TheoremBase

Integrals against mu are integrals of the density against Lebesgue measure; Euclidean integration by parts moves each second derivative of the test function onto the density, producing the inner product of grad(m)/m with the gradient. Cauchy-Schwarz gives finite Fisher information, and the projection clause of the tangent-space lemma identifies the score.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. The function mm is continuous on Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} (claim 3 of Euclidean Space Is Open in Itself), hence Borel by Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation (ii), and takes values in [0,∞)[0,\infty); so μ\mu is the measure with density mm with respect to λd\lambda_{d} in the sense of claim 3 of Image Measures and Measures with a Density: Measures, Integrals and Change of Variables, and that claim is in force: for a Borel f:Rd→[0,∞]f:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to[0,\infty], ∫f dμ=∫fm dλd\int f\,d\mu=\int fm\,d\lambda_{d} in [0,∞][0,\infty], and a Borel f:Rd→Rf:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} is μ\mu-integrable exactly when fmfm is λd\lambda_{d}-integrable, with ∫f dμ=∫fm dλd\int f\,d\mu=\int fm\,d\lambda_{d}. Points of Rd\mathbb{R}^{d} are tuples, the dot product is u⋅v=∑i=1duiviu\cdot v=\sum_{i=1}^{d}u_{i}v_{i} and scalar multiples are coordinatewise (Difference, Dot Product, and Orthogonality in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n). Finite sums are those of Finite Sum Notation in a Field, with Properties of Finite Sums in force.

Step 1: η\eta is square-integrable. The map η\eta and the function ∥η∥2\lVert\eta\rVert^{2} are Borel, as recorded in the statement (the continuity of ∂im\partial_{i}m there is clause 1 of Functions of Class Cᵏ on an Open Subset of ℝⁿ read through its clause 3, with claim 1 of Euclidean Continuity Agrees with Metric Continuity for Real-Valued Functions). The function ∥η∥2\lVert\eta\rVert^{2} is nonnegative with finite integral by hypothesis, so it is μ\mu-integrable by Integrable Functions and Their Lebesgue Integral; that is, η\eta is a square-integrable random vector on (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu) and its class lies in L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}) (Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation (ii)).

Step 2: the identity of claim 1. Fix ψ∈Cc∞(Rd)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d}). By The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure (ii), Δψ\Delta\psi is Borel and μ\mu-integrable, so ∫Δψ dμ=∫(Δψ) m dλd\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu=\int(\Delta\psi)\,m\,d\lambda_{d} with (Δψ)m(\Delta\psi)m integrable. For each i∈[d]i\in[d], the function ∂iψ\partial_{i}\psi is smooth (claim 3 of Basic Properties of Cᵏ Functions), hence of class C1C^{1}, and compactly supported by The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure (i); so Integration by Parts on Euclidean Space Against a Compactly Supported Function of Class C1C^{1} (ii), applied with f=mf=m and g=∂iψg=\partial_{i}\psi, says that m ∂i∂iψm\,\partial_{i}\partial_{i}\psi and (∂im) ∂iψ(\partial_{i}m)\,\partial_{i}\psi are λd\lambda_{d}-integrable and

∫Rdm ∂i∂iψ dλd=−∫Rd(∂im) ∂iψ dλd.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}m\,\partial_{i}\partial_{i}\psi\,d\lambda_{d}=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}(\partial_{i}m)\,\partial_{i}\psi\,d\lambda_{d}.

Pointwise, (Δψ)m=∑i=1dm ∂i∂iψ(\Delta\psi)m=\sum_{i=1}^{d}m\,\partial_{i}\partial_{i}\psi by The Laplacian of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function (i) and claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums, and ∑i=1d(∂im) ∂iψ=∇m⋅∇ψ\sum_{i=1}^{d}(\partial_{i}m)\,\partial_{i}\psi=\nabla m\cdot\nabla\psi; moreover ∇m=m η\nabla m=m\,\eta coordinatewise (as m m−1∂im=∂imm\,m^{-1}\partial_{i}m=\partial_{i}m), so ∇m⋅∇ψ=∑i=1dm ηi ∂iψ=m (η⋅∇ψ)\nabla m\cdot\nabla\psi=\sum_{i=1}^{d}m\,\eta_{i}\,\partial_{i}\psi=m\,(\eta\cdot\nabla\psi), again by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums. By Linearity of the Lebesgue Integral over a Finite Sum of Integrable Functions (ii), applied with all coefficients equal to 11 for the first equality below and to −1-1 for the second and third,

∫RdΔψ dμ=∑i=1d∫Rdm ∂i∂iψ dλd=−∑i=1d∫Rd(∂im) ∂iψ dλd=−∫Rd(η⋅∇ψ) m dλd.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\Delta\psi\,d\mu=\sum_{i=1}^{d}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}m\,\partial_{i}\partial_{i}\psi\,d\lambda_{d}=-\sum_{i=1}^{d}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}(\partial_{i}m)\,\partial_{i}\psi\,d\lambda_{d}=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}(\eta\cdot\nabla\psi)\,m\,d\lambda_{d}.

Now η\eta and ∇ψ\nabla\psi are square-integrable random vectors on (Rd,B(Rd),μ)(\mathbb{R}^{d},\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^{d}),\mu), so by Square-Integrable Random Vectors: Coordinates, Operations, Almost Sure Equality and the Mean-Square Form (ii) the function η⋅∇ψ\eta\cdot\nabla\psi is Borel and μ\mu-integrable, with ∫η⋅∇ψ dμ=⟨η,∇ψ⟩μ\int\eta\cdot\nabla\psi\,d\mu=\langle\eta,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu} by The Space of Square-Integrable Random Vectors (iii); by claim 3 of Image Measures and Measures with a Density: Measures, Integrals and Change of Variables, ∫(η⋅∇ψ) m dλd=∫η⋅∇ψ dμ\int(\eta\cdot\nabla\psi)\,m\,d\lambda_{d}=\int\eta\cdot\nabla\psi\,d\mu. Hence ∫Δψ dμ=−⟨η,∇ψ⟩μ\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu=-\langle\eta,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}, which is claim 1.

Step 3: claim 2. By Step 2 and The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space in the inner product space L2(μ;Rd)L^{2}(\mu;\mathbb{R}^{d}),

∣∫RdΔψ dμ∣=∣⟨η,∇ψ⟩μ∣≤∥η∥μ ∥∇ψ∥μ(ψ∈Cc∞(Rd)),\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\Delta\psi\,d\mu\Bigr|=|\langle\eta,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}|\le\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}\,\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu}\qquad(\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{d})),

using ∣−s∣=∣s∣|-s|=|s| (claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field); so μ\mu has finite Fisher information with C=∥η∥μC=\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}. The functional ℓ(ψ)=−∫Δψ dμ\ell(\psi)=-\int\Delta\psi\,d\mu of Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure (ii) is linear in ψ\psi (The Gradient of a Test Function is Bounded and Square-Integrable, and Its Laplacian Bounded and Integrable, Against Every Probability Measure (iii) and claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and the Integrability Criterion), satisfies ∣ℓ(ψ)∣≤∥η∥μ∥∇ψ∥μ|\ell(\psi)|\le\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\mu} by the display above, and satisfies ⟨η,∇ψ⟩μ=ℓ(ψ)\langle\eta,\nabla\psi\rangle_{\mu}=\ell(\psi) for every ψ\psi by Step 2; so Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients (iv) and Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients (v) apply with C=∥η∥μC=\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}, the element ξ\xi of the former being ξμ\xi_{\mu} by Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure (ii), and give ξμ=PTμη\xi_{\mu}=P_{T_{\mu}}\eta and ∥ξμ∥μ≤∥η∥μ\lVert\xi_{\mu}\rVert_{\mu}\le\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}, whence I(μ)=∥ξμ∥μ2≤∥η∥μ2\mathcal{I}(\mu)=\lVert\xi_{\mu}\rVert_{\mu}^{2}\le\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2} by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Finally, for every xx, ∥η(x)∥=∣m(x)−1∣ ∥∇m(x)∥=m(x)−1∥∇m(x)∥\lVert\eta(x)\rVert=|m(x)^{-1}|\,\lVert\nabla m(x)\rVert=m(x)^{-1}\lVert\nabla m(x)\rVert by claim 5 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square (m(x)−1>0m(x)^{-1}>0 by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), so ∥η(x)∥2m(x)=m(x)−1∥∇m(x)∥2\lVert\eta(x)\rVert^{2}m(x)=m(x)^{-1}\lVert\nabla m(x)\rVert^{2}, and claim 3 of Image Measures and Measures with a Density: Measures, Integrals and Change of Variables for the nonnegative Borel function ∥η∥2\lVert\eta\rVert^{2} gives ∥η∥μ2=∫∥η∥2 dμ=∫∥η∥2m dλd=∫m−1∥∇m∥2 dλd\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2}=\int\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}\,d\mu=\int\lVert\eta\rVert^{2}m\,d\lambda_{d}=\int m^{-1}\lVert\nabla m\rVert^{2}\,d\lambda_{d}, which is the displayed integral; this proves claim 2.

Step 4: claim 3. If η∈Tμ\eta\in T_{\mu}, the last assertion of Basic Properties of the Tangent Space: Closed Subspace, the Identity Map Belongs to It, Second-Moment Limits, and Representation of Bounded Functionals on Gradients (v) gives ξμ=η\xi_{\mu}=\eta, and then I(μ)=∥η∥μ2\mathcal{I}(\mu)=\lVert\eta\rVert_{\mu}^{2} by Finite Fisher Information, the Score and the Fisher Information of a Probability Measure (iii).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…