TheoremBase

Proof of Approximation of a Twice Continuously Differentiable Function with Bounded First and Second Derivatives by Test Functions

lemmalem:test-function-approximation-bounded-c2-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 6,293 chars · 19 deps · depth 30 Reason: Review fix: choose the mollification radius strictly below the threshold of the uniform-convergence theorem (half the least radius), and add two missing citations.

Multiply f by the scaled cutoff equal to 1 on the ball of radius n; the linear growth of f keeps the derivatives of the product uniformly bounded. Then mollify, moving derivatives onto the compactly supported product by integration by parts, and choose the mollification radius so that on a large ball the first and second derivatives are within 1/n of those of the product.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement.

Step 0 (growth of ff). By Gradients of Functions with Bounded Derivatives Belong to the Tangent Space; Constants Are Tangent; the Score Identity; the Score Has Mean Zero; Translation of Tangent Fields §tangent, read with its dimension equal to qq (its measure plays no role in that inequality), f(x)f(0Rq)+qMx|f(x)|\le|f(0_{\mathbb{R}^{q}})|+\sqrt{q}\,M\lVert x\rVert for every xRqx\in\mathbb{R}^{q}.

Step 1 (cutting off). Let χ\chi, χR\chi_{R} and the constants M1,M2M_{1},M_{2} be as in Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §cutoff. For nNn\in\mathbb{N}, read as a positive real number, let hn=χnfh_{n}=\chi_{n}f. It is of class C2C^{2} by Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set, vanishes at every xx with x2n\lVert x\rVert\ge2n, so that hnh_{n}, and each of its first partial derivatives (which vanish on the open set {x>2n}\{\lVert x\rVert>2n\}), is compactly supported by Compact Support on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Means Vanishing Outside a Bounded Set; by the product rule

ihn=χnif+fiχn,jihn=χnjif+jχnif+iχnjf+fjiχn.\partial_{i}h_{n}=\chi_{n}\partial_{i}f+f\,\partial_{i}\chi_{n},\qquad\partial_{j}\partial_{i}h_{n}=\chi_{n}\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f+\partial_{j}\chi_{n}\,\partial_{i}f+\partial_{i}\chi_{n}\,\partial_{j}f+f\,\partial_{j}\partial_{i}\chi_{n}.

The function χn\chi_{n} is constant on the open sets {x<n}\{\lVert x\rVert<n\} (value 11) and {x>2n}\{\lVert x\rVert>2n\} (value 00), so its first and second partial derivatives vanish there, by Partial Derivative on a Euclidean Open Set. At the remaining points, nx2nn\le\lVert x\rVert\le2n and Step 0 gives f(x)(f(0Rq)+2qM)n=:An|f(x)|\le(|f(0_{\mathbb{R}^{q}})|+2\sqrt{q}M)\,n=:A\,n. Hence, for all xx, using 1n1\le n, 0χn10\le\chi_{n}\le1 and the bounds of Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §cutoff,

ihn(x)M+AM1,jihn(x)M+2MM1+AM2.|\partial_{i}h_{n}(x)|\le M+AM_{1},\qquad|\partial_{j}\partial_{i}h_{n}(x)|\le M+2MM_{1}+AM_{2}.

Let MM' be the larger of these two bounds. Moreover, if x<n\lVert x\rVert<n, then hn=fh_{n}=f on the open ball {y<n}\{\lVert y\rVert<n\} around xx, so ihn(x)=if(x)\partial_{i}h_{n}(x)=\partial_{i}f(x) and jihn(x)=jif(x)\partial_{j}\partial_{i}h_{n}(x)=\partial_{j}\partial_{i}f(x).

Step 2 (mollifying). Let ρ\rho be a mollifier kernel of radius 11 on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q} (Existence of Mollifier Kernels of Every Radius) and, for ε>0\varepsilon>0, ρε(y)=(ε1)qρ(ε1y)\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)=(\varepsilon^{-1})^{q}\rho(\varepsilon^{-1}y), a mollifier kernel of radius ε\varepsilon by Rescaling a Mollifier Kernel. With Ω=Rq\Omega=\mathbb{R}^{q} in Convolution of a Continuous Function with a Compactly Supported Continuous Kernel one has Ωε=Rq\Omega^{\varepsilon}=\mathbb{R}^{q}, so for every continuous g:RqRg:\mathbb{R}^{q}\to\mathbb{R} the convolution gρεg*\rho_{\varepsilon} is defined on Rq\mathbb{R}^{q}; if gK|g|\le K then gρεKρεdλq=K|g*\rho_{\varepsilon}|\le K\int\rho_{\varepsilon}\,d\lambda_{q}=K by monotonicity of the integral (Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral) and 0ρε0\le\rho_{\varepsilon}. Let gg be of class C1C^{1} and compactly supported, and let i[q]i\in[q] and xRqx\in\mathbb{R}^{q}. By Differentiating a Convolution through the Kernel, claim 2, i(gρε)(x)=g(xy)iρε(y)dy\partial_{i}(g*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)=\int g(x-y)\,\partial_{i}\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)\,dy. The function yg(xy)y\mapsto g(x-y) is of class C1C^{1} with iith partial derivative (ig)(xy)-(\partial_{i}g)(x-y), by claim 1 of A Composition of CkC^k Maps Between Euclidean Open Sets is of Class CkC^k, the map yxyy\mapsto x-y being smooth by claims 2 and 3 of Constants, Coordinate Functions, Sums and Products of CkC^k Functions on a Euclidean Open Set; and ρε\rho_{\varepsilon} is of class C1C^{1} and compactly supported, as it vanishes whenever y>ε\lVert y\rVert>\varepsilon (Compact Support on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Means Vanishing Outside a Bounded Set). So Integration by Parts on Euclidean Space Against a Compactly Supported Function of Class C1C^{1} §parts gives

i(gρε)(x)=Rq(ig)(xy)ρε(y)dy=((ig)ρε)(x).(D)\partial_{i}(g*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{q}}(\partial_{i}g)(x-y)\,\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)\,dy=\bigl((\partial_{i}g)*\rho_{\varepsilon}\bigr)(x).\tag{D}

Applying (D) to g=hng=h_{n} and then to g=ihng=\partial_{i}h_{n} (of class C1C^{1} and compactly supported) gives i(hnρε)=(ihn)ρε\partial_{i}(h_{n}*\rho_{\varepsilon})=(\partial_{i}h_{n})*\rho_{\varepsilon} and ji(hnρε)=(jihn)ρε\partial_{j}\partial_{i}(h_{n}*\rho_{\varepsilon})=(\partial_{j}\partial_{i}h_{n})*\rho_{\varepsilon}, both bounded by MM' by Step 1. For 0<ε10<\varepsilon\le1 the function hnρεh_{n}*\rho_{\varepsilon} is smooth by claim 2 of Convolution with a CkC^k Kernel is of Class CkC^k, and it vanishes whenever x>2n+1\lVert x\rVert>2n+1, since then the integrand hn(xy)ρε(y)h_{n}(x-y)\rho_{\varepsilon}(y) vanishes for every yy: either y>ε\lVert y\rVert>\varepsilon and ρε(y)=0\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)=0, or y1\lVert y\rVert\le1 and xyxy>2n\lVert x-y\rVert\ge\lVert x\rVert-\lVert y\rVert>2n by the triangle inequality (claim 6 of Elementary Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n), so hn(xy)=0h_{n}(x-y)=0; so it is compactly supported by Compact Support on Rn\mathbb{R}^n Means Vanishing Outside a Bounded Set, hence a test function.

Step 3 (choice of the radius). Let Kn=Bˉ(0Rq,2n+2)K_{n}=\bar{B}(0_{\mathbb{R}^{q}},2n+2), compact by A Closed Euclidean Ball is Convex and Compact. Each of the finitely many continuous functions ihn\partial_{i}h_{n} and jihn\partial_{j}\partial_{i}h_{n} satisfies Mollification Converges Uniformly on Compact Subsets (with Ω=Rq\Omega=\mathbb{R}^{q}, δ=1\delta=1, K=KnK=K_{n} and η=n1\eta=n^{-1}). Let εn\varepsilon_{n} be half the least of the finitely many radii it provides and of 11; then εn(0,1]\varepsilon_{n}\in(0,1] lies strictly below each of those radii, so that theorem applies with ε=εn\varepsilon=\varepsilon_{n} and gives

((ihn)ρεn)(x)ihn(x)<n1,((jihn)ρεn)(x)jihn(x)<n1\bigl|\bigl((\partial_{i}h_{n})*\rho_{\varepsilon_{n}}\bigr)(x)-\partial_{i}h_{n}(x)\bigr|<n^{-1},\qquad\bigl|\bigl((\partial_{j}\partial_{i}h_{n})*\rho_{\varepsilon_{n}}\bigr)(x)-\partial_{j}\partial_{i}h_{n}(x)\bigr|<n^{-1}

for all xKnx\in K_{n} and i,j[q]i,j\in[q]. Let ψn=hnρεnCc(Rq)\psi_{n}=h_{n}*\rho_{\varepsilon_{n}}\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}^{q}). By Step 2, its first and second partial derivatives are bounded by MM'.

Step 4 (convergence). Fix xRqx\in\mathbb{R}^{q} and i,j[q]i,j\in[q]. For every n>xn>\lVert x\rVert (such nn exist by The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers, and all larger nn qualify) one has xKnx\in K_{n}, and by Steps 1–3

iψn(x)if(x)=((ihn)ρεn)(x)ihn(x)<n1,|\partial_{i}\psi_{n}(x)-\partial_{i}f(x)|=\bigl|\bigl((\partial_{i}h_{n})*\rho_{\varepsilon_{n}}\bigr)(x)-\partial_{i}h_{n}(x)\bigr|<n^{-1},

and likewise for the second derivatives. Since n10n^{-1}\to0, the stated limits hold by Limit of a Sequence of Real Numbers. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…