Each result cited below is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.
Claim 1 (Evaluation). Since s Ω = X s\Omega=X s Ω = X , the pair ( X , P ) (X,P) ( X , P ) of Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §operations equals ( s Ω , P ) (s\Omega,P) ( s Ω , P ) , so π = l a w ( X , P ) \pi=\mathrm{law}(X,P) π = law ( X , P ) satisfies π = l a w ( s Ω , P ) \pi=\mathrm{law}(s\Omega,P) π = law ( s Ω , P ) and the first case of The Controlled von Neumann Hamiltonian on Phase-Space Noncommutative Laws §hamiltonian applies with the space ( H , M , Ω ) (H,M,\Omega) ( H , M , Ω ) , the tuple s s s and the momentum P P P . By Plan Jets and Hamiltonians on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §lifts , H M v N ( X , P ) = H v N ( π ) \mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{vN}}_{M}(X,P)=\mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{vN}}(\pi) H M vN ( X , P ) = H vN ( π ) , hence
H M v N ( X , P ) = 1 2 ∑ j = 1 d ∥ [ P j , s j ] ∥ 2 − f ( p r # 1 π ) . \mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{vN}}_{M}(X,P)=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{d}\lVert[P_{j},s_{j}]\rVert^{2}-f(\mathrm{pr}^{1}_{\#}\pi). H M vN ( X , P ) = 2 1 j = 1 ∑ d ∥[ P j , s j ] ∥ 2 − f ( pr # 1 π ) .
By Calculus of Laws of Square-Integrable Tuples: Bounded Tuples, the Lipschitz Bound, Moments, Affine Push-Forwards, Couplings and Embeddings §push-forward , p r # 1 π = l a w ( p r 1 ( X , P ) ) \mathrm{pr}^{1}_{\#}\pi=\mathrm{law}(\mathrm{pr}^{1}(X,P)) pr # 1 π = law ( pr 1 ( X , P )) . The coordinate datum p r 1 \mathrm{pr}^{1} pr 1 of Affine Data and Affine Substitutions of Noncommutative Polynomials §coordinate has zero shift and coefficient matrix with entries 1 1 1 at the positions ( i , i ) (i,i) ( i , i ) , i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] , and 0 0 0 elsewhere, so the affine image of Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §operations gives ( p r 1 ( X , P ) ) i = X i (\mathrm{pr}^{1}(X,P))_{i}=X_{i} ( pr 1 ( X , P ) ) i = X i for i ∈ [ d ] i\in[d] i ∈ [ d ] , that is, p r 1 ( X , P ) = X \mathrm{pr}^{1}(X,P)=X pr 1 ( X , P ) = X . Hence f ( p r # 1 π ) = f ( l a w ( X ) ) f(\mathrm{pr}^{1}_{\#}\pi)=f(\mathrm{law}(X)) f ( pr # 1 π ) = f ( law ( X )) , which is the claimed formula.
Claim 2 (Structure condition). Assume f f f is uniformly continuous. Let R > 0 R>0 R > 0 and η > 0 \eta>0 η > 0 be real. By Uniformly Continuous Map Between Metric Spaces , with the metrics of Plan Jets and Hamiltonians on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §metrics , there is a real r > 0 r>0 r > 0 such that ∣ f ( μ ) − f ( ν ) ∣ < η |f(\mu)-f(\nu)|<\eta ∣ f ( μ ) − f ( ν ) ∣ < η for all μ , ν ∈ Σ d 2 \mu,\nu\in\Sigma^{2}_{d} μ , ν ∈ Σ d 2 with W ^ 2 ( μ , ν ) < r \widehat{W}_{2}(\mu,\nu)<r W 2 ( μ , ν ) < r ; we show that this r r r has the property required in The Structure Condition at Bounded Positions for a Hamiltonian on Phase-Space Noncommutative Laws §structure . Let ( H , M , Ω ) (H,M,\Omega) ( H , M , Ω ) be a tracial W*-probability space, let X , Y X,Y X , Y be L 2 L^{2} L 2 d d d -tuples with l a w ( X ) , l a w ( Y ) ∈ κ d ( Σ d , R ) \mathrm{law}(X),\mathrm{law}(Y)\in\kappa_{d}(\Sigma_{d,R}) law ( X ) , law ( Y ) ∈ κ d ( Σ d , R ) , and let α > 0 \alpha>0 α > 0 be real with α ∥ X − Y ∥ 2 2 + ∥ X − Y ∥ 2 < r \alpha\lVert X-Y\rVert_{2}^{2}+\lVert X-Y\rVert_{2}<r α ∥ X − Y ∥ 2 2 + ∥ X − Y ∥ 2 < r . By Square-Integrable Tuples with a Bounded Law are Vacuum Tuples of Bounded Self-Adjoint Operators §operator there are self-adjoint d d d -tuples s s s and t t t in M M M with s Ω = X s\Omega=X s Ω = X and t Ω = Y t\Omega=Y t Ω = Y . Put P = α ( X − Y ) P=\alpha(X-Y) P = α ( X − Y ) , the real multiple of Plan Jets and Hamiltonians on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §pairing ; it is an L 2 L^{2} L 2 d d d -tuple with P j = α ( X j − Y j ) P_{j}=\alpha(X_{j}-Y_{j}) P j = α ( X j − Y j ) . For j ∈ [ d ] j\in[d] j ∈ [ d ] , P j = α ( s j Ω − t j Ω ) = b j Ω P_{j}=\alpha(s_{j}\Omega-t_{j}\Omega)=b_{j}\Omega P j = α ( s j Ω − t j Ω ) = b j Ω with b j = α ( s j − t j ) ∈ M b_{j}=\alpha(s_{j}-t_{j})\in M b j = α ( s j − t j ) ∈ M . By The Commutator of a Square-Integrable Vector with a Bounded Self-Adjoint Operator: Linearity, the Norm Bound, Vacuum Vectors and Dependence on the Law Only §vacuum ,
[ P j , t j ] = ( b j t j − t j b j ) Ω = α ( s j t j − t j s j ) Ω , [ P j , s j ] = ( b j s j − s j b j ) Ω = α ( s j t j − t j s j ) Ω , [P_{j},t_{j}]=(b_{j}t_{j}-t_{j}b_{j})\Omega=\alpha(s_{j}t_{j}-t_{j}s_{j})\Omega,\qquad[P_{j},s_{j}]=(b_{j}s_{j}-s_{j}b_{j})\Omega=\alpha(s_{j}t_{j}-t_{j}s_{j})\Omega, [ P j , t j ] = ( b j t j − t j b j ) Ω = α ( s j t j − t j s j ) Ω , [ P j , s j ] = ( b j s j − s j b j ) Ω = α ( s j t j − t j s j ) Ω ,
since t j t j t_{j}t_{j} t j t j and s j s j s_{j}s_{j} s j s j cancel in the respective differences. Thus [ P j , t j ] = [ P j , s j ] [P_{j},t_{j}]=[P_{j},s_{j}] [ P j , t j ] = [ P j , s j ] for every j ∈ [ d ] j\in[d] j ∈ [ d ] , and Claim 1, applied at X X X with s s s and at Y Y Y with t t t , gives
H M v N ( Y , P ) − H M v N ( X , P ) = f ( l a w ( X ) ) − f ( l a w ( Y ) ) . \mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{vN}}_{M}(Y,P)-\mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{vN}}_{M}(X,P)=f(\mathrm{law}(X))-f(\mathrm{law}(Y)). H M vN ( Y , P ) − H M vN ( X , P ) = f ( law ( X )) − f ( law ( Y )) .
Since α ∥ X − Y ∥ 2 2 ≥ 0 \alpha\lVert X-Y\rVert_{2}^{2}\ge0 α ∥ X − Y ∥ 2 2 ≥ 0 , we have ∥ X − Y ∥ 2 < r \lVert X-Y\rVert_{2}<r ∥ X − Y ∥ 2 < r , and W ^ 2 ( l a w ( X ) , l a w ( Y ) ) ≤ ∥ X − Y ∥ 2 \widehat{W}_{2}(\mathrm{law}(X),\mathrm{law}(Y))\le\lVert X-Y\rVert_{2} W 2 ( law ( X ) , law ( Y )) ≤ ∥ X − Y ∥ 2 by Calculus of Laws of Square-Integrable Tuples: Bounded Tuples, the Lipschitz Bound, Moments, Affine Push-Forwards, Couplings and Embeddings §lipschitz . Hence f ( l a w ( X ) ) − f ( l a w ( Y ) ) < η f(\mathrm{law}(X))-f(\mathrm{law}(Y))<\eta f ( law ( X )) − f ( law ( Y )) < η , which is the required inequality.
Claim 3 (Momentum continuity). Let R > 0 R>0 R > 0 and η > 0 \eta>0 η > 0 be real and put r = η / ( 4 d R 3 ) r=\eta/(4dR^{3}) r = η / ( 4 d R 3 ) . Let ( H , M , Ω ) (H,M,\Omega) ( H , M , Ω ) be a tracial W*-probability space, let X X X be an L 2 L^{2} L 2 d d d -tuple with l a w ( X ) ∈ κ d ( Σ d , R ) \mathrm{law}(X)\in\kappa_{d}(\Sigma_{d,R}) law ( X ) ∈ κ d ( Σ d , R ) , with s s s as in Claim 1, so that ∥ s j ∥ o p ≤ R \lVert s_{j}\rVert_{\mathrm{op}}\le R ∥ s j ∥ op ≤ R by Square-Integrable Tuples with a Bounded Law are Vacuum Tuples of Bounded Self-Adjoint Operators §bound , and let P , P ′ P,P' P , P ′ be L 2 L^{2} L 2 d d d -tuples with ∥ P ∥ 2 ≤ R \lVert P\rVert_{2}\le R ∥ P ∥ 2 ≤ R , ∥ P ′ ∥ 2 ≤ R \lVert P'\rVert_{2}\le R ∥ P ′ ∥ 2 ≤ R and ∥ P − P ′ ∥ 2 < r \lVert P-P'\rVert_{2}<r ∥ P − P ′ ∥ 2 < r . By Claim 1 at X X X for P P P and for P ′ P' P ′ ,
H M v N ( X , P ) − H M v N ( X , P ′ ) = 1 2 ∑ j = 1 d ( ∥ a j ∥ 2 − ∥ a j ′ ∥ 2 ) , a j = [ P j , s j ] , a j ′ = [ P j ′ , s j ] . \mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{vN}}_{M}(X,P)-\mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{vN}}_{M}(X,P')=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{j=1}^{d}\Bigl(\lVert a_{j}\rVert^{2}-\lVert a'_{j}\rVert^{2}\Bigr),\qquad a_{j}=[P_{j},s_{j}],\quad a'_{j}=[P'_{j},s_{j}]. H M vN ( X , P ) − H M vN ( X , P ′ ) = 2 1 j = 1 ∑ d ( ∥ a j ∥ 2 − ∥ a j ′ ∥ 2 ) , a j = [ P j , s j ] , a j ′ = [ P j ′ , s j ] .
By The Commutator of a Square-Integrable Vector with a Bounded Self-Adjoint Operator: Linearity, the Norm Bound, Vacuum Vectors and Dependence on the Law Only §linear , a j − a j ′ = [ P j − P j ′ , s j ] a_{j}-a'_{j}=[P_{j}-P'_{j},s_{j}] a j − a j ′ = [ P j − P j ′ , s j ] , so The Commutator of a Square-Integrable Vector with a Bounded Self-Adjoint Operator: Linearity, the Norm Bound, Vacuum Vectors and Dependence on the Law Only §bound gives ∥ a j − a j ′ ∥ ≤ 2 R ∥ P j − P j ′ ∥ \lVert a_{j}-a'_{j}\rVert\le2R\lVert P_{j}-P'_{j}\rVert ∥ a j − a j ′ ∥ ≤ 2 R ∥ P j − P j ′ ∥ , ∥ a j ∥ ≤ 2 R ∥ P j ∥ \lVert a_{j}\rVert\le2R\lVert P_{j}\rVert ∥ a j ∥ ≤ 2 R ∥ P j ∥ and ∥ a j ′ ∥ ≤ 2 R ∥ P j ′ ∥ \lVert a'_{j}\rVert\le2R\lVert P'_{j}\rVert ∥ a j ′ ∥ ≤ 2 R ∥ P j ′ ∥ . By the definition of the L 2 L^{2} L 2 norm in Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §tuples , ∥ P j ∥ ≤ ∥ P ∥ 2 ≤ R \lVert P_{j}\rVert\le\lVert P\rVert_{2}\le R ∥ P j ∥ ≤ ∥ P ∥ 2 ≤ R , ∥ P j ′ ∥ ≤ R \lVert P'_{j}\rVert\le R ∥ P j ′ ∥ ≤ R and ∥ P j − P j ′ ∥ ≤ ∥ P − P ′ ∥ 2 \lVert P_{j}-P'_{j}\rVert\le\lVert P-P'\rVert_{2} ∥ P j − P j ′ ∥ ≤ ∥ P − P ′ ∥ 2 . The triangle inequality of The Induced Norm is a Norm, and Induces a Metric gives ∣ ∥ a j ∥ − ∥ a j ′ ∥ ∣ ≤ ∥ a j − a j ′ ∥ \bigl|\lVert a_{j}\rVert-\lVert a'_{j}\rVert\bigr|\le\lVert a_{j}-a'_{j}\rVert ∥ a j ∥ − ∥ a j ′ ∥ ≤ ∥ a j − a j ′ ∥ , hence
∣ ∥ a j ∥ 2 − ∥ a j ′ ∥ 2 ∣ = ∣ ∥ a j ∥ − ∥ a j ′ ∥ ∣ ( ∥ a j ∥ + ∥ a j ′ ∥ ) ≤ 2 R ∥ P − P ′ ∥ 2 ⋅ 4 R 2 = 8 R 3 ∥ P − P ′ ∥ 2 . \bigl|\lVert a_{j}\rVert^{2}-\lVert a'_{j}\rVert^{2}\bigr|=\bigl|\lVert a_{j}\rVert-\lVert a'_{j}\rVert\bigr|\bigl(\lVert a_{j}\rVert+\lVert a'_{j}\rVert\bigr)\le2R\lVert P-P'\rVert_{2}\cdot4R^{2}=8R^{3}\lVert P-P'\rVert_{2}. ∥ a j ∥ 2 − ∥ a j ′ ∥ 2 = ∥ a j ∥ − ∥ a j ′ ∥ ( ∥ a j ∥ + ∥ a j ′ ∥ ) ≤ 2 R ∥ P − P ′ ∥ 2 ⋅ 4 R 2 = 8 R 3 ∥ P − P ′ ∥ 2 .
Summing over j ∈ [ d ] j\in[d] j ∈ [ d ] and halving, ∣ H M v N ( X , P ) − H M v N ( X , P ′ ) ∣ ≤ 4 d R 3 ∥ P − P ′ ∥ 2 < 4 d R 3 r = η \bigl|\mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{vN}}_{M}(X,P)-\mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{vN}}_{M}(X,P')\bigr|\le4dR^{3}\lVert P-P'\rVert_{2}<4dR^{3}r=\eta H M vN ( X , P ) − H M vN ( X , P ′ ) ≤ 4 d R 3 ∥ P − P ′ ∥ 2 < 4 d R 3 r = η . This is the property of Hamiltonians on Phase-Space Noncommutative Laws that are Uniformly Continuous in the Momentum at Bounded Positions §momentum .