TheoremBase

Proof of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space

propositionprop:rn-real-vector-space-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Initial publication of the proof of prop:rn-real-vector-space-2026a, verifying the eight vector space conditions coordinatewise from the field axioms of the real numbers and identifying the zero vector, the additive inverses, and the difference.

Proof

Throughout, a point of Euclidean space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is an ordered nn-tuple of real numbers, and two points are equal exactly when their corresponding coordinates are equal; for a point zz we write ziz_i for its ii-th coordinate, the index ii always being a natural number with 1≀i≀n1\le i\le n in the order on the natural numbers. The real numbers form a field; the eight axioms of that definition are used below without further comment, and 00, 11, βˆ’t-t denote its additive identity, multiplicative identity, and the additive inverse of tt.

Step 1 (The two operations). By the definition of the sum of points and the definition of the scalar multiple, for all points u,vu,v of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and every real number Ξ»\lambda the tuples u+vu+v and Ξ»v\lambda v are again points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, with

(u+v)i=ui+vi,(Ξ»v)i=Ξ»vi.(u+v)_i=u_i+v_i,\qquad (\lambda v)_i=\lambda v_i .

Thus ++ assigns a point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n to each pair of points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and scalar multiplication assigns a point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n to each real number and each point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n; these are operations of the kind required by the definition of a vector space over the field of real numbers. It remains to verify the eight conditions of that definition, and each is verified coordinatewise from the corresponding field axiom.

Step 2 (The eight conditions). Let u,v,wu,v,w be points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, let Ξ»,ΞΌ\lambda,\mu be real numbers, and let ii satisfy 1≀i≀n1\le i\le n.

Condition 1: ((u+v)+w)i=(ui+vi)+wi=ui+(vi+wi)=(u+(v+w))i((u+v)+w)_i=(u_i+v_i)+w_i=u_i+(v_i+w_i)=(u+(v+w))_i, by associativity of addition in the field.

Condition 2: (u+v)i=ui+vi=vi+ui=(v+u)i(u+v)_i=u_i+v_i=v_i+u_i=(v+u)_i, by commutativity of addition.

Condition 3: let 0Rn0_{\mathbb{R}^n} be the origin of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so that (0Rn)i=0(0_{\mathbb{R}^n})_i=0. Then (v+0Rn)i=vi+0=vi(v+0_{\mathbb{R}^n})_i=v_i+0=v_i, because 00 is the additive identity. Hence v+0Rn=vv+0_{\mathbb{R}^n}=v for every point vv, and condition 3 holds with 0Rn0_{\mathbb{R}^n} in the role of the zero vector.

Condition 4: given vv, each coordinate viv_i has an additive inverse βˆ’vi-v_i in the field, so w=(βˆ’v1,…,βˆ’vn)w=(-v_1,\dots,-v_n) is a point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and (v+w)i=vi+(βˆ’vi)=0=(0Rn)i(v+w)_i=v_i+(-v_i)=0=(0_{\mathbb{R}^n})_i. Hence v+w=0Rnv+w=0_{\mathbb{R}^n}.

Condition 5: (λ(μv))i=λ(μvi)=(λμ)vi=((λμ)v)i(\lambda(\mu v))_i=\lambda(\mu v_i)=(\lambda\mu)v_i=((\lambda\mu)v)_i, by associativity of multiplication.

Condition 6: (1v)i=1vi=vi(1v)_i=1v_i=v_i, because 11 is the multiplicative identity.

Condition 7: (Ξ»(u+v))i=Ξ»(ui+vi)=Ξ»ui+Ξ»vi=(Ξ»u+Ξ»v)i(\lambda(u+v))_i=\lambda(u_i+v_i)=\lambda u_i+\lambda v_i=(\lambda u+\lambda v)_i, by distributivity.

Condition 8: ((Ξ»+ΞΌ)v)i=(Ξ»+ΞΌ)vi=Ξ»vi+ΞΌvi=(Ξ»v+ΞΌv)i((\lambda+\mu)v)_i=(\lambda+\mu)v_i=\lambda v_i+\mu v_i=(\lambda v+\mu v)_i, again by distributivity.

Since all eight conditions hold, Rn\mathbb{R}^n with these two operations is a real vector space.

Step 3 (Claim 1: the zero vector). That 0Rn0_{\mathbb{R}^n} is a zero vector was shown under condition 3. Suppose zz is also a zero vector, that is, v+z=vv+z=v for every point vv of Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Taking v=0Rnv=0_{\mathbb{R}^n} gives 0Rn+z=0Rn0_{\mathbb{R}^n}+z=0_{\mathbb{R}^n}, while condition 3 applied to v=zv=z gives z+0Rn=zz+0_{\mathbb{R}^n}=z. By condition 2 the two left-hand sides are equal, so z=0Rnz=0_{\mathbb{R}^n}.

Step 4 (Claim 2: the additive inverse). Let x=(x1,…,xn)x=(x_1,\dots,x_n). By condition 4 the point (βˆ’x1,…,βˆ’xn)(-x_1,\dots,-x_n) satisfies x+(βˆ’x1,…,βˆ’xn)=0Rnx+(-x_1,\dots,-x_n)=0_{\mathbb{R}^n}. Conversely, if ww is a point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n with x+w=0Rnx+w=0_{\mathbb{R}^n}, then comparing ii-th coordinates gives xi+wi=0x_i+w_i=0, whence wi=βˆ’xiw_i=-x_i by claim 1 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field. As this holds for every ii, we get w=(βˆ’x1,…,βˆ’xn)w=(-x_1,\dots,-x_n), which proves uniqueness. Finally, by the definition of the scalar multiple and the identity (βˆ’s)t=βˆ’(st)(-s)t=-(st) of claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, applied with s=1s=1 and t=xit=x_i,

((βˆ’1)x)i=(βˆ’1)xi=βˆ’(1xi)=βˆ’xi,((-1)x)_i=(-1)x_i=-(1x_i)=-x_i ,

the last equality because 11 is the multiplicative identity. Hence (βˆ’1)x=(βˆ’x1,…,βˆ’xn)(-1)x=(-x_1,\dots,-x_n).

Step 5 (Claim 3: agreement with the difference). Let y=(y1,…,yn)y=(y_1,\dots,y_n). By the definition of the difference of points its ii-th coordinate is xiβˆ’yix_i-y_i, which abbreviates xi+(βˆ’yi)x_i+(-y_i). By Step 4 the ii-th coordinate of βˆ’y-y is βˆ’yi-y_i, so by the definition of the sum of points the ii-th coordinate of x+(βˆ’y)x+(-y) is xi+(βˆ’yi)x_i+(-y_i) as well. The two points therefore have the same coordinates, so xβˆ’y=x+(βˆ’y)x-y=x+(-y). β– \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…