TheoremBase

Proof of McCann's Jacobian Equation Along an Optimal Map Between Absolutely Continuous Measures

lemmalem:jacobian-equation-optimal-map-euclidean-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 5,515 chars · 13 deps · depth 24 Reason: Proof of McCann's Jacobian equation via the area inequality in both directions.

Two applications of the area inequality, one for each potential, bound the integrals of the ratio w = rho/(rho1(T)rho_1(T) det D2D^2 phi) and of its reciprocal by 1; since w + 1/w - 2 >= 0, it vanishes almost everywhere, which forces w = 1.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. Elementary order and field arithmetic in R\mathbb{R} is used without mention (Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Integrals against λd\lambda_{d} are written ∫⋯dλd\int\cdots d\lambda_{d}; a Borel set is μ\mu-full if its complement is μ\mu-null, and finitely many μ\mu-full sets have a μ\mu-full intersection (claim 4 of Basic Properties of a Measure); likewise for ν\nu. The densities ρ,ρ1\rho,\rho_{1} are Borel, real and nonnegative, μ\mu is the measure with density ρ\rho with respect to λd\lambda_{d}, and so, by claim 3 of Image Measures, Measures with Densities, and Change of Variables, ∫u dμ=∫uρ dλd\int u\,d\mu=\int u\rho\,d\lambda_{d} for every Borel u≥0u\ge0; likewise for ν\nu and ρ1\rho_{1}. In particular ∫ρ dλd=μ(Rd)=1\int\rho\,d\lambda_{d}=\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d})=1 and ∫ρ1 dλd=1\int\rho_{1}\,d\lambda_{d}=1. By Optimal Transport Maps and Uniquely Mapped Pairs of Probability Measures §map, TT is Borel and T#μ=νT_{\#}\mu=\nu.

Step 1: the Hessians. By Along an Optimal Map between Absolutely Continuous Measures the Hessians of the Two Convex Potentials are Inverse Matrices §hessians, applied to μ,ν,T,S,G,G′,φ,ψ,D,D′\mu,\nu,T,S,G,G',\varphi,\psi,D,D', there is a μ\mu-full Borel X0⊆DX_{0}\subseteq D every point of which has the properties listed there; in particular every x∈X0x\in X_{0} satisfies: T(x)∈D′T(x)\in D'; φ\varphi is twice differentiable at xx with first-order coefficient T(x)T(x); ψ\psi is twice differentiable at T(x)T(x) with first-order coefficient xx; D2φ(x)D^{2}\varphi(x) and D2ψ(T(x))D^{2}\psi(T(x)) are positive definite; and det⁡D2φ(x)⋅det⁡D2ψ(T(x))=1\det D^{2}\varphi(x)\cdot\det D^{2}\psi(T(x))=1. By Determinants of Positive Definite Matrices: Positivity, the Bound log⁡det⁡A≤tr A−d\log\det A\le\mathrm{tr}\,A-d, Bounds under Pinching, and the Expansion of det⁡(I+tB)\det(I+tB) §positive, 0<det⁡D2φ(x)0<\det D^{2}\varphi(x) for x∈X0x\in X_{0}.

Step 2: two area inequalities. (a) Let k1k_{1} be the function of The Area Inequality for the Gradient of a Convex Function §area for f=φf=\varphi, U=GU=G, A=X0A=X_{0} (a Borel subset of GG at whose points φ\varphi is twice differentiable) and h=ρ1h=\rho_{1}: by Step 1, k1(x)=ρ1(T(x))det⁡D2φ(x)k_{1}(x)=\rho_{1}(T(x))\det D^{2}\varphi(x) for x∈X0x\in X_{0} and k1(x)=0k_{1}(x)=0 otherwise. That theorem gives that k1k_{1} is Borel and nonnegative with

∫k1 dλd≤∫ρ1 dλd=1.(1)\int k_{1}\,d\lambda_{d}\le\int\rho_{1}\,d\lambda_{d}=1.\qquad(1)

(b) By The Points of Twice Differentiability of a Convex Function: a Borel Set of Full Measure, and Borel Measurability of the Gradient and Hessian on It §full for ψ\psi on G′G' there is a Borel Aψ⊆G′A_{\psi}\subseteq G' with λd(G′∖Aψ)=0\lambda_{d}(G'\setminus A_{\psi})=0 at whose points ψ\psi is twice differentiable; put A′=D′∩AψA'=D'\cap A_{\psi}, which is ν\nu-full (ν(G′∖Aψ)=0\nu(G'\setminus A_{\psi})=0 by absolute continuity). Let kk be the function of The Area Inequality for the Gradient of a Convex Function §area for f=ψf=\psi, U=G′U=G', A=A′A=A' and h=ρh=\rho: k(y)=ρ(Dψ(y))det⁡D2ψ(y)k(y)=\rho(D\psi(y))\det D^{2}\psi(y) for y∈A′y\in A' and k(y)=0k(y)=0 otherwise; that theorem gives ∫k dλd≤∫ρ dλd=1\int k\,d\lambda_{d}\le\int\rho\,d\lambda_{d}=1. The sets P={ρ>0}P=\{\rho>0\} and P1={ρ1>0}P_{1}=\{\rho_{1}>0\} are Borel, and μ(Rd∖P)=∫1{ρ=0}ρ dλd=0\mu(\mathbb{R}^{d}\setminus P)=\int\mathbf{1}_{\{\rho=0\}}\rho\,d\lambda_{d}=0, so PP is μ\mu-full; likewise P1P_{1} is ν\nu-full. Let u:Rd→Ru:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be u=kρ1−1u=k\rho_{1}^{-1} on P1P_{1} and u=0u=0 elsewhere, a nonnegative Borel function. Then ∫u dν=∫1P1k dλd≤∫k dλd≤1\int u\,d\nu=\int\mathbf{1}_{P_{1}}k\,d\lambda_{d}\le\int k\,d\lambda_{d}\le1 (monotonicity, claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral), and since T#μ=νT_{\#}\mu=\nu, Probability Measures on Euclidean Space and Random Vectors: Standing Notation §pushforward gives

∫u∘T dμ=∫u dν≤1.(2)\int u\circ T\,d\mu=\int u\,d\nu\le1.\qquad(2)

Step 3: the ratio and its reciprocal. Let X1=X0∩P∩T−1(P1∩A′)X_{1}=X_{0}\cap P\cap T^{-1}(P_{1}\cap A'), a Borel set which is μ\mu-full because μ(T−1(P1∩A′))=ν(P1∩A′)=1\mu(T^{-1}(P_{1}\cap A'))=\nu(P_{1}\cap A')=1. Let x∈X1x\in X_{1} and y=T(x)y=T(x). Then y∈A′∩P1y\in A'\cap P_{1} and Dψ(y)=xD\psi(y)=x by Step 1, so k(y)=ρ(x)det⁡D2ψ(y)=ρ(x) (det⁡D2φ(x))−1k(y)=\rho(x)\det D^{2}\psi(y)=\rho(x)\,(\det D^{2}\varphi(x))^{-1} and, writing w(x)=u(T(x))w(x)=u(T(x)),

w(x)=ρ(x)ρ1(T(x)) det⁡D2φ(x)>0,w(x)−1=k1(x)ρ(x),(3)w(x)=\frac{\rho(x)}{\rho_{1}(T(x))\,\det D^{2}\varphi(x)}>0,\qquad w(x)^{-1}=\frac{k_{1}(x)}{\rho(x)},\qquad(3)

using ρ(x)>0\rho(x)>0, ρ1(y)>0\rho_{1}(y)>0, det⁡D2φ(x)>0\det D^{2}\varphi(x)>0 and Step 2(a). Let v:Rd→Rv:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be v=k1ρ−1v=k_{1}\rho^{-1} on X1X_{1} and v=0v=0 elsewhere, a nonnegative Borel function. Then vρ=1X1k1v\rho=\mathbf{1}_{X_{1}}k_{1} everywhere, so by monotonicity and (1)

∫v dμ=∫1X1k1 dλd≤∫k1 dλd≤1.(4)\int v\,d\mu=\int\mathbf{1}_{X_{1}}k_{1}\,d\lambda_{d}\le\int k_{1}\,d\lambda_{d}\le1.\qquad(4)

Step 4: the ratio equals 11. Let F:Rd→RF:\mathbb{R}^{d}\to\mathbb{R} be F(x)=u(T(x))+v(x)−2F(x)=u(T(x))+v(x)-2 for x∈X1x\in X_{1} and F(x)=0F(x)=0 otherwise; it is Borel. For x∈X1x\in X_{1}, (3) gives F(x)=w+w−1−2=(w−1)2w−1≥0F(x)=w+w^{-1}-2=(w-1)^{2}w^{-1}\ge0 with w=w(x)>0w=w(x)>0; so 0≤F0\le F everywhere, and

F+2 1X1=1X1 (u∘T)+1X1 v≤u∘T+vF+2\,\mathbf{1}_{X_{1}}=\mathbf{1}_{X_{1}}\,(u\circ T)+\mathbf{1}_{X_{1}}\,v\le u\circ T+v

everywhere. By claim 1 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral (additivity and monotonicity of the integral of nonnegative functions), μ(X1)=1\mu(X_{1})=1, (2) and (4),

∫F dμ+2≤∫u∘T dμ+∫v dμ≤2,\int F\,d\mu+2\le\int u\circ T\,d\mu+\int v\,d\mu\le2,

the integrals lying in [0,∞][0,\infty]; hence ∫F dμ=0\int F\,d\mu=0, and by The Lebesgue Integral and Null Sets: Almost-Everywhere Comparison, Markov's Inequality, and Dominated Convergence Almost Everywhere §vanishing the Borel set Z={x∈Rd:F(x)=0}Z=\{x\in\mathbb{R}^{d}:F(x)=0\} is μ\mu-full. Let X=X1∩ZX=X_{1}\cap Z, a μ\mu-full Borel set with X⊆X0⊆DX\subseteq X_{0}\subseteq D; so every x∈Xx\in X has all the properties listed in Along an Optimal Map between Absolutely Continuous Measures the Hessians of the Two Convex Potentials are Inverse Matrices §hessians, since x∈X0x\in X_{0}. For x∈Xx\in X, (w(x)−1)2w(x)−1=F(x)=0(w(x)-1)^{2}w(x)^{-1}=F(x)=0 gives w(x)=1w(x)=1, which by (3) is

ρ(x)=ρ1(T(x)) det⁡D2φ(x),\rho(x)=\rho_{1}(T(x))\,\det D^{2}\varphi(x),

and ρ(x)>0\rho(x)>0 since x∈Px\in P. This is the Jacobian equation.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…