TheoremBase

Proof of The Pythagorean Identity for Sine and Cosine

lemmalem:sine-cosine-pythagorean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Β· 4,954 chars Β· 16 deps Β· depth 15 Reason: First publication. The sum of squares has vanishing derivative by the product rule, hence is constant on each $[-R,R]$ by the vanishing-derivative corollary; its value at the origin is $1$. The bounds follow by monotonicity of squaring on the nonnegative reals.

The sum of squares has zero derivative by the product rule and the derivatives of sine and cosine, hence is constant on every [βˆ’R,R][-R,R]; its value at the origin is 11. The bounds follow by monotonicity of squaring.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement; it is applied to the data named at the point of use. Sums and products of functions are formed pointwise, as in the statements of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives and Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space; those items state their hypotheses for a pair of functions, and where only one function is named below the second is taken to be that same function. Every point of R\mathbb{R} is an interior point of the interval R\mathbb{R} by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line and Their Interior Points Β§whole-line.

Let h:Rβ†’Rh:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} be the function h=cos⁑cos⁑+sin⁑sin⁑h=\cos\cos+\sin\sin, that is, h(t)=(cos⁑t)2+(sin⁑t)2h(t)=(\cos t)^{2}+(\sin t)^{2}.

Claim 1 (the derivative of hh vanishes). Let t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R}. By Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine Β§derivative, cos⁑\cos is differentiable at tt with derivative βˆ’sin⁑t-\sin t, and sin⁑\sin is differentiable at tt with derivative cos⁑t\cos t. Claim 3 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives (the product rule), applied on the interval R\mathbb{R} at tt with both of the functions named there taken to be cos⁑\cos, gives that cos⁑cos⁑\cos\cos is differentiable at tt with derivative (βˆ’sin⁑t)cos⁑t+cos⁑t(βˆ’sin⁑t)(-\sin t)\cos t+\cos t(-\sin t); the same claim with both functions taken to be sin⁑\sin gives that sin⁑sin⁑\sin\sin is differentiable at tt with derivative (cos⁑t)sin⁑t+sin⁑tcos⁑t(\cos t)\sin t+\sin t\cos t. Claim 2 of that lemma then gives that hh is differentiable at tt with derivative

((βˆ’sin⁑t)cos⁑t+cos⁑t(βˆ’sin⁑t))+((cos⁑t)sin⁑t+sin⁑tcos⁑t).\bigl((-\sin t)\cos t+\cos t(-\sin t)\bigr)+\bigl((\cos t)\sin t+\sin t\cos t\bigr).

Multiplication in the field R\mathbb{R} is commutative, and claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field gives (βˆ’s)r=βˆ’(sr)(-s)r=-(sr) for all s,r∈Rs,r\in\mathbb{R}; so each of the first two summands equals βˆ’(cos⁑tsin⁑t)-(\cos t\sin t) and each of the last two equals cos⁑tsin⁑t\cos t\sin t. By the additive inverse axiom of that field the four summands cancel in pairs, and the derivative of hh at tt is 00.

Claim 2 (hh is continuous on R\mathbb{R}). By Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine Β§continuous, cos⁑\cos and sin⁑\sin are continuous on R\mathbb{R}. Claim 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space, applied with (X,d)=(R,dR)(X,d)=(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) and A=RA=\mathbb{R} β€” first to the pair cos⁑,cos⁑\cos,\cos, then to the pair sin⁑,sin⁑\sin,\sin, then to the pair cos⁑cos⁑,sin⁑sin⁑\cos\cos,\sin\sin β€” therefore gives in turn that cos⁑cos⁑\cos\cos, sin⁑sin⁑\sin\sin and their sum hh are continuous on R\mathbb{R}.

Claim 3 (clause 1). Fix x∈Rx\in\mathbb{R} and put R=1+∣x∣R=1+|x|. By claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field one has 0β‰€βˆ£x∣0\le|x|, and 0<10<1 by claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Claim 3 of the latter, applied with 0<10<1 and ∣xβˆ£β‰€βˆ£x∣|x|\le|x|, gives ∣x∣=0+∣x∣<1+∣x∣=R|x|=0+|x|<1+|x|=R; applied with 0<10<1 and 0β‰€βˆ£x∣0\le|x| it gives 0=0+0<R0=0+0<R. By claim 9 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, ∣x∣<R|x|<R means βˆ’R<x<R-R<x<R, and 0<R0<R likewise means βˆ’R<0<R-R<0<R. So xx and 00 both lie in the closed interval [βˆ’R,R][-R,R], which by Basic Facts about Intervals of the Real Line and Their Interior Points Β§closed-interval is an interval every point of which strictly between βˆ’R-R and RR is an interior point of it.

By claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative and Claim 2, the restriction h∣[βˆ’R,R]h|_{[-R,R]} is continuous on [βˆ’R,R][-R,R]; by claim 2 of that lemma and Claim 1 it is differentiable at every tt with βˆ’R<t<R-R<t<R, with derivative 00 there. Hence A Continuous Function with Vanishing Derivative is Constant, applied with a=βˆ’Ra=-R and b=Rb=R, gives h(t)=h(βˆ’R)h(t)=h(-R) for every t∈[βˆ’R,R]t\in[-R,R]; in particular

h(x)=h(βˆ’R)=h(0).h(x)=h(-R)=h(0).

By Uniform Convergence, Continuity, Parity and Derivatives of Sine and Cosine Β§values, cos⁑0=1\cos0=1 and sin⁑0=0\sin0=0, so h(0)=1β‹…1+0β‹…0=1+0=1h(0)=1\cdot1+0\cdot0=1+0=1, using the multiplicative identity of R\mathbb{R}, claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field and the additive identity. Therefore (cos⁑x)2+(sin⁑x)2=1(\cos x)^{2}+(\sin x)^{2}=1, which is clause 1.

Claim 4 (clause 2). Let x∈Rx\in\mathbb{R}. By claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field one has 0≀(sin⁑x)20\le(\sin x)^{2}, and by Claim 3 the difference 1βˆ’(cos⁑x)21-(\cos x)^{2} equals (sin⁑x)2(\sin x)^{2}; so claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives (cos⁑x)2≀1(\cos x)^{2}\le1.

By claim 1 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, ∣cos⁑x∣2=(cos⁑x)2|\cos x|^{2}=(\cos x)^{2}, so ∣cos⁑x∣2≀1=1β‹…1=12|\cos x|^{2}\le1=1\cdot1=1^{2}. Since 0β‰€βˆ£cos⁑x∣0\le|\cos x| by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and 0≀10\le1 by claim 1 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∣cos⁑xβˆ£β‰€1|\cos x|\le1.

The same argument with cos⁑\cos and sin⁑\sin exchanged β€” using 0≀(cos⁑x)20\le(\cos x)^{2}, again by claim 2 of Nonnegativity of Squares in an Ordered Field, and, from Claim 3, 1βˆ’(sin⁑x)2=(cos⁑x)21-(\sin x)^{2}=(\cos x)^{2} β€” gives ∣sin⁑xβˆ£β‰€1|\sin x|\le1. This is clause 2, and the proof is complete.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…