Exponent laws and the product rule come from the splitting and termwise rules for iterated products, factorisation from telescoping, and the order clauses from inductions using the ordered-ring axioms; monotonicity in the exponent writes n = m + d and compares with 1, and Bernoulli's inequality is proved by induction.
Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement and is applied to the data indicated where it is cited.
In the commutative ring , multiplication is associative and commutative by the ring laws, and is a neutral element of it, since (unique by A Binary Operation Has at Most One Neutral Element §unique, so it is the of Powers with Exponents in the Natural Numbers with Zero §zero). Inductions below run over the set of those for which the claim holds, and conclude by induction from on , The Natural Numbers and the Natural Numbers with Zero: Arithmetic, Order, Induction and Recursion §induction; an element of is or lies in by The Natural Numbers with Zero and Their Embedding into the Integers §naturals.
(S) Each set over which an induction runs exists, as follows. The rings below are and the fields , which are commutative rings by Fields §field and Ordered Fields §ordered-field. For such a ring and an element of it, Maps Given by Iterated Operations: Partial Iterates, Images of Natural Numbers, Powers and Operations over a Finite Set §ring-powers gives a map from to the ring with for every , and Maps Given by Iterated Operations: Partial Iterates, Images of Natural Numbers, Powers and Operations over a Finite Set §images gives a map from to the ring whose value at each is the image of in the ring. In the claim of an induction, replace each power by and each image of a natural number by ; since these are equal, the resulting property of holds for exactly when the claim does. That property is written with values of the maps and and of the operations of the ring and of , and with and, in an ordered field, its order and strict order . Each value is taken at an argument in its domain, since the property is formed for and the arguments (, , ) then lie in . The maps (for instance for the element in the exponents clause), operations and relations are fixed before the induction and are its parameters, and no quantifier is applied to a class variable. So the property is predicative by Predicativity of Expressions with Abbreviations, and Symbol-Free Forms of the Basic Defined Set Symbols §closure, its values being eliminated as in Predicativity of Expressions with Abbreviations, and Symbol-Free Forms of the Basic Defined Set Symbols §value and Predicativity of Expressions with Abbreviations, and Symbol-Free Forms of the Basic Defined Set Symbols §operation, and its relation notation as in Predicativity of Expressions with Abbreviations, and Symbol-Free Forms of the Basic Defined Set Symbols §pair-membership: for instance, for and every set , holds if and only if , and this formula is predicative by Predicativity under Renaming of Set Variables by Variables, of Formulas with Ordered Pairs, and of Formulas for Relations, Functions, Maps, Injectivity, Surjectivity and Bijectivity §pair-membership. Hence the set of those having the property is a set by Sets and Maps: Ordinary Notation §set-builder, and the induction runs over it. Each induction below names this property.
Preliminaries. (R) For and , . For this is Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms §recursion for the constant map on , together with Powers with Exponents in the Natural Numbers with Zero §power. For , the same clause gives by Powers with Exponents in the Natural Numbers with Zero §zero.
For the ring laws give the following. (Z) : indeed , and adding gives . (N) , by the uniqueness in Additive and Multiplicative Inverses Are Unique §negative, since by commutativity and (Z). Hence . (D) , by the same uniqueness, since .
Exponents. If or , then because and , (Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §zero). If , it is Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms §splitting for the constant map on . For the second law, if , then by Arithmetic of Multiplication on Omega: Recursion Rules, Distributivity, Associativity, Commutativity, No Zero Divisors, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §zero. For we induct on , with the property of (S): by (R) and Arithmetic of Multiplication on Omega: Recursion Rules, Distributivity, Associativity, Commutativity, No Zero Divisors, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §one, and if , then (R), the induction hypothesis, the first law and Arithmetic of Multiplication on Omega: Recursion Rules, Distributivity, Associativity, Commutativity, No Zero Divisors, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §successor give
Product. For , . For , the identity is Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms §termwise for the constant maps and on . Next, by (R). For : , and by (R), so for all by induction from , with the property of (S). Finally, if , write with ( if , and otherwise by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §predecessor). Then by (R) and (Z).
Factorisation. Let . All differences of exponents below are differences in , and each identity between them is checked from that definition, which characterises for as the unique with , using the laws of Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §associative, Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §commutative and Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §zero. For we have by Intervals of Natural Numbers: Initial Segments, Adding One Element, Splitting and Shifting §segment, being the least natural number, so and are defined; put . Let , so , and and are defined. Then , since and the difference is unique, and in the same way , and , the last because . Hence , and by (R), and . So (R), commutativity and (N) give
Finally , and , since and , so and . Hence Finite Sums in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Differences, Telescoping, Constant Terms, Comparison and the Triangle Inequality §distributive and Finite Sums in a Commutative Ring and in an Ordered Field: Distributivity, Differences, Telescoping, Constant Terms, Comparison and the Triangle Inequality §telescoping give
Reciprocal. A field is a commutative ring, so the clauses above apply to . If , then the product clause gives . As by (Z) and by Fields §field for every , this forces , and then by the uniqueness in Additive and Multiplicative Inverses Are Unique §reciprocal.
Geometric. Let and . The factorisation clause with in place of , together with and from the product clause, gives for . By (D) and (N), . Moreover , since otherwise . Hence
From now on is an ordered field, so the clauses above and the rules of Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field apply.
Sign. Let . Then by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §squares, and . If , then by (R) and Ordered Rings §ordered-ring, so for all by induction, with the property of (S). If , then also by the reciprocal clause, so . For the absolute value, by Absolute Value in an Ordered Field §absolute-value, which settles . For , the map satisfies by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §absolute-value, so Iterated Operations: Recursion, Splitting, Reordering, Termwise Combination and Homomorphisms §homomorphism with gives .
Monotone. Let , so . We induct on , with the property of (S); the case is the hypothesis. Suppose . Since by the sign clause and by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum, Ordered Rings §ordered-ring gives , so by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum. Also by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-product. Hence by (R) and Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §mixed, applied to and .
Monotone-iff. Let and . If , then or , and by the monotone clause in the first case and trivially in the second. Conversely, suppose but not . Then because the order is total, so by the monotone clause, contradicting . If , then and , so and , hence ; the converse is trivial.
Base below one. Let . For every , by the sign clause and , so by (R) and Ordered Rings §ordered-ring; that is, , and by the sign clause. It remains to show . This holds for , and for by induction, with the property of (S): , and .
Base above one. Let , so by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §squares. For every , by the sign clause and , so , that is, . It remains to show . This holds for , and for by induction, with the property of (S): , and .
Exponent monotone. Let with . By Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §difference there is with , so by the exponents clause. If , then , since by Arithmetic of Addition on Omega: Recursion Rules, Associativity, Commutativity, Cancellation and Compatibility with the Order §zero; so by The Natural Numbers with Zero and Their Embedding into the Integers §naturals, and by Arithmetic and Order of the Natural Numbers §least.
Let . By the base-above-one clause, and ; as by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §squares, . Hence Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-product with gives , using commutativity. If moreover and , then and , so the monotone clause, with and in place of and , and the product clause give ; the same rule then gives .
Let . Then by the sign clause, and by the base-below-one clause, so by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum. By (N) and commutativity, , which is by Ordered Rings §ordered-ring; that is, by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum.
Bernoulli. Let , so by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum. By Commutative Rings, Fields and Ordered Fields: Standard Notation §numerals, the factor stands for its image in . By the same clause, and are the zero and the unit of and the image of a sum is the sum of the images, so for every ; and in , that is , by Inequalities in an Ordered Field: Mixed Transitivity, Strict Sums, Signs, Products, Natural Numbers, Halving, Reciprocals, Absolute Values and Squares §naturals. For , , as by commutativity and (Z). For we induct, with the property of (S), and being the maps of (S) for : . Suppose . Then by Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum and Ordered Rings §ordered-ring, so by (R) and Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum,
where the middle equality expands the product by the ring laws, using , and the last step uses , which holds by , Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §squares and Ordered Rings §ordered-ring, together with Rules of Arithmetic and Order in an Ordered Field §order-sum.
Loading…