TheoremBase

Proof

Conventions. Identify k×kk\times k matrices with Rk2\mathbb{R}^{k^{2}}. From claims 1 and 2 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals: for matrices U,VU,V, ∣UV∣e≤k ∣U∣e∣V∣e|UV|_{e}\le k\,|U|_{e}|V|_{e} where ∣⋅∣e|\cdot|_{e} is the largest absolute entry, and ∣X∣e≤∣X∣≤k2∣X∣e|X|_{e}\le|X|\le k^{2}|X|_{e} for the Euclidean norm ∣X∣|X| on entries; moreover ∣X∣≤k ∣X∣e|X|\le k\,|X|_{e}, since ∣X∣2=∑ijXij2≤k2∣X∣e2|X|^{2}=\sum_{ij}X_{ij}^{2}\le k^{2}|X|_{e}^{2} and the nonnegative square root is monotone. Every closed subinterval [p,q][p,q] of [a,b][a,b] with p<qp<q is nonempty and is compact by Closed Interval [a,b][a,b] is Compact in R\mathbb{R}, so by Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Subset of a Metric Space every real-valued continuous function on [p,q][p,q] attains a maximum and a minimum and is in particular bounded; we use this repeatedly below. In particular, fix reals α,δ≥0\alpha,\delta\ge0 bounding all entries of A(t)A(t) and D(t)D(t) on [a,b][a,b]. Transpose manipulations use claim 3 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals. Set F(t,X)=A(t)X+XA(t)⊤−XD(t)X+C(t)F(t,X)=A(t)X+XA(t)^{\top}-XD(t)X+C(t).

Hypotheses of the a priori theorem. Composition continuity: entries of F(t,h(t))F(t,h(t)) are polynomial combinations of continuous real-valued functions (Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space). Local Lipschitz: for ∣X∣,∣Y∣≤R|X|,|Y|\le R, write XDX−YDY=(X−Y)DX+YD(X−Y)XDX-YDY=(X-Y)DX+YD(X-Y); every entry of the right side is bounded by 2k2δR ∣X−Y∣e2k^{2}\delta R\,|X-Y|_{e} (two products of three factors, entries of X,YX,Y bounded by RR), and the linear terms contribute at most 2kα ∣X−Y∣e2k\alpha\,|X-Y|_{e} per entry, so ∣F(t,X)−F(t,Y)∣≤k2 (2kα+2k2δR) ∣X−Y∣=:LR ∣X−Y∣|F(t,X)-F(t,Y)|\le k^{2}\,(2k\alpha+2k^{2}\delta R)\,|X-Y|=:L_R\,|X-Y|, using ∣X−Y∣e≤∣X−Y∣|X-Y|_{e}\le|X-Y|.

Properties of solutions on subintervals. Let a<c≤ba<c\le b and let hh be any continuous solution of the Riccati integral equation on [a,c][a,c], in the sense of the solution notion of A Priori Bounded Solutions of Locally Lipschitz Ordinary Differential Equations Exist Globally (whose statement records that the integrand is continuous on [a,c][a,c]).

(a) Uniqueness on [a,c][a,c]. If h,h~h,\widetilde h are two solutions on [a,c][a,c], choose RR with ∣h(t)∣≤R|h(t)|\le R and ∣h~(t)∣≤R|\widetilde h(t)|\le R on [a,c][a,c]: each entry is bounded by Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Subset of a Metric Space, and ∣X∣≤k ∣X∣e|X|\le k\,|X|_{e} converts entry bounds to Euclidean bounds. Subtracting the two integral equations and applying claim 5 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals (with p=k2p=k^{2}) and the Lipschitz estimate, u(t):=∣h(t)−h~(t)∣u(t):=|h(t)-\widetilde h(t)| satisfies u(t)≤k2LR∫atu(r) dru(t)\le k^{2}L_R\int_a^tu(r)\,dr on [a,c][a,c], and uu is continuous. By claim 7 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals (translation), uˉ(τ):=u(a+τ)\bar u(\tau):=u(a+\tau) is continuous on [0,c−a][0,c-a] and satisfies uˉ(τ)≤k2LR∫0τuˉ(σ) dσ\bar u(\tau)\le k^{2}L_R\int_0^{\tau}\bar u(\sigma)\,d\sigma. The interval [0,c−a][0,c-a] is nonempty, since a<ca<c, and compact by Closed Interval [a,b][a,b] is Compact in R\mathbb{R}. The function uˉ\bar u is continuous, hence bounded by Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Subset of a Metric Space and measurable by claim 4 of Measurability of Countable Suprema, Bounded Pointwise Limits, Monotone Functions, and Continuous Functions, and its Riemann integral over a subinterval of [0,c−a][0,c-a] agrees with the corresponding Lebesgue integral by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval. Applying Gronwall's Lemma for Bounded Measurable Functions on [0,c−a][0,c-a] with its constants taken to be 00 and k2LRk^{2}L_R gives uˉ≤0\bar u\le0; since u≥0u\ge0, u≡0u\equiv0 and h=h~h=\widetilde h.

(b) Symmetry. Since C(t)C(t), D(t)D(t), P0P_0 are symmetric, transposing the equation shows t↦h(t)⊤t\mapsto h(t)^{\top} is also a solution on [a,c][a,c]: (Ah)⊤=h⊤A⊤(A h)^{\top}=h^{\top}A^{\top}, (hA⊤)⊤=Ah⊤(hA^{\top})^{\top}=Ah^{\top}, and (hDh)⊤=h⊤D⊤h⊤=h⊤Dh⊤(hDh)^{\top}=h^{\top}D^{\top}h^{\top}=h^{\top}Dh^{\top} (claim 3 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals). By (a), h(t)⊤=h(t)h(t)^{\top}=h(t): every h(t)h(t) is symmetric.

(c) Positive semidefiniteness. Define Aˉ(r)=A(r)−h(r)D(r)\bar A(r)=A(r)-h(r)D(r) on [a,c][a,c]; its entries are continuous, being sums and products of continuous real-valued functions (Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space). Using symmetry of h(r)h(r) and D(r)D(r),

Aˉh+hAˉ⊤+(C+hDh)=Ah−hDh+hA⊤−hDh+C+hDh=Ah+hA⊤−hDh+C,\bar A h+h\bar A^{\top}+\bigl(C+hDh\bigr)=Ah-hDh+hA^{\top}-hDh+C+hDh=Ah+hA^{\top}-hDh+C ,

since hAˉ⊤=h(A⊤−Dh)=hA⊤−hDhh\bar A^{\top}=h(A^{\top}-Dh)=hA^{\top}-hDh. Hence hh satisfies on [a,c][a,c] the linear matrix equation of Lyapunov Representation and Positive Semidefiniteness for Linear Matrix Equations, applied with bb replaced by cc and data (Aˉ,Cˉ,P0)(\bar A,\bar C,P_0) where Cˉ:=C+hDh\bar C:=C+hDh; Cˉ\bar C has continuous entries, is symmetric ((hDh)⊤=hDh(hDh)^{\top}=hDh by (b)), and is positive semidefinite: x⋅(h(r)D(r)h(r)x)=(h(r)x)⋅(D(r)(h(r)x))≥0x\cdot(h(r)D(r)h(r)x)=(h(r)x)\cdot\bigl(D(r)(h(r)x)\bigr)\ge0 by the transpose-dot identity and symmetry of h(r)h(r). By the uniqueness in claim 1 of Lyapunov Representation and Positive Semidefiniteness for Linear Matrix Equations, hh is the solution treated there, and claims 2-3 there give: every h(t)h(t) is positive semidefinite.

(d) Comparison with Λ\Lambda. Let Λ\Lambda be as in the statement (existing on [a,b][a,b] by Lyapunov Representation and Positive Semidefiniteness for Linear Matrix Equations; symmetric positive semidefinite by claims 2-3 there). On [a,c][a,c], Δ:=Λ−h\Delta:=\Lambda-h satisfies, subtracting the two integral equations,

Δ(t)=∫at(A(r)Δ(r)+Δ(r)A(r)⊤+h(r)D(r)h(r)) dr,\Delta(t)=\int_a^t\bigl(A(r)\Delta(r)+\Delta(r)A(r)^{\top}+h(r)D(r)h(r)\bigr)\,dr ,

an equation of the form treated in Lyapunov Representation and Positive Semidefiniteness for Linear Matrix Equations (with bb replaced by cc), with coefficient AA, inhomogeneity hDhhDh (continuous, symmetric, positive semidefinite by (c)'s computation), and initial value 00 (positive semidefinite). By claims 1-3 there, Δ(t)\Delta(t) is positive semidefinite: h(t)⪯Λ(t)h(t)\preceq\Lambda(t) in the semidefinite order.

(e) Entry bound. By (c), (d), and Entry Bounds for Positive Semidefinite Matrices, ∣hij(t)∣≤max⁡lΛll(t)≤λ∗|h_{ij}(t)|\le\max_{l}\Lambda_{ll}(t)\le\lambda^{*}, where λ∗≥0\lambda^{*}\ge0 is the maximum over [a,b][a,b] of the continuous function t↦max⁡lΛll(t)t\mapsto\max_l\Lambda_{ll}(t) (Extreme Value Theorem on a Compact Subset of a Metric Space; a maximum of finitely many continuous functions is continuous, since max⁡(u,v)=12(u+v+∣u−v∣)\max(u,v)=\tfrac12(u+v+|u-v|), and it is nonnegative since the diagonal entries of the positive semidefinite Λ(t)\Lambda(t) are nonnegative by Entry Bounds for Positive Semidefinite Matrices). Hence ∣h(t)∣≤k ∣h(t)∣e≤kλ∗=:ρ|h(t)|\le k\,|h(t)|_{e}\le k\lambda^{*}=:\rho. Also ∣P0∣≤ρ|P_0|\le\rho: at t=at=a the Lyapunov integral equation gives Λ(a)=P0\Lambda(a)=P_0 (degenerate interval, convention of Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables), so 0⪯P0=Λ(a)0\preceq P_0=\Lambda(a) and ∣(P0)ij∣≤max⁡lΛll(a)≤λ∗|(P_0)_{ij}|\le\max_l\Lambda_{ll}(a)\le\lambda^{*} by Entry Bounds for Positive Semidefinite Matrices, whence ∣P0∣≤kλ∗=ρ|P_0|\le k\lambda^{*}=\rho.

Conclusion. The hypotheses (i)-(iii) of A Priori Bounded Solutions of Locally Lipschitz Ordinary Differential Equations Exist Globally hold with this ρ\rho: (i) and (ii) were checked above, and (iii) holds by (e), every solution on every [a,c][a,c] being bounded by ρ\rho in the Euclidean norm on entries, with ρ≥∣P0∣\rho\ge|P_0|. Hence there is exactly one continuous solution PP on [a,b][a,b]. Applying (b), (c), (d) with c=bc=b to PP gives symmetry and 0⪯P(t)⪯Λ(t)0\preceq P(t)\preceq\Lambda(t), and the final entry bound is Entry Bounds for Positive Semidefinite Matrices applied to 0⪯P(t)⪯Λ(t)0\preceq P(t)\preceq\Lambda(t). ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…