TheoremBase

Positions whose law has norm bound R have L2 norm at most dR, so the published conditions applied with the radius dR give the conditions at bounded positions.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. The natural number dd is read as the real number ι(d)\iota(d), with ι\iota the canonical map; 1≤d1\le d by claim 2 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field. For every real aa, the constant finite sum ∑j=1da\sum_{j=1}^{d}a equals dada: by induction on dd, using the recursion of claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, claim 1 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field (ι(1)=1\iota(1)=1 and ι(n+1)=ι(n)+1\iota(n+1)=\iota(n)+1) and distributivity.

Step 1 (Positions at bounded laws have L2L^{2} norm at most dRdR). Let R>0R>0 be real, let (H,M,Ω)(H,M,\Omega) be a tracial W*-probability space and let XX be an L2L^{2} dd-tuple of it with law(X)=κd(λ)\mathrm{law}(X)=\kappa_{d}(\lambda) for some λ∈Σd,R\lambda\in\Sigma_{d,R}. By Calculus of Laws of Square-Integrable Tuples: Bounded Tuples, the Lipschitz Bound, Moments, Affine Push-Forwards, Couplings and Embeddings §moments and Calculus of Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Agreement on Bounded Laws, Lipschitz Estimates, Functoriality of Push-Forwards, Moment Formulas, Positivity, the Cost and the Diagonal Coupling §bounded,

∥X∥22=M^(law(X))=M^(κd(λ))=M(λ)=∑j=1dλ(xjxj).\lVert X\rVert_{2}^{2}=\widehat{M}(\mathrm{law}(X))=\widehat{M}(\kappa_{d}(\lambda))=M(\lambda)=\sum_{j=1}^{d}\lambda(x_{j}x_{j}).

For j∈[d]j\in[d], xjxj=xwx_{j}x_{j}=x_{w} for the word ww of length 22 both of whose letters are jj (Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §monomials); λ(xjxj)=λ(xj∗xj)\lambda(x_{j}x_{j})=\lambda(x_{j}^{*}x_{j}) is real and nonnegative by condition (b) of Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §tracial-state, as xj∗=xjx_{j}^{*}=x_{j} (Noncommutative Polynomials Form a Unital Complex Algebra with Involution: Linear Extension from Monomials, Products, Adjoints and Self-Adjoint Parts §adjoint); and λ(xjxj)=∣λ(xw)∣≤R2\lambda(x_{j}x_{j})=|\lambda(x_{w})|\le R^{2} by Noncommutative Laws of Finitely Many Self-Adjoint Variables with a Norm Bound §norm-bound. Here M(λ)M(\lambda) is the second moment of Noncommutative Laws, Couplings and the Wasserstein Distance: Standing Notation §laws, a sum of the real numbers λ(xjxj)\lambda(x_{j}x_{j}), which is the real sum. Summing these dd inequalities, claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers and the constant-sum identity above give ∥X∥22≤∑j=1dR2=dR2\lVert X\rVert_{2}^{2}\le\sum_{j=1}^{d}R^{2}=dR^{2}, and dR2≤d2R2=(dR)2dR^{2}\le d^{2}R^{2}=(dR)^{2} by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, since 1≤d1\le d and 0≤dR20\le dR^{2}, and by commutativity of multiplication. As ∥X∥2≥0\lVert X\rVert_{2}\ge0 and dR>0dR>0, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∥X∥2≤dR\lVert X\rVert_{2}\le dR. Moreover R≤dRR\le dR by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Step 2 (Claim 1). Assume the structure condition, and let R>0R>0 and η>0\eta>0 be real. Apply it with the radius dR>0dR>0 and with η\eta, obtaining a real r>0r>0. Let (H,M,Ω)(H,M,\Omega), XX, YY and α\alpha be as in The Structure Condition at Bounded Positions for a Hamiltonian on Phase-Space Noncommutative Laws §structure for RR and this rr. By Step 1, ∥X∥2≤dR\lVert X\rVert_{2}\le dR and ∥Y∥2≤dR\lVert Y\rVert_{2}\le dR, and α∥X−Y∥22+∥X−Y∥2<r\alpha\lVert X-Y\rVert_{2}^{2}+\lVert X-Y\rVert_{2}<r; so the structure condition gives HM(Y,α(X−Y))−HM(X,α(X−Y))<η\mathcal{H}_{M}(Y,\alpha(X-Y))-\mathcal{H}_{M}(X,\alpha(X-Y))<\eta. Hence H\mathcal{H} satisfies the structure condition at bounded positions.

Step 3 (Claim 2). Assume that H\mathcal{H} is uniformly continuous on bounded sets, and let R>0R>0 and η>0\eta>0 be real. Apply that definition with the radius dRdR and with η\eta, obtaining a real r>0r>0. Let (H,M,Ω)(H,M,\Omega), XX, PP and P′P' be as in Hamiltonians on Phase-Space Noncommutative Laws that are Uniformly Continuous in the Momentum at Bounded Positions §momentum for RR and this rr. By Step 1, ∥X∥2≤dR\lVert X\rVert_{2}\le dR, and ∥P∥2≤R≤dR\lVert P\rVert_{2}\le R\le dR, ∥P′∥2≤R≤dR\lVert P'\rVert_{2}\le R\le dR. Take X′=XX'=X: then X−X′X-X' is the zero dd-tuple, whose L2L^{2} norm is 00 (Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §tuples), so ∥X−X′∥2+∥P−P′∥2=∥P−P′∥2<r\lVert X-X'\rVert_{2}+\lVert P-P'\rVert_{2}=\lVert P-P'\rVert_{2}<r. The uniform continuity gives ∣HM(X,P)−HM(X,P′)∣<η|\mathcal{H}_{M}(X,P)-\mathcal{H}_{M}(X,P')|<\eta. Hence H\mathcal{H} is uniformly continuous in the momentum at bounded positions.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…