TheoremBase

Proof

Throughout we use the identity ∣u+w∣2=∣u∣2+2 u⋅w+∣w∣2|u+w|^2=|u|^2+2\,u\cdot w+|w|^2 for u,w∈Rnu,w\in\mathbb{R}^n, which follows by expanding the dot product coordinatewise together with ∣x∣2=x⋅x|x|^2=x\cdot x from the elementary properties of the Euclidean norm.

Claim 1, existence. Fix x∈Rnx\in\mathbb{R}^n. The set {∣x−y∣:y∈C}\{|x-y|:y\in C\} is nonempty and bounded below by 00, so it has a real infimum d≥0d\ge0. For each natural number kk choose yk∈Cy_k\in C with ∣x−yk∣≤d+1k|x-y_k|\le d+\frac{1}{k}. By the triangle inequality, ∣yk∣≤∣x∣+∣x−yk∣≤∣x∣+d+1|y_k|\le|x|+|x-y_k|\le|x|+d+1, so the sequence (yk)(y_k) is bounded, and by the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem some subsequence (ykj)(y_{k_j}) converges to a point p∈Rnp\in\mathbb{R}^n.

The point pp lies in CC: otherwise pp would lie in the complement of CC, which is open because CC is closed, so some open ball around pp would miss CC, contradicting the convergence of the points ykj∈Cy_{k_j}\in C to pp. Moreover ∣∣x−ykj∣−∣x−p∣∣≤∣ykj−p∣\big||x-y_{k_j}|-|x-p|\big|\le|y_{k_j}-p| by the triangle inequality, so ∣x−p∣=lim⁡j∣x−ykj∣=d|x-p|=\lim_j|x-y_{k_j}|=d. Thus p∈Cp\in C attains the infimum, that is ∣x−p∣≤∣x−y∣|x-p|\le|x-y| for all y∈Cy\in C.

Claim 1, uniqueness. Suppose p,q∈Cp,q\in C both satisfy ∣x−p∣=∣x−q∣=d|x-p|=|x-q|=d. Since CC is convex, the midpoint 12p+12q\frac{1}{2}p+\frac{1}{2}q lies in CC. Applying the expansion above with u=x−pu=x-p and w=x−qw=x-q to ∣u+w∣2+∣u−w∣2=2∣u∣2+2∣w∣2|u+w|^2+|u-w|^2=2|u|^2+2|w|^2 and dividing by 44 gives

∣x−p+q2∣2=12∣x−p∣2+12∣x−q∣2−14∣p−q∣2=d2−14∣p−q∣2.\Big|x-\tfrac{p+q}{2}\Big|^2=\tfrac{1}{2}|x-p|^2+\tfrac{1}{2}|x-q|^2-\tfrac{1}{4}|p-q|^2=d^2-\tfrac{1}{4}|p-q|^2 .

The left-hand side is at least d2d^2 because p+q2∈C\frac{p+q}{2}\in C and dd is the infimum, so ∣p−q∣2≤0|p-q|^2\le0 and hence p=qp=q. This proves Claim 1, and πC(x)\pi_C(x) is well defined.

Claim 2. Suppose first that p=πC(x)p=\pi_C(x), let y∈Cy\in C, and let t∈(0,1]t\in(0,1]. By convexity p+t(y−p)=(1−t)p+ty∈Cp+t(y-p)=(1-t)p+ty\in C, so

∣x−p∣2≤∣x−p−t(y−p)∣2=∣x−p∣2−2t (x−p)⋅(y−p)+t2∣y−p∣2.|x-p|^2\le\big|x-p-t(y-p)\big|^2=|x-p|^2-2t\,(x-p)\cdot(y-p)+t^2|y-p|^2 .

Hence 2(x−p)⋅(y−p)≤t ∣y−p∣22(x-p)\cdot(y-p)\le t\,|y-p|^2 for every t∈(0,1]t\in(0,1], and letting tt tend to 00 gives (x−p)⋅(y−p)≤0(x-p)\cdot(y-p)\le0.

Conversely, suppose p∈Cp\in C satisfies (x−p)⋅(y−p)≤0(x-p)\cdot(y-p)\le0 for every y∈Cy\in C. For y∈Cy\in C,

∣x−y∣2=∣(x−p)−(y−p)∣2=∣x−p∣2−2 (x−p)⋅(y−p)+∣y−p∣2≥∣x−p∣2,|x-y|^2=\big|(x-p)-(y-p)\big|^2=|x-p|^2-2\,(x-p)\cdot(y-p)+|y-p|^2\ge|x-p|^2 ,

so pp attains the minimum, and by the uniqueness in Claim 1, p=πC(x)p=\pi_C(x).

Claim 3. If x∈Cx\in C then ∣x−x∣=0≤∣x−y∣|x-x|=0\le|x-y| for every y∈Cy\in C, so xx attains the minimum and πC(x)=x\pi_C(x)=x by uniqueness. Since πC\pi_C takes values in CC and fixes every point of CC, it maps Rn\mathbb{R}^n onto CC.

Claim 4. Let x,x′∈Rnx,x'\in\mathbb{R}^n and put p=πC(x)p=\pi_C(x), p′=πC(x′)p'=\pi_C(x'). By Claim 2 applied to xx with y=p′∈Cy=p'\in C, and to x′x' with y=p∈Cy=p\in C,

(x−p)⋅(p′−p)≤0,(x′−p′)⋅(p−p′)≤0.(x-p)\cdot(p'-p)\le0,\qquad (x'-p')\cdot(p-p')\le0 .

The second inequality says (x′−p′)⋅(p′−p)≥0(x'-p')\cdot(p'-p)\ge0. Subtracting it from the first,

((x−x′)−(p−p′))⋅(p′−p)≤0,\big((x-x')-(p-p')\big)\cdot(p'-p)\le0 ,

which rearranges to ∣p−p′∣2≤(x−x′)⋅(p−p′)|p-p'|^2\le(x-x')\cdot(p-p'). By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, applied to the positive semidefinite quadratic form given by the identity matrix, for which the associated bilinear form is the dot product, (x−x′)⋅(p−p′)≤∣x−x′∣ ∣p−p′∣(x-x')\cdot(p-p')\le|x-x'|\,|p-p'|. Hence ∣p−p′∣2≤∣x−x′∣ ∣p−p′∣|p-p'|^2\le|x-x'|\,|p-p'|. If p=p′p=p' the asserted inequality is trivial; otherwise dividing by ∣p−p′∣>0|p-p'|>0 gives ∣p−p′∣≤∣x−x′∣|p-p'|\le|x-x'|. Thus πC\pi_C is Lipschitz with constant 11. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…