TheoremBase

Proof of Uniform Window Discrepancy Bound for a Counting Process with Poisson Increments on the Integer Grid

lemmalem:poisson-window-discrepancy-2026b
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of lem:poisson-window-discrepancy-2026b: carried forward from the verified proof of 2026a (version 058faf2b) with the single appeal to the Poisson-process definition replaced by the weakened hypothesis; the argument uses only monotone paths and grid Poisson laws.

Proof

Grid events. Let II be the set of pairs (i,i)(i,i') of integers with 0iin0\le i\le i'\le n and iim+2i'-i\le m+2; it has at most (n+1)(m+3)(n+1)(m+3) elements, since ii ranges over {0,,n}\{0,\dots,n\} and iii'-i over {0,,m+2}\{0,\dots,m+2\}. For (i,i)I(i,i')\in I put

Ei,i={ω: Pi(ω)Pi(ω)(ii)x},E_{i,i'}=\bigl\{\omega:\ |\mathsf{P}_{i'}(\omega)-\mathsf{P}_{i}(\omega)-(i'-i)|\ge x\bigr\},

and let GG be the complement of (i,i)IEi,i\bigcup_{(i,i')\in I}E_{i,i'}. Write H\mathcal{H} for the σ\sigma-algebra generated by P0,,Pn\mathsf{P}_0,\dots,\mathsf{P}_n. Each Pi\mathsf{P}_i with 0in0\le i\le n is H\mathcal{H}-measurable, so ωPi(ω)Pi(ω)(ii)\omega\mapsto\mathsf{P}_{i'}(\omega)-\mathsf{P}_{i}(\omega)-(i'-i) is H\mathcal{H}-measurable by claims 1 and 2 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions (constants, sums and scalar multiples), its absolute value is H\mathcal{H}-measurable by Sequentially Continuous Functions of Measurable Euclidean Maps are Measurable (the absolute value being continuous), and Ei,iE_{i,i'}, the preimage of [x,)[x,\infty), belongs to H\mathcal{H}; hence so does GG, the complement of a finite union. If i=ii=i' then Ei,i=E_{i,i'}=\emptyset because x>0x>0. If i<ii<i', the increment PiPi\mathsf{P}_{i'}-\mathsf{P}_{i} has the Poisson distribution with parameter iii'-i by hypothesis (the integers i,ii,i' satisfying 0i<in0\le i<i'\le n), so by claim 3 of Series Formula, Exponential Moments, and Chernoff Tail Bounds for the Poisson Distribution, with μ=iim+2\mu=i'-i\le m+2 and its monotonicity assertion, P(Ei,i)2exp(ϖm+2(x))P(E_{i,i'})\le2\exp(-\varpi_{m+2}(x)). By countable subadditivity (claim 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure, applied to an enumeration of the finite family (Ei,i)(i,i)I(E_{i,i'})_{(i,i')\in I} padded with empty sets), P(ΩG)(i,i)IP(Ei,i)2(n+1)(m+3)exp(ϖm+2(x))P(\Omega\setminus G)\le\sum_{(i,i')\in I}P(E_{i,i'})\le2(n+1)(m+3)\exp(-\varpi_{m+2}(x)), every term being at most 2exp(ϖm+2(x))2\exp(-\varpi_{m+2}(x)). (Only pairs with iim+1i'-i\le m+1 are used below, so the constant could be sharpened slightly; we keep the simpler form.)

From grid windows to all windows. Fix ωG\omega\in G and real uuu\le u' with 0uun0\le u\le u'\le n and uumu'-u\le m; write P\mathsf{P} for the counting path P(ω)\mathsf{P}(\omega), which is nondecreasing by condition 2 of Counting Path and Its Jump Times. By Existence and Uniqueness of the Integer Part of a Real Number let y\lfloor y\rfloor denote the integer part of a real yy, so y1<yyy-1<\lfloor y\rfloor\le y, and let y\lceil y\rceil be y\lfloor y\rfloor if y=yy=\lfloor y\rfloor and y+1\lfloor y\rfloor+1 otherwise, the least integer y\ge y, so yy<y+1y\le\lceil y\rceil<y+1.

Upper bound. Put i=ui=\lfloor u\rfloor and i=ui'=\lceil u'\rceil. Then i0i\ge0 (as u0u\ge0 and ii is the largest integer u\le u, while 0u0\le u), iuuii\le u\le u'\le i', and ini'\le n (as nn is an integer u\ge u'). Moreover ii<(u+1)(u1)=uu+2m+2i'-i<(u'+1)-(u-1)=u'-u+2\le m+2, so (i,i)I(i,i')\in I and ωEi,i\omega\notin E_{i,i'}. By monotonicity of the path,

PuPuPiPi<(ii)+x<(uu)+2+x.\mathsf{P}_{u'}-\mathsf{P}_{u}\le\mathsf{P}_{i'}-\mathsf{P}_{i}<(i'-i)+x<(u'-u)+2+x .

Lower bound. Put j=uj=\lceil u\rceil and j=uj'=\lfloor u'\rfloor, so uj<u+1u\le j<u+1 and u1<juu'-1<j'\le u', both integers in [0,n][0,n]. If jjj\le j', then jjuumj'-j\le u'-u\le m, so (j,j)I(j,j')\in I and ωEj,j\omega\notin E_{j,j'}; by monotonicity,

PuPuPjPj>(jj)x>(uu)2x.\mathsf{P}_{u'}-\mathsf{P}_{u}\ge\mathsf{P}_{j'}-\mathsf{P}_{j}>(j'-j)-x>(u'-u)-2-x .

If j>jj>j', then no integer lies in [u,u][u,u'], which forces uu<1u'-u<1 (otherwise the integer u+1\lfloor u\rfloor+1 would satisfy u<u+1u+1uu<\lfloor u\rfloor+1\le u+1\le u'); hence PuPu0>(uu)1(uu)2x\mathsf{P}_{u'}-\mathsf{P}_{u}\ge0>(u'-u)-1\ge(u'-u)-2-x.

Combining the two bounds, PuPu(uu)x+2|\mathsf{P}_{u'}-\mathsf{P}_{u}-(u'-u)|\le x+2 for every window with 0uun0\le u\le u'\le n and uumu'-u\le m, as claimed.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…