TheoremBase

Proof of Limits and Bounded Sequences of Symmetric Real Matrices

lemmalem:symmetric-matrix-limits-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 8,698 chars · 23 deps · depth 18 Reason: First publication of the proof: subsequence extracted by applying Bolzano-Weierstrass to the columns in turn and passing to the entries, with the ordering claims from the quadratic form bound and the comparison theorem for limits.

The subsequence is extracted by applying the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem to the columns one at a time and passing to the entries; the remaining claims follow from the quadratic form bound for the norm and the comparison theorem for limits of real sequences.

Proof

Throughout we use the notation of the statement. We first record three elementary facts.

(P1) If ψ:NN\psi:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N} is strictly increasing, then kψ(k)k\le\psi(k) for every kNk\in\mathbb{N}. Indeed 1ψ(1)1\le\psi(1) because every natural number satisfies 11\le\cdot by claim 4 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers; and if kψ(k)k\le\psi(k) then ψ(k)<ψ(k+1)\psi(k)<\psi(k+1), so k<ψ(k+1)k<\psi(k+1) and hence k+1ψ(k+1)k+1\le\psi(k+1).

(P2) If a sequence (am)(a_{m}) in a metric space (Y,d)(Y,d) converges to aa and ψ:NN\psi:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N} is strictly increasing, then (aψ(k))kN(a_{\psi(k)})_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges to aa. Indeed, given a positive ε\varepsilon, take NN as in Convergent Sequence in a Metric Space; for kNk\ge N we have ψ(k)kN\psi(k)\ge k\ge N by (P1), so d(aψ(k),a)<εd(a_{\psi(k)},a)<\varepsilon.

(P3) A composite of strictly increasing maps NN\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N} is strictly increasing, directly from the definition.

We also use that ej=1\lVert e_{j}\rVert=1 for every j[n]j\in[n], as recorded in Real Matrices, Symmetric Matrices and the Semidefinite Ordering: Standing Notation §basis.

Claim 1. Put R=R+1R'=R+1. Since 0X1R0\le\lVert X_{1}\rVert\le R by claim 1 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix, the number RR' is positive, and XmR\lVert X_{m}\rVert\le R' for every mm. By Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix §vector-bound, for all mNm\in\mathbb{N} and j[n]j\in[n],

XmejXmejR.\lVert X_{m}e_{j}\rVert\le\lVert X_{m}\rVert\,\lVert e_{j}\rVert\le R' .

Hence every XmejX_{m}e_{j} lies in the closed ball K=Bˉ(0Rn,R)K=\bar{B}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}},R'), which equals {ζRn:ζR}\{\zeta\in\mathbb{R}^{n}:\lVert\zeta\rVert\le R'\} because dE(0Rn,ζ)=ζd_{E}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{n}},\zeta)=\lVert\zeta\rVert by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and which is bounded by claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Closed Ball in a Metric Space.

We show by induction on l{0,1,,n}l\in\{0,1,\dots,n\} that there is a strictly increasing φl:NN\varphi_{l}:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N} such that for every j[n]j\in[n] with jlj\le l the sequence (Xφl(k)ej)kN\bigl(X_{\varphi_{l}(k)}e_{j}\bigr)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} converges in (Rn,dE)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_{E}). For l=0l=0 take φ0\varphi_{0} to be the identity map; the condition is vacuous. Suppose the assertion holds for some ll with l<nl<n. The sequence (Xφl(k)el+1)kN\bigl(X_{\varphi_{l}(k)}e_{l+1}\bigr)_{k\in\mathbb{N}} takes its values in the bounded set KK, so by Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem in Euclidean Space there are a strictly increasing ρ:NN\rho:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N} and a point of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} to which (Xφl(ρ(k))el+1)k\bigl(X_{\varphi_{l}(\rho(k))}e_{l+1}\bigr)_{k} converges. Put φl+1=φlρ\varphi_{l+1}=\varphi_{l}\circ\rho, which is strictly increasing by (P3). For jlj\le l the sequence (Xφl+1(k)ej)k\bigl(X_{\varphi_{l+1}(k)}e_{j}\bigr)_{k} arises from the convergent sequence (Xφl(k)ej)k\bigl(X_{\varphi_{l}(k)}e_{j}\bigr)_{k} by the strictly increasing map ρ\rho, hence converges by (P2); and for j=l+1j=l+1 it converges by construction. This completes the induction.

Put φ=φn\varphi=\varphi_{n} and, for j[n]j\in[n], let cjRnc_{j}\in\mathbb{R}^{n} be the limit of (Xφ(k)ej)k\bigl(X_{\varphi(k)}e_{j}\bigr)_{k}. By Convergence in Euclidean Space is Coordinatewise Convergence, for every i[n]i\in[n] the sequence of real numbers ((Xφ(k)ej)i)k\bigl((X_{\varphi(k)}e_{j})_{i}\bigr)_{k} converges to (cj)i(c_{j})_{i}. By Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix §entry-formula and the fact, recorded in Orthonormal Families, Standard Basis Vectors, and Plane Rotations of Euclidean Space, that the iith coordinate of a point zz equals zeiz\cdot e_{i}, we have (Xφ(k))ij=ei(Xφ(k)ej)=(Xφ(k)ej)i(X_{\varphi(k)})_{ij}=e_{i}\cdot(X_{\varphi(k)}e_{j})=(X_{\varphi(k)}e_{j})_{i}. Hence for all i,j[n]i,j\in[n] the real sequence ((Xφ(k))ij)k\bigl((X_{\varphi(k)})_{ij}\bigr)_{k} converges to (cj)i(c_{j})_{i}.

Let XX be the real n×nn\times n matrix with Xij=(cj)iX_{ij}=(c_{j})_{i}. For all i,ji,j the two real sequences ((Xφ(k))ij)k\bigl((X_{\varphi(k)})_{ij}\bigr)_{k} and ((Xφ(k))ji)k\bigl((X_{\varphi(k)})_{ji}\bigr)_{k} are equal term by term, because each XmX_{m} is symmetric; by uniqueness of limits, Uniqueness of Limits in a Metric Space applied in the metric space of The Absolute Value Metric on the Real Line, we get Xij=XjiX_{ij}=X_{ji}. Thus XX is symmetric and XS(n)X\in\mathcal{S}(n).

It remains to prove that (Xφ(k))k\bigl(X_{\varphi(k)}\bigr)_{k} converges to XX in (S(n),dS(n))\bigl(\mathcal{S}(n),d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}\bigr). Put Σ=i=1nj=1n1\Sigma=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}1, a real number satisfying 1Σ1\le\Sigma by claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums; in particular Σ\Sigma and Σ+Σ\Sigma+\Sigma are positive and have multiplicative inverses. Let εR\varepsilon\in\mathbb{R} be positive and put ε=ε(Σ+Σ)1\varepsilon'=\varepsilon\,(\Sigma+\Sigma)^{-1}, which is positive. For each pair i,j[n]i,j\in[n] choose NijNN_{ij}\in\mathbb{N} such that kNijk\ge N_{ij} implies (Xφ(k))ijXij<ε\bigl|(X_{\varphi(k)})_{ij}-X_{ij}\bigr|<\varepsilon', and put N=i=1nj=1nNijN=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}N_{ij}, a natural number; since every NijN_{ij} is nonnegative, claim 6 of Properties of Finite Sums gives NijNN_{ij}\le N for all i,ji,j. Let kNk\ge N. By Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix §entry-sum, applied to the matrix Xφ(k)XX_{\varphi(k)}-X, which lies in S(n)\mathcal{S}(n) by claim 1 of The Positive Semidefinite Ordering is a Partial Order Compatible with the Linear Structure, and by the entrywise description of the difference of matrices,

dS(n)(Xφ(k),X)=Xφ(k)Xi=1nj=1n(Xφ(k))ijXij.d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}\bigl(X_{\varphi(k)},X\bigr)=\bigl\lVert X_{\varphi(k)}-X\bigr\rVert\le\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\bigl|(X_{\varphi(k)})_{ij}-X_{ij}\bigr| .

Each summand is at most ε\varepsilon', so by claim 1 of Comparison and Absolute Value Bounds for Finite Sums of Real Numbers, applied to the inner and then the outer sum, and by claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums applied twice to pull the constant ε\varepsilon' out, the right-hand side is at most εΣ\varepsilon'\,\Sigma, which equals ε(Σ+Σ)1Σ\varepsilon\,(\Sigma+\Sigma)^{-1}\Sigma and is therefore smaller than ε\varepsilon. This is the required convergence.

Claim 2. Let zRnz\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. By claim 1 of Linearity of the Matrix-Vector Product and the Quadratic Form as a Double Sum and claim 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n,

z(Xmz)z(Xz)=z((XmX)z),z\cdot(X_{m}z)-z\cdot(Xz)=z\cdot\bigl((X_{m}-X)z\bigr),

and by claim 2 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix,

z(Xmz)z(Xz)XmXz2=dS(n)(Xm,X)z2.\bigl|z\cdot(X_{m}z)-z\cdot(Xz)\bigr|\le\lVert X_{m}-X\rVert\,\lVert z\rVert^{2}=d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(X_{m},X)\,\lVert z\rVert^{2}.

If zz is the origin then z2=0\lVert z\rVert^{2}=0 by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n and the two sides of the asserted convergence agree for every mm. Otherwise z\lVert z\rVert is positive by claims 1 and 3 there, hence so is z2\lVert z\rVert^{2} by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and it has a positive multiplicative inverse. Given a positive ε\varepsilon, choose NN with dS(n)(Xm,X)<ε(z2)1d_{\mathcal{S}(n)}(X_{m},X)<\varepsilon\,(\lVert z\rVert^{2})^{-1} for mNm\ge N; then z(Xmz)z(Xz)<ε\bigl|z\cdot(X_{m}z)-z\cdot(Xz)\bigr|<\varepsilon for such mm.

Claim 3. Let zRnz\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. By The Positive Semidefinite Ordering on Symmetric Matrices the hypothesis XmYmX_{m}\preceq Y_{m} gives z(Xmz)z(Ymz)z\cdot(X_{m}z)\le z\cdot(Y_{m}z) for every mm. By claim 2 the real sequences (z(Xmz))m\bigl(z\cdot(X_{m}z)\bigr)_{m} and (z(Ymz))m\bigl(z\cdot(Y_{m}z)\bigr)_{m} converge to z(Xz)z\cdot(Xz) and z(Yz)z\cdot(Yz) respectively, so claim 1 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences gives z(Xz)z(Yz)z\cdot(Xz)\le z\cdot(Yz). As zz was arbitrary, XYX\preceq Y by The Positive Semidefinite Ordering on Symmetric Matrices.

Claim 4. Put λ=a+C\lambda=a+\lVert C\rVert, which is nonnegative because 0a0\le a and 0C0\le\lVert C\rVert by claim 1 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix. By claim 3 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix we have CCInC\preceq\lVert C\rVert I_{n}. Moreover λInCIn=aIn\lambda I_{n}-\lVert C\rVert I_{n}=aI_{n}, read entrywise from Scalar Multiple of a Real Matrix and Difference of Real Matrices, and aInaI_{n} is positive semidefinite: by Vector, Entry and Comparison Bounds for the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix §identity we have z((aIn)z)=az2z\cdot\bigl((aI_{n})z\bigr)=a\lVert z\rVert^{2} for every zz, and this is nonnegative because aa is nonnegative by hypothesis and z2\lVert z\rVert^{2} is nonnegative by claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n. Hence CInλIn\lVert C\rVert I_{n}\preceq\lambda I_{n} by claim 5 of The Positive Semidefinite Ordering is a Partial Order Compatible with the Linear Structure. Likewise aIn(λIn)=CIn-aI_{n}-(-\lambda I_{n})=\lVert C\rVert I_{n}, which is positive semidefinite by the same argument applied to the nonnegative number C\lVert C\rVert, so λInaIn-\lambda I_{n}\preceq-aI_{n}. Two applications of transitivity, claim 2 of The Positive Semidefinite Ordering is a Partial Order Compatible with the Linear Structure, now give

λInXandXλIn,-\lambda I_{n}\preceq X\qquad\text{and}\qquad X\preceq\lambda I_{n},

and claim 3 of Properties of the Norm of a Symmetric Real Matrix yields Xλ=a+C\lVert X\rVert\le\lambda=a+\lVert C\rVert.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…