TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout, a real-valued function on a subinterval II of the real numbers R\mathbb{R} is called continuous on II when it is continuous relative to II, both II and the codomain R\mathbb{R} carrying the metric of the real line.

Claim 1. Write B\mathcal{B} for the base family of all ξi\xi^{i} and all WtjW^{j}_t, jointly Gaussian by hypothesis. Every member of the enlarged family is a mean-square limit of finite linear — hence affine — combinations of members of B\mathcal{B}: for the Wiener integrals this holds by claim 1 of Adapted Mean-Square Continuous Processes are Ito Integrable together with claim 1 of Existence and Uniqueness of the Mean-Square Extension of the Elementary Stochastic Integral (the elementary stochastic integrals of the deterministic grid-value approximants are finite linear combinations of increments of the WjW^{j}), and for the XtiX^{i}_t it is claim 3 of Existence, Uniqueness, and Variation of Constants for Linear Stochastic Differential Equations (with the forcing values absent, since every grg_r is the zero tuple). By Mean-Square Limits of Affine Combinations Adjoin to a Jointly Gaussian Family, the enlarged family is jointly Gaussian.

Claim 2. Taking expectations in the defining equation of Mean-Square Solution of a Linear Stochastic Differential Equation with Additive Wiener Noise (with vanishing forcing): Wiener integrals are centered (claim 2 of Wiener Integrals Against a Vector Brownian Motion are Jointly Gaussian), and by claim 3 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral (with Z=1Z=1) together with linearity of the expectation and of the Riemann integral (claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval, Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral),

μi(t)=E[ξi]+∫0t∑jAij(r) μj(r) dr(0≤t≤T),\mu^{i}(t)=\mathbb{E}[\xi^{i}]+\int_0^t\sum_jA_{ij}(r)\,\mu^{j}(r)\,dr\qquad(0\le t\le T),

with μi\mu^{i} continuous (claim 3 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral). This is the linear system of claim 3 of Fundamental Solution and Variation of Constants for Linear Ordinary Differential Equations with vanishing inhomogeneity on [0,T][0,T], whose unique continuous solution is Φ(t) E[ξ]\Phi(t)\,\mathbb{E}[\xi].

Claim 3. Fix i,ki,k. The pair (Y,Z)=(Xi,Xk)(Y,Z)=(X^{i},X^{k}) is of the form treated in Second-Moment Evolution for Processes of Integral Form on [0,T][0,T]: Xti=ξi+∫0tαr dr+∑j∫0tεij(r) dWrjX^{i}_t=\xi^{i}+\int_0^t\alpha_r\,dr+\sum_j\int_0^t\varepsilon_{ij}(r)\,dW^{j}_r with αr=∑jAij(r)Xrj\alpha_r=\sum_jA_{ij}(r)X^{j}_r, mean-square continuous by claims 1-2 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral (and similarly for XkX^{k}). The orthogonality hypothesis of that lemma holds by its claim 2: for every ss, XsiX^{i}_s and XskX^{k}_s lie in the closed mean-square span of the ξi′\xi^{i'} and the Wrj′W^{j'}_r with r≤sr\le s (claim 3 of Existence, Uniqueness, and Variation of Constants for Linear Stochastic Differential Equations), and σ(ξ1,…,ξl)\sigma(\xi^{1},\dots,\xi^{l}) is independent of the WW-σ\sigma-algebra by hypothesis. Hence, by claim 1 of Second-Moment Evolution for Processes of Integral Form,

E[XtiXtk]=E[ξiξk]+∫0t(∑jAij E[XrjXrk]+∑jAkj E[XriXrj]+∑jεijεkj(r))dr.\mathbb{E}[X^{i}_tX^{k}_t]=\mathbb{E}[\xi^{i}\xi^{k}]+\int_0^t\Bigl(\sum_jA_{ij}\,\mathbb{E}[X^{j}_rX^{k}_r]+\sum_jA_{kj}\,\mathbb{E}[X^{i}_rX^{j}_r]+\sum_j\varepsilon_{ij}\varepsilon_{kj}(r)\Bigr)dr .

The functions μi\mu^{i} are continuous on [0,T][0,T] and, by claim 3 of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part I, on a Closed Real Interval applied to claim 2's integral equation (whose integrand r↦∑jAij(r)μj(r)r\mapsto\sum_jA_{ij}(r)\mu^{j}(r) is continuous on [0,T][0,T] by claim 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space), differentiable at every point of (0,T)(0,T) with (μi)′=∑jAijμj(\mu^{i})'=\sum_jA_{ij}\mu^{j}. By the product rule, claim 3 of Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives, the function μiμk\mu^{i}\mu^{k} is differentiable at every point of (0,T)(0,T) with derivative q:=∑jAijμjμk+μi∑jAkjμjq:=\sum_jA_{ij}\mu^{j}\mu^{k}+\mu^{i}\sum_jA_{kj}\mu^{j}, and μiμk\mu^{i}\mu^{k} is continuous on [0,T][0,T] by claim 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space. The function qq is likewise continuous on [0,T][0,T] by claim 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space, hence Riemann integrable on [0,T][0,T] by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval. Now fix t∈(0,T]t\in(0,T]. By claim 1 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative the restrictions of μiμk\mu^{i}\mu^{k} and of qq to [0,t][0,t] are continuous on [0,t][0,t], so the restriction of qq is Riemann integrable on [0,t][0,t] by claim 3 of Restricted Lebesgue Measure and Integral Toolkit on a Compact Interval; and by claim 2 of Restriction Stability of Continuity and of the Derivative the restriction of μiμk\mu^{i}\mu^{k} is differentiable at every point of (0,t)(0,t) with derivative qq there. Hence Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II, on a Closed Real Interval, applied on [0,t][0,t], gives the corresponding integral identity for that tt; the degenerate case t=0t=0 holds by the convention ∫00:=0\int_0^0:=0. Subtracting it from the display above and using Cov⁡(Xti,Xtk)=E[XtiXtk]−μi(t)μk(t)\operatorname{Cov}(X^{i}_t,X^{k}_t)=\mathbb{E}[X^{i}_tX^{k}_t]-\mu^{i}(t)\mu^{k}(t) (Covariance of Square-Integrable Random Variables) and linearity of the Riemann integral,

Pik(t)=Pik(0)+∫0t(∑jAij(r)Pjk(r)+∑jAkj(r)Pij(r)+(εε⊤)ik(r))dr,P_{ik}(t)=P_{ik}(0)+\int_0^t\Bigl(\sum_jA_{ij}(r)P_{jk}(r)+\sum_jA_{kj}(r)P_{ij}(r)+(\varepsilon\varepsilon^{\top})_{ik}(r)\Bigr)dr ,

with Pik(0)=E[ξiξk]−E[ξi]E[ξk]=Cov⁡(ξi,ξk)P_{ik}(0)=\mathbb{E}[\xi^{i}\xi^{k}]-\mathbb{E}[\xi^{i}]\mathbb{E}[\xi^{k}]=\operatorname{Cov}(\xi^{i},\xi^{k}). Since Pij=PjiP_{ij}=P_{ji} (symmetry of the covariance), ∑jAkjPij=(PA⊤)ik\sum_jA_{kj}P_{ij}=(PA^{\top})_{ik} by Product of Real Matrices and Transpose of a Real Matrix, and ∑jεijεkj=(εε⊤)ik\sum_j\varepsilon_{ij}\varepsilon_{kj}=(\varepsilon\varepsilon^{\top})_{ik}, this is exactly the asserted entrywise equation. Its entries are continuous (claim 1 of Second-Moment Evolution for Processes of Integral Form and continuity of μiμk\mu^{i}\mu^{k}), so PP is a continuous solution of the equation of claim 1 of Lyapunov Representation and Positive Semidefiniteness for Linear Matrix Equations for the data (A,εε⊤,P0)(A,\varepsilon\varepsilon^{\top},P_0), hence the unique one. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…