TheoremBase

Proof of Vector Fields with Test-Function Components are Dense in the Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Measure of Finite Second Moment

lemmalem:test-fields-dense-l2-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 5,792 chars · 25 deps · depth 27 Reason: E2 Stage 2: proof of density of test fields.

Approximate by a bounded Lipschitz field, mollify its components uniformly on a large ball, and cut off smoothly outside it. The error is small on the ball and controlled by the second moment outside it.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. The rules of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field for adding, multiplying and comparing inequalities between real numbers, the properties of the absolute value in Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and the norm properties of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n (claim 4: vlv|v_{l}|\le\lVert v\rVert; claim 5: homogeneity; claim 6: triangle inequality) are used without further mention. Integrals of nonnegative Borel functions are taken in [0,][0,\infty] and compared by claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral. For real a,ba,b, (a+b)22a2+2b2(a+b)^{2}\le2a^{2}+2b^{2}, since the difference is (ab)20(a-b)^{2}\ge0.

Let ξL2(μ;Rd)\xi\in L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) and ε>0\varepsilon>0.

Step 1 (a bounded Lipschitz field). By The Bounded Lipschitz Vector Fields are Dense in the Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure §dense there is a bounded Lipschitz map ζ:RdRd\zeta:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R}^{d}, in the sense of that lemma, with ξζμε/3\lVert\xi-\zeta\rVert_{\mu}\le\varepsilon/3; let M0M\ge0 satisfy ζ(x)M\lVert\zeta(x)\rVert\le M for all xx. Each component ζl\zeta_{l} satisfies ζl(x)M|\zeta_{l}(x)|\le M and ζl(x)ζl(y)ζ(x)ζ(y)|\zeta_{l}(x)-\zeta_{l}(y)|\le\lVert\zeta(x)-\zeta(y)\rVert, so it is Lipschitz, hence continuous (A Lipschitz Map is Uniformly Continuous).

Step 2 (the radius). Put R=1+9M2M2(μ)ε2R=1+9M^{2}M_{2}(\mu)\varepsilon^{-2}, where M2(μ)=x2μ(dx)<M_{2}(\mu)=\int\lVert x\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)<\infty is the second moment. Then R1R\ge1, and pointwise 1{x>R}(x)R2x2\mathbf{1}_{\{\lVert x\rVert>R\}}(x)\le R^{-2}\lVert x\rVert^{2}, so

M2μ({x:x>R})M2R2M2(μ)M2R1M2(μ)(ε/3)2,M^{2}\mu\bigl(\{x:\lVert x\rVert>R\}\bigr)\le M^{2}R^{-2}M_{2}(\mu)\le M^{2}R^{-1}M_{2}(\mu)\le(\varepsilon/3)^{2},

the set being Borel as xx2x\mapsto\lVert x\rVert^{2} is Borel (Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §functions) and {x>R}={x2>R2}\{\lVert x\rVert>R\}=\{\lVert x\rVert^{2}>R^{2}\} (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field), a set of the form covered by claim 3 of Rational Intervals and Rays Generate the Borel Sigma-Algebra of the Real Line.

Step 3 (mollification). Let ρ\rho be a mollifier kernel of radius 11 on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} (Existence of Mollifier Kernels of Every Radius), and for δ>0\delta>0 let ρδ(y)=(δ1)dρ(δ1y)\rho_{\delta}(y)=(\delta^{-1})^{d}\rho(\delta^{-1}y), a mollifier kernel of radius δ\delta (Rescaling a Mollifier Kernel). With Ω=Rd\Omega=\mathbb{R}^{d} in Convolution of a Continuous Function with a Compactly Supported Continuous Kernel, Ωδ=Rd\Omega^{\delta}=\mathbb{R}^{d}, so ζlρδ\zeta_{l}*\rho_{\delta} is defined on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d}, and it is smooth there by claim 2 of Convolution with a CkC^k Kernel is of Class CkC^k. Let K=Bˉ(0Rd,2R)K=\bar{B}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{d}},2R), compact by A Closed Euclidean Ball is Convex and Compact, and τ=ε/(3d)\tau=\varepsilon/(3d), the natural number d1d\ge1 read in R\mathbb{R}. For each l[d]l\in[d], claim 2 of Mollification Converges Uniformly on Compact Subsets (with n=dn=d, Ω=Rd\Omega=\mathbb{R}^{d}, f=ζlf=\zeta_{l}, radius 11, the compact set KK and η=τ\eta=\tau) gives ε0,l>0\varepsilon_{0,l}>0. Let δ\delta be half the least of ε0,1,,ε0,d\varepsilon_{0,1},\dots,\varepsilon_{0,d} and 11; then 0<δ<ε0,l0<\delta<\varepsilon_{0,l} for every ll, and

(ζlρδ)(x)ζl(x)<τ(xK, l[d]).\bigl|(\zeta_{l}*\rho_{\delta})(x)-\zeta_{l}(x)\bigr|<\tau\qquad(x\in K,\ l\in[d]).

Step 4 (the test field). Let χR\chi_{R} be the cutoff of Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §cutoff (dimension dd): smooth, 0χR10\le\chi_{R}\le1, χR(x)=1\chi_{R}(x)=1 for xR\lVert x\rVert\le R and χR(x)=0\chi_{R}(x)=0 for x2R\lVert x\rVert\ge2R. Put ηl=χR(ζlρδ)\eta_{l}=\chi_{R}\,(\zeta_{l}*\rho_{\delta}). It is smooth by claim 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set and vanishes whenever x>2R\lVert x\rVert>2R, so it is compactly supported by claim 2 of Compact Support on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Means Vanishing Outside a Bounded Set; hence ηlCc(Rd)\eta_{l}\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}) (Test Functions on Euclidean Space, Their Gradient Maps and Laplacians §space), and η=(η1,,ηd)\eta=(\eta_{1},\dots,\eta_{d}) is a test field.

Step 5 (the estimate). Let xRdx\in\mathbb{R}^{d} and write ζρδ\zeta*\rho_{\delta} for the map with components ζlρδ\zeta_{l}*\rho_{\delta}. We claim

η(x)ζ(x)ε3+M1{x>R}(x).(P)\lVert\eta(x)-\zeta(x)\rVert\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3}+M\,\mathbf{1}_{\{\lVert x\rVert>R\}}(x).\tag{P}

If x>2R\lVert x\rVert>2R, then η(x)=0\eta(x)=0 and η(x)ζ(x)=ζ(x)M\lVert\eta(x)-\zeta(x)\rVert=\lVert\zeta(x)\rVert\le M. If x2R\lVert x\rVert\le2R, then xKx\in K and l((ζlρδ)(x)ζl(x))2<dτ2(ε/3)2\sum_{l}\bigl((\zeta_{l}*\rho_{\delta})(x)-\zeta_{l}(x)\bigr)^{2}<d\tau^{2}\le(\varepsilon/3)^{2}, so (ζρδ)(x)ζ(x)<ε/3\lVert(\zeta*\rho_{\delta})(x)-\zeta(x)\rVert<\varepsilon/3 (claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field); since η(x)ζ(x)=χR(x)((ζρδ)(x)ζ(x))(1χR(x))ζ(x)\eta(x)-\zeta(x)=\chi_{R}(x)\bigl((\zeta*\rho_{\delta})(x)-\zeta(x)\bigr)-(1-\chi_{R}(x))\zeta(x),

η(x)ζ(x)χR(x)ε3+(1χR(x))Mε3+(1χR(x))M,\lVert\eta(x)-\zeta(x)\rVert\le\chi_{R}(x)\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3}+(1-\chi_{R}(x))M\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3}+(1-\chi_{R}(x))M,

and 1χR(x)=01-\chi_{R}(x)=0 when xR\lVert x\rVert\le R, while 1χR(x)11-\chi_{R}(x)\le1 always. This proves (P). The map ηζ\eta-\zeta is Borel (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §borel-maps), and squaring (P),

ηζμ2=η(x)ζ(x)2μ(dx)2(ε3)2+2M2μ({x>R})4(ε3)2\lVert\eta-\zeta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\int\lVert\eta(x)-\zeta(x)\rVert^{2}\,\mu(dx)\le2\bigl(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3}\bigr)^{2}+2M^{2}\mu\bigl(\{\lVert x\rVert>R\}\bigr)\le4\bigl(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{3}\bigr)^{2}

by Step 2, so ηζμ2ε/3\lVert\eta-\zeta\rVert_{\mu}\le2\varepsilon/3 (claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field). By the triangle inequality in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) (Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu, claim 1 of The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity), ξημξζμ+ζημε\lVert\xi-\eta\rVert_{\mu}\le\lVert\xi-\zeta\rVert_{\mu}+\lVert\zeta-\eta\rVert_{\mu}\le\varepsilon. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…