)|=\bigl|\bigl(f(z)-f(w)\bigr)+\bigl(f(w)-f(x)\bigr)\bigr|\le|f(z)-f(w)|+|f(w)-f(x)|<\eta'+\eta'=\eta .

Since x∈Kx\in K and z∈Ωz\in\Omega with d(x,z)<θd(x,z)<\theta were arbitrary, θ\theta has the required property. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…