TheoremBase

Proof of Sums, Nonnegative Multiples, Monotonicity and Quadratic Reparametrisation of Moduli of Continuity

lemmalem:modulus-arithmetic-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 5,744 chars · 5 deps · depth 11 Reason: Proof of the closure properties of moduli of continuity, including the quadratic reparametrisation of a bounded modulus.

Nonnegativity is inherited from the summands or the factor; for the smallness condition one halves the tolerance and takes the lesser of the two radii in the case of a sum, and divides the tolerance by the factor in the case of a multiple.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Write σ\sigma for the function of claim 1 and τ\tau for the function of claim 2, and recall that a modulus of continuity satisfies the two conditions of Modulus of Continuity: it is nonnegative on TT, and for every positive ε\varepsilon there is a positive δ\delta such that every tTt\in T with tδt\le\delta satisfies a value at most ε\varepsilon.

Claim 1. Let tTt\in T. Since 0ω(t)0\le\omega(t) and 0ω(t)0\le\omega'(t), claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0σ(t)0\le\sigma(t), which is condition 1.

For condition 2, let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive; then ε2\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} is positive by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Choose a positive δ\delta such that every tTt\in T with tδt\le\delta satisfies ω(t)ε2\omega(t)\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}, and a positive δ\delta' such that every tTt\in T with tδt\le\delta' satisfies ω(t)ε2\omega'(t)\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}. Let δ\delta'' be the lesser of δ\delta and δ\delta', as provided by claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; it is one of the two, hence positive, and satisfies δδ\delta''\le\delta and δδ\delta''\le\delta'. Let tTt\in T satisfy tδt\le\delta''. By transitivity tδt\le\delta and tδt\le\delta', so ω(t)ε2\omega(t)\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2} and ω(t)ε2\omega'(t)\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}, so claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0ε2ω(t)0\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}-\omega(t) and 0ε2ω(t)0\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}-\omega'(t); their sum is nonnegative by claim 2 of that lemma, and it equals (ε2+ε2)(ω(t)+ω(t))\bigl(\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}\bigr)-\bigl(\omega(t)+\omega'(t)\bigr), so claim 3 of that lemma applied in the other direction gives

σ(t)=ω(t)+ω(t)ε2+ε2=ε.\sigma(t)=\omega(t)+\omega'(t)\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}+\tfrac{\varepsilon}{2}=\varepsilon .

Thus σ\sigma is a modulus of continuity.

Claim 2. Let tTt\in T. From 0c0\le c and 0ω(t)0\le\omega(t), claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0cω(t)=τ(t)0\le c\,\omega(t)=\tau(t), which is condition 1.

For condition 2, let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive. If c=0c=0 then τ(t)=0\tau(t)=0 for every tTt\in T, and τ(t)ε\tau(t)\le\varepsilon holds for every tTt\in T, so any positive δ\delta serves. Suppose instead that cc is positive. Then 1c\tfrac{1}{c} is positive by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so εc\tfrac{\varepsilon}{c} is positive by claim 5 of that lemma. Choose a positive δ\delta such that every tTt\in T with tδt\le\delta satisfies ω(t)εc\omega(t)\le\tfrac{\varepsilon}{c}. For such a tt, multiplying by the nonnegative number cc with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives

τ(t)=cω(t)cεc=ε.\tau(t)=c\,\omega(t)\le c\,\tfrac{\varepsilon}{c}=\varepsilon .

Thus τ\tau is a modulus of continuity.

Claim 3. Let s,tTs,t\in T satisfy sts\le t. If ω\omega and ω\omega' are nondecreasing then ω(s)ω(t)\omega(s)\le\omega(t) and ω(s)ω(t)\omega'(s)\le\omega'(t), so σ(s)σ(t)\sigma(s)\le\sigma(t) by the same combination of claims 3 and 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field used in claim 1. If ω\omega is nondecreasing then ω(s)ω(t)\omega(s)\le\omega(t), and multiplying by the nonnegative number cc with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives τ(s)τ(t)\tau(s)\le\tau(t).

Claim 4. Let MM be as in the claim, and write Q(s)Q(s) and ω[c]\omega^{[c]} as in the statement; the supremum defining ω[c](s)\omega^{[c]}(s) is the least upper bound of Q(s)Q(s), as recorded in The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §bounds.

The three inequalities. Let s,tTs,t\in T satisfy t2cst^{2}\le c\,s. Then ω(t)Q(s)\omega(t)\in Q(s), and a supremum is an upper bound of its set, so ω(t)ω[c](s)\omega(t)\le\omega^{[c]}(s); this is the displayed inequality of the claim. Taking t=0t=0, which is admissible because 02=0cs0^{2}=0\le c\,s, gives 0ω(0)ω[c](s)0\le\omega(0)\le\omega^{[c]}(s), since ω\omega is nonnegative. Finally MM is an upper bound of Q(s)Q(s) by hypothesis, so ω[c](s)M\omega^{[c]}(s)\le M, a supremum being the least upper bound.

Monotonicity. Let s,sTs,s'\in T satisfy sss\le s'. Multiplying by the nonnegative number cc with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives cscsc\,s\le c\,s', so every tTt\in T with t2cst^{2}\le c\,s satisfies t2cst^{2}\le c\,s' by transitivity; hence every member of Q(s)Q(s) is a member of Q(s)Q(s'). As ω[c](s)\omega^{[c]}(s') is an upper bound of Q(s)Q(s'), it is an upper bound of Q(s)Q(s), and therefore ω[c](s)ω[c](s)\omega^{[c]}(s)\le\omega^{[c]}(s').

Condition 2. Let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive and choose a positive θ\theta such that every tTt\in T with tθt\le\theta satisfies ω(t)ε\omega(t)\le\varepsilon. Let δ\delta be 11 if c=0c=0, and θ2c\tfrac{\theta^{2}}{c} if cc is positive; in the second case θ2\theta^{2} is positive by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, 1c\tfrac{1}{c} is positive by claim 7 of that lemma, and so δ\delta is positive by claim 5 of it again. In either case cδθ2c\,\delta\le\theta^{2}: the product is 00 when c=0c=0, and equals θ2\theta^{2} otherwise. Let sTs\in T satisfy sδs\le\delta and let tTt\in T satisfy t2cst^{2}\le c\,s. Multiplying sδs\le\delta by the nonnegative cc with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives cscδc\,s\le c\,\delta, so t2θ2t^{2}\le\theta^{2} by transitivity. Were θ<t\theta<t, claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field would give θ2<t2\theta^{2}<t^{2}, contradicting t2θ2t^{2}\le\theta^{2}; so tθt\le\theta by trichotomy, and hence ω(t)ε\omega(t)\le\varepsilon. Thus ε\varepsilon is an upper bound of Q(s)Q(s), and ω[c](s)ε\omega^{[c]}(s)\le\varepsilon because a supremum is the least upper bound. So ω[c]\omega^{[c]} is a modulus of continuity, and it is nondecreasing by the previous paragraph.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…