TheoremBase

Proof of Prokhorov's Theorem on Euclidean Space: a Tight Sequence of Probability Measures Has a Weakly Convergent Subsequence

theoremthm:prokhorov-sequential-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 15,997 chars · 20 deps · depth 19 Reason: First publication of the proof: transport to the closed unit ball, weak sequential compactness there, tightness to place all the limit mass in the open ball, and radial cutoffs to control both sides.

The radial map transports the sequence to the compact closed unit ball, where weak sequential compactness gives a limit; tightness puts all of its mass in the open ball, and pushing forward by the inverse map produces the limit measure, cutoffs controlling the error on both sides.

Proof

Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named where it is used. Throughout, Bˉ\bar{B}, UU, dBˉd_{\bar{B}}, dUd_{U}, hh and gg are as in The Radial Compactification of Euclidean Space: Norm Continuity, a Homeomorphism onto the Open Unit Ball, Radial Cutoffs, and Extension of Test Functions, read at the dimension mm, and T\mathcal{T} is the collection of subsets of Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} open in (Rm,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{m},d_{E}). Write B(Bˉ)\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}) and B(U)\mathcal{B}(U) for the Borel σ\sigma-algebras of the metric spaces (Bˉ,dBˉ)(\bar{B},d_{\bar{B}}) and (U,dU)(U,d_{U}).

Step 0 (a bound used three times). Let (Z,dZ)(Z,d_{Z}) be a metric space, let ν\nu be a Borel measure on (Z,dZ)(Z,d_{Z}) with ν(Z)<\nu(Z)<\infty, let AA belong to the Borel σ\sigma-algebra B(Z)\mathcal{B}(Z) of (Z,dZ)(Z,d_{Z}), let MM be a nonnegative real number, and let u:ZRu:Z\to\mathbb{R} be measurable with respect to B(Z)\mathcal{B}(Z) and the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of the real line, with u(z)M|u(z)|\le M for every zZz\in Z and u(z)=0u(z)=0 for every zZAz\in Z\setminus A. Then uu is integrable with respect to ν\nu and

ZudνMν(A).\Bigl|\int_{Z}u\,d\nu\Bigr|\le M\,\nu(A).

Indeed, uu is integrable with respect to ν\nu by claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. By The Metric Subspace: Continuity, the Borel Sigma-Algebra, and the Restriction of a Borel Measure §integral, applied to (Z,dZ)(Z,d_{Z}), the set AA, the measure ν\nu and the function uu, the restriction uAu|_{A} is measurable with respect to B(A)\mathcal{B}(A), is integrable with respect to νA\nu|_{A}, and Zudν=AuAd(νA)\int_{Z}u\,d\nu=\int_{A}u|_{A}\,d(\nu|_{A}). By The Metric Subspace: Continuity, the Borel Sigma-Algebra, and the Restriction of a Borel Measure §borel-subset, νA\nu|_{A} is a Borel measure on (A,dA)(A,d_{A}) with νA(A)=ν(A)\nu|_{A}(A)=\nu(A), which is finite because ν(A)ν(Z)<\nu(A)\le\nu(Z)<\infty by claim 2 of Basic Properties of a Measure. Since uA(z)M|u|_{A}(z)|\le M for every zAz\in A, claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, applied on (A,dA)(A,d_{A}), gives AuAd(νA)MνA(A)=Mν(A)\bigl|\int_{A}u|_{A}\,d(\nu|_{A})\bigr|\le M\,\nu|_{A}(A)=M\,\nu(A).

Step 1 (transport to the closed unit ball). By claims 2 and 3 of The Radial Compactification of Euclidean Space: Norm Continuity, a Homeomorphism onto the Open Unit Ball, Radial Cutoffs, and Extension of Test Functions, h(x)UBˉh(x)\in U\subseteq\bar{B} for every xRmx\in\mathbb{R}^{m}, so the map hBˉ:RmBˉh_{\bar{B}}:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\bar{B} with hBˉ(x)=h(x)h_{\bar{B}}(x)=h(x) is well defined. By claim 3 of that lemma hh is continuous on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} as a map into (Rm,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{m},d_{E}), so hBˉh_{\bar{B}} is continuous on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} as a map into (Bˉ,dBˉ)(\bar{B},d_{\bar{B}}) by The Metric Subspace: Continuity, the Borel Sigma-Algebra, and the Restriction of a Borel Measure §continuity-restriction. By claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, hBˉh_{\bar{B}} is measurable with respect to B(Rm)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) and B(Bˉ)\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}).

For each nNn\in\mathbb{N} let μ~n\tilde{\mu}_{n} be the image measure of μn\mu_{n} under hBˉh_{\bar{B}}, formed by claim 1 of that lemma for the measure space (Rm,B(Rm),μn)(\mathbb{R}^{m},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}),\mu_{n}) and the measurable space (Bˉ,B(Bˉ))(\bar{B},\mathcal{B}(\bar{B})). By that claim μ~n\tilde{\mu}_{n} is a measure on (Bˉ,B(Bˉ))(\bar{B},\mathcal{B}(\bar{B})), that is, a Borel measure on (Bˉ,dBˉ)(\bar{B},d_{\bar{B}}) by Borel Measure on a Metric Space, and μ~n(Bˉ)=μn(Rm)=1\tilde{\mu}_{n}(\bar{B})=\mu_{n}(\mathbb{R}^{m})=1.

Step 2 (extraction). The metric space (Bˉ,dBˉ)(\bar{B},d_{\bar{B}}) is compact by claim 2 of The Radial Compactification of Euclidean Space: Norm Continuity, a Homeomorphism onto the Open Unit Ball, Radial Cutoffs, and Extension of Test Functions. By Weak Sequential Compactness of Borel Measures of Total Mass One on a Compact Metric Space, applied to it and to the sequence (μ~n)nN(\tilde{\mu}_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}}, there are a strictly increasing sequence (nj)jN(n_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} in N\mathbb{N} and a Borel measure μ~\tilde{\mu} on (Bˉ,dBˉ)(\bar{B},d_{\bar{B}}) with μ~(Bˉ)=1\tilde{\mu}(\bar{B})=1 such that (μ~nj)jN(\tilde{\mu}_{n_{j}})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} converges weakly to μ~\tilde{\mu}. These (nj)jN(n_{j})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} and μ~\tilde{\mu} are fixed for the rest of the proof, before any test function is chosen.

Step 3 (cutoffs adapted to a tolerance). Let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<ε0<\varepsilon. Since (μn)nN(\mu_{n})_{n\in\mathbb{N}} is tight, Tight Family of Borel Measures on a Metric Space §sequence provides a set KRmK\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{m}, compact in (Rm,T)(\mathbb{R}^{m},\mathcal{T}), with μn(RmK)ε\mu_{n}(\mathbb{R}^{m}\setminus K)\le\varepsilon for every nNn\in\mathbb{N}. Distinguish two cases.

Case A: KK is empty. Then RmK=Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}\setminus K=\mathbb{R}^{m}, so 1=μ1(Rm)ε1=\mu_{1}(\mathbb{R}^{m})\le\varepsilon.

Case B: KK is nonempty. By claim 4 of The Radial Compactification of Euclidean Space: Norm Continuity, a Homeomorphism onto the Open Unit Ball, Radial Cutoffs, and Extension of Test Functions there is a real ρ\rho with 0ρ<10\le\rho<1 and h(x)ρ\lVert h(x)\rVert\le\rho for every xKx\in K. Let σ=21(1+ρ)\sigma=2^{-1}(1+\rho) and let χ:RmR\chi:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R} be the map given by claim 5 of that lemma for this ρ\rho, so that ρ<σ<1\rho<\sigma<1, χ\chi is continuous on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}, 0χ10\le\chi\le 1, χ(y)=1\chi(y)=1 whenever yρ\lVert y\rVert\le\rho, and χ(y)=0\chi(y)=0 whenever σy\sigma\le\lVert y\rVert. In particular

χ(h(x))=1for every xK.(i)\chi(h(x))=1\qquad\text{for every }x\in K. \tag{i}

Let χBˉ\chi_{\bar{B}} be the restriction of χ\chi to Bˉ\bar{B}. It is continuous on Bˉ\bar{B} as a map from (Bˉ,dBˉ)(\bar{B},d_{\bar{B}}) to R\mathbb{R}, by claim 4 of Semicontinuity and Continuity Under Composition with a Continuous Map followed by The Metric Subspace: Continuity, the Borel Sigma-Algebra, and the Restriction of a Borel Measure §continuity-map, and χBˉ1|\chi_{\bar{B}}|\le 1; so it is measurable with respect to B(Bˉ)\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}) by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space and integrable with respect to each of μ~n\tilde{\mu}_{n} and μ~\tilde{\mu} by claim 6(b) of that lemma. Since h(x)Bˉh(x)\in\bar{B} for every xx, the composition χBˉhBˉ\chi_{\bar{B}}\circ h_{\bar{B}} is the map xχ(h(x))x\mapsto\chi(h(x)), and claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives, for every nn,

Rmχ(h(x))μn(dx)=BˉχBˉdμ~n.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}\chi(h(x))\,\mu_{n}(dx)=\int_{\bar{B}}\chi_{\bar{B}}\,d\tilde{\mu}_{n}.

The map x1χ(h(x))x\mapsto 1-\chi(h(x)) is continuous on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}, hence measurable with respect to B(Rm)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, takes values in the interval from 00 to 11, and vanishes on KK by (i). The set RmK\mathbb{R}^{m}\setminus K belongs to B(Rm)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) by Compact Subsets of a Metric Space are Closed and Borel §borel, so Step 0, applied with Z=RmZ=\mathbb{R}^{m}, ν=μn\nu=\mu_{n}, A=RmKA=\mathbb{R}^{m}\setminus K and M=1M=1, gives Rm(1χ(h(x)))μn(dx)μn(RmK)ε\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}(1-\chi(h(x)))\,\mu_{n}(dx)\le\mu_{n}(\mathbb{R}^{m}\setminus K)\le\varepsilon. By claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral and claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space,

Rm(1χ(h(x)))μn(dx)=1BˉχBˉdμ~n,\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}\bigl(1-\chi(h(x))\bigr)\,\mu_{n}(dx)=1-\int_{\bar{B}}\chi_{\bar{B}}\,d\tilde{\mu}_{n},

so 1εBˉχBˉdμ~n1-\varepsilon\le\int_{\bar{B}}\chi_{\bar{B}}\,d\tilde{\mu}_{n} for every nNn\in\mathbb{N}. By Step 2 the sequence (BˉχBˉdμ~nj)jN\bigl(\int_{\bar{B}}\chi_{\bar{B}}\,d\tilde{\mu}_{n_{j}}\bigr)_{j\in\mathbb{N}} converges to BˉχBˉdμ~\int_{\bar{B}}\chi_{\bar{B}}\,d\tilde{\mu}, so comparison with the constant sequence of value 1ε1-\varepsilon, by claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences, gives

1εBˉχBˉdμ~.(ii)1-\varepsilon\le\int_{\bar{B}}\chi_{\bar{B}}\,d\tilde{\mu}. \tag{ii}

Step 4 (the limit measure). We show that μ~(U)=1\tilde{\mu}(U)=1. By claim 2 of The Radial Compactification of Euclidean Space: Norm Continuity, a Homeomorphism onto the Open Unit Ball, Radial Cutoffs, and Extension of Test Functions the set UU is open in (Bˉ,dBˉ)(\bar{B},d_{\bar{B}}), hence UB(Bˉ)U\in\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}) by claim 1 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space.

Let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<ε0<\varepsilon and run Step 3 with it. In Case A we have 1ε1\le\varepsilon, so 1ε0μ~(U)1-\varepsilon\le 0\le\tilde{\mu}(U). In Case B, let D={yBˉ:y<σ}D=\{y\in\bar{B}:\lVert y\rVert<\sigma\}. Then D=BˉVD=\bar{B}\cap V, where VV is the open ball of (Rm,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{m},d_{E}) with centre 00 and radius σ\sigma, open by Open Ball in a Metric Space is Open; so DD is open in (Bˉ,dBˉ)(\bar{B},d_{\bar{B}}) by claim 2 of The Restriction of a Metric to a Subset Induces the Subspace Topology and DB(Bˉ)D\in\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}) by claim 1 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Since σ<1\sigma<1 we have DUD\subseteq U. The map χBˉ\chi_{\bar{B}} vanishes at every yBˉDy\in\bar{B}\setminus D, because such a yy satisfies σy\sigma\le\lVert y\rVert. Step 0, applied with Z=BˉZ=\bar{B}, ν=μ~\nu=\tilde{\mu}, A=DA=D and M=1M=1, therefore gives BˉχBˉdμ~μ~(D)\int_{\bar{B}}\chi_{\bar{B}}\,d\tilde{\mu}\le\tilde{\mu}(D), and μ~(D)μ~(U)\tilde{\mu}(D)\le\tilde{\mu}(U) by claim 2 of Basic Properties of a Measure. With (ii) this gives 1εμ~(U)1-\varepsilon\le\tilde{\mu}(U) again.

Thus 1εμ~(U)1-\varepsilon\le\tilde{\mu}(U) for every positive real ε\varepsilon, so 1μ~(U)1\le\tilde{\mu}(U) by claim 2 of Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack; and μ~(U)μ~(Bˉ)=1\tilde{\mu}(U)\le\tilde{\mu}(\bar{B})=1 by claim 2 of Basic Properties of a Measure. Hence μ~(U)=1\tilde{\mu}(U)=1.

By The Metric Subspace: Continuity, the Borel Sigma-Algebra, and the Restriction of a Borel Measure §borel-subset, applied to (Bˉ,dBˉ)(\bar{B},d_{\bar{B}}) and the set UB(Bˉ)U\in\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}), the restriction μ~U\tilde{\mu}|_{U} is a Borel measure on (U,dU)(U,d_{U}) with μ~U(U)=μ~(U)=1\tilde{\mu}|_{U}(U)=\tilde{\mu}(U)=1. By claim 3 of The Radial Compactification of Euclidean Space: Norm Continuity, a Homeomorphism onto the Open Unit Ball, Radial Cutoffs, and Extension of Test Functions the map gg is continuous on UU as a map from (U,dU)(U,d_{U}) into (Rm,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{m},d_{E}), hence measurable with respect to B(U)\mathcal{B}(U) and B(Rm)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space. Let μ\mu be the image measure of μ~U\tilde{\mu}|_{U} under gg, formed by claim 1 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables; by that claim μ\mu is a measure on (Rm,B(Rm))(\mathbb{R}^{m},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m})) with μ(Rm)=μ~U(U)=1\mu(\mathbb{R}^{m})=\tilde{\mu}|_{U}(U)=1, so μP(Rm)\mu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §measures.

Step 5 (weak convergence). Let f:RmRf:\mathbb{R}^{m}\to\mathbb{R} be bounded and continuous on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}, and let MM be a nonnegative real number with f(x)M|f(x)|\le M for every xRmx\in\mathbb{R}^{m}. Being continuous, ff is measurable with respect to B(Rm)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{m}) by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and integrable with respect to every probability measure on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m} by claim 6(b) of that lemma. Let ηR\eta\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<η0<\eta. The choices are made in this order: η\eta determines ε\varepsilon, then Step 3 determines KK and, in Case B, ρ\rho, σ\sigma and χ\chi, then FF, and finally the index NN.

Put ε=η(2(2M+1))1\varepsilon=\eta\bigl(2(2M+1)\bigr)^{-1}, a positive real number, and run Step 3 with this ε\varepsilon.

Case A. Here 1ε1\le\varepsilon, so η=2(2M+1)ε2(2M+1)\eta=2(2M+1)\varepsilon\ge 2(2M+1) and therefore 2M<η2M<\eta. By claim 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space we have RmfdμnjM\bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu_{n_{j}}\bigr|\le M for every jj and RmfdμM\bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu\bigr|\le M, so by claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field the difference of the two integrals has absolute value at most 2M2M, hence less than η\eta, for every jNj\in\mathbb{N}.

Case B. Let F:BˉRF:\bar{B}\to\mathbb{R} be the map given by claim 6 of The Radial Compactification of Euclidean Space: Norm Continuity, a Homeomorphism onto the Open Unit Ball, Radial Cutoffs, and Extension of Test Functions for the data ρ\rho, σ\sigma, χ\chi and ff of Step 3. Thus FF is continuous on Bˉ\bar{B} as a map from (Bˉ,dBˉ)(\bar{B},d_{\bar{B}}), FM|F|\le M, F(h(x))=χ(h(x))f(x)F(h(x))=\chi(h(x))f(x) for every xRmx\in\mathbb{R}^{m}, and F(y)=0F(y)=0 whenever yBˉy\in\bar{B} and σy\sigma\le\lVert y\rVert; in particular F(y)=0F(y)=0 for every yBˉUy\in\bar{B}\setminus U, since such a yy satisfies y=1\lVert y\rVert=1 and σ<1\sigma<1. By claims 3 and 6(b) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, FF is measurable with respect to B(Bˉ)\mathcal{B}(\bar{B}) and integrable with respect to μ~n\tilde{\mu}_{n} for every nn and with respect to μ~\tilde{\mu}.

(a) The approximating side. Since FhBˉF\circ h_{\bar{B}} is the map xχ(h(x))f(x)x\mapsto\chi(h(x))f(x), claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables gives BˉFdμ~n=Rmχ(h(x))f(x)μn(dx)\int_{\bar{B}}F\,d\tilde{\mu}_{n}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}\chi(h(x))f(x)\,\mu_{n}(dx) for every nn, and claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral gives

RmfdμnBˉFdμ~n=Rm(1χ(h(x)))f(x)μn(dx).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu_{n}-\int_{\bar{B}}F\,d\tilde{\mu}_{n}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}\bigl(1-\chi(h(x))\bigr)f(x)\,\mu_{n}(dx).

The integrand is continuous, hence measurable; it has absolute value at most MM, because 01χ(h(x))10\le 1-\chi(h(x))\le 1 and fM|f|\le M; and it vanishes on KK by (i). Step 0, applied with Z=RmZ=\mathbb{R}^{m}, ν=μn\nu=\mu_{n} and A=RmKA=\mathbb{R}^{m}\setminus K, gives

RmfdμnBˉFdμ~nMμn(RmK)Mε(nN).\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu_{n}-\int_{\bar{B}}F\,d\tilde{\mu}_{n}\Bigr|\le M\,\mu_{n}(\mathbb{R}^{m}\setminus K)\le M\varepsilon\qquad(n\in\mathbb{N}).

(b) The limit side. By claim 2 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, applied to the image measure μ\mu of μ~U\tilde{\mu}|_{U} under gg and to the bounded measurable map ff, we have Rmfdμ=Ufgd(μ~U)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu=\int_{U}f\circ g\,d(\tilde{\mu}|_{U}). Since FF vanishes on BˉU\bar{B}\setminus U, The Metric Subspace: Continuity, the Borel Sigma-Algebra, and the Restriction of a Borel Measure §integral, applied to (Bˉ,dBˉ)(\bar{B},d_{\bar{B}}), the set UU, the measure μ~\tilde{\mu} and the function FF, gives BˉFdμ~=UFUd(μ~U)\int_{\bar{B}}F\,d\tilde{\mu}=\int_{U}F|_{U}\,d(\tilde{\mu}|_{U}), and FUF|_{U} is the map yχ(y)f(g(y))y\mapsto\chi(y)f(g(y)) on UU. Writing χU\chi_{U} for the restriction of χ\chi to UU, claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral gives

RmfdμBˉFdμ~=U(1χU)(fg)d(μ~U),\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu-\int_{\bar{B}}F\,d\tilde{\mu}=\int_{U}\bigl(1-\chi_{U}\bigr)\,(f\circ g)\,d(\tilde{\mu}|_{U}),

all the integrands being continuous on UU, hence measurable with respect to B(U)\mathcal{B}(U) by claim 3 of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space, and bounded, hence integrable by claim 6(b) of that lemma. Pointwise on UU,

M(1χU)(1χU)(fg)M(1χU),-M\bigl(1-\chi_{U}\bigr)\le\bigl(1-\chi_{U}\bigr)(f\circ g)\le M\bigl(1-\chi_{U}\bigr),

since 01χU10\le 1-\chi_{U}\le 1 and fM|f|\le M; integrating and using the monotonicity and the linearity of claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, together with claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field,

RmfdμBˉFdμ~MU(1χU)d(μ~U)=M(1UχUd(μ~U)),\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu-\int_{\bar{B}}F\,d\tilde{\mu}\Bigr|\le M\int_{U}\bigl(1-\chi_{U}\bigr)\,d(\tilde{\mu}|_{U})=M\Bigl(1-\int_{U}\chi_{U}\,d(\tilde{\mu}|_{U})\Bigr),

the last step by claim 6(a) of Borel Measurability and Bounded Integration on a Metric Space and μ~U(U)=1\tilde{\mu}|_{U}(U)=1. Finally χBˉ\chi_{\bar{B}} vanishes on BˉU\bar{B}\setminus U, so The Metric Subspace: Continuity, the Borel Sigma-Algebra, and the Restriction of a Borel Measure §integral gives UχUd(μ~U)=BˉχBˉdμ~\int_{U}\chi_{U}\,d(\tilde{\mu}|_{U})=\int_{\bar{B}}\chi_{\bar{B}}\,d\tilde{\mu}, which is at least 1ε1-\varepsilon by (ii). Hence

RmfdμBˉFdμ~Mε.\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu-\int_{\bar{B}}F\,d\tilde{\mu}\Bigr|\le M\varepsilon .

(c) Conclusion. The map FF is bounded and continuous on Bˉ\bar{B}, so by Step 2 the sequence (BˉFdμ~nj)jN\bigl(\int_{\bar{B}}F\,d\tilde{\mu}_{n_{j}}\bigr)_{j\in\mathbb{N}} converges to BˉFdμ~\int_{\bar{B}}F\,d\tilde{\mu}; by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers there is NNN\in\mathbb{N} such that

BˉFdμ~njBˉFdμ~<εfor every jN with Nj.\Bigl|\int_{\bar{B}}F\,d\tilde{\mu}_{n_{j}}-\int_{\bar{B}}F\,d\tilde{\mu}\Bigr|<\varepsilon\qquad\text{for every }j\in\mathbb{N}\text{ with }N\le j .

For such jj, claim 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, applied twice to the decomposition of fdμnjfdμ\int f\,d\mu_{n_{j}}-\int f\,d\mu into the three differences bounded in (a), (c) and (b), gives

RmfdμnjRmfdμMε+ε+Mε=(2M+1)ε=21η<η.\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu_{n_{j}}-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu\Bigr|\le M\varepsilon+\varepsilon+M\varepsilon=(2M+1)\varepsilon=2^{-1}\eta<\eta .

In both cases we have produced, for the given η\eta, an index NN beyond which the difference of the two integrals has absolute value less than η\eta. As η\eta was an arbitrary positive real number, (Rmfdμnj)jN\bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu_{n_{j}}\bigr)_{j\in\mathbb{N}} converges to Rmfdμ\int_{\mathbb{R}^{m}}f\,d\mu in the sense of Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers. As ff was an arbitrary bounded continuous real-valued map on Rm\mathbb{R}^{m}, the subsequence (μnj)jN(\mu_{n_{j}})_{j\in\mathbb{N}} converges weakly to μ\mu on (Rm,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{m},d_{E}) in the sense of Weak Convergence of Finite Borel Measures on a Metric Space.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…