TheoremBase

Proof

Claim 1. We argue by induction on nn, using Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers, on the statement P(n)P(n): every injective map u:[n]→[n]u:[n]\to[n] is a bijection.

For P(1)P(1): by claim 2 of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers we have [1]={1}[1]=\{1\}, so u(1)=1u(1)=1, and 11 is the one and only element of [1][1] whose image under uu is 11. Thus uu is a bijection by Bijection of Sets.

Assume P(n)P(n) and let u:[S(n)]→[S(n)]u:[S(n)]\to[S(n)] be injective. Put a=u(S(n))a=u(S(n)) and define θ:[S(n)]→[S(n)]\theta:[S(n)]\to[S(n)] by

θ(a)=S(n),θ(S(n))=a,θ(k)=k  for k∈[S(n)] with k≠a and k≠S(n);\theta(a)=S(n),\qquad \theta(S(n))=a,\qquad \theta(k)=k\ \text{ for }k\in[S(n)]\text{ with }k\ne a\text{ and }k\ne S(n);

if a=S(n)a=S(n) this prescription is consistent and gives θ(k)=k\theta(k)=k for every kk. In all cases θ(θ(k))=k\theta(\theta(k))=k for every k∈[S(n)]k\in[S(n)], so θ\theta is a two-sided inverse of itself and claim 3 of Inverse of a Bijection shows that θ\theta is a bijection from [S(n)][S(n)] onto [S(n)][S(n)].

Let v:[S(n)]→[S(n)]v:[S(n)]\to[S(n)] be the map v(k)=θ(u(k))v(k)=\theta(u(k)). It is injective: θ\theta is injective by claim 1 of Injectivity, Composition, and Restriction of Bijections, so v(j)=v(k)v(j)=v(k) gives u(j)=u(k)u(j)=u(k) and hence j=kj=k. Moreover v(S(n))=θ(a)=S(n)v(S(n))=\theta(a)=S(n).

Let k∈[n]k\in[n]. If v(k)=S(n)v(k)=S(n) then v(k)=v(S(n))v(k)=v(S(n)), so k=S(n)k=S(n) by injectivity, contradicting S(n)∉[n]S(n)\notin[n] from claim 3 of Basic Properties of Initial Segments of the Natural Numbers. Since [S(n)]=[n]∪{S(n)}[S(n)]=[n]\cup\{S(n)\} by that same claim, it follows that v(k)∈[n]v(k)\in[n]. Hence the restriction v′v' of vv to [n][n] is a map from [n][n] to [n][n], and it is injective because vv is. By P(n)P(n) it is a bijection.

We check that vv is a bijection from [S(n)][S(n)] onto [S(n)][S(n)]. Let y∈[S(n)]y\in[S(n)]. If y=S(n)y=S(n), then v(S(n))=yv(S(n))=y, while no k∈[n]k\in[n] satisfies v(k)=yv(k)=y, since v(k)∈[n]v(k)\in[n] and S(n)∉[n]S(n)\notin[n]; so S(n)S(n) is the unique preimage. If y∈[n]y\in[n], then there is exactly one k∈[n]k\in[n] with v′(k)=yv'(k)=y, and v(S(n))=S(n)≠yv(S(n))=S(n)\ne y, again because S(n)∉[n]S(n)\notin[n]; so that kk is the unique preimage. Thus vv is a bijection.

Finally, θ(v(k))=θ(θ(u(k)))=u(k)\theta(v(k))=\theta(\theta(u(k)))=u(k) for every kk, so uu is the composition of the bijections vv and θ\theta and is therefore a bijection by claim 2 of Injectivity, Composition, and Restriction of Bijections. This proves P(S(n))P(S(n)). That a bijection from [n][n] to [n][n] is a permutation of [n][n] is Permutation of the Set {1,…,r}\{1,\dots,r\}.

Claim 2. Let XX be nonempty and finite, so that XX has nn elements for some n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, and let φ:[n]→X\varphi:[n]\to X be a bijection, as provided by Number of Elements of a Set. By claims 1 and 2 of Inverse of a Bijection the inverse φ−1:X→[n]\varphi^{-1}:X\to[n] exists and is a bijection. Let w:[n]→[n]w:[n]\to[n] be the map w(k)=φ−1(u(φ(k)))w(k)=\varphi^{-1}\bigl(u(\varphi(k))\bigr). If w(j)=w(k)w(j)=w(k), then applying φ\varphi and using φ∘φ−1=id\varphi\circ\varphi^{-1}=\mathrm{id} gives u(φ(j))=u(φ(k))u(\varphi(j))=u(\varphi(k)), hence φ(j)=φ(k)\varphi(j)=\varphi(k) since uu is injective, hence j=kj=k since φ\varphi is injective by claim 1 of Injectivity, Composition, and Restriction of Bijections. So ww is injective, and claim 1 shows that ww is a bijection.

For every x∈Xx\in X we have φ(w(φ−1(x)))=u(x)\varphi(w(\varphi^{-1}(x)))=u(x), using φ∘φ−1=id\varphi\circ\varphi^{-1}=\mathrm{id} twice. Thus uu is the composition of the three bijections φ−1\varphi^{-1}, ww and φ\varphi, and two applications of claim 2 of Injectivity, Composition, and Restriction of Bijections show that uu is a bijection from XX onto XX.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…