TheoremBase

Proof

Order arithmetic is that of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, absolute values have the properties of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and 2=1+12=1+1. By Lebesgue Measure on Rn\mathbb{R}^n the triple formed by Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, its Borel σ\sigma-algebra and λn\lambda_{n} is a measure space.

Step 1 (proof of claim 1). By A Compact Subset of an Open Set Admits a Uniform Ball Radius, applied to the metric space (Rn,d)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d), the open set Ω\Omega and the compact set KK, there is a real number rr with 0<r0<r such that Bˉ(x,r)⊆Ω\bar B(x,r)\subseteq\Omega for every x∈Kx\in K.

Put ε1=r δ−1\varepsilon_{1}=r\,\delta^{-1}; it is positive by claims 7 and 5 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Let ε\varepsilon satisfy 0<ε≤ε10<\varepsilon\le\varepsilon_{1} and let x∈Kx\in K. Multiplying ε≤ε1\varepsilon\le\varepsilon_{1} by the nonnegative element δ\delta (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives εδ≤ε1δ=(rδ−1)δ=r\varepsilon\delta\le\varepsilon_{1}\delta=(r\delta^{-1})\delta=r. Hence every yy with d(x,y)≤εδd(x,y)\le\varepsilon\delta satisfies d(x,y)≤rd(x,y)\le r, so Bˉ(x,εδ)⊆Bˉ(x,r)⊆Ω\bar B(x,\varepsilon\delta)\subseteq\bar B(x,r)\subseteq\Omega by Closed Ball in a Metric Space. Thus x∈Ωεδx\in\Omega^{\varepsilon\delta}, and since x∈Kx\in K was arbitrary, K⊆ΩεδK\subseteq\Omega^{\varepsilon\delta}.

Step 2 (choice of ε0\varepsilon_{0}). Let η\eta satisfy 0<η0<\eta and put η′=η⋅2−1\eta'=\eta\cdot 2^{-1}, so that 0<η′0<\eta' and η′<η\eta'<\eta by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field.

By Uniform Continuity Along a Compact Subset of the Domain, applied to (Rn,d)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d), to Ω\Omega, to KK, to ff and to η′\eta', there is a real number θ\theta with 0<θ0<\theta such that

∣f(z)−f(x)∣<η′for every x∈K and every z∈Ω with d(x,z)<θ.|f(z)-f(x)|<\eta'\qquad\text{for every }x\in K\text{ and every }z\in\Omega\text{ with }d(x,z)<\theta .

Let ε0\varepsilon_{0} be the smaller of ε1\varepsilon_{1} and θ δ−1\theta\,\delta^{-1} (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); both are positive, so 0<ε00<\varepsilon_{0}.

Now fix ε\varepsilon with 0<ε<ε00<\varepsilon<\varepsilon_{0} and fix x∈Kx\in K. From ε<ε0≤ε1\varepsilon<\varepsilon_{0}\le\varepsilon_{1} we get ε≤ε1\varepsilon\le\varepsilon_{1} (claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), so Step 1 gives K⊆ΩεδK\subseteq\Omega^{\varepsilon\delta} and in particular Bˉ(x,εδ)⊆Ω\bar B(x,\varepsilon\delta)\subseteq\Omega. From ε<ε0≤θδ−1\varepsilon<\varepsilon_{0}\le\theta\delta^{-1} and claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, multiplying by the positive element δ\delta, we get εδ<(θδ−1)δ=θ\varepsilon\delta<(\theta\delta^{-1})\delta=\theta.

Step 3 (two convolution integrands). By Rescaling a Mollifier Kernel, ρε\rho_{\varepsilon} is a mollifier kernel of radius εδ\varepsilon\delta; by conditions 2, 3 and 4 of Mollifier Kernel of Radius δ\delta on Rn\mathbb{R}^n it satisfies 0≤ρε(y)0\le\rho_{\varepsilon}(y) for every yy, it vanishes at every yy with εδ<∥y∥\varepsilon\delta<\lVert y\rVert, and it is integrable with ∫Rnρε dλn=1\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho_{\varepsilon}\,d\lambda_{n}=1. By condition 1 and claim 3 of Euclidean Space is Open in Itself, and CkC^k Maps are Continuous it is continuous on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} as a map into (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}).

Let hx:Rn→Rh_{x}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be the integrand of Convolution of a Continuous Function with a Compactly Supported Continuous Kernel for ff and the kernel ρε\rho_{\varepsilon} of radius εδ\varepsilon\delta at the point xx, that is, hx(y)=f(x−y)ρε(y)h_{x}(y)=f(x-y)\rho_{\varepsilon}(y) for those yy with x−y∈Ωx-y\in\Omega and hx(y)=0h_{x}(y)=0 for all other yy; thus (f∗ρε)(x)=∫Rnhx dλn(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}h_{x}\,d\lambda_{n}, and hxh_{x} is integrable by claim 1 of The Convolution Integrand is Continuous, Compactly Supported and Integrable.

Let F:Ω→RF:\Omega\to\mathbb{R} be given by F(z)=f(z)+(−f(x))F(z)=f(z)+(-f(x)). By claims 1, 2 and 5 of Continuity of Sums and Products of Real-Valued Functions on a Metric Space, FF is continuous on Ω\Omega as a map into (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}). Let gx:Rn→Rg_{x}:\mathbb{R}^{n}\to\mathbb{R} be the integrand of Convolution of a Continuous Function with a Compactly Supported Continuous Kernel for FF and the same kernel at the same point, that is, gx(y)=F(x−y)ρε(y)g_{x}(y)=F(x-y)\rho_{\varepsilon}(y) for those yy with x−y∈Ωx-y\in\Omega and gx(y)=0g_{x}(y)=0 for all other yy.

Step 4 (gx=hx+(−f(x))ρεg_{x}=h_{x}+(-f(x))\rho_{\varepsilon} pointwise). Let y∈Rny\in\mathbb{R}^{n}.

If x−y∈Ωx-y\in\Omega, then by distributivity in the field R\mathbb{R},

gx(y)=(f(x−y)+(−f(x)))ρε(y)=f(x−y)ρε(y)+(−f(x))ρε(y)=hx(y)+(−f(x))ρε(y).g_{x}(y)=\bigl(f(x-y)+(-f(x))\bigr)\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)=f(x-y)\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)+(-f(x))\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)=h_{x}(y)+(-f(x))\rho_{\varepsilon}(y).

If x−y∉Ωx-y\notin\Omega, then εδ<∥y∥\varepsilon\delta<\lVert y\rVert. Indeed, x−(x−y)=yx-(x-y)=y in the real vector space Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, so claim 2 of Properties of the Euclidean Norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n: Square, Distance, Vanishing, Coordinate Bounds, Homogeneity, Triangle Inequalities and Expansion of a Square gives d(x,x−y)=∥x−(x−y)∥=∥y∥d(x,x-y)=\lVert x-(x-y)\rVert=\lVert y\rVert; were ∥y∥≤εδ\lVert y\rVert\le\varepsilon\delta, then x−yx-y would lie in Bˉ(x,εδ)⊆Ω\bar B(x,\varepsilon\delta)\subseteq\Omega, contrary to assumption, and the order on R\mathbb{R} being total this leaves εδ<∥y∥\varepsilon\delta<\lVert y\rVert. Hence ρε(y)=0\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)=0, so both sides of the asserted identity are 00, using claim 1 of Zero Products and Elementary Identities in a Field.

Step 5 (the difference as an integral). By claim 2 of Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, applied to the integrable functions hxh_{x} and ρε\rho_{\varepsilon} with a=1a=1 and b=−f(x)b=-f(x), the function 1⋅hx+(−f(x))ρε1\cdot h_{x}+(-f(x))\rho_{\varepsilon} is integrable with respect to λn\lambda_{n} and

∫Rn(1⋅hx+(−f(x))ρε) dλn=1⋅∫Rnhx dλn+(−f(x))∫Rnρε dλn.\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\bigl(1\cdot h_{x}+(-f(x))\rho_{\varepsilon}\bigr)\,d\lambda_{n}=1\cdot\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}h_{x}\,d\lambda_{n}+(-f(x))\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\rho_{\varepsilon}\,d\lambda_{n}.

By Step 4 the function on the left is gxg_{x}, and the right-hand side is (f∗ρε)(x)+(−f(x))⋅1=(f∗ρε)(x)−f(x)(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)+(-f(x))\cdot 1=(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)-f(x). Hence

∫Rngx dλn=(f∗ρε)(x)−f(x).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g_{x}\,d\lambda_{n}=(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)-f(x).

Step 6 (the bound). Let z∈Bˉ(x,εδ)z\in\bar B(x,\varepsilon\delta). Then z∈Ωz\in\Omega by Step 2, and d(x,z)≤εδ<θd(x,z)\le\varepsilon\delta<\theta by Closed Ball in a Metric Space and Step 2, so d(x,z)<θd(x,z)<\theta by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Since x∈Kx\in K, Step 2 gives ∣F(z)∣=∣f(z)−f(x)∣<η′|F(z)|=|f(z)-f(x)|<\eta', hence ∣F(z)∣≤η′|F(z)|\le\eta'.

Thus η′\eta' is a nonnegative real number bounding ∣F∣|F| on Bˉ(x,εδ)\bar B(x,\varepsilon\delta), and Bˉ(x,εδ)⊆Ω\bar B(x,\varepsilon\delta)\subseteq\Omega. Claim 2 of The Convolution Integrand is Continuous, Compactly Supported and Integrable, applied to Ω\Omega, to FF, to the kernel ρε\rho_{\varepsilon} with radius εδ\varepsilon\delta, to the point xx and to M=η′M=\eta', therefore gives

∣∫Rngx dλn∣≤η′∫Rn∣ρε∣ dλn.\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}g_{x}\,d\lambda_{n}\Bigr|\le\eta'\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}|\rho_{\varepsilon}|\,d\lambda_{n}.

For every yy we have 0≤ρε(y)0\le\rho_{\varepsilon}(y), and by claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field the value ∣ρε(y)∣|\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)| is ρε(y)\rho_{\varepsilon}(y) or −ρε(y)-\rho_{\varepsilon}(y); in the second case 0≤−ρε(y)0\le-\rho_{\varepsilon}(y) gives ρε(y)≤0\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)\le 0 by claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and hence ρε(y)=0=∣ρε(y)∣\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)=0=|\rho_{\varepsilon}(y)|. So ∣ρε∣|\rho_{\varepsilon}| is the function ρε\rho_{\varepsilon}, and its integral is 11.

Combining with Step 5,

∣(f∗ρε)(x)−f(x)∣≤η′⋅1=η′<η,\bigl|(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)-f(x)\bigr|\le\eta'\cdot 1=\eta'<\eta ,

so ∣(f∗ρε)(x)−f(x)∣<η|(f*\rho_{\varepsilon})(x)-f(x)|<\eta by claim 2 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Since x∈Kx\in K and ε\varepsilon with 0<ε<ε00<\varepsilon<\varepsilon_{0} were arbitrary, claim 2 follows. ■\blacksquare

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…