TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout, SS denotes the successor map of Natural Numbers, so that S(n)=n+1S(n)=n+1 by statement 1 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers; each appeal to Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers is to a subset A⊆NA\subseteq\mathbb{N} containing 11 and closed under SS. Finite sums and their properties are those of Finite Sum Notation in a Field and Properties of Finite Sums. For n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}, [n][n] is the initial segment determined by nn and un:[n]→Fu^{n}:[n]\to F is the constant family with value 11 used in The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field.

1. Base and step. By claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, ιF(1)=∑k=11uk1=u11=1\iota_{F}(1)=\sum_{k=1}^{1}u^{1}_{k}=u^{1}_{1}=1.

Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. Since n≤S(n)n\le S(n) by statements 1 and 5 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, every k∈[n]k\in[n] lies in [S(n)][S(n)], and the restriction of uS(n)u^{S(n)} to [n][n] is the constant family unu^{n}. Claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums therefore gives

ιF(S(n))=∑k=1S(n)ukS(n)=(∑k=1nukn)+uS(n)S(n)=ιF(n)+1.\iota_{F}(S(n))=\sum_{k=1}^{S(n)}u^{S(n)}_{k}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}u^{n}_{k}\Bigr)+u^{S(n)}_{S(n)}=\iota_{F}(n)+1 .

2. The unit is a lower bound. Let A={n∈N:1≤ιF(n)}A=\{n\in\mathbb{N}:1\le\iota_{F}(n)\}. By part 1 and reflexivity of ≤\le we have 1∈A1\in A. Suppose n∈An\in A. Statement 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0<10<1, so statement 1 of the same result gives ιF(n)+0<ιF(n)+1\iota_{F}(n)+0<\iota_{F}(n)+1; since ιF(n)+0=ιF(n)\iota_{F}(n)+0=\iota_{F}(n) by Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, part 1 yields ιF(n)<ιF(S(n))\iota_{F}(n)<\iota_{F}(S(n)). Combining 1≤ιF(n)1\le\iota_{F}(n) with this by mixed transitivity, statement 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives 1<ιF(S(n))1<\iota_{F}(S(n)) and in particular 1≤ιF(S(n))1\le\iota_{F}(S(n)), so S(n)∈AS(n)\in A. By induction A=NA=\mathbb{N}.

3. Positivity. Let n∈Nn\in\mathbb{N}. From 0<10<1 and 1≤ιF(n)1\le\iota_{F}(n), mixed transitivity gives 0<ιF(n)0<\iota_{F}(n); in particular ιF(n)≠0\iota_{F}(n)\ne 0. Statement 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field then says that ιF(n)−1\iota_{F}(n)^{-1} exists and satisfies 0<ιF(n)−10<\iota_{F}(n)^{-1}.

4. Additivity. Fix m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} and let

A={n∈N:ιF(m+n)=ιF(m)+ιF(n)}.A=\{n\in\mathbb{N}:\iota_{F}(m+n)=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(n)\}.

Since m+1=S(m)m+1=S(m), part 1 gives ιF(m+1)=ιF(m)+1=ιF(m)+ιF(1)\iota_{F}(m+1)=\iota_{F}(m)+1=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(1), so 1∈A1\in A. Suppose n∈An\in A. Statements 4 and 2 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers give m+S(n)=S(n)+m=S(n+m)=S(m+n)m+S(n)=S(n)+m=S(n+m)=S(m+n), so by part 1 and the induction hypothesis

ιF(m+S(n))=ιF(m+n)+1=(ιF(m)+ιF(n))+1=ιF(m)+(ιF(n)+1)=ιF(m)+ιF(S(n)),\iota_{F}(m+S(n))=\iota_{F}(m+n)+1=\bigl(\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(n)\bigr)+1=\iota_{F}(m)+\bigl(\iota_{F}(n)+1\bigr)=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(S(n)),

using the associativity of addition in the field FF. Hence S(n)∈AS(n)\in A, and by induction A=NA=\mathbb{N}.

5. Multiplicativity. Fix m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} and let

A={n∈N:ιF(mn)=ιF(m) ιF(n)}.A=\{n\in\mathbb{N}:\iota_{F}(mn)=\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(n)\}.

Identity 3 of Natural Numbers gives m⋅1=mm\cdot 1=m, and ιF(m) ιF(1)=ιF(m)⋅1=ιF(m)\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(1)=\iota_{F}(m)\cdot 1=\iota_{F}(m) by part 1 and the multiplicative identity of FF; hence 1∈A1\in A. Suppose n∈An\in A. Identity 4 of Natural Numbers gives m⋅S(n)=mn+mm\cdot S(n)=mn+m, so part 4 and the induction hypothesis give

ιF(m⋅S(n))=ιF(mn)+ιF(m)=ιF(m) ιF(n)+ιF(m)⋅1=ιF(m)(ιF(n)+1)=ιF(m) ιF(S(n)),\iota_{F}(m\cdot S(n))=\iota_{F}(mn)+\iota_{F}(m)=\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(n)+\iota_{F}(m)\cdot 1=\iota_{F}(m)\bigl(\iota_{F}(n)+1\bigr)=\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(S(n)),

using the distributivity of multiplication over addition in FF. Hence S(n)∈AS(n)\in A, and by induction A=NA=\mathbb{N}.

6. Strict monotonicity. Let m,n∈Nm,n\in\mathbb{N} with m<nm<n. By statement 7 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers there is k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} with n=m+kn=m+k, so part 4 gives ιF(n)=ιF(m)+ιF(k)\iota_{F}(n)=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(k). By part 3 we have 0<ιF(k)0<\iota_{F}(k), so statement 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives ιF(m)+0<ιF(m)+ιF(k)\iota_{F}(m)+0<\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(k), and ιF(m)+0=ιF(m)\iota_{F}(m)+0=\iota_{F}(m) by Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field. Hence ιF(m)<ιF(n)\iota_{F}(m)<\iota_{F}(n).

7. Injectivity. We prove the contrapositive. Let m,n∈Nm,n\in\mathbb{N} with m≠nm\ne n. By trichotomy, statement 3 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, either m<nm<n or n<mn<m. In the first case part 6 gives ιF(m)<ιF(n)\iota_{F}(m)<\iota_{F}(n) and in the second it gives ιF(n)<ιF(m)\iota_{F}(n)<\iota_{F}(m); in either case ιF(m)≠ιF(n)\iota_{F}(m)\ne\iota_{F}(n).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…