Reason: Initial publication: second-order Taylor expansion with Peano remainder along the opposite increments tz and -tz, combined with midpoint convexity, gives the quadratic form bound for every positive tolerance.
Step 1: the left-hand side vanishes. By Matrix-Vector Product and homogeneity of finite sums with the factor 0, the ith coordinate of 0nβz is βj=1nβ0zjβ=0βj=1nβzjβ=0, so 0nβz is the origin of Rn; the same computation applied to zβ (0nβz)=βi=1nβziβ0 gives zβ (0nβz)=0. So it suffices to prove 0β€Q, where Q=zβ (Mz).
If z is the origin, then ziβ=0 for every i and the same computation gives Q=0, so the conclusion holds. Assume therefore that z is not the origin. Then 0<β₯zβ₯, since β₯zβ₯=dEβ(z,0Rnβ) is nonnegative by Metric Space, a metric by Euclidean Distance is a Metric on Rn, and vanishes only when z is the origin; hence N=β₯zβ₯2 is positive as a product of positive elements.
Step 2: the two Taylor estimates. Let Ξ΅βR satisfy 0<Ξ΅, and let Ξ΄βR with 0<Ξ΄ be as in Second-Order Taylor Expansion with Peano Remainder for f, x and Ξ΅: every hβRn with β₯hβ₯<Ξ΄ satisfies x+hβU and
using halving, so both estimates are available and x+h,x+hβ²βU.
Write G=βi=1nββxiββfβ(x)ziβ. Since hiβ=tziβ and hiβ²β=(βt)ziβ, homogeneity of finite sums gives the linear terms tG and (βt)G=β(tG). For the quadratic terms, hiβhjβ=(tt)(ziβzjβ) and, using (βa)b=β(ab) twice together with claim 5 of Additive Cancellation and Elementary Additive Identities in a Field, also hiβ²βhjβ²β=(tt)(ziβzjβ); applying homogeneity of finite sums to the inner and then to the outer sum gives
Finally β₯hβ₯2=(tβ₯zβ₯)(tβ₯zβ₯)=(tt)N, and likewise for hβ². Reading the two estimates through the two-sided form of claim 6 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and keeping only the upper bounds,
Step 3: midpoint convexity. For each index i we have hiβ+hiβ²β=tziβ+(βt)ziβ=(t+(βt))ziβ=0, so 21β(x+h)+21β(x+hβ²)=x, the two points agreeing in every coordinate. Since 0<21β and 21β<1 by halving, and 1β21β=21β, convexity of f applied to the points x+h and x+hβ² of U gives
f(x)β€21βf(x+h)+21βf(x+hβ²).
Adding the two estimates of step 2, multiplying the result by the nonnegative element 21β, and using transitivity,
f(x)β€f(x)+21β(tt)Q+Ξ΅(tt)N.
Translating by βf(x) gives 0β€(tt)(21βQ+Ξ΅N), and multiplying by the positive element (tt)β1 gives
0β€21βQ+Ξ΅N.
Step 4: conclusion. The last inequality holds for every Ξ΅βR with 0<Ξ΅. Suppose, for contradiction, that 0β€Q fails. By the totality of the order of Ordered Field this means Qβ€0 and Qξ =0, so 0<βQ by sign reversal. Choose
Ξ΅=21ββ 21β(βQ)Nβ1,
which is positive as a product of positive elements. Then Ξ΅N=21ββ 21β(βQ), so 21βQ+Ξ΅N=21βQβ21ββ 21βQ=21ββ 21βQ, using (βa)b=β(ab) and 21β=21ββ 21β+21ββ 21β. Step 3 therefore gives 0β€21ββ 21βQ, and multiplying by the positive element (21ββ 21β)β1 gives 0β€Q, contradicting Qξ =0 and Qβ€0.
Hence 0β€Q, that is, zβ (0nβz)β€zβ (D2f(x)z). As zβRn was arbitrary, 0nββͺ―D2f(x).