Proof of Sums, Nonnegative Multiples, Monotonicity and Quadratic Reparametrisation of Moduli of Continuity
lemmalem:modulus-arithmetic-2026aNonnegativity is inherited from the summands or the factor; for the smallness condition one halves the tolerance and takes the lesser of the two radii in the case of a sum, and divides the tolerance by the factor in the case of a multiple.
Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Write for the function of claim 1 and for the function of claim 2, and recall that a modulus of continuity satisfies the two conditions of Modulus of Continuity: it is nonnegative on , and for every positive there is a positive such that every with satisfies a value at most .
Claim 1. Let . Since and , claim 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives , which is condition 1.
For condition 2, let be positive; then is positive by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Choose a positive such that every with satisfies , and a positive such that every with satisfies . Let be the lesser of and , as provided by claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; it is one of the two, hence positive, and satisfies and . Let satisfy . By transitivity and , so and , so claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives and ; their sum is nonnegative by claim 2 of that lemma, and it equals , so claim 3 of that lemma applied in the other direction gives
Thus is a modulus of continuity.
Claim 2. Let . From and , claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives , which is condition 1.
For condition 2, let be positive. If then for every , and holds for every , so any positive serves. Suppose instead that is positive. Then is positive by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so is positive by claim 5 of that lemma. Choose a positive such that every with satisfies . For such a , multiplying by the nonnegative number with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives
Thus is a modulus of continuity.
Claim 3. Let satisfy . If and are nondecreasing then and , so by the same combination of claims 3 and 2 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field used in claim 1. If is nondecreasing then , and multiplying by the nonnegative number with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives .
Claim 4. Let be as in the claim, and write and as in the statement; the supremum defining is the least upper bound of , as recorded in The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background §bounds.
The three inequalities. Let satisfy . Then , and a supremum is an upper bound of its set, so ; this is the displayed inequality of the claim. Taking , which is admissible because , gives , since is nonnegative. Finally is an upper bound of by hypothesis, so , a supremum being the least upper bound.
Monotonicity. Let satisfy . Multiplying by the nonnegative number with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives , so every with satisfies by transitivity; hence every member of is a member of . As is an upper bound of , it is an upper bound of , and therefore .
Condition 2. Let be positive and choose a positive such that every with satisfies . Let be if , and if is positive; in the second case is positive by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, is positive by claim 7 of that lemma, and so is positive by claim 5 of it again. In either case : the product is when , and equals otherwise. Let satisfy and let satisfy . Multiplying by the nonnegative with claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives , so by transitivity. Were , claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field would give , contradicting ; so by trichotomy, and hence . Thus is an upper bound of , and because a supremum is the least upper bound. So is a modulus of continuity, and it is nondecreasing by the previous paragraph.
Loading…
Prerequisites
c058856a-ba20-4b30-9674-87dd7d1e9837