Write (I) for claim of Elementary Properties of an Orthonormal Family, (P) for claim of The Span of a Finite Family is the Smallest Subspace Containing It, (F) for claim of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors, (Q) for claim of A Linear Subspace is a Vector Space and Inherits an Inner Product, and (V) for claim of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space. Conditions on an inner product are numbered as in Complex Inner Product Space, and the axioms of a vector space are used freely. Sums of vectors are finite sums.
The -tuple is orthonormal, since its only component is a unit vector and contains no two distinct indices. By (P1), , and by the definition of the span together with (F1) the elements of are exactly the vectors with a complex number.
We also record that for every , by (V3) and condition 3.
A vector lies in exactly when kills it. If then because . Conversely suppose and let . By conditions 1 and 3 and claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus,
so .
Claim 1. Existence. Let . Apply (I4) to the orthonormal tuple and the vector : with by (F1), and , one gets and , so by the criterion above and .
Uniqueness. Suppose with and complex. Applying and using conditions 2 and 3 together with ,
By (I1) applied to with the -tuple of coefficients we have , so and hence . In particular the pair produced above is the only one, and its first entry is .
Claim 2. Let . By the definition of the dimension there is a basis of , so by spanning and (F1) every satisfies for some complex . Also : otherwise by the record above, contradicting and . Write ; then , since otherwise by (V3). Hence , so (P3) gives and therefore .
Now let . Since , the definition of the orthogonal complement gives , so by condition 4. Thus .
Claim 3. Let .
. If , then claim 1 gives for every , so spans ; being orthonormal it is linearly independent by (I3), hence a basis of of length . By claim 2 of Orthonormal Bases and Basis Size in a Finite-Dimensional Inner Product Space and the definition of the dimension, . But is a successor and is not a successor, by Natural Numbers, a contradiction.
A spanning tuple of . By claim 1 of Orthonormal Bases and Basis Size in a Finite-Dimensional Inner Product Space and the definition of the dimension there is an orthonormal basis of . Let assign to each the vector , which lies in by claim 1. Conditions 2 and 3, together with the vector space axioms, make a linear map from to . Let be the tuple with .
By (Q1) the set is a vector space under the operations of , and by (Q2) finite sums formed in agree with those formed in . Let . Since spans there is a tuple of complex numbers with , so by (F4) and the linearity of ,
On the other hand , so by (V3). Hence spans the vector space .
An orthonormal basis of . Since , A Finite Spanning Family Contains a Basis applied to and gives a natural number and a basis of . By (Q3) the set with the restricted inner product is a complex inner product space, so Gram-Schmidt Orthonormalisation applied to the linearly independent tuple gives an orthonormal whose span in equals that of . As spans , so does ; and is linearly independent by (I3). Hence is an orthonormal basis of .
Adjoining . Let have for and . By (Q3) the inner product of is the restriction of that of , so every component of is a unit vector of and distinct components of are orthogonal in ; and is a unit vector. Let be distinct. If both lie in , then and are orthogonal. Otherwise exactly one of them equals , by claim 5 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers; and for we have , so , while by condition 1 and claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus. Hence is orthonormal, and linearly independent by (I3).
Let . By claim 1, with , and for some tuple of complex numbers, the sum being the same in and in by (Q2). Let be the tuple of complex numbers on with for and . By the recursion and restriction parts of (F1),
the last equality by commutativity of addition in . So spans and is therefore an orthonormal basis of .
The size. Both and are bases of , so by claim 2 of Orthonormal Bases and Basis Size in a Finite-Dimensional Inner Product Space. The successor map is injective by Natural Numbers, so . Thus and are as asserted.
Loadingβ¦
Prerequisites
dc802a80-1878-461c-b843-f7cab9ac0d75