TheoremBase

Proof of Hessian Lower Bound for a C2C^2 Test Function Touching a Semiconvex Function from Above

lemmalem:semiconvex-upper-test-hessian-bound-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: First publication of the proof of lem:semiconvex-upper-test-hessian-bound-2026a: midpoint doubling inequality from the quadratic increment form of semiconvexity, combined with the second-order Taylor expansion of the test function along a fixed direction.

Proof

Throughout, iφ\partial_i\varphi is the partial derivative of φ\varphi with respect to the ii-th coordinate and ijφ\partial_i\partial_j\varphi is the iterated partial derivative of clause 4 of C^k Maps on a Euclidean Open Set, defined on all of UU by clause 2 there. Sums are finite sums of real numbers, t2t^{2} abbreviates ttt\cdot t, and t|t| is the absolute value. Write 2=1+12=1+1 and 4=224=2\cdot 2; then 0<20<2 and 0<40<4 by claims 8 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so 212^{-1} and 414^{-1} exist, and we abbreviate a21a\cdot 2^{-1} by a2\tfrac{a}{2}.

Convention on absolute values. If aRa\in\mathbb{R} satisfies 0a0\le a then a=a|a|=a. Indeed a|a| equals aa or a-a by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field; in the second case 0a=a0\le|a|=-a gives a0a\le 0 by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so a=0a=0 by antisymmetry of the total order and a=0=0=a|a|=-0=0=a. In particular 2=2|2|=2, and 1=1=1|-1|=|1|=1 by claim 2 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field together with claim 6 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

Symmetric points. For hRnh\in\mathbb{R}^{n} we have x0h=x0+(1)hx_{0}-h=x_{0}+(-1)h by claims 3 and 2 of Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a Real Vector Space, and therefore, by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n,

h=(1)h=1h=h.\lVert -h\rVert=\lVert(-1)h\rVert=|-1|\,\lVert h\rVert=\lVert h\rVert .

By claim 2 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, d(x0,x0+h)=hd(x_{0},x_{0}+h)=\lVert h\rVert and d(x0,x0h)=h=hd(x_{0},x_{0}-h)=\lVert -h\rVert=\lVert h\rVert.

Step 1: a doubling inequality for φ\varphi.

Because the function xw(x)φ(x)x\mapsto w(x)-\varphi(x) has a local maximum at x0x_{0} relative to UU, there is δ1R\delta_{1}\in\mathbb{R} with 0<δ10<\delta_{1} such that every yUy\in U with d(x0,y)<δ1d(x_{0},y)<\delta_{1} satisfies w(y)φ(y)w(x0)φ(x0)w(y)-\varphi(y)\le w(x_{0})-\varphi(x_{0}). Because UU is open in (Rn,d)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d) and x0Ux_{0}\in U, Open Subset of a Metric Space supplies δ2R\delta_{2}\in\mathbb{R} with 0<δ20<\delta_{2} such that the open ball of centre x0x_{0} and radius δ2\delta_{2}, that is the set of yRny\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with d(x0,y)<δ2d(x_{0},y)<\delta_{2}, is contained in UU. By claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field there is rRr\in\mathbb{R} with rδ1r\le\delta_{1}, rδ2r\le\delta_{2}, and rr equal to δ1\delta_{1} or to δ2\delta_{2}; in either case 0<r0<r.

We claim that every hRnh\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with h<r\lVert h\rVert<r satisfies x0+hUx_{0}+h\in U, x0hUx_{0}-h\in U and

(μ)h2    φ(x0+h)+φ(x0h)2φ(x0).(-\mu)\lVert h\rVert^{2}\;\le\;\varphi(x_{0}+h)+\varphi(x_{0}-h)-2\varphi(x_{0}).

We call this the doubling inequality.

To prove it, fix such an hh. By the computation of the distances above and mixed transitivity (claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) we have d(x0,x0±h)<δ2d(x_{0},x_{0}\pm h)<\delta_{2}, so both points lie in UU, and d(x0,x0±h)<δ1d(x_{0},x_{0}\pm h)<\delta_{1}, so the local maximum property gives

w(x0+h)φ(x0+h)w(x0)φ(x0),w(x0h)φ(x0h)w(x0)φ(x0).w(x_{0}+h)-\varphi(x_{0}+h)\le w(x_{0})-\varphi(x_{0}),\qquad w(x_{0}-h)-\varphi(x_{0}-h)\le w(x_{0})-\varphi(x_{0}).

Adding these two inequalities — each is equivalent by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field to the statement that a certain difference is nonnegative, the two differences have nonnegative sum by claim 2 there, and claim 3 converts back — yields

w(x0+h)+w(x0h)    2w(x0)2φ(x0)+φ(x0+h)+φ(x0h).w(x_{0}+h)+w(x_{0}-h)\;\le\;2w(x_{0})-2\varphi(x_{0})+\varphi(x_{0}+h)+\varphi(x_{0}-h).

Next, x0+hx_{0}+h and x0hx_{0}-h lie in UU, hence in Ω\Omega. Computing coordinatewise with Euclidean Space Rn\mathbb{R}^n, Sum of Points of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n,

12(x0+h)+(112)(x0h)=x0,(x0+h)(x0h)=2h,\tfrac{1}{2}(x_{0}+h)+\bigl(1-\tfrac{1}{2}\bigr)(x_{0}-h)=x_{0},\qquad (x_{0}+h)-(x_{0}-h)=2h,

the first because 112=121-\tfrac12=\tfrac12 and 12(x0i+hi)+12(x0ihi)=x0i\tfrac12(x_{0i}+h_i)+\tfrac12(x_{0i}-h_i)=x_{0i}, the second because (x0i+hi)(x0ihi)=hi+hi=2hi(x_{0i}+h_i)-(x_{0i}-h_i)=h_i+h_i=2h_i. Moreover 2h=2h=2h\lVert 2h\rVert=|2|\,\lVert h\rVert=2\lVert h\rVert by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so 2h2=4h2\lVert 2h\rVert^{2}=4\lVert h\rVert^{2}. Since 0120\le\tfrac12 and 121\tfrac12\le1 by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field applied with ε=1\varepsilon=1, Quadratic Increment Characterisation of Semiconvexity, applied to ww on Ω\Omega with x=x0+hx=x_{0}+h, y=x0hy=x_{0}-h and t=12t=\tfrac12, gives

w(x0)    12w(x0+h)+12w(x0h)+μ212124h2.w(x_{0})\;\le\;\tfrac{1}{2}w(x_{0}+h)+\tfrac{1}{2}w(x_{0}-h)+\frac{\mu}{2}\cdot\tfrac{1}{2}\cdot\tfrac{1}{2}\cdot 4\lVert h\rVert^{2}.

Here 12124=2121(22)=1\tfrac12\cdot\tfrac12\cdot4=2^{-1}2^{-1}(2\cdot2)=1, so the last term is μ2h2\tfrac{\mu}{2}\lVert h\rVert^{2}. Multiplying the whole inequality by 22, which is legitimate by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field because 020\le 2, and using 221=12\cdot 2^{-1}=1, we obtain

2w(x0)    w(x0+h)+w(x0h)+μh2.2w(x_{0})\;\le\;w(x_{0}+h)+w(x_{0}-h)+\mu\lVert h\rVert^{2}.

Adding μh2\mu\lVert h\rVert^{2} to both sides of the previous displayed inequality for w(x0+h)+w(x0h)w(x_{0}+h)+w(x_{0}-h) (again claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, the two differences being equal) and chaining the two inequalities gives

2w(x0)    2w(x0)2φ(x0)+φ(x0+h)+φ(x0h)+μh2.2w(x_{0})\;\le\;2w(x_{0})-2\varphi(x_{0})+\varphi(x_{0}+h)+\varphi(x_{0}-h)+\mu\lVert h\rVert^{2}.

Cancelling the common summand 2w(x0)2w(x_{0}), by two applications of claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and then using claim 3 once more together with the identity (μ)h2=(μh2)(-\mu)\lVert h\rVert^{2}=-\bigl(\mu\lVert h\rVert^{2}\bigr) of claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field, we arrive at the doubling inequality. This proves the claim.

Step 2: reduction to a quadratic form.

Let z=(z1,,zn)Rnz=(z_{1},\dots,z_{n})\in\mathbb{R}^{n}. By The Positive Semidefinite Ordering on Symmetric Matrices it suffices to prove that

z((μ)Inz)    z(D2φ(x0)z).z\cdot\bigl((-\mu)I_{n}z\bigr)\;\le\;z\cdot\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(x_{0})z\bigr).

By Identity Matrix and Scalar Multiple of a Real Matrix the entry of (μ)In(-\mu)I_{n} in row ii and column jj is (μ)(-\mu) when i=ji=j and is (μ)0=0(-\mu)\cdot 0=0 otherwise, by claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field. Hence by Matrix-Vector Product and claim 7 of Properties of Finite Sums, ((μ)Inz)i=(μ)zi\bigl((-\mu)I_{n}z\bigr)_{i}=(-\mu)z_{i}, and therefore, by the definition of the dot product, claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums and claim 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n,

z((μ)Inz)=i=1nzi((μ)zi)=(μ)i=1nzi2=(μ)z2.z\cdot\bigl((-\mu)I_{n}z\bigr)=\sum_{i=1}^{n}z_{i}\bigl((-\mu)z_{i}\bigr)=(-\mu)\sum_{i=1}^{n}z_{i}^{2}=(-\mu)\lVert z\rVert^{2}.

By Hessian Matrix of a C^2 Function and Matrix-Vector Product, (D2φ(x0)z)i=j=1nijφ(x0)zj\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(x_{0})z\bigr)_{i}=\sum_{j=1}^{n}\partial_i\partial_j\varphi(x_{0})z_{j}, so, writing QQ for the number z(D2φ(x0)z)z\cdot\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(x_{0})z\bigr) and using claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums on the inner sum,

Q=i=1nj=1nijφ(x0)zizj=i=1nj=1njiφ(x0)zizj,Q=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\partial_i\partial_j\varphi(x_{0})\,z_{i}z_{j} =\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\partial_j\partial_i\varphi(x_{0})\,z_{i}z_{j},

the second equality because ijφ(x0)=jiφ(x0)\partial_i\partial_j\varphi(x_{0})=\partial_j\partial_i\varphi(x_{0}) for all i,ji,j by claim 1 of Equality of Mixed Second Partial Derivatives and Symmetry of the Hessian. Write also L=i=1niφ(x0)ziL=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\partial_i\varphi(x_{0})z_{i}. We must show (μ)z2Q(-\mu)\lVert z\rVert^{2}\le Q.

Suppose first that zz is the origin of Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}. Then z=0\lVert z\rVert=0 by claim 3 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, so (μ)z2=0(-\mu)\lVert z\rVert^{2}=0 by claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field; and every zi=0z_{i}=0, so each summand of the sum defining QQ equals 0ai0\cdot a_{i} with ai=(D2φ(x0)z)ia_{i}=\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(x_{0})z\bigr)_{i}, whence Q=0i=1nai=0Q=0\cdot\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{i}=0 by claims 3 and 1 of Properties of Finite Sums and Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field respectively. The required inequality reads 000\le 0 and holds.

Step 3: the case z0z\ne 0, by Taylor expansion.

Suppose now that zz is not the origin. By claims 3 and 1 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n we have z0\lVert z\rVert\ne 0 and 0z0\le\lVert z\rVert, hence 0<z0<\lVert z\rVert and, by claim 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, 0<z20<\lVert z\rVert^{2}; by claim 7 there, (z2)1\bigl(\lVert z\rVert^{2}\bigr)^{-1} exists and is positive.

Assume, seeking a contradiction, that the desired inequality fails. Since the order on R\mathbb{R} is total, this means Q<(μ)z2Q<(-\mu)\lVert z\rVert^{2}. Put

c=(μ)z2Q,ε=(12c2)(z2)1.c=(-\mu)\lVert z\rVert^{2}-Q,\qquad \varepsilon=\Bigl(\tfrac{1}{2}\cdot\tfrac{c}{2}\Bigr)\cdot\bigl(\lVert z\rVert^{2}\bigr)^{-1}.

By claim 1 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field we have 0<c0<c, hence 0<c20<\tfrac{c}{2} and 0<12c20<\tfrac12\cdot\tfrac{c}{2} by claim 8 there, and so 0<ε0<\varepsilon by claim 5 there.

Apply Second-Order Taylor Expansion with Peano Remainder to φ\varphi at the point x0x_{0} with this ε\varepsilon: there is δR\delta\in\mathbb{R} with 0<δ0<\delta such that every kRnk\in\mathbb{R}^{n} with k<δ\lVert k\rVert<\delta satisfies x0+kUx_{0}+k\in U and

φ(x0+k)φ(x0)i=1niφ(x0)ki12i=1nj=1njiφ(x0)kikj    εk2.\Bigl|\,\varphi(x_{0}+k)-\varphi(x_{0})-\sum_{i=1}^{n}\partial_i\varphi(x_{0})k_{i}-\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\partial_j\partial_i\varphi(x_{0})k_{i}k_{j}\,\Bigr|\;\le\;\varepsilon\lVert k\rVert^{2}.

By claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field choose ρR\rho\in\mathbb{R} with ρr\rho\le r, ρδ\rho\le\delta and ρ\rho equal to rr or to δ\delta, so that 0<ρ0<\rho. Put

s=ρ2z1,h=sz.s=\tfrac{\rho}{2}\cdot\lVert z\rVert^{-1},\qquad h=s\,z .

Then 0<s0<s by claims 8, 7 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, so s=s|s|=s by the convention above, and by claim 5 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n together with z1z=1\lVert z\rVert^{-1}\lVert z\rVert=1,

h=sz=ρ2<ρ,\lVert h\rVert=|s|\,\lVert z\rVert=\tfrac{\rho}{2}<\rho ,

the last step by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Consequently h<r\lVert h\rVert<r and h<δ\lVert h\rVert<\delta by mixed transitivity, and likewise h=h<δ\lVert -h\rVert=\lVert h\rVert<\delta.

By Scalar Multiple of a Point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n we have hi=szih_{i}=s\,z_{i}, and h=(s)z-h=(-s)z with (h)i=(s)zi(-h)_{i}=(-s)z_{i}, by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field applied coordinatewise. Claim 3 of Properties of Finite Sums, applied to the outer and the inner sums, therefore gives

i=1niφ(x0)hi=sL,i=1nj=1njiφ(x0)hihj=s2Q,\sum_{i=1}^{n}\partial_i\varphi(x_{0})h_{i}=sL,\qquad \sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\partial_j\partial_i\varphi(x_{0})h_{i}h_{j}=s^{2}Q,

and, since (s)zi(s)zj=s2zizj(-s)z_{i}(-s)z_{j}=s^{2}z_{i}z_{j} by claim 2 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field,

i=1niφ(x0)(h)i=(sL),i=1nj=1njiφ(x0)(h)i(h)j=s2Q.\sum_{i=1}^{n}\partial_i\varphi(x_{0})(-h)_{i}=-(sL),\qquad \sum_{i=1}^{n}\sum_{j=1}^{n}\partial_j\partial_i\varphi(x_{0})(-h)_{i}(-h)_{j}=s^{2}Q .

Also h2=(sz)2=s2z2\lVert h\rVert^{2}=\bigl(s\lVert z\rVert\bigr)^{2}=s^{2}\lVert z\rVert^{2} and h2=s2z2\lVert -h\rVert^{2}=s^{2}\lVert z\rVert^{2}.

Write

A+=φ(x0+h)φ(x0)sL12s2Q,A=φ(x0h)φ(x0)+sL12s2Q,A_{+}=\varphi(x_{0}+h)-\varphi(x_{0})-sL-\tfrac{1}{2}s^{2}Q,\qquad A_{-}=\varphi(x_{0}-h)-\varphi(x_{0})+sL-\tfrac{1}{2}s^{2}Q,

so that the two applications of the Taylor estimate, at k=hk=h and at k=hk=-h, read A+εs2z2|A_{+}|\le\varepsilon s^{2}\lVert z\rVert^{2} and Aεs2z2|A_{-}|\le\varepsilon s^{2}\lVert z\rVert^{2}. By claims 3 and 5 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and the addition of inequalities as in Step 1,

A++A    A++A    A++A    εs2z2+εs2z2,A_{+}+A_{-}\;\le\;|A_{+}+A_{-}|\;\le\;|A_{+}|+|A_{-}|\;\le\;\varepsilon s^{2}\lVert z\rVert^{2}+\varepsilon s^{2}\lVert z\rVert^{2},

while A++A=φ(x0+h)+φ(x0h)2φ(x0)s2QA_{+}+A_{-}=\varphi(x_{0}+h)+\varphi(x_{0}-h)-2\varphi(x_{0})-s^{2}Q, the terms sL\mp sL cancelling and 12s2Q+12s2Q=s2Q\tfrac12 s^{2}Q+\tfrac12 s^{2}Q=s^{2}Q by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Hence, by claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field,

φ(x0+h)+φ(x0h)2φ(x0)    s2Q+εs2z2+εs2z2.\varphi(x_{0}+h)+\varphi(x_{0}-h)-2\varphi(x_{0})\;\le\;s^{2}Q+\varepsilon s^{2}\lVert z\rVert^{2}+\varepsilon s^{2}\lVert z\rVert^{2}.

Since h<r\lVert h\rVert<r, the doubling inequality of Step 1 applies to hh and gives

(μ)s2z2=(μ)h2    φ(x0+h)+φ(x0h)2φ(x0).(-\mu)s^{2}\lVert z\rVert^{2}=(-\mu)\lVert h\rVert^{2}\;\le\;\varphi(x_{0}+h)+\varphi(x_{0}-h)-2\varphi(x_{0}).

Chaining the two displays and multiplying by (s2)1\bigl(s^{2}\bigr)^{-1}, which is positive by claims 5 and 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and so may be applied by claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, we obtain

(μ)z2    Q+εz2+εz2.(-\mu)\lVert z\rVert^{2}\;\le\;Q+\varepsilon\lVert z\rVert^{2}+\varepsilon\lVert z\rVert^{2}.

By the choice of ε\varepsilon and (z2)1z2=1\bigl(\lVert z\rVert^{2}\bigr)^{-1}\lVert z\rVert^{2}=1 we have εz2=12c2\varepsilon\lVert z\rVert^{2}=\tfrac12\cdot\tfrac{c}{2}, so εz2+εz2=c2\varepsilon\lVert z\rVert^{2}+\varepsilon\lVert z\rVert^{2}=\tfrac{c}{2} by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Since c=c2+c2c=\tfrac{c}{2}+\tfrac{c}{2} and Q+c=(μ)z2Q+c=(-\mu)\lVert z\rVert^{2}, the right-hand side equals (μ)z2c2(-\mu)\lVert z\rVert^{2}-\tfrac{c}{2}, so

(μ)z2    (μ)z2c2.(-\mu)\lVert z\rVert^{2}\;\le\;(-\mu)\lVert z\rVert^{2}-\tfrac{c}{2}.

By claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field this gives 0c20\le-\tfrac{c}{2}, hence c20\tfrac{c}{2}\le 0 by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; combined with 0<c20<\tfrac{c}{2} and mixed transitivity this yields 0<00<0, which is false.

Therefore (μ)z2Q(-\mu)\lVert z\rVert^{2}\le Q also when zz is not the origin. In both cases z((μ)Inz)z(D2φ(x0)z)z\cdot\bigl((-\mu)I_{n}z\bigr)\le z\cdot\bigl(D^{2}\varphi(x_{0})z\bigr), and since zRnz\in\mathbb{R}^{n} was arbitrary, (μ)InD2φ(x0)(-\mu)I_{n}\preceq D^{2}\varphi(x_{0}).

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…