TheoremBase

Proof of Local Bounds for the Delta-Envelope and Attained Maxima on Closed Balls, for a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair

lemmalem:penalised-usc-attains-ball-wasserstein-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 6,792 chars · 21 deps · depth 34 Reason: First proof: envelope bound by the least usc majorant on the open trace; attainment by coercivity.

Lower semicontinuity of the penalty makes the constant minus delta times the penalty an upper semicontinuous majorant on the open ball, which dominates the envelope. For the maximum, a maximising sequence has bounded penalty, so coercivity gives a convergent subsequence in the penalty domain; its limit stays in the closed ball and upper semicontinuity makes it a maximiser.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named at the point of use. By Basic Properties of a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §lsc the penalty E\mathcal{E} is lower semicontinuous on D\mathcal{D} relative to D\mathcal{D}, and by Basic Properties of a Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pair §bounded-below there is e0Re_{0}\in\mathbb{R} with e0E(ν)e_{0}\le\mathcal{E}(\nu) for every νD\nu\in\mathcal{D}. The symmetry and the triangle inequality of W2W_{2} (The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §symmetry, The Quadratic Wasserstein Distance is a Metric on the Wasserstein Space §triangle) are used without further mention.

Claim 1. Put O={νP2(Rd):W2(ν,μ^)<r}O=\{\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}):W_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<r\}, which is open in (P2(Rd),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W_{2}) by Open Ball in a Metric Space is Open, and S=DOS'=\mathcal{D}\cap O, which contains μ^\hat{\mu} and is therefore nonempty. By The Delta-Envelopes of a Function on the Wasserstein Space Relative to a Penalty Pair §minus the function uδEu-\delta\mathcal{E} on D\mathcal{D} is bounded above near each point of D\mathcal{D} and uδ=(uδE)u^{-}_{\delta}=(u-\delta\mathcal{E})^{*}. By Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set §near-bounds its restriction (uδE)S(u-\delta\mathcal{E})|_{S'} is bounded above near each point of SS', and by Local Bounds, Semicontinuous Envelopes and Local Extrema Are Unchanged on the Trace of an Open Set §upper

((uδE)S)(ν)=uδ(ν)(νS).\bigl((u-\delta\mathcal{E})|_{S'}\bigr)^{*}(\nu)=u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)\qquad(\nu\in S').

Let h:SRh:S'\to\mathbb{R} be h(ν)=cδE(ν)h(\nu)=c-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu). We show that hh is upper semicontinuous on SS'. Let ν0S\nu_{0}\in S' and let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive; then εδ1\varepsilon\delta^{-1} is positive by claims 7 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. By Lower Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space applied to E\mathcal{E} at ν0\nu_{0} with εδ1\varepsilon\delta^{-1}, there is a positive θ\theta with E(ν0)εδ1<E(ν)\mathcal{E}(\nu_{0})-\varepsilon\delta^{-1}<\mathcal{E}(\nu) for every νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} with W2(ν0,ν)<θW_{2}(\nu_{0},\nu)<\theta. For such ν\nu lying in SS', multiplying by the positive δ\delta (claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives δE(ν0)ε<δE(ν)\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu_{0})-\varepsilon<\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu), and hence, by claim 1 of that lemma applied twice, cδE(ν)<cδE(ν0)+εc-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)<c-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu_{0})+\varepsilon, that is h(ν)<h(ν0)+εh(\nu)<h(\nu_{0})+\varepsilon. So hh is upper semicontinuous at ν0\nu_{0} relative to SS' by Upper Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space.

For νS\nu\in S' we have u(ν)cu(\nu)\le c by hypothesis, so u(ν)δE(ν)h(ν)u(\nu)-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le h(\nu) by the compatibility of the order with addition. Properties of the Upper Semicontinuous Envelope §least, applied on SS' to (uδE)S(u-\delta\mathcal{E})|_{S'} and hh, gives ((uδE)S)(ν)h(ν)\bigl((u-\delta\mathcal{E})|_{S'}\bigr)^{*}(\nu)\le h(\nu) for νS\nu\in S'. With the identity displayed above, uδ(ν)cδE(ν)u^{-}_{\delta}(\nu)\le c-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) for every νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} with W2(ν,μ^)<rW_{2}(\nu,\hat{\mu})<r.

Claim 2. For νK\nu\in K we have δe0δE(ν)\delta e_{0}\le\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu) by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, hence g(ν)cδE(ν)cδe0g(\nu)\le c-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu)\le c-\delta e_{0}. The set {g(ν):νK}\{g(\nu):\nu\in K\} is therefore nonempty, since μ^K\hat{\mu}\in K, and bounded above by cδe0c-\delta e_{0}; let ss be its least upper bound, which exists by The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §bounds. Then g(μ^)sg(\hat{\mu})\le s.

By Existence of a Sequence of Positive Real Numbers with Limit Zero there is a sequence (hn)nN(h_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} of positive real numbers with limit 00; replacing hnh_{n} by min{hn,1}\min\{h_{n},1\} we may assume hn1h_{n}\le1 for every nn, the new sequence being positive by claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and still having limit 00 by claim 2 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, squeezed between the constant sequence 00 and (hn)(h_{n}). For each nNn\in\mathbb{N}, claim 3 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R}, applied with ε=hn\varepsilon=h_{n}, provides νnK\nu_{n}\in K with

shn<g(νn)s.s-h_{n}<g(\nu_{n})\le s .

Then g(μ^)1shn<g(νn)g(\hat{\mu})-1\le s-h_{n}<g(\nu_{n}), so, using g(νn)cδE(νn)g(\nu_{n})\le c-\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n}) and claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, δE(νn)<cg(μ^)+1\delta\,\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})<c-g(\hat{\mu})+1, and multiplying by δ1\delta^{-1} (claims 7 and 10 of that lemma),

E(νn)cwithc=δ1(cg(μ^)+1)(nN).\mathcal{E}(\nu_{n})\le c'\qquad\text{with}\qquad c'=\delta^{-1}\bigl(c-g(\hat{\mu})+1\bigr)\qquad(n\in\mathbb{N}).

By Wasserstein-Coercive Penalty Pairs §coercive the set {μD:E(μ)c}\{\mu\in\mathcal{D}:\mathcal{E}(\mu)\le c'\} is sequentially compact in (P2(Rd),W2)(\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),W_{2}), so by Sequentially Compact Subset of a Metric Space there are ν\nu^{*} in that set, in particular νD\nu^{*}\in\mathcal{D}, and a strictly increasing sequence (nk)kN(n_{k})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} in N\mathbb{N} such that (νnk)kN(\nu_{n_{k}})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges to ν\nu^{*}.

ν\nu^{*} lies in KK. Let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. By Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space there is kk with W2(νnk,ν)<εW_{2}(\nu_{n_{k}},\nu^{*})<\varepsilon, and then W2(ν,μ^)W2(ν,νnk)+W2(νnk,μ^)ε+rW_{2}(\nu^{*},\hat{\mu})\le W_{2}(\nu^{*},\nu_{n_{k}})+W_{2}(\nu_{n_{k}},\hat{\mu})\le\varepsilon+r, since νnkK\nu_{n_{k}}\in K. As ε\varepsilon was arbitrary, W2(ν,μ^)rW_{2}(\nu^{*},\hat{\mu})\le r by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-above, so νK\nu^{*}\in K and g(ν)sg(\nu^{*})\le s.

ν\nu^{*} is a maximiser. The real sequence (hn)(h_{n}) converges to 00 in the metric space (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}), dR(x,y)=xyd_{\mathbb{R}}(x,y)=|x-y| being the metric of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line, so that convergence in (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}) is exactly the condition of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers; by A Subsequence of a Convergent Sequence Has the Same Limit the subsequence (hnk)kN(h_{n_{k}})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges to 00 as well. Let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. By Upper Semicontinuous Function on a Subset of a Metric Space there is a positive θ\theta with g(ν)<g(ν)+εg(\nu)<g(\nu^{*})+\varepsilon for every νD\nu\in\mathcal{D} with W2(ν,ν)<θW_{2}(\nu^{*},\nu)<\theta. Choose kk so large that W2(νnk,ν)<θW_{2}(\nu_{n_{k}},\nu^{*})<\theta and hnk<εh_{n_{k}}<\varepsilon, which is possible because both conditions hold from some index on and the larger of the two indices serves. Then

sε<shnk<g(νnk)<g(ν)+ε,s-\varepsilon<s-h_{n_{k}}<g(\nu_{n_{k}})<g(\nu^{*})+\varepsilon ,

so sg(ν)+2εs\le g(\nu^{*})+2\varepsilon. As ε\varepsilon was arbitrary, sg(ν)s\le g(\nu^{*}) by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-above (applied with the positive numbers 2ε2\varepsilon, which exhaust the positive reals by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Together with g(ν)sg(\nu^{*})\le s this gives g(ν)=sg(\nu^{*})=s, and so g(ν)s=g(ν)g(\nu)\le s=g(\nu^{*}) for every νK\nu\in K.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…