We use the numbered claims of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers, of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers and of Injectivity, Composition, and Restriction of Bijections. Every appeal to induction means an application of Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, so that it suffices to verify a property at and to pass from to , where is the successor map of Natural Numbers.
Step 1: reduction to initial segments. Suppose and are bijections. Define as follows: for the element lies in , so there is exactly one with ; set . By construction, for and we have if and only if . Fix . Since is a bijection, there is exactly one with , i.e. exactly one with . Hence is a bijection from onto .
It therefore suffices to prove the following statement for all :
: for every , if there exists a bijection , then .
Step 2: base case . By claim 2 of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers we have . Let be a bijection and suppose . By claim 6 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers we may write with . By claim 3 of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers, with , and by claim 1 of that lemma ; hence and are distinct elements of . But and both lie in , so , contradicting injectivity of (claim 1 of Injectivity, Composition, and Restriction of Bijections). Hence .
Step 3: inductive step. Assume , let , and let be a bijection. By claims 1 and 3 of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers we have , , and
In particular , so contains the two distinct elements and .
First, : otherwise by claim 2 of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers, and surjectivity of would give and , forcing , a contradiction. Hence for some by claim 6 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers, and claim 3 of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers gives
Since is a bijection, there is exactly one with . Let interchange and and fix every other element of ; explicitly , , and otherwise (if this is the identity map). Since for every , each has as a preimage, and it is the only one because implies . Hence is a bijection, and is a bijection from onto by claim 2 of Injectivity, Composition, and Restriction of Bijections. It satisfies .
We claim that the restriction of to is a bijection onto . First, let . Then because , so by claim 1 of Injectivity, Composition, and Restriction of Bijections; since , we conclude . Second, let . Since is a bijection onto and , there is exactly one with . This satisfies , because while and . Hence , and it is the unique element of mapped to . This proves the claim.
Applying to this bijection from onto gives , hence . This proves .
By induction holds for every , and with Step 1 this completes the proof.
Loadingβ¦
Prerequisites
d74d0714-4514-441d-9829-dd2e7f73052b