Grid events. Let I be the set of pairs (i,i′) of integers with 0≤i≤i′≤n and i′−i≤m+2; it has at most (n+1)(m+3) elements, since i ranges over {0,…,n} and i′−i over {0,…,m+2}. For (i,i′)∈I put
Ei,i′={ω: ∣Pi′(ω)−Pi(ω)−(i′−i)∣≥x},
and let G be the complement of ⋃(i,i′)∈IEi,i′. Write H for the σ-algebra generated by P0,…,Pn. Each Pi with 0≤i≤n is H-measurable, so ω↦Pi′(ω)−Pi(ω)−(i′−i) is H-measurable by claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions (constants, sums and scalar multiples), its absolute value is H-measurable by Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable (the absolute value being continuous), and Ei,i′, the preimage of [x,∞), belongs to H; hence so does G, the complement of a finite union. If i=i′ then Ei,i′=∅ because x>0. If i<i′, the increment Pi′−Pi has the Poisson distribution with parameter i′−i by hypothesis (the integers i,i′ satisfying 0≤i<i′≤n), so by claim 3 of Series Formula, Exponential Moments, and Chernoff Tail Bounds for the Poisson Distribution, with μ=i′−i≤m+2 and its monotonicity assertion, P(Ei,i′)≤2exp(−ϖm+2(x)). By countable subadditivity (claim 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure, applied to an enumeration of the finite family (Ei,i′)(i,i′)∈I padded with empty sets), P(Ω∖G)≤∑(i,i′)∈IP(Ei,i′)≤2(n+1)(m+3)exp(−ϖm+2(x)), every term being at most 2exp(−ϖm+2(x)). (Only pairs with i′−i≤m+1 are used below, so the constant could be sharpened slightly; we keep the simpler form.)
From grid windows to all windows. Fix ω∈G and real u≤u′ with 0≤u≤u′≤n and u′−u≤m; write P for the counting path P(ω), which is nondecreasing by condition 2 of Counting Path and Its Jump Times. By Existence and Uniqueness of the Integer Part of a Real Number let ⌊y⌋ denote the integer part of a real y, so y−1<⌊y⌋≤y, and let ⌈y⌉ be ⌊y⌋ if y=⌊y⌋ and ⌊y⌋+1 otherwise, the least integer ≥y, so y≤⌈y⌉<y+1.
Upper bound. Put i=⌊u⌋ and i′=⌈u′⌉. Then i≥0 (as u≥0 and i is the largest integer ≤u, while 0≤u), i≤u≤u′≤i′, and i′≤n (as n is an integer ≥u′). Moreover i′−i<(u′+1)−(u−1)=u′−u+2≤m+2, so (i,i′)∈I and ω∈/Ei,i′. By monotonicity of the path,
Pu′−Pu≤Pi′−Pi<(i′−i)+x<(u′−u)+2+x.
Lower bound. Put j=⌈u⌉ and j′=⌊u′⌋, so u≤j<u+1 and u′−1<j′≤u′, both integers in [0,n]. If j≤j′, then j′−j≤u′−u≤m, so (j,j′)∈I and ω∈/Ej,j′; by monotonicity,
Pu′−Pu≥Pj′−Pj>(j′−j)−x>(u′−u)−2−x.
If j>j′, then no integer lies in [u,u′], which forces u′−u<1 (otherwise the integer ⌊u⌋+1 would satisfy u<⌊u⌋+1≤u+1≤u′); hence Pu′−Pu≥0>(u′−u)−1≥(u′−u)−2−x.
Combining the two bounds, ∣Pu′−Pu−(u′−u)∣≤x+2 for every window with 0≤u≤u′≤n and u′−u≤m, as claimed.