TheoremBase

Countable additivity of the restricted measure is that of the original measure on a sequence that also lies in F; for the trace measure, the sequence of traces on Y is a pairwise disjoint sequence of measurable sets whose union is the trace of the union. Sigma-finiteness passes on through the traces of a witnessing sequence and monotonicity.

Proof

Write ρ=μ∣FY\rho=\mu|_{\mathcal{F}_{Y}}. Every member of F\mathcal{F} is a subset of XX, as FβŠ†P(X)\mathcal{F}\subseteq\mathcal{P}(X) by Οƒ-Algebra and Measurable Space (i), with P(X)\mathcal{P}(X) (and likewise P(Y)\mathcal{P}(Y)) the power set; unions ⋃m∈NAm\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}A_{m} of sequences are those of Indexed Families of Sets and Their Union, Intersection and Product (ii). In particular YβŠ†XY\subseteq X, so X∩Y=YX\cap Y=Y. A sequence in FY\mathcal{F}_{Y} is also a sequence in F\mathcal{F}, since its range is contained in FYβŠ†F\mathcal{F}_{Y}\subseteq\mathcal{F}.

Proof of (i). By Closure Properties of Οƒ-Algebras, Intersections and Traces of Οƒ-Algebras, and the Generated Οƒ-Algebra (vi), applied to the Οƒ\sigma-algebra FY\mathcal{F}_{Y} on YY of Closure Properties of Οƒ-Algebras, Intersections and Traces of Οƒ-Algebras, and the Generated Οƒ-Algebra (xi), βˆ…βˆˆFY\emptyset\in\mathcal{F}_{Y}, and ρ(βˆ…)=ΞΌ(βˆ…)=0\rho(\emptyset)=\mu(\emptyset)=0 by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i). Let (Am)(A_{m}) be a sequence in FY\mathcal{F}_{Y} of pairwise disjoint sets. Then ⋃m∈NAm∈FY\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}A_{m}\in\mathcal{F}_{Y} by Οƒ-Algebra and Measurable Space (i), and (Am)(A_{m}) is a pairwise disjoint sequence in F\mathcal{F}, so by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i)

ρ(⋃m∈NAm)=ΞΌ(⋃m∈NAm)=βˆ‘m∈NΞΌ(Am)=βˆ‘m∈Nρ(Am),\rho\Bigl(\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}A_{m}\Bigr)=\mu\Bigl(\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}A_{m}\Bigr)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\mu(A_{m})=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\rho(A_{m}),

the sums being those of Sum of a Sequence in [0,∞] (ii), and the last equality holding because the sequences m↦μ(Am)m\mapsto\mu(A_{m}) and m↦ρ(Am)m\mapsto\rho(A_{m}) have the same terms and are therefore equal. Hence ρ\rho is a measure on (Y,FY)(Y,\mathcal{F}_{Y}) by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i).

Proof of (ii). By (i), ρ\rho is a measure on (Y,FY)(Y,\mathcal{F}_{Y}). Further Y∈FYY\in\mathcal{F}_{Y} by Οƒ-Algebra and Measurable Space (i), and ρ(Y)=ΞΌ(Y)\rho(Y)=\mu(Y); so if ΞΌ(Y)<∞\mu(Y)<\infty, then ρ(Y)<∞\rho(Y)<\infty and ρ\rho is finite by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (iii).

Proof of (iii). Let gg be the map A↦A∩YA\mapsto A\cap Y of Sequences and Maps of Sets: Complements, Traces, Two-Term Sequences, the Disjointing Sequence, and Sequences in a Subset (ii), with F\mathcal{F} in place of A\mathcal{A}. It is a map Fβ†’P(Y)\mathcal{F}\to\mathcal{P}(Y). For A∈FA\in\mathcal{F}, g(A)=A∩Y∈Fg(A)=A\cap Y\in\mathcal{F} by Closure Properties of Οƒ-Algebras, Intersections and Traces of Οƒ-Algebras, and the Generated Οƒ-Algebra (ix); as every element of ran⁑g\operatorname{ran}g is such a value, ran⁑gβŠ†F\operatorname{ran}g\subseteq\mathcal{F}, so gg is a map Fβ†’F\mathcal{F}\to\mathcal{F} by Functions, Values of a Function, and Functions from One Class to Another (iii), and Ξ½=μ∘g\nu=\mu\circ g is a map Fβ†’[0,∞]\mathcal{F}\to[0,\infty] with Ξ½(A)=ΞΌ(A∩Y)\nu(A)=\mu(A\cap Y) (Basic Properties of Functions: Equality, Composition, Identity, Inverse and Restriction (ii)); it is the only map with these values (Values, Restriction and Equality of a Map, and the Map u↦t(u)u\mapsto t(u) as a Defined Set Symbol (iv)). We have Ξ½(βˆ…)=ΞΌ(βˆ…βˆ©Y)=ΞΌ(βˆ…)=0\nu(\emptyset)=\mu(\emptyset\cap Y)=\mu(\emptyset)=0 by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i). Let (Am)(A_{m}) be a sequence in F\mathcal{F} of pairwise disjoint sets. By Sequences and Maps of Sets: Complements, Traces, Two-Term Sequences, the Disjointing Sequence, and Sequences in a Subset (ii), applied with the set F\mathcal{F} in place of ZZ, there is exactly one sequence (Cm)(C_{m}) in P(Y)\mathcal{P}(Y) with Cm=Am∩YC_{m}=A_{m}\cap Y for every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}. Each CmC_{m} lies in F\mathcal{F} by Closure Properties of Οƒ-Algebras, Intersections and Traces of Οƒ-Algebras, and the Generated Οƒ-Algebra (ix) and satisfies CmβŠ†YC_{m}\subseteq Y, so Cm∈FYC_{m}\in\mathcal{F}_{Y}; as FYβŠ†P(Y)\mathcal{F}_{Y}\subseteq\mathcal{P}(Y), (Cm)(C_{m}) is a sequence in FY\mathcal{F}_{Y} by Sequences and Maps of Sets: Complements, Traces, Two-Term Sequences, the Disjointing Sequence, and Sequences in a Subset (v), applied to the set YY, and hence a sequence in F\mathcal{F}. Its terms are pairwise disjoint, since CmβŠ†AmC_{m}\subseteq A_{m} for every mm (Monotone Sequences of Sets, Unions of Traces, and Disjointness of Smaller Sets (v)), and ⋃m∈NCm=(⋃m∈NAm)∩Y\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}C_{m}=\bigl(\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}A_{m}\bigr)\cap Y (Monotone Sequences of Sets, Unions of Traces, and Disjointness of Smaller Sets (iii)). By Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i) applied to (Cm)(C_{m}),

Ξ½(⋃m∈NAm)=ΞΌ(⋃m∈NCm)=βˆ‘m∈NΞΌ(Cm)=βˆ‘m∈NΞ½(Am),\nu\Bigl(\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}A_{m}\Bigr)=\mu\Bigl(\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}C_{m}\Bigr)=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\mu(C_{m})=\sum_{m\in\mathbb{N}}\nu(A_{m}),

the last equality because μ(Cm)=μ(Am∩Y)=ν(Am)\mu(C_{m})=\mu(A_{m}\cap Y)=\nu(A_{m}) for every mm, so the two sequences of terms are equal. Hence ν\nu is a measure on (X,F)(X,\mathcal{F}) by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (i).

Proof of (iv). As X∈FX\in\mathcal{F} by Οƒ-Algebra and Measurable Space (i) and X∩Y=YX\cap Y=Y, we have Ξ½(X)=ΞΌ(X∩Y)=ΞΌ(Y)\nu(X)=\mu(X\cap Y)=\mu(Y).

Proof of (v). By Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (iv) there is a sequence (Xm)(X_{m}) in F\mathcal{F} with ⋃m∈NXm=X\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}X_{m}=X and ΞΌ(Xm)<∞\mu(X_{m})<\infty for every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}. For each mm, Xm∩Y∈FX_{m}\cap Y\in\mathcal{F} by Closure Properties of Οƒ-Algebras, Intersections and Traces of Οƒ-Algebras, and the Generated Οƒ-Algebra (ix), and Xm∩YβŠ†XmX_{m}\cap Y\subseteq X_{m}, so Ξ½(Xm)=ΞΌ(Xm∩Y)≀μ(Xm)\nu(X_{m})=\mu(X_{m}\cap Y)\le\mu(X_{m}) by Basic Properties of a Measure (iii), so Ξ½(Xm)<∞\nu(X_{m})<\infty (Small Facts about [0,∞]: Zero, Finiteness and Sums of Zeros (iii)). So the sequence (Xm)(X_{m}) shows that Ξ½\nu is Οƒ\sigma-finite, by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (iv). For ρ\rho, let (Dm)(D_{m}) be the sequence in P(Y)\mathcal{P}(Y) with Dm=Xm∩YD_{m}=X_{m}\cap Y for every m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N}, given by Sequences and Maps of Sets: Complements, Traces, Two-Term Sequences, the Disjointing Sequence, and Sequences in a Subset (ii). By the same argument as for (Cm)(C_{m}) in the proof of (iii), with XmX_{m} in place of AmA_{m} (which does not use disjointness), (Dm)(D_{m}) is a sequence in FY\mathcal{F}_{Y} and ⋃m∈NDm=(⋃m∈NXm)∩Y=X∩Y=Y\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}D_{m}=\bigl(\bigcup_{m\in\mathbb{N}}X_{m}\bigr)\cap Y=X\cap Y=Y. Moreover ρ(Dm)=ΞΌ(Xm∩Y)=Ξ½(Xm)<∞\rho(D_{m})=\mu(X_{m}\cap Y)=\nu(X_{m})<\infty for every mm. So (Dm)(D_{m}) shows that ρ\rho is Οƒ\sigma-finite on (Y,FY)(Y,\mathcal{F}_{Y}), by Measure, Measure Space, and Probability Measure (iv).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…