TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout we use claims 4 and 5 of the inner-product lemma: the pairing ⟨⋅,⋅⟩L2\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{L^{2}} is symmetric and linear in each argument, ⟨u,u⟩L2=∥u∥L22\langle u,u\rangle_{L^{2}}=\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}, the norm vanishes only at the zero element, and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality ∣⟨u,v⟩L2∣≤∥u∥L2∥v∥L2|\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}}|\le\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}\lVert v\rVert_{L^{2}} holds. We also record an elementary fact used below: if a real sequence (an)(a_{n}) has limit aa and an≤Ma_{n}\le M for every nn, then a≤Ma\le M; for if a>Ma>M, choosing nn with ∣an−a∣<a−M|a_{n}-a|<a-M would give an>Ma_{n}>M.

Claim 1. Let v∈Hv\in H. The real sequence (⟨un,v⟩L2)n\bigl(\langle u_{n},v\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr)_{n} has limit ⟨u,v⟩L2\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}} and also limit ⟨u′,v⟩L2\langle u',v\rangle_{L^{2}}, so these are equal by uniqueness of limits of real sequences. By linearity, ⟨u−u′,v⟩L2=0\langle u-u',v\rangle_{L^{2}}=0 for every v∈Hv\in H. Taking v=u−u′v=u-u' gives ∥u−u′∥L22=0\lVert u-u'\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}=0, hence u−u′=0u-u'=0, that is u=u′u=u'.

Claim 2. Let v∈Hv\in H and let ε>0\varepsilon>0 be real. By linearity and Cauchy-Schwarz,

∣⟨un,v⟩L2−⟨u,v⟩L2∣=∣⟨un−u,v⟩L2∣≤∥un−u∥L2 ∥v∥L2.\bigl|\langle u_{n},v\rangle_{L^{2}}-\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr|=\bigl|\langle u_{n}-u,v\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr|\le\lVert u_{n}-u\rVert_{L^{2}}\,\lVert v\rVert_{L^{2}} .

If ∥v∥L2=0\lVert v\rVert_{L^{2}}=0 the right-hand side is 00 for every nn. Otherwise choose NN with ∥un−u∥L2<ε/∥v∥L2\lVert u_{n}-u\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon/\lVert v\rVert_{L^{2}} for n≥Nn\ge N, so that the left-hand side is less than ε\varepsilon for n≥Nn\ge N. In either case the sequence (⟨un,v⟩L2)n\bigl(\langle u_{n},v\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr)_{n} has limit ⟨u,v⟩L2\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}}; as vv was arbitrary, un⇀uu_{n}\rightharpoonup u.

Claim 3. Note first that C≥∥u1∥L2≥0C\ge\lVert u_{1}\rVert_{L^{2}}\ge0. Applying the definition of weak convergence with the test element uu, the real sequence (⟨un,u⟩L2)n\bigl(\langle u_{n},u\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr)_{n} has limit ⟨u,u⟩L2=∥u∥L22\langle u,u\rangle_{L^{2}}=\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}. For every nn, Cauchy-Schwarz gives

⟨un,u⟩L2≤∣⟨un,u⟩L2∣≤∥un∥L2∥u∥L2≤C ∥u∥L2.\langle u_{n},u\rangle_{L^{2}}\le\bigl|\langle u_{n},u\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr|\le\lVert u_{n}\rVert_{L^{2}}\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}\le C\,\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}} .

By the elementary fact recorded above, ∥u∥L22≤C∥u∥L2\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}^{2}\le C\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}. If ∥u∥L2=0\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}=0 then ∥u∥L2=0≤C\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}=0\le C; otherwise dividing by the positive number ∥u∥L2\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}} gives ∥u∥L2≤C\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}\le C.

Claim 4. As in claim 3, C≥0C\ge0. By linearity of the pairing in its first argument,

⟨un,vn⟩L2−⟨u,v⟩L2=⟨un,vn−v⟩L2+(⟨un,v⟩L2−⟨u,v⟩L2),\langle u_{n},v_{n}\rangle_{L^{2}}-\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}}=\langle u_{n},v_{n}-v\rangle_{L^{2}}+\bigl(\langle u_{n},v\rangle_{L^{2}}-\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr),

using linearity in the second argument for the first term. By Cauchy-Schwarz, ∣⟨un,vn−v⟩L2∣≤C ∥vn−v∥L2\bigl|\langle u_{n},v_{n}-v\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr|\le C\,\lVert v_{n}-v\rVert_{L^{2}}.

Let ε>0\varepsilon>0 be real. If C=0C=0 the first term vanishes for every nn; if C>0C>0, choose N1N_{1} with ∥vn−v∥L2<ε/(2C)\lVert v_{n}-v\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon/(2C) for n≥N1n\ge N_{1}, so that the first term is less than ε/2\varepsilon/2 in absolute value. Since un⇀uu_{n}\rightharpoonup u, choose N2N_{2} with ∣⟨un,v⟩L2−⟨u,v⟩L2∣<ε/2\bigl|\langle u_{n},v\rangle_{L^{2}}-\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr|<\varepsilon/2 for n≥N2n\ge N_{2}. For n≥max⁡(N1,N2)n\ge\max(N_{1},N_{2}) the displayed difference is less than ε\varepsilon in absolute value. Hence (⟨un,vn⟩L2)n\bigl(\langle u_{n},v_{n}\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr)_{n} has limit ⟨u,v⟩L2\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}}.

Claim 5. As in claim 3, C≥0C\ge0. Let v∈Hv\in H and let ε>0\varepsilon>0 be real. Put M=C+∥u∥L2+1M=C+\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}+1, a real number with M>0M>0. The set {ζ∈H:dL2(ζ,v)<ε/(2M)}\{\zeta\in H:d_{L^{2}}(\zeta,v)<\varepsilon/(2M)\} is a nonempty open subset of (H,dL2)(H,d_{L^{2}}), so by density of EE it contains an element w∈Ew\in E; thus ∥v−w∥L2<ε/(2M)\lVert v-w\rVert_{L^{2}}<\varepsilon/(2M).

For every nn, writing ⟨un,v⟩L2−⟨u,v⟩L2\langle u_{n},v\rangle_{L^{2}}-\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}} as

⟨un,v−w⟩L2+(⟨un,w⟩L2−⟨u,w⟩L2)+⟨u,w−v⟩L2\langle u_{n},v-w\rangle_{L^{2}}+\bigl(\langle u_{n},w\rangle_{L^{2}}-\langle u,w\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr)+\langle u,w-v\rangle_{L^{2}}

and applying Cauchy-Schwarz to the first and third terms gives

∣⟨un,v⟩L2−⟨u,v⟩L2∣≤(∥un∥L2+∥u∥L2)∥v−w∥L2+∣⟨un,w⟩L2−⟨u,w⟩L2∣,\bigl|\langle u_{n},v\rangle_{L^{2}}-\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr|\le\bigl(\lVert u_{n}\rVert_{L^{2}}+\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}\bigr)\lVert v-w\rVert_{L^{2}}+\bigl|\langle u_{n},w\rangle_{L^{2}}-\langle u,w\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr|,

and ∥un∥L2+∥u∥L2≤C+∥u∥L2<M\lVert u_{n}\rVert_{L^{2}}+\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}\le C+\lVert u\rVert_{L^{2}}<M. Since w∈Ew\in E, choose NN with ∣⟨un,w⟩L2−⟨u,w⟩L2∣<ε/2\bigl|\langle u_{n},w\rangle_{L^{2}}-\langle u,w\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr|<\varepsilon/2 for n≥Nn\ge N. Then for n≥Nn\ge N,

∣⟨un,v⟩L2−⟨u,v⟩L2∣<M⋅ε2M+ε2=ε.\bigl|\langle u_{n},v\rangle_{L^{2}}-\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr|<M\cdot\frac{\varepsilon}{2M}+\frac{\varepsilon}{2}=\varepsilon .

So (⟨un,v⟩L2)n\bigl(\langle u_{n},v\rangle_{L^{2}}\bigr)_{n} has limit ⟨u,v⟩L2\langle u,v\rangle_{L^{2}} for every v∈Hv\in H, that is un⇀uu_{n}\rightharpoonup u.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…