TheoremBase

Continuity and differentiability come from the chain rule through the coordinate map; the growth bound from a Gronwall-type monotonicity argument along a segment, then Gaussian integrability from exponential moments. The tangent inequality follows from one-dimensional convexity, and tangency from the bounded cylindrical approximations n(1-exp(-V/n)) and dominated convergence.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Elementary real-number order and arithmetic, including manipulations of finite sums, the monotonicity of squares and of nonnegative square roots on the nonnegative reals, and the limit laws for real sequences, are carried by The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §background and are not cited step by step.

Throughout, xk=⟨x,ek⟩x_{k}=\langle x,e_{k}\rangle and pd(x)=(x1,…,xd)p_{d}(x)=(x_{1},\dots,x_{d}) as in Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §coordinates, ∥⋅∥\lVert\cdot\rVert is the Euclidean norm of Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, and aˉ\bar{a} is the bound ak≤aˉa_{k}\le\bar{a} of Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §weights. For w∈Rdw\in\mathbb{R}^{d} let q(w)q(w) be the nonnegative square root of ∑k=1dwk2/ak\sum_{k=1}^{d}w_{k}^{2}/a_{k}, so that q(pd(x))=∣pd(x)∣aq(p_{d}(x))=|p_{d}(x)|_{a} in the notation of the statement.

Step 0 (Preliminaries). (i) Coordinates. The inner product of XX is linear in its first argument (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product), so (x+z)k=xk+zk(x+z)_{k}=x_{k}+z_{k} and (tx)k=t xk(tx)_{k}=t\,x_{k} for x,z∈Xx,z\in X, t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}; hence pd(x+z)=pd(x)+pd(z)p_{d}(x+z)=p_{d}(x)+p_{d}(z) and pd(0X)=0p_{d}(0_{X})=0. By Borel Sets of a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Coordinates, Determination by Finite-Dimensional Projections, and Pairs §continuity, ∥pd(x)−pd(x′)∥≤∣x−x′∣\lVert p_{d}(x)-p_{d}(x')\rVert\le|x-x'| for x,x′∈Xx,x'\in X; in particular ∥pd(z)∥≤∣z∣\lVert p_{d}(z)\rVert\le|z|.

(ii) Finite combinations of basis vectors. Let c1,…,cd∈Rc_{1},\dots,c_{d}\in\mathbb{R} and y=∑j=1dcjejy=\sum_{j=1}^{d}c_{j}e_{j}. Since (ek)(e_{k}) is orthonormal (Borel Probability Measures on a Real Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis: Standing Notation §space), bilinearity (Real Inner Product Space §inner-product, Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear) gives yk=cky_{k}=c_{k} for k≤dk\le d and yk=0y_{k}=0 for k>dk>d. Each ek=ak−1/2fke_{k}=a_{k}^{-1/2}f_{k} lies in XaX^{a} by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §basis, and XaX^{a} is a linear subspace by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §hilbert, so y∈Xay\in X^{a}. For z∈Xaz\in X^{a}, the terms ak−1ykzka_{k}^{-1}y_{k}z_{k} of the series defining ⟨y,z⟩a\langle y,z\rangle_{a} in The Noise Space of a Weight Sequence on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §inner-product vanish for k>dk>d, so its partial sums are constant from the dd-th on and its sum is the finite sum:

⟨y,z⟩a=∑k=1dak−1ckzk,∣y∣a2=∑k=1dak−1ck2.(P)\langle y,z\rangle_{a}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}^{-1}c_{k}z_{k},\qquad |y|_{a}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}^{-1}c_{k}^{2}.\tag{P}

(iii) Heads of the noise norm. For h∈Xah\in X^{a}, q(pd(h))2=∑k=1dak−1hk2=Sd(h)≤∣h∣a2q(p_{d}(h))^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}^{-1}h_{k}^{2}=S_{d}(h)\le|h|_{a}^{2} by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §partial-sums, so q(pd(h))≤∣h∣aq(p_{d}(h))\le|h|_{a}.

(iv) Slope. The constant CC of (c) is nonnegative: at any u∈Rdu\in\mathbb{R}^{d} the left-hand side of (c) in Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §slope is a sum of nonnegative terms and (1+∣v(u)∣)2(1+|v(u)|)^{2} is positive. For u,w∈Rdu,w\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, the points α=(ak1/2∂kv(u))k≤d\alpha=(a_{k}^{1/2}\partial_{k}v(u))_{k\le d} and ω=(ak−1/2wk)k≤d\omega=(a_{k}^{-1/2}w_{k})_{k\le d} of Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} have dot product ∑k=1d∂kv(u)wk\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}v(u)w_{k}, ∥α∥2=∑k=1dak∂kv(u)2\lVert\alpha\rVert^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\partial_{k}v(u)^{2} and ∥ω∥2=q(w)2\lVert\omega\rVert^{2}=q(w)^{2} by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for the dot product of Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} (Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product) and then (c) with monotonicity of square roots,

∣∑k=1d∂kv(u) wk∣≤(∑k=1dak∂kv(u)2)1/2q(w)≤C1/2(1+∣v(u)∣) q(w).(S)\Bigl|\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}v(u)\,w_{k}\Bigr|\le\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\partial_{k}v(u)^{2}\Bigr)^{1/2}q(w)\le C^{1/2}\bigl(1+|v(u)|\bigr)\,q(w).\tag{S}

Taking for ww the ii-th unit vector (i≤di\le d), for which q(w)=ai−1/2q(w)=a_{i}^{-1/2}, gives ∣∂iv(u)∣≤ai−1/2C1/2(1+∣v(u)∣)|\partial_{i}v(u)|\le a_{i}^{-1/2}C^{1/2}(1+|v(u)|).

(v) Regularity of vv. Since vv is of class C2C^{2}, clause 2 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set makes vv and each ∂kv\partial_{k}v (k≤dk\le d) of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, with the iterated partial derivatives ∂j∂kv\partial_{j}\partial_{k}v of clause 4 there; by clause 1 there, vv and each ∂kv\partial_{k}v are continuous at every point, which, as ∑i(ui′−ui)2=∥u′−u∥2\sum_{i}(u'_{i}-u_{i})^{2}=\lVert u'-u\rVert^{2} (Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square), says: for u∈Rdu\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is δ>0\delta>0 with ∣f(u′)−f(u)∣<ε|f(u')-f(u)|<\varepsilon whenever ∥u′−u∥<δ\lVert u'-u\rVert<\delta (f=vf=v or f=∂kvf=\partial_{k}v). By A Real-Valued C^1 Function is Differentiable at Every Point, vv and each ∂kv\partial_{k}v are differentiable at every point of Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, with derivative matrix the row of their partial derivatives.

(vi) Composition with pdp_{d}. If f:Rd→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} has the continuity property of (v), then f∘pdf\circ p_{d} is continuous on (X,d)(X,d): given xx and ε\varepsilon, take δ\delta for ff at pd(x)p_{d}(x); then ∣x′−x∣<δ|x'-x|<\delta gives ∥pd(x′)−pd(x)∥<δ\lVert p_{d}(x')-p_{d}(x)\rVert<\delta by (i), so ∣f(pd(x′))−f(pd(x))∣<ε|f(p_{d}(x'))-f(p_{d}(x))|<\varepsilon. A continuous function X→RX\to\mathbb{R} is Borel by claims 2 and 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space.

(vii) Affine paths. For u,w∈Rdu,w\in\mathbb{R}^{d}, Chain Rule Along an Affine Path (with U=RdU=\mathbb{R}^{d}, J=RJ=\mathbb{R}, every real number being an interior point of R\mathbb{R} by The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus §intervals) and (v) show that t↦v(u+tw)t\mapsto v(u+tw) is differentiable at every t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} with derivative ∑k=1d∂kv(u+tw) wk\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}v(u+tw)\,w_{k}, and that for k≤dk\le d the function t↦∂kv(u+tw)t\mapsto\partial_{k}v(u+tw) is differentiable at every tt with derivative ∑j=1d∂j∂kv(u+tw) wj\sum_{j=1}^{d}\partial_{j}\partial_{k}v(u+tw)\,w_{j}. Differentiable functions on R\mathbb{R} are continuous on R\mathbb{R} by Differentiability at an Interior Point Implies Continuity There, in the sense of The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus §continuity.

Step 1 (Claim 1). V=v∘pdV=v\circ p_{d} is continuous and Borel by (v) and (vi), and −b≤v(pd(x))=V(x)-b\le v(p_{d}(x))=V(x) by (a). For k≤dk\le d, ∂kV=∂kv∘pd\partial_{k}V=\partial_{k}v\circ p_{d} is continuous by (v), (vi); for k>dk>d it is the constant 00.

Coordinates and formulas. By (ii) with ck=ak∂kv(pd(x))c_{k}=a_{k}\partial_{k}v(p_{d}(x)), ∇aV(x)\nabla_{a}V(x) has kk-th coordinate ak∂kV(x)a_{k}\partial_{k}V(x) for every k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} (both sides vanish for k>dk>d), and (P) gives, for h∈Xah\in X^{a},

⟨∇aV(x),h⟩a=∑k=1dak−1ak∂kV(x)hk=∑k=1d∂kV(x)hk,∣∇aV(x)∣a2=∑k=1dak ∂kV(x)2.\langle\nabla_{a}V(x),h\rangle_{a}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}^{-1}a_{k}\partial_{k}V(x)h_{k}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}V(x)h_{k},\qquad|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}V(x)^{2}.

Continuity and measurability of ∇aV\nabla_{a}V. For x,x′∈Xx,x'\in X, ∇aV(x′)−∇aV(x)=∑k=1dak(∂kV(x′)−∂kV(x))ek\nabla_{a}V(x')-\nabla_{a}V(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\bigl(\partial_{k}V(x')-\partial_{k}V(x)\bigr)e_{k}, so by (P) ∣∇aV(x′)−∇aV(x)∣a2=∑k=1dak(∂kV(x′)−∂kV(x))2|\nabla_{a}V(x')-\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}(\partial_{k}V(x')-\partial_{k}V(x))^{2}. Given xx and ε>0\varepsilon>0, put η=ε/(daˉ)1/2\eta=\varepsilon/(d\bar{a})^{1/2} and choose by continuity of each ∂kV\partial_{k}V (k≤dk\le d) a δk>0\delta_{k}>0 with ∣∂kV(x′)−∂kV(x)∣<η|\partial_{k}V(x')-\partial_{k}V(x)|<\eta when ∣x′−x∣<δk|x'-x|<\delta_{k}; with δ=min⁡k≤dδk\delta=\min_{k\le d}\delta_{k}, ∣x′−x∣<δ|x'-x|<\delta gives ∣∇aV(x′)−∇aV(x)∣a2<daˉη2=ε2|\nabla_{a}V(x')-\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2}<d\bar{a}\eta^{2}=\varepsilon^{2}. So ∇aV\nabla_{a}V is continuous from (X,d)(X,d) into XaX^{a} with the distance of ∣⋅∣a|\cdot|_{a}. Its coordinate functions x↦⟨∇aV(x),ek⟩=ak∂kV(x)x\mapsto\langle\nabla_{a}V(x),e_{k}\rangle=a_{k}\partial_{k}V(x) are continuous, hence Borel by (vi), so ∇aV\nabla_{a}V is measurable into XaX^{a} by The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §measurable. Moreover x↦∣∇aV(x)∣ax\mapsto|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a} is continuous, since ∣∣∇aV(x′)∣a−∣∇aV(x)∣a∣≤∣∇aV(x′)−∇aV(x)∣a\bigl||\nabla_{a}V(x')|_{a}-|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}\bigr|\le|\nabla_{a}V(x')-\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a} by The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity §reverse-triangle in the inner product space XaX^{a} (The Noise Space is a Real Hilbert Space: Orthonormal Basis, Continuous Embedding, Partial Sums, Closed Balls and Borel Measurability §hilbert); hence it is Borel.

Differentiability. Fix x∈Xx\in X, put u=pd(x)u=p_{d}(x) and p=∑k=1d∂kv(u)ek∈Xp=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}v(u)e_{k}\in X. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By (v) and Differentiability at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces (with m=1m=1, where the Euclidean norm of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is the absolute value by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square) there is δ>0\delta>0 such that 0<∥w∥<δ0<\lVert w\rVert<\delta implies ∣v(u+w)−v(u)−∑k=1d∂kv(u)wk∣≤ε∥w∥|v(u+w)-v(u)-\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}v(u)w_{k}|\le\varepsilon\lVert w\rVert. Let z∈Xz\in X with ∣z∣<δ|z|<\delta and w=pd(z)w=p_{d}(z). By (i), pd(x+z)=u+wp_{d}(x+z)=u+w and ∥w∥≤∣z∣<δ\lVert w\rVert\le|z|<\delta, and by linearity of the inner product in its first argument ⟨p,z⟩=∑k=1d∂kv(u)zk=∑k=1d∂kv(u)wk\langle p,z\rangle=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}v(u)z_{k}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}v(u)w_{k}. If w=0w=0 then ∣V(x+z)−V(x)−⟨p,z⟩∣=0|V(x+z)-V(x)-\langle p,z\rangle|=0; otherwise it is at most ε∥w∥≤ε∣z∣\varepsilon\lVert w\rVert\le\varepsilon|z|. Hence VV is differentiable at xx with gradient pp, so DV(x)=pDV(x)=p by Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §gradient, VV is differentiable on XX (Fréchet Differentiability and the Gradient on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §on-set), and by Partial Derivatives along an Orthonormal Basis of a Function Differentiable on a Hilbert Space §partial and (ii) its kk-th partial derivative is ⟨p,ek⟩\langle p,e_{k}\rangle, which is ∂kv(u)\partial_{k}v(u) for k≤dk\le d and 00 for k>dk>d, that is, ∂kV(x)\partial_{k}V(x).

Step 2 (Claim 2). C≥0C\ge0 was shown in (iv), so L=C1/2(∣b+1∣+2)≥0L=C^{1/2}(|b+1|+2)\ge0. Put g(u)=v(u)+b+1g(u)=v(u)+b+1 for u∈Rdu\in\mathbb{R}^{d}; by (a), g(u)≥1g(u)\ge1. As v(u)=g(u)−(b+1)v(u)=g(u)-(b+1), ∣v(u)∣≤g(u)+∣b+1∣|v(u)|\le g(u)+|b+1|, and using 1≤g(u)1\le g(u), 1+∣v(u)∣≤g(u)+g(u)+∣b+1∣g(u)=(∣b+1∣+2)g(u)1+|v(u)|\le g(u)+g(u)+|b+1|g(u)=(|b+1|+2)g(u). With (S),

∣∑k=1d∂kv(u) wk∣≤L g(u) q(w)(u,w∈Rd).(G)\Bigl|\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}v(u)\,w_{k}\Bigr|\le L\,g(u)\,q(w)\qquad(u,w\in\mathbb{R}^{d}).\tag{G}

Fix x∈Xx\in X and h∈Xah\in X^{a}; let u=pd(x)u=p_{d}(x), w=pd(h)w=p_{d}(h) and s=q(w)s=q(w), so s≤∣h∣as\le|h|_{a} by (iii). Let ϕ(t)=g(u+tw)=v(u+tw)+b+1\phi(t)=g(u+tw)=v(u+tw)+b+1 for t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}. By (vii) and claims 1 and 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, ϕ\phi is differentiable at every tt with ϕ′(t)=∑k=1d∂kv(u+tw)wk\phi'(t)=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}v(u+tw)w_{k}, so ϕ′(t)≤Ls ϕ(t)\phi'(t)\le Ls\,\phi(t) by (G). Let E(t)=exp⁡(−Ls t)E(t)=\exp(-Ls\,t); by Derivative and Continuity of the Scaled Exponential Function (with c=−Lsc=-Ls) it is differentiable with E′(t)=−Ls E(t)E'(t)=-Ls\,E(t), and E(t)>0E(t)>0 by claim 2 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function. By claim 3 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, ψ=ϕE\psi=\phi E is differentiable at every tt with ψ′(t)=(ϕ′(t)−Ls ϕ(t))E(t)≤0\psi'(t)=(\phi'(t)-Ls\,\phi(t))E(t)\le0. ψ\psi is continuous on R\mathbb{R} by (vii), so The Sign of the Derivative and Monotonicity §nonincreasing (with I=RI=\mathbb{R}) gives ψ(1)≤ψ(0)\psi(1)\le\psi(0), that is, ϕ(1)exp⁡(−Ls)≤ϕ(0)\phi(1)\exp(-Ls)\le\phi(0). Multiplying by exp⁡(Ls)>0\exp(Ls)>0 and using exp⁡(Ls)exp⁡(−Ls)=exp⁡(0)=1\exp(Ls)\exp(-Ls)=\exp(0)=1 (claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function) gives ϕ(1)≤ϕ(0)exp⁡(Ls)\phi(1)\le\phi(0)\exp(Ls). Since L≥0L\ge0 and s≤∣h∣as\le|h|_{a}, Ls≤L∣h∣aLs\le L|h|_{a}, and exp⁡\exp is increasing (claim 4 there), while ϕ(0)≥1>0\phi(0)\ge1>0; hence ϕ(1)≤ϕ(0)exp⁡(L∣h∣a)\phi(1)\le\phi(0)\exp(L|h|_{a}). Finally ϕ(0)=V(x)+b+1\phi(0)=V(x)+b+1 and, as u+w=pd(x+h)u+w=p_{d}(x+h) by (i), ϕ(1)=V(x+h)+b+1\phi(1)=V(x+h)+b+1. This is claim 2.

Step 3 (Claim 3). Let x∈Xx\in X, h=∑k=1dxkekh=\sum_{k=1}^{d}x_{k}e_{k} and x′=x−hx'=x-h. By (ii), h∈Xah\in X^{a}, hk=xkh_{k}=x_{k} for k≤dk\le d, so pd(h)=pd(x)p_{d}(h)=p_{d}(x), and by (P) ∣h∣a2=∑k=1dxk2/ak|h|_{a}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}x_{k}^{2}/a_{k}, so ∣h∣a=∣pd(x)∣a|h|_{a}=|p_{d}(x)|_{a}. By (i), pd(x′)=pd(x)−pd(h)=0p_{d}(x')=p_{d}(x)-p_{d}(h)=0, so V(x′)=v(0)V(x')=v(0). Claim 2 applied at x′x' with this hh gives V(x)+b+1=V(x′+h)+b+1≤(v(0)+b+1)exp⁡(L∣pd(x)∣a)V(x)+b+1=V(x'+h)+b+1\le(v(0)+b+1)\exp(L|p_{d}(x)|_{a}).

Step 4 (Claim 4). Let μ∈P(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X) with VV integrable. For x∈Xx\in X, (c) at u=pd(x)u=p_{d}(x), the formula of Step 1 and monotonicity of square roots give ∣∇aV(x)∣a≤C1/2(1+∣V(x)∣)|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}\le C^{1/2}(1+|V(x)|); and for k≤dk\le d, ak∂kV(x)2≤∣∇aV(x)∣a2a_{k}\partial_{k}V(x)^{2}\le|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2}, so ∣∂kV(x)∣≤ak−1/2C1/2(1+∣V(x)∣)|\partial_{k}V(x)|\le a_{k}^{-1/2}C^{1/2}(1+|V(x)|), while ∂kV=0\partial_{k}V=0 for k>dk>d. The functions ∣∇aV∣a|\nabla_{a}V|_{a} and ∣∂kV∣|\partial_{k}V| are Borel by Step 1 and claim 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions. Since VV is integrable, ∫X∣V∣ dμ<∞\int_{X}|V|\,d\mu<\infty (Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral), and the constant 11 is integrable by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space; so ∫XC1/2(1+∣V∣) dμ<∞\int_{X}C^{1/2}(1+|V|)\,d\mu<\infty by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative, and by the monotonicity there the nonnegative Borel functions ∣∇aV∣a|\nabla_{a}V|_{a} and ak1/2∣∂kV∣a_{k}^{1/2}|\partial_{k}V| have finite integrals. By the criterion of Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral (and Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable for the factor ak−1/2a_{k}^{-1/2}), ∣∇aV∣a|\nabla_{a}V|_{a} and each ∂kV\partial_{k}V are integrable.

Step 5 (Claim 5). Let cˉ=∑k=1∞ck\bar{c}=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}c_{k}, a convergent series of positive terms (Variance Sequences and Their Truncations §variances); then ck≤∑j=1kcj≤cˉc_{k}\le\sum_{j=1}^{k}c_{j}\le\bar{c} for every kk by Series of Nonnegative Real Numbers, Comparison, and the Geometric Series §dominates. Let m=min⁡k≤dakm=\min_{k\le d}a_{k}, positive. Put t=4cˉ/m+1t=4\bar{c}/m+1, positive, and α=1/(tm)\alpha=1/(tm), positive; then 2αck≤2cˉ/(4cˉ+m)≤122\alpha c_{k}\le2\bar{c}/(4\bar{c}+m)\le\tfrac12 for every kk, so by Moments of a Diagonal Gaussian Measure on a Hilbert Space: Coordinate Covariances, Finite Second Moment, and Exponential Moments of the Squared Norm §exponential (with θ=12\theta=\tfrac12) the function x↦exp⁡(α∣x∣2)x\mapsto\exp(\alpha|x|^{2}) is Borel and integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c}.

For x∈Xx\in X let s=∣pd(x)∣as=|p_{d}(x)|_{a}. Then s2=∑k=1dxk2/ak≤m−1∥pd(x)∥2≤m−1∣x∣2s^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}x_{k}^{2}/a_{k}\le m^{-1}\lVert p_{d}(x)\rVert^{2}\le m^{-1}|x|^{2} by Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n §square and (i). Since 0≤(Lt−s)2/t=L2t−2Ls+s2/t0\le(Lt-s)^{2}/t=L^{2}t-2Ls+s^{2}/t, we have 2Ls≤L2t+s2/t≤L2t+α∣x∣22Ls\le L^{2}t+s^{2}/t\le L^{2}t+\alpha|x|^{2}. Let G0=v(0)+b+1≥1G_{0}=v(0)+b+1\ge1. By claim 3 and V(x)+b+1≥1V(x)+b+1\ge1, squaring nonnegative numbers and using claims 1 and 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function,

(V(x)+b+1)2≤G02exp⁡(2Ls)≤G02exp⁡(L2t)exp⁡(α∣x∣2).(V(x)+b+1)^{2}\le G_{0}^{2}\exp(2Ls)\le G_{0}^{2}\exp(L^{2}t)\exp(\alpha|x|^{2}).

As (r−r′)2≤2r2+2r′2(r-r')^{2}\le2r^{2}+2r'^{2}, V(x)2≤2(V(x)+b+1)2+2(b+1)2≤2G02exp⁡(L2t)exp⁡(α∣x∣2)+2(b+1)2V(x)^{2}\le2(V(x)+b+1)^{2}+2(b+1)^{2}\le2G_{0}^{2}\exp(L^{2}t)\exp(\alpha|x|^{2})+2(b+1)^{2}. The right-hand side is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable, constants being integrable by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space), and V2V^{2} is Borel (Step 1 and claim 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions) and nonnegative, so V2V^{2} is integrable by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §nonnegative and the criterion of Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral. Since (∣V∣−1)2≥0(|V|-1)^{2}\ge0 gives ∣V∣≤12(1+V2)|V|\le\tfrac12(1+V^{2}), VV (Borel) is integrable in the same way. Finally, by Step 4, ∣∇aV∣a2≤C(1+∣V∣)2≤2C(1+V2)|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\le C(1+|V|)^{2}\le2C(1+V^{2}), and ∣∇aV∣a2=∑k=1dak(∂kV)2|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}(\partial_{k}V)^{2} is Borel (Step 1, claims 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions); so it is integrable with respect to γc\gamma_{c} in the same way.

Step 6 (Claim 6). Let x,y∈Xx,y\in X with h=y−x∈Xah=y-x\in X^{a}; let u=pd(x)u=p_{d}(x), w=pd(h)w=p_{d}(h), so u+w=pd(y)u+w=p_{d}(y) by (i), and s=q(w)≤∣h∣as=q(w)\le|h|_{a} by (iii). Let F(t)=v(u+tw)F(t)=v(u+tw) and F1(t)=∑k=1d∂kv(u+tw)wkF_{1}(t)=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}v(u+tw)w_{k} for t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}. By (vii) and claim 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives (applied to the finitely many summands), FF is differentiable with F′=F1F'=F_{1}, and F1F_{1} is differentiable with

F1′(t)=∑k=1d∑j=1d∂j∂kv(u+tw) wjwk ≥ −K∑k=1dwk2ak=−Ks2F_{1}'(t)=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\sum_{j=1}^{d}\partial_{j}\partial_{k}v(u+tw)\,w_{j}w_{k}\ \ge\ -K\sum_{k=1}^{d}\frac{w_{k}^{2}}{a_{k}}=-Ks^{2}

by (b) in Admissible Cylindrical Potentials on a Hilbert Space in the Noise Geometry §semiconvex, at the point u+twu+tw with h=wh=w there. By claim 1 of Derivative of a Polynomial Function on the Real Line and claims 1, 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, Q(t)=K2s2t2Q(t)=\tfrac{K}{2}s^{2}t^{2} has derivative Ks2tKs^{2}t, and t↦Ks2tt\mapsto Ks^{2}t has derivative Ks2Ks^{2}. So G=F+QG=F+Q and G1=F1+Ks2tG_{1}=F_{1}+Ks^{2}t satisfy G′=G1G'=G_{1} and G1′=F1′+Ks2≥0G_{1}'=F_{1}'+Ks^{2}\ge0 on R\mathbb{R}. By A Real Function with Nonnegative Second Derivative is Convex on an Interval with J=RJ=\mathbb{R} (order-convex, each tt lying strictly between t−1t-1 and t+1t+1), applied with the points 00 and 11: G(θ)≤(1−θ)G(0)+θG(1)G(\theta)\le(1-\theta)G(0)+\theta G(1) for 0≤θ≤10\le\theta\le1, so (G(θ)−G(0))/θ≤G(1)−G(0)(G(\theta)-G(0))/\theta\le G(1)-G(0) for 0<θ≤10<\theta\le1. Suppose G1(0)>G(1)−G(0)G_{1}(0)>G(1)-G(0); put ε=G1(0)−(G(1)−G(0))>0\varepsilon=G_{1}(0)-(G(1)-G(0))>0 and let δ\delta be given for ε\varepsilon by differentiability of GG at 00 with G′(0)=G1(0)G'(0)=G_{1}(0) (Single-Variable Calculus on an Interval §derivative); for θ=min⁡(δ/2,1)\theta=\min(\delta/2,1) we get (G(θ)−G(0))/θ>G1(0)−ε=G(1)−G(0)(G(\theta)-G(0))/\theta>G_{1}(0)-\varepsilon=G(1)-G(0), a contradiction. Hence F1(0)=G1(0)≤G(1)−G(0)=F(1)+K2s2−F(0)F_{1}(0)=G_{1}(0)\le G(1)-G(0)=F(1)+\tfrac{K}{2}s^{2}-F(0). Now F(0)=V(x)F(0)=V(x), F(1)=v(pd(y))=V(y)F(1)=v(p_{d}(y))=V(y), and F1(0)=∑k=1d∂kV(x)hk=⟨∇aV(x),y−x⟩aF_{1}(0)=\sum_{k=1}^{d}\partial_{k}V(x)h_{k}=\langle\nabla_{a}V(x),y-x\rangle_{a} by Step 1; and K2s2≤K2∣y−x∣a2\tfrac{K}{2}s^{2}\le\tfrac{K}{2}|y-x|_{a}^{2} as K≥0K\ge0. This gives claim 6.

Step 7 (Claim 7). Let μ∈P(X)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(X) with ∫X∣∇aV∣a2 dμ<∞\int_{X}|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}\,d\mu<\infty. By Step 1, ∇aV\nabla_{a}V is measurable into XaX^{a}, so it is square-integrable (The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §space) and its class lies in L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) (The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §classes). Let B=∣b∣B=|b|, so exp⁡(B)≥1\exp(B)\ge1.

The truncations. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N} let χn(r)=n−nexp⁡(−r/n)\chi_{n}(r)=n-n\exp(-r/n) (r∈Rr\in\mathbb{R}). By Derivative and Continuity of the Scaled Exponential Function (with c=−1/nc=-1/n) and claims 1, 2 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, χn\chi_{n} is differentiable at every rr with χn′(r)=exp⁡(−r/n)\chi_{n}'(r)=\exp(-r/n), and r↦exp⁡(−r/n)r\mapsto\exp(-r/n) is continuous (same lemma); χn\chi_{n} is continuous by Differentiability at an Interior Point Implies Continuity There. Reading R\mathbb{R} as R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, the partial derivative of Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set is defined by the same difference quotients as the derivative of Single-Variable Calculus on an Interval §derivative, and continuity at a point in the sense of Continuity at a Point for Maps Between Euclidean Spaces for n=m=1n=m=1 is the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta continuity of The Real Line: Standing Notation and Background for Calculus §continuity (as (r′−r)2<δ2(r'-r)^{2}<\delta^{2} iff ∣r′−r∣<δ|r'-r|<\delta); so χn\chi_{n} is of class C1C^{1} on R1\mathbb{R}^{1} by clauses 1 and 3 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, R1\mathbb{R}^{1} being open by claim 1 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous. By (v) and claims 1, 2 of A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k (with k=1k=1), ψn=χn∘v\psi_{n}=\chi_{n}\circ v is of class C1C^{1} on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} with ∂iψn(u)=exp⁡(−v(u)/n) ∂iv(u)\partial_{i}\psi_{n}(u)=\exp(-v(u)/n)\,\partial_{i}v(u).

Elementary bounds. For r≥−br\ge-b and n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}: (B1) 0<exp⁡(−r/n)≤exp⁡(B)0<\exp(-r/n)\le\exp(B), since −r/n≤B-r/n\le B and exp⁡\exp is positive and increasing (claims 2, 4 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function); hence n(1−exp⁡(B))≤χn(r)≤nn(1-\exp(B))\le\chi_{n}(r)\le n. (B2) (1+∣r∣)exp⁡(−r/n)≤n+(1+B)exp⁡(B)(1+|r|)\exp(-r/n)\le n+(1+B)\exp(B): if r≥0r\ge0, exp⁡(r/n)≥1+r/n\exp(r/n)\ge1+r/n (claim 4 there), so by claim 2 there exp⁡(−r/n)≤n/(n+r)\exp(-r/n)\le n/(n+r) and (1+r)n/(n+r)≤n(1+r)n/(n+r)\le n as n≥1n\ge1; if −b≤r<0-b\le r<0, then ∣r∣≤B|r|\le B and (B1) applies. (B3) ∣1−exp⁡(−r/n)∣≤exp⁡(B)|1-\exp(-r/n)|\le\exp(B): for r≥0r\ge0, 0<exp⁡(−r/n)≤exp⁡(0)=10<\exp(-r/n)\le\exp(0)=1; for r<0r<0, 1≤exp⁡(−r/n)≤exp⁡(B)1\le\exp(-r/n)\le\exp(B).

Cylindrical approximants. Since v≥−bv\ge-b, (B1) shows ψn\psi_{n} is bounded, and (iv) with (B2) gives ∣∂iψn(u)∣≤ai−1/2C1/2(1+∣v(u)∣)exp⁡(−v(u)/n)≤ai−1/2C1/2(n+(1+B)exp⁡(B))|\partial_{i}\psi_{n}(u)|\le a_{i}^{-1/2}C^{1/2}(1+|v(u)|)\exp(-v(u)/n)\le a_{i}^{-1/2}C^{1/2}(n+(1+B)\exp(B)). So ψn∈Cb1(Rd)\psi_{n}\in C^{1}_{b}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) (Bounded Continuously Differentiable Functions with Bounded Partial Derivatives on Euclidean Space §bounded) and φn=ψn∘pd∈FCb1(X)\varphi_{n}=\psi_{n}\circ p_{d}\in\mathcal{F}C^{1}_{b}(X) with representation (d,ψn)(d,\psi_{n}) (Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §cylindrical, Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions on a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §representation). By The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §gradient and Bounded C^1 Cylindrical Functions: Linear Structure, the Gradient and the Partial Derivatives, Bounds and Integrability, and Density in the Square-Integrable Functions §partial,

∇aφn(x)=∑k=1dak ∂kψn(pd(x)) ek=exp⁡(−V(x)/n) ∇aV(x)(x∈X),\nabla_{a}\varphi_{n}(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{d}a_{k}\,\partial_{k}\psi_{n}(p_{d}(x))\,e_{k}=\exp(-V(x)/n)\,\nabla_{a}V(x)\qquad(x\in X),

and its class lies in GμaG^{a}_{\mu} (The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §gradients).

Convergence. By The Space of Square-Integrable Maps from a Measure Space into a Hilbert Space with an Orthonormal Basis §operations, [∇aφn]−[∇aV][\nabla_{a}\varphi_{n}]-[\nabla_{a}V] is the class of x↦(exp⁡(−V(x)/n)−1)∇aV(x)x\mapsto(\exp(-V(x)/n)-1)\nabla_{a}V(x), whose squared noise norm is fn(x)=(1−exp⁡(−V(x)/n))2∣∇aV(x)∣a2f_{n}(x)=(1-\exp(-V(x)/n))^{2}|\nabla_{a}V(x)|_{a}^{2} by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity, so ∥[∇aφn]−[∇aV]∥μ2=∫Xfn dμ\lVert[\nabla_{a}\varphi_{n}]-[\nabla_{a}V]\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\int_{X}f_{n}\,d\mu. Each fnf_{n} is Borel: x↦exp⁡(−V(x)/n)x\mapsto\exp(-V(x)/n) is the composite of the Borel VV with a continuous, hence Borel, function (claims 3, 4 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space), and products of Borel functions are Borel (claims 2, 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions). For fixed xx, exp⁡(−V(x)/n)\exp(-V(x)/n) is the value at 1/n1/n of E(τ)=exp⁡(−V(x)τ)E(\tau)=\exp(-V(x)\tau), which is continuous at 00 with E(0)=1E(0)=1 (Derivative and Continuity of the Scaled Exponential Function, claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Exponential Function), and 1/n→01/n\to0; so fn(x)→0f_{n}(x)\to0. By (B3) and V≥−bV\ge-b, 0≤fn≤exp⁡(2B)∣∇aV∣a20\le f_{n}\le\exp(2B)|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2}, which is integrable with respect to μ\mu: the function ∣∇aV∣a2|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2} is Borel (as in Step 5) and nonnegative with finite integral, hence integrable by the criterion of Integrable Function and the Lebesgue Integral, and so its constant multiple exp⁡(2B)∣∇aV∣a2\exp(2B)|\nabla_{a}V|_{a}^{2} is integrable by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral §integrable. Claim 3 of Dominated Convergence Theorem (with limit the constant 00) gives ∫Xfn dμ→∫X0 dμ=0\int_{X}f_{n}\,d\mu\to\int_{X}0\,d\mu=0, hence ∥[∇aφn]−[∇aV]∥μ→0\lVert[\nabla_{a}\varphi_{n}]-[\nabla_{a}V]\rVert_{\mu}\to0, i.e. [∇aφn]→[∇aV][\nabla_{a}\varphi_{n}]\to[\nabla_{a}V] in the metric of the real Hilbert space L2(μ;Xa)L^{2}(\mu;X^{a}) (Probability Measures on a Hilbert Space Transported in the Noise Norm: Standing Notation §fields, Real Inner Product Space §distance). By Sequential Characterization of the Closure in a Metric Space, [∇aV][\nabla_{a}V] lies in the closure of GμaG^{a}_{\mu}, which is TμaT^{a}_{\mu} by The Noise Gradient of a Cylindrical Function and the Noise Tangent Space at a Probability Measure on a Hilbert Space §tangent and Real Hilbert Space §topology. This proves claim 7.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…