TheoremBase

Proof of The Score Paired with the Identity, and the Laplacian of a Convex Potential Bounded by its Pairing with the Score

lemmalem:laplacian-score-comparison-convex-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 6,856 chars · 22 deps · depth 30 Reason: Stage 1M: proof of the score identity pairing and Laplacian comparison.

Second-moment cutoffs and dominated convergence give the identity pairing; for the comparison, the score identity applied to mollified Lipschitz truncations, Fatou as the mollification vanishes, and dominated convergence as the truncation level grows.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Write ξ=ξμ\xi=\xi_{\mu} and fix a Borel representative of it. Since ξ2dμ<\int\lVert\xi\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty and μ\mu is a probability measure, for every Borel v:RdRdv:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d} with v2dμ<\int\lVert v\rVert^{2}\,d\mu<\infty the function ξv\lVert\xi\rVert\lVert v\rVert is μ\mu-integrable and ξvξv|\xi\cdot v|\le\lVert\xi\rVert\lVert v\rVert pointwise, by Hoelder's Inequality, for Two and for Finitely Many Factors §holder and Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality for the Euclidean Dot Product; in particular ξ\lVert\xi\rVert itself is μ\mu-integrable (take vv constant of norm 11). Limits of integrals below are justified by the dominated convergence theorem with such dominating functions.

Claim 1. Let ψR\psi_{R} (RNR\in\mathbb{N}) and MM be as in Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball with q=dq=d. By Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §test, ψR\psi_{R} is smooth and compactly supported, hence a test function, so the definition of the score gives

ξψRdμ=ξ,ψRμ=ΔψRdμ.\int\xi\cdot\nabla\psi_{R}\,d\mu=\langle\xi,\nabla\psi_{R}\rangle_{\mu}=-\int\Delta\psi_{R}\,d\mu .

The coordinates of ψR(x)\nabla\psi_{R}(x) are iψR(x)\partial_{i}\psi_{R}(x), bounded by MxM\lVert x\rVert, so ψR(x)dMx\lVert\nabla\psi_{R}(x)\rVert\le\sqrt{d}\,M\lVert x\rVert (as v2=ivi2\lVert v\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i}v_{i}^{2}), and ΔψRdM|\Delta\psi_{R}|\le dM. By Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §ball, ψR(x)=x\nabla\psi_{R}(x)=x and ΔψR(x)=d\Delta\psi_{R}(x)=d whenever x<R\lVert x\rVert<R, hence for all R>xR>\lVert x\rVert. So, as RR\to\infty, ξψRξid\xi\cdot\nabla\psi_{R}\to\xi\cdot\mathrm{id} pointwise with domination by dMξid\sqrt{d}M\lVert\xi\rVert\lVert\mathrm{id}\rVert, and ΔψRd\Delta\psi_{R}\to d pointwise with domination by the constant dMdM. Dominated convergence gives ξ,idμ=ddμ=d\langle\xi,\mathrm{id}\rangle_{\mu}=-\int d\,d\mu=-d.

Claim 2. The set GG is nonempty (μ(G)=1\mu(G)=1); fix x0Gx_{0}\in G and q0Gφ(x0)q_{0}\in\partial_{G}\varphi(x_{0}) (The Subdifferential of a Convex Function on an Open Convex Set is Nonempty §nonempty) and let LL range over natural numbers with q0<L\lVert q_{0}\rVert<L. Let φL\varphi^{L} be the Lipschitz truncation of φ\varphi at level LL, convex on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} and Lipschitz with constant LL (The Lipschitz Truncation of a Convex Function: a Global Lipschitz Convex Minorant Agreeing with It Where the Slope is Small §minorant). By The Points of Twice Differentiability of a Convex Function: a Borel Set of Full Measure, and Borel Measurability of the Gradient and Hessian on It §full (with dd for nn and U=RdU=\mathbb{R}^{d}) there is ALB(Rd)A^{L}\in\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) with λd(RdAL)=0\lambda_{d}(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus A^{L})=0, hence μ(AL)=1\mu(A^{L})=1 by absolute continuity, at every point of which φL\varphi^{L} is twice differentiable; let gLg^{L} and ΔL\Delta^{L} be the Borel maps defined from φL\varphi^{L} and ALA^{L} exactly as gg and Δ\Delta are defined from φ\varphi and AA, and 0ΔL0\le\Delta^{L} (The Points of Twice Differentiability of a Convex Function: a Borel Set of Full Measure, and Borel Measurability of the Gradient and Hessian on It §borel and The Points of Twice Differentiability of a Convex Function: a Borel Set of Full Measure, and Borel Measurability of the Gradient and Hessian on It §nonnegative). At yALy\in A^{L}, gL(y)g^{L}(y) is the only subgradient of φL\varphi^{L} (Subgradients near a Point of Twice Differentiability of a Convex Function, and Invariance of the Second-Order Expansion under Lipschitz Truncation §singleton), so gL(y)L\lVert g^{L}(y)\rVert\le L by Elementary Calculus of the Subdifferential of a Convex Function §bounded, φL\varphi^{L} being Lipschitz with constant LL on every ball; off ALA^{L}, gL=0Rdg^{L}=0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}.

Step A: the inequality for φL\varphi^{L}. Let ρ\rho be a mollifier kernel of radius 11 (Existence of Mollifier Kernels of Every Radius) and Fm=φLρ1/mF_{m}=\varphi^{L}*\rho_{1/m} for mNm\in\mathbb{N}. By Mollification of a Lipschitz Convex Function: Smooth Convex Approximations with Bounded Gradients Converging Where the Subgradient is Unique §regularity, FmF_{m} is smooth and convex with DFmL\lVert DF_{m}\rVert\le L, so iFmL|\partial_{i}F_{m}|\le L (claim 4 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n); by Mollification at a Point of Twice Differentiability: Convergence of the Mollified Gradient and Hessian, and a Hessian Bound for Lipschitz Functions §bound, with its constant KK for the dimension dd, the radius 11 and the kernel ρ\rho, jiFmKLm|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}F_{m}|\le KLm. Hence Gradients of Functions with Bounded Derivatives Belong to the Tangent Space; Constants Are Tangent; the Score Identity; the Score Has Mean Zero; Translation of Tangent Fields §score-identity applies with the single bound max{L,KLm}\max\{L,KLm\} for all first and second partial derivatives:

ξDFmdμ=ΔFmdμ,with ΔFm=iiiFm0,\int\xi\cdot DF_{m}\,d\mu=-\int\Delta F_{m}\,d\mu,\qquad\text{with }\Delta F_{m}=\sum_{i}\partial_{i}\partial_{i}F_{m}\ge0,

the diagonal entries of the positive semidefinite Hessian D2Fm(x)D^{2}F_{m}(x) being nonnegative. For yALy\in A^{L}, Mollification at a Point of Twice Differentiability: Convergence of the Mollified Gradient and Hessian, and a Hessian Bound for Lipschitz Functions §convergence with εm=m1\varepsilon_{m}=m^{-1} gives DFm(y)gL(y)DF_{m}(y)\to g^{L}(y) and D2Fm(y)D2φL(y)D^{2}F_{m}(y)\to D^{2}\varphi^{L}(y) in S(d)\mathcal{S}(d), hence ΔFm(y)ΔL(y)\Delta F_{m}(y)\to\Delta^{L}(y), the diagonal entries converging by Limits and Bounded Sequences of Symmetric Real Matrices §quadratic-form with z=eiz=e_{i}. Since μ(AL)=1\mu(A^{L})=1 and ξDFmLξ|\xi\cdot DF_{m}|\le L\lVert\xi\rVert, dominated convergence gives ξDFmdμξ,gLμ\int\xi\cdot DF_{m}\,d\mu\to\langle\xi,g^{L}\rangle_{\mu}. For yALy\notin A^{L}, ΔL(y)=0ΔFm(y)\Delta^{L}(y)=0\le\Delta F_{m}(y). Hence lim infmΔFm1ALΔL\liminf_{m}\Delta F_{m}\ge\mathbf{1}_{A^{L}}\Delta^{L} pointwise, and Fatou's Lemma gives

ΔLdμ=1ALΔLdμlim infmΔFmdμ=ξ,gLμ.(1)\int\Delta^{L}\,d\mu=\int\mathbf{1}_{A^{L}}\Delta^{L}\,d\mu\le\liminf_{m}\int\Delta F_{m}\,d\mu=-\langle\xi,g^{L}\rangle_{\mu}.\qquad(1)

Step B: LL\to\infty. Let A=ALALA^{\ast}=A\cap\bigcap_{L}A^{L}, a Borel set with μ(A)=1\mu(A^{\ast})=1 (countably many μ\mu-full sets; claim 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure). Fix yAy\in A^{\ast}. If L>g(y)=Dφ(y)L>\lVert g(y)\rVert=\lVert D\varphi(y)\rVert, then Subgradients near a Point of Twice Differentiability of a Convex Function, and Invariance of the Second-Order Expansion under Lipschitz Truncation §truncation shows that φL\varphi^{L} is twice differentiable at yy with first-order coefficient Dφ(y)D\varphi(y) and Hessian D2φ(y)D^{2}\varphi(y); by the uniqueness recorded in Differential Calculus and Convexity on Euclidean Open Sets: Standing Notation §twice-differentiable, gL(y)=g(y)g^{L}(y)=g(y) and ΔL(y)=Δ(y)\Delta^{L}(y)=\Delta(y). If Lg(y)L\le\lVert g(y)\rVert, then gL(y)Lg(y)\lVert g^{L}(y)\rVert\le L\le\lVert g(y)\rVert. So ξgLξg|\xi\cdot g^{L}|\le\lVert\xi\rVert\lVert g\rVert on AA^{\ast}, and ξgLξg\xi\cdot g^{L}\to\xi\cdot g and ΔLΔ\Delta^{L}\to\Delta pointwise on AA^{\ast} (the sequences being eventually constant). Dominated convergence gives ξ,gLμξ,gμ\langle\xi,g^{L}\rangle_{\mu}\to\langle\xi,g\rangle_{\mu}, and Fatou's lemma applied to 1AΔL0\mathbf{1}_{A^{\ast}}\Delta^{L}\ge0, together with (1), gives

Δdμ=1AΔdμlim infLΔLdμξ,gμ,\int\Delta\,d\mu=\int\mathbf{1}_{A^{\ast}}\Delta\,d\mu\le\liminf_{L}\int\Delta^{L}\,d\mu\le-\langle\xi,g\rangle_{\mu},

where Δdμ=1AΔdμ\int\Delta\,d\mu=\int\mathbf{1}_{A^{\ast}}\Delta\,d\mu and 1ALΔLdμ=ΔLdμ\int\mathbf{1}_{A^{L}}\Delta^{L}\,d\mu=\int\Delta^{L}\,d\mu hold because the integrands agree μ\mu-almost everywhere (The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §comparison). In particular Δdμ<\int\Delta\,d\mu<\infty, so the nonnegative Borel function Δ\Delta is integrable with respect to μ\mu.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…