TheoremBase

The properties are derived by induction on the natural numbers from the recursive description of the canonical map and elementary order arithmetic.

Proof

Throughout, SS denotes the successor map of Natural Numbers, so that S(n)=n+1S(n)=n+1 by statement 1 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers; each appeal to Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers is to a subset A⊆NA\subseteq\mathbb{N} containing 11 and closed under SS. Finite sums and their properties are those of Finite Sum Notation in a Field and Properties of Finite Sums. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, [n][n] is the initial segment determined by nn and un:[n]→Fu^{n}:[n]\to F is the constant family with value 11 used in The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field.

1. Base and step. By claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, ιF(1)=∑k=11uk1=u11=1\iota_{F}(1)=\sum_{k=1}^{1}u^{1}_{k}=u^{1}_{1}=1.

Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. Since n≤S(n)n\le S(n) by statements 1 and 5 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, every k∈[n]k\in[n] lies in [S(n)][S(n)], and the restriction of uS(n)u^{S(n)} to [n][n] is the constant family unu^{n}. Claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums therefore gives

ιF(S(n))=∑k=1S(n)ukS(n)=(∑k=1nukn)+uS(n)S(n)=ιF(n)+1.\iota_{F}(S(n))=\sum_{k=1}^{S(n)}u^{S(n)}_{k}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}u^{n}_{k}\Bigr)+u^{S(n)}_{S(n)}=\iota_{F}(n)+1 .

2. The unit is a lower bound. Let A={n∈N:1≤ιF(n)}A=\{n\in\mathbb{N}:1\le\iota_{F}(n)\}. By part 1 and reflexivity of ≤\le we have 1∈A1\in A. Suppose n∈An\in A. Statement 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0<10<1, so statement 1 of the same result gives ιF(n)+0<ιF(n)+1\iota_{F}(n)+0<\iota_{F}(n)+1; since ιF(n)+0=ιF(n)\iota_{F}(n)+0=\iota_{F}(n) by Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, part 1 yields ιF(n)<ιF(S(n))\iota_{F}(n)<\iota_{F}(S(n)). Combining 1≤ιF(n)1\le\iota_{F}(n) with this by mixed transitivity, statement 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives 1<ιF(S(n))1<\iota_{F}(S(n)) and in particular 1≤ιF(S(n))1\le\iota_{F}(S(n)), so S(n)∈AS(n)\in A. By induction A=NA=\mathbb{N}.

3. Positivity. Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. From 0<10<1 and 1≤ιF(n)1\le\iota_{F}(n), mixed transitivity gives 0<ιF(n)0<\iota_{F}(n); in particular ιF(n)≠0\iota_{F}(n)\ne 0. Statement 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field then says that ιF(n)−1\iota_{F}(n)^{-1} exists and satisfies 0<ιF(n)−10<\iota_{F}(n)^{-1}.

4. Additivity. Fix m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} and let

A={n∈N:ιF(m+n)=ιF(m)+ιF(n)}.A=\{n\in\mathbb{N}:\iota_{F}(m+n)=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(n)\}.

Since m+1=S(m)m+1=S(m), part 1 gives ιF(m+1)=ιF(m)+1=ιF(m)+ιF(1)\iota_{F}(m+1)=\iota_{F}(m)+1=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(1), so 1∈A1\in A. Suppose n∈An\in A. Statements 4 and 2 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers give m+S(n)=S(n)+m=S(n+m)=S(m+n)m+S(n)=S(n)+m=S(n+m)=S(m+n), so by part 1 and the induction hypothesis

ιF(m+S(n))=ιF(m+n)+1=(ιF(m)+ιF(n))+1=ιF(m)+(ιF(n)+1)=ιF(m)+ιF(S(n)),\iota_{F}(m+S(n))=\iota_{F}(m+n)+1=\bigl(\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(n)\bigr)+1=\iota_{F}(m)+\bigl(\iota_{F}(n)+1\bigr)=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(S(n)),

using the associativity of addition in the field FF. Hence S(n)∈AS(n)\in A, and by induction A=NA=\mathbb{N}.

5. Multiplicativity. Fix m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} and let

A={n∈N:ιF(mn)=ιF(m) ιF(n)}.A=\{n\in\mathbb{N}:\iota_{F}(mn)=\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(n)\}.

Identity 3 of Natural Numbers gives m⋅1=mm\cdot 1=m, and ιF(m) ιF(1)=ιF(m)⋅1=ιF(m)\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(1)=\iota_{F}(m)\cdot 1=\iota_{F}(m) by part 1 and the multiplicative identity of FF; hence 1∈A1\in A. Suppose n∈An\in A. Identity 4 of Natural Numbers gives m⋅S(n)=mn+mm\cdot S(n)=mn+m, so part 4 and the induction hypothesis give

ιF(m⋅S(n))=ιF(mn)+ιF(m)=ιF(m) ιF(n)+ιF(m)⋅1=ιF(m)(ιF(n)+1)=ιF(m) ιF(S(n)),\iota_{F}(m\cdot S(n))=\iota_{F}(mn)+\iota_{F}(m)=\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(n)+\iota_{F}(m)\cdot 1=\iota_{F}(m)\bigl(\iota_{F}(n)+1\bigr)=\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(S(n)),

using the distributivity of multiplication over addition in FF. Hence S(n)∈AS(n)\in A, and by induction A=NA=\mathbb{N}.

6. Strict monotonicity. Let m,n∈Nm,n\in\mathbb{N} with m<nm<n. By statement 7 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers there is k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with n=m+kn=m+k, so part 4 gives ιF(n)=ιF(m)+ιF(k)\iota_{F}(n)=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(k). By part 3 we have 0<ιF(k)0<\iota_{F}(k), so statement 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives ιF(m)+0<ιF(m)+ιF(k)\iota_{F}(m)+0<\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(k), and ιF(m)+0=ιF(m)\iota_{F}(m)+0=\iota_{F}(m) by Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field. Hence ιF(m)<ιF(n)\iota_{F}(m)<\iota_{F}(n).

7. Injectivity. We prove the contrapositive. Let m,n∈Nm,n\in\mathbb{N} with m≠nm\ne n. By trichotomy, statement 3 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, either m<nm<n or n<mn<m. In the first case part 6 gives ιF(m)<ιF(n)\iota_{F}(m)<\iota_{F}(n) and in the second it gives ιF(n)<ιF(m)\iota_{F}(n)<\iota_{F}(m); in either case ιF(m)≠ιF(n)\iota_{F}(m)\ne\iota_{F}(n).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…