TheoremBase

Proof of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field

lemmalem:natural-number-image-properties-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: First published proof. The base and step come from the restriction independence and recursion of finite sums; the remaining claims are four inductions on subsets of N, with strict monotonicity obtained from the subtraction property of the order on N.

Proof

Throughout, SS denotes the successor map of Natural Numbers, so that S(n)=n+1S(n)=n+1 by statement 1 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers; each appeal to Principle of Induction for the Natural Numbers is to a subset ANA\subseteq\mathbb{N} containing 11 and closed under SS. Finite sums and their properties are those of Finite Sum Notation in a Field and Properties of Finite Sums. For nNn\in\mathbb{N}, [n][n] is the initial segment determined by nn and un:[n]Fu^{n}:[n]\to F is the constant family with value 11 used in The Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to a Field.

1. Base and step. By claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums, ιF(1)=k=11uk1=u11=1\iota_{F}(1)=\sum_{k=1}^{1}u^{1}_{k}=u^{1}_{1}=1.

Let nNn\in\mathbb{N}. Since nS(n)n\le S(n) by statements 1 and 5 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, every k[n]k\in[n] lies in [S(n)][S(n)], and the restriction of uS(n)u^{S(n)} to [n][n] is the constant family unu^{n}. Claim 1 of Properties of Finite Sums therefore gives

ιF(S(n))=k=1S(n)ukS(n)=(k=1nukn)+uS(n)S(n)=ιF(n)+1.\iota_{F}(S(n))=\sum_{k=1}^{S(n)}u^{S(n)}_{k}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{n}u^{n}_{k}\Bigr)+u^{S(n)}_{S(n)}=\iota_{F}(n)+1 .

2. The unit is a lower bound. Let A={nN:1ιF(n)}A=\{n\in\mathbb{N}:1\le\iota_{F}(n)\}. By part 1 and reflexivity of \le we have 1A1\in A. Suppose nAn\in A. Statement 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0<10<1, so statement 1 of the same result gives ιF(n)+0<ιF(n)+1\iota_{F}(n)+0<\iota_{F}(n)+1; since ιF(n)+0=ιF(n)\iota_{F}(n)+0=\iota_{F}(n) by Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, part 1 yields ιF(n)<ιF(S(n))\iota_{F}(n)<\iota_{F}(S(n)). Combining 1ιF(n)1\le\iota_{F}(n) with this by mixed transitivity, statement 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, gives 1<ιF(S(n))1<\iota_{F}(S(n)) and in particular 1ιF(S(n))1\le\iota_{F}(S(n)), so S(n)AS(n)\in A. By induction A=NA=\mathbb{N}.

3. Positivity. Let nNn\in\mathbb{N}. From 0<10<1 and 1ιF(n)1\le\iota_{F}(n), mixed transitivity gives 0<ιF(n)0<\iota_{F}(n); in particular ιF(n)0\iota_{F}(n)\ne 0. Statement 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field then says that ιF(n)1\iota_{F}(n)^{-1} exists and satisfies 0<ιF(n)10<\iota_{F}(n)^{-1}.

4. Additivity. Fix mNm\in\mathbb{N} and let

A={nN:ιF(m+n)=ιF(m)+ιF(n)}.A=\{n\in\mathbb{N}:\iota_{F}(m+n)=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(n)\}.

Since m+1=S(m)m+1=S(m), part 1 gives ιF(m+1)=ιF(m)+1=ιF(m)+ιF(1)\iota_{F}(m+1)=\iota_{F}(m)+1=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(1), so 1A1\in A. Suppose nAn\in A. Statements 4 and 2 of Arithmetic of Addition on the Natural Numbers give m+S(n)=S(n)+m=S(n+m)=S(m+n)m+S(n)=S(n)+m=S(n+m)=S(m+n), so by part 1 and the induction hypothesis

ιF(m+S(n))=ιF(m+n)+1=(ιF(m)+ιF(n))+1=ιF(m)+(ιF(n)+1)=ιF(m)+ιF(S(n)),\iota_{F}(m+S(n))=\iota_{F}(m+n)+1=\bigl(\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(n)\bigr)+1=\iota_{F}(m)+\bigl(\iota_{F}(n)+1\bigr)=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(S(n)),

using the associativity of addition in the field FF. Hence S(n)AS(n)\in A, and by induction A=NA=\mathbb{N}.

5. Multiplicativity. Fix mNm\in\mathbb{N} and let

A={nN:ιF(mn)=ιF(m)ιF(n)}.A=\{n\in\mathbb{N}:\iota_{F}(mn)=\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(n)\}.

Identity 3 of Natural Numbers gives m1=mm\cdot 1=m, and ιF(m)ιF(1)=ιF(m)1=ιF(m)\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(1)=\iota_{F}(m)\cdot 1=\iota_{F}(m) by part 1 and the multiplicative identity of FF; hence 1A1\in A. Suppose nAn\in A. Identity 4 of Natural Numbers gives mS(n)=mn+mm\cdot S(n)=mn+m, so part 4 and the induction hypothesis give

ιF(mS(n))=ιF(mn)+ιF(m)=ιF(m)ιF(n)+ιF(m)1=ιF(m)(ιF(n)+1)=ιF(m)ιF(S(n)),\iota_{F}(m\cdot S(n))=\iota_{F}(mn)+\iota_{F}(m)=\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(n)+\iota_{F}(m)\cdot 1=\iota_{F}(m)\bigl(\iota_{F}(n)+1\bigr)=\iota_{F}(m)\,\iota_{F}(S(n)),

using the distributivity of multiplication over addition in FF. Hence S(n)AS(n)\in A, and by induction A=NA=\mathbb{N}.

6. Strict monotonicity. Let m,nNm,n\in\mathbb{N} with m<nm<n. By statement 7 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers there is kNk\in\mathbb{N} with n=m+kn=m+k, so part 4 gives ιF(n)=ιF(m)+ιF(k)\iota_{F}(n)=\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(k). By part 3 we have 0<ιF(k)0<\iota_{F}(k), so statement 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives ιF(m)+0<ιF(m)+ιF(k)\iota_{F}(m)+0<\iota_{F}(m)+\iota_{F}(k), and ιF(m)+0=ιF(m)\iota_{F}(m)+0=\iota_{F}(m) by Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field. Hence ιF(m)<ιF(n)\iota_{F}(m)<\iota_{F}(n).

7. Injectivity. We prove the contrapositive. Let m,nNm,n\in\mathbb{N} with mnm\ne n. By trichotomy, statement 3 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers, either m<nm<n or n<mn<m. In the first case part 6 gives ιF(m)<ιF(n)\iota_{F}(m)<\iota_{F}(n) and in the second it gives ιF(n)<ιF(m)\iota_{F}(n)<\iota_{F}(m); in either case ιF(m)ιF(n)\iota_{F}(m)\ne\iota_{F}(n).

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…