TheoremBase

Proof of Second-Moment Evolution for Processes of Integral Form

lemmalem:second-moment-evolution-2026c
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof carried onto lem:second-moment-evolution-2026c. Reroutes the fundamental theorem of calculus to thm:ftc-part2-closed-interval-2026a, applied on [a,t] with the restricted continuity, interior differentiability and Riemann integrability supplied by claims 1 and 2 of lem:restriction-continuity-derivative-2026a and claim 3 of lem:interval-lebesgue-toolkit-2026b; also reroutes the extreme value theorem, uniform mean-square continuity and the componentwise toolkit to their current versions. Adds the metric-convention sentence.

Proof

Throughout, a real-valued function on a subinterval II of the real numbers R\mathbb{R} is called continuous on II when it is continuous relative to II, both II and the codomain R\mathbb{R} carrying the metric of the real line. Throughout, βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯2\lVert\cdot\rVert_2, Cauchy-Schwarz, and the triangle inequality are from Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product and Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm; bilinearity of the covariance and the identity Cov⁑(V,Vβ€²)=E[VVβ€²]βˆ’E[V]E[Vβ€²]\operatorname{Cov}(V,V')=\mathbb{E}[VV']-\mathbb{E}[V]\mathbb{E}[V'] are from that definition and the bilinearity of the mean-square inner product; Wiener integrals are centered with the covariances of claim 3 of Wiener Integrals Against a Vector Brownian Motion are Jointly Gaussian. Write Ξ”jf(s,t)=∫atfj dWjβˆ’βˆ«asfj dWj\Delta^{f}_j(s,t)=\int_a^tf_j\,dW^{j}-\int_a^sf_j\,dW^{j} (in the sense of the statement's convention, so Ξ”jf(s,t)=∫0tfj0 dWjβˆ’βˆ«0sfj0 dWj\Delta^{f}_j(s,t)=\int_0^tf^{0}_j\,dW^{j}-\int_0^sf^{0}_j\,dW^{j}) and similarly Ξ”jh(s,t)\Delta^{h}_j(s,t). By bilinearity and claim 3 of Wiener Integrals Against a Vector Brownian Motion are Jointly Gaussian, for a≀s≀t≀ba\le s\le t\le b and any j,jβ€²j,j',

Cov⁑(Ξ”jf(s,t),Ξ”jβ€²h(s,t))=Ξ΄jjβ€²βˆ«stfj0hj0 dr=Ξ΄jjβ€²βˆ«stfjhj dr,Var⁑(Ξ”jf(s,t))=∫stfj2 dr≀(tβˆ’s)max⁑[a,b]fj2,\operatorname{Cov}\bigl(\Delta^{f}_j(s,t),\Delta^{h}_{j'}(s,t)\bigr)=\delta_{jj'}\int_s^tf^{0}_jh^{0}_j\,dr=\delta_{jj'}\int_s^tf_jh_j\,dr,\qquad \operatorname{Var}\bigl(\Delta^{f}_j(s,t)\bigr)=\int_s^tf_j^{2}\,dr\le(t-s)\max_{[a,b]}f_j^{2},

using Additivity of the Riemann Integral on Adjacent Intervals, claim 4 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals, and Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval (the extended integrands agree with fj,hjf_j,h_j on [s,t]βŠ†[a,b][s,t]\subseteq[a,b]); degenerate intervals follow Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables.

Regularity. (Yt)(Y_t) is mean-square continuous: the time-integral part by claim 6 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral, the Wiener parts because βˆ₯Ξ”jf(s,t)βˆ₯22=Var⁑(Ξ”jf(s,t))≀(tβˆ’s)max⁑fj2\lVert\Delta^{f}_j(s,t)\rVert_2^{2}=\operatorname{Var}(\Delta^{f}_j(s,t))\le(t-s)\max f_j^{2}, and sums by the triangle inequality; likewise (Zt)(Z_t). Ya=yY_a=y and Za=zZ_a=z almost surely by the conventions. By Uniform Mean-Square Continuity on a Compact Interval, sup⁑tβˆ₯Ytβˆ₯2\sup_t\lVert Y_t\rVert_2 and sup⁑tβˆ₯Ztβˆ₯2\sup_t\lVert Z_t\rVert_2 are finite; fix MΞ±=max⁑tβˆ₯Ξ±tβˆ₯2M_\alpha=\max_t\lVert\alpha_t\rVert_2, MΞ²=max⁑tβˆ₯Ξ²tβˆ₯2M_\beta=\max_t\lVert\beta_t\rVert_2 (claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral and Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval).

Claim 1. Put Ο†(t)=E[YtZt]\varphi(t)=\mathbb{E}[Y_tZ_t] and ψ(r)=E[Ξ±rZr]+E[YrΞ²r]+βˆ‘jfj(r)hj(r)\psi(r)=\mathbb{E}[\alpha_rZ_r]+\mathbb{E}[Y_r\beta_r]+\sum_jf_j(r)h_j(r).

Continuity. βˆ£Ο†(t)βˆ’Ο†(s)βˆ£β‰€βˆ₯Ytβˆ’Ysβˆ₯2βˆ₯Ztβˆ₯2+βˆ₯Ysβˆ₯2βˆ₯Ztβˆ’Zsβˆ₯2|\varphi(t)-\varphi(s)|\le\lVert Y_t-Y_s\rVert_2\lVert Z_t\rVert_2+\lVert Y_s\rVert_2\lVert Z_t-Z_s\rVert_2 (Cauchy-Schwarz), so Ο†\varphi is continuous on [a,b][a,b]; similarly ∣E[Ξ±rZr]βˆ’E[Ξ±rβ€²Zrβ€²]βˆ£β‰€βˆ₯Ξ±rβˆ’Ξ±rβ€²βˆ₯2βˆ₯Zrβˆ₯2+βˆ₯Ξ±rβ€²βˆ₯2βˆ₯Zrβˆ’Zrβ€²βˆ₯2|\mathbb{E}[\alpha_rZ_r]-\mathbb{E}[\alpha_{r'}Z_{r'}]|\le\lVert\alpha_r-\alpha_{r'}\rVert_2\lVert Z_r\rVert_2+\lVert\alpha_{r'}\rVert_2\lVert Z_r-Z_{r'}\rVert_2, so ψ\psi is continuous.

Increment expansion. Fix a≀s<t≀ba\le s<t\le b. Almost surely (claim 5 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral for the time parts), Ytβˆ’Ys=∫stΞ±r dr+βˆ‘jΞ”jf(s,t)Y_t-Y_s=\int_s^t\alpha_r\,dr+\sum_j\Delta^{f}_j(s,t) and similarly for ZZ. Then

Ο†(t)βˆ’Ο†(s)=E[(Ytβˆ’Ys)Zs]+E[Ys(Ztβˆ’Zs)]+E[(Ytβˆ’Ys)(Ztβˆ’Zs)].\varphi(t)-\varphi(s)=\mathbb{E}\bigl[(Y_t-Y_s)Z_s\bigr]+\mathbb{E}\bigl[Y_s(Z_t-Z_s)\bigr]+\mathbb{E}\bigl[(Y_t-Y_s)(Z_t-Z_s)\bigr].

First term: E[(∫stΞ±)Zs]=∫stE[Ξ±rZs] dr\mathbb{E}[(\int_s^t\alpha)Z_s]=\int_s^t\mathbb{E}[\alpha_rZ_s]\,dr (claim 3 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral on [s,t][s,t]), and E[Ξ”jf(s,t)Zs]=Cov⁑(Ξ”jf(s,t),Zs)=0\mathbb{E}[\Delta^{f}_j(s,t)Z_s]=\operatorname{Cov}(\Delta^{f}_j(s,t),Z_s)=0 by the orthogonality hypothesis and centering. Second term symmetrically: E[Ys(Ztβˆ’Zs)]=∫stE[YsΞ²r] dr\mathbb{E}[Y_s(Z_t-Z_s)]=\int_s^t\mathbb{E}[Y_s\beta_r]\,dr. Third term: expanding bilinearly, E[(∫stΞ±)(∫stΞ²)]\mathbb{E}[(\int_s^t\alpha)(\int_s^t\beta)] is bounded in absolute value by (tβˆ’s)2MΞ±MΞ²(t-s)^{2}M_\alpha M_\beta (claims 4 and 6 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral and Cauchy-Schwarz); each mixed term E[(∫stΞ±)Ξ”jh]\mathbb{E}[(\int_s^t\alpha)\Delta^{h}_j] or E[Ξ”jf(∫stΞ²)]\mathbb{E}[\Delta^{f}_j(\int_s^t\beta)] is bounded by (tβˆ’s)3/2(t-s)^{3/2} times a constant (Cauchy-Schwarz with the variance bound above); and βˆ‘j,jβ€²E[Ξ”jfΞ”jβ€²h]=βˆ‘j∫stfjhj dr\sum_{j,j'}\mathbb{E}[\Delta^{f}_j\Delta^{h}_{j'}]=\sum_j\int_s^tf_jh_j\,dr. Hence

Ο†(t)βˆ’Ο†(s)=∫st(E[Ξ±rZs]+E[YsΞ²r]+βˆ‘jfj(r)hj(r))dr+R(s,t),∣R(s,t)βˆ£β‰€C (tβˆ’s)3/2,\varphi(t)-\varphi(s)=\int_s^t\Bigl(\mathbb{E}[\alpha_rZ_s]+\mathbb{E}[Y_s\beta_r]+\sum_jf_j(r)h_j(r)\Bigr)dr+R(s,t),\qquad|R(s,t)|\le C\,(t-s)^{3/2},

for a constant CC independent of s,ts,t.

Differentiability. Fix an interior point s∈(a,b)s\in(a,b). For t↓st\downarrow s, dividing by tβˆ’st-s: the error term tends to 00, and

∣1tβˆ’s∫st(E[Ξ±rZs]+E[YsΞ²r]+βˆ‘jfjhj(r))drβˆ’Οˆ(s)βˆ£β‰€max⁑r∈[s,t]∣(E[Ξ±rZs]+E[YsΞ²r]+βˆ‘jfjhj(r))βˆ’Οˆ(s)∣\Bigl|\frac{1}{t-s}\int_s^t\bigl(\mathbb{E}[\alpha_rZ_s]+\mathbb{E}[Y_s\beta_r]+\textstyle\sum_jf_jh_j(r)\bigr)dr-\psi(s)\Bigr|\le\max_{r\in[s,t]}\Bigl|\bigl(\mathbb{E}[\alpha_rZ_s]+\mathbb{E}[Y_s\beta_r]+\textstyle\sum_jf_jh_j(r)\bigr)-\psi(s)\Bigr|

by monotonicity of the Riemann integral (via claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral); the right side tends to 00 as t↓st\downarrow s by continuity (Cauchy-Schwarz and mean-square continuity, as above). For the left-hand quotient, apply the increment expansion to the pair (tβ€²,s)(t',s) with t′↑st'\uparrow s: the frozen factors are then Ytβ€²,Ztβ€²Y_{t'},Z_{t'}, and by Cauchy-Schwarz

∣E[Ξ±rZtβ€²]βˆ’E[Ξ±sZs]βˆ£β‰€βˆ₯Ξ±rβˆ’Ξ±sβˆ₯2 βˆ₯Ztβ€²βˆ₯2+βˆ₯Ξ±sβˆ₯2 βˆ₯Ztβ€²βˆ’Zsβˆ₯2⟢0\bigl|\mathbb{E}[\alpha_rZ_{t'}]-\mathbb{E}[\alpha_sZ_s]\bigr|\le\lVert\alpha_r-\alpha_s\rVert_2\,\lVert Z_{t'}\rVert_2+\lVert\alpha_s\rVert_2\,\lVert Z_{t'}-Z_s\rVert_2\longrightarrow0

uniformly over r∈[tβ€²,s]r\in[t',s] as t′↑st'\uparrow s (uniform mean-square continuity, Uniform Mean-Square Continuity on a Compact Interval, and the bounded norms MΞ±M_\alpha, sup⁑βˆ₯Zβˆ₯2\sup\lVert Z\rVert_2), and similarly for E[Ytβ€²Ξ²r]\mathbb{E}[Y_{t'}\beta_r]; the same maximum estimate then gives the left-hand derivative. Hence Ο†\varphi is differentiable at every interior point with Ο†β€²=ψ\varphi'=\psi; Ο†\varphi is continuous on [a,b][a,b] and ψ\psi is continuous on [a,b][a,b]. Fix t∈(a,b]t\in(a,b]. By claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative the restrictions of Ο†\varphi and of ψ\psi to [a,t][a,t] are continuous on [a,t][a,t], so the restriction of ψ\psi is Riemann integrable on [a,t][a,t] by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval; and by claim 2 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative the restriction of Ο†\varphi is differentiable at every point of (a,t)(a,t) with derivative ψ\psi there. Hence Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II, on a Closed Real Interval, applied on [a,t][a,t] (the degenerate case t=at=a holding by convention), gives the asserted identity with Ο†(a)=E[YaZa]=E[yz]\varphi(a)=\mathbb{E}[Y_aZ_a]=\mathbb{E}[yz] (almost-sure equality preserves expectations of products).

Claim 2. The map Q′↦Cov⁑(Ξ”,Qβ€²)Q'\mapsto\operatorname{Cov}(\Delta,Q'), Ξ”:=∫atf dWjβˆ’βˆ«asf dWj\Delta:=\int_a^tf\,dW^{j}-\int_a^sf\,dW^{j}, is linear and continuous under mean-square limits: ∣Cov⁑(Ξ”,Qβ€²)βˆ’Cov⁑(Ξ”,Qβ€²β€²)βˆ£β‰€βˆ₯Ξ”βˆ₯2βˆ₯Qβ€²βˆ’Qβ€²β€²βˆ₯2+∣E[Ξ”]βˆ£β€‰βˆ£E[Qβ€²βˆ’Qβ€²β€²]∣|\operatorname{Cov}(\Delta,Q')-\operatorname{Cov}(\Delta,Q'')|\le\lVert\Delta\rVert_2\lVert Q'-Q''\rVert_2+|\mathbb{E}[\Delta]|\,|\mathbb{E}[Q'-Q'']|, and both terms tend to 00 along mean-square convergence (Cauchy-Schwarz; ∣E[V]βˆ£β‰€βˆ₯Vβˆ₯2|\mathbb{E}[V]|\le\lVert V\rVert_2). Hence it suffices to check Cov⁑(Ξ”,Qβ€²)=0\operatorname{Cov}(\Delta,Q')=0 for Qβ€²Q' ranging over the generators. For Qβ€²=1Q'=1: covariances with constants vanish. For Qβ€²=Wrjβ€²Q'=W^{j'}_r with r≀sr\le s: claim 3 of Wiener Integrals Against a Vector Brownian Motion are Jointly Gaussian and bilinearity give Cov⁑(Ξ”,Wrjβ€²)=Ξ΄jjβ€²(∫0min⁑(t,r)f0βˆ’βˆ«0min⁑(s,r)f0)=Ξ΄jjβ€²(∫0rf0βˆ’βˆ«0rf0)=0\operatorname{Cov}(\Delta,W^{j'}_r)=\delta_{jj'}\bigl(\int_0^{\min(t,r)}f^{0}-\int_0^{\min(s,r)}f^{0}\bigr)=\delta_{jj'}\bigl(\int_0^{r}f^{0}-\int_0^{r}f^{0}\bigr)=0. For Qβ€²=ΞΎiQ'=\xi^{i}: choose the Οƒ(Wvj:vβ‰₯0)\sigma(W^{j}_v:v\ge0)-measurable versions of the two Wiener integrals (claim 1 of Wiener Integrals Against a Vector Brownian Motion are Jointly Gaussian; covariances are unchanged under almost-sure replacement), so Ξ”\Delta is measurable for a sub-Οƒ\sigma-algebra of Οƒ(Wvjβ€²:allΒ jβ€²,v)\sigma(W^{j'}_v:\text{all }j',v), which is independent of Οƒ(ΞΎ1,…,ΞΎl)\sigma(\xi^{1},\dots,\xi^{l}); hence Ξ”\Delta and ΞΎi\xi^{i} are independent (closing remark of Sigma-Algebra Generated by Random Variables and Independence of Sigma-Algebras), and Expectation of a Product of Independent Random Variables gives E[Δξi]=E[Ξ”]E[ΞΎi]\mathbb{E}[\Delta\xi^{i}]=\mathbb{E}[\Delta]\mathbb{E}[\xi^{i}], so Cov⁑(Ξ”,ΞΎi)=0\operatorname{Cov}(\Delta,\xi^{i})=0. β– \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…