Proof of Along an Optimal Map between Absolutely Continuous Measures the Hessians of the Two Convex Potentials are Inverse Matrices
lemmalem:hessians-along-optimal-maps-euclidean-2026aBrenier uniqueness makes both pairs uniquely mapped, so the maps are inverse almost everywhere; intersecting with the Alexandrov sets and removing non-density points gives the set, on which the deterministic inverse-Hessian lemma applies.
Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. A set is called -full if , equivalently ; a finite intersection of -full sets is -full, its complement being contained in the union of the complements (claim 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure); likewise for .
Step 1: the maps are mutually inverse. Since is an optimal map from to , the coupling is optimal and ; by Brenier's Theorem: Optimal Couplings out of an Absolutely Continuous Measure are Induced by a Unique Map §unique-coupling ( being absolutely continuous) every optimal coupling of and equals it, so is uniquely mapped. In the same way, being absolutely continuous, is uniquely mapped with optimal map . By The Optimal Maps of a Uniquely Mapped Pair and of Its Reverse are Mutually Inverse Almost Everywhere §inverse, the set , which belongs to as recorded in that lemma, is -full.
Step 2: points of twice differentiability. By The Points of Twice Differentiability of a Convex Function: a Borel Set of Full Measure, and Borel Measurability of the Gradient and Hessian on It §full, read with in place of , there are with , , , such that is twice differentiable at every point of and at every point of . By absolute continuity, and ; as , the set is -full, and likewise is -full. Hence is -full, and since is Borel with (Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward), satisfies .
Step 3: the set . Put , a -full Borel subset of . By The Lebesgue Density Theorem in §ae, the set of points of that are not density points of is null, hence contained in some with , so . Put : then , , , and every point of is a density point of .
Step 4: the properties at . Let and . Since , we have and . Since , is twice differentiable at with some first-order coefficient and Hessian ; by Subgradients near a Point of Twice Differentiability of a Convex Function, and Invariance of the Second-Order Expansion under Lipschitz Truncation §singleton, as , so . Since , is twice differentiable at with some first-order coefficient and Hessian , and in the same way , so .
We apply Hessians of Two Convex Functions with Mutually Inverse Subgradients are Inverse Matrices at a Density Point §inverse with , , , , , the points and , the matrices and , and the set . Its hypothesis on holds: for put ; then gives , and gives and , so . And is a density point of . The lemma yields , that and are positive definite, and , which are the remaining assertions.
Loading…
Prerequisites
550da0e1-b4dd-4973-bd09-5706f387953e