TheoremBase

Proof of The Orthogonal Complement of a Unit Vector

lemmalem:orthogonal-complement-unit-vector-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v1Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Initial publication. Decomposition from the orthogonal decomposition of an orthonormal family; the dimension-one case by showing the line is all of V; the splitting by projecting an orthonormal basis into the complement, extracting a basis, orthonormalising, and adjoining the unit vector.

Proof

Write (Ikk) for claim kk of Elementary Properties of an Orthonormal Family, (Pkk) for claim kk of The Span of a Finite Family is the Smallest Subspace Containing It, (Fkk) for claim kk of Properties of Finite Sums of Vectors, (Qkk) for claim kk of A Linear Subspace is a Vector Space and Inherits an Inner Product, and (Vkk) for claim kk of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space. Conditions on an inner product are numbered as in Complex Inner Product Space, and the axioms of a vector space are used freely. Sums of vectors are finite sums.

The 11-tuple u~\tilde{u} is orthonormal, since its only component is a unit vector and [1][1] contains no two distinct indices. By (P1), u∈Uu\in U, and by the definition of the span together with (F1) the elements of UU are exactly the vectors cucu with cc a complex number.

We also record that ⟨y,0V⟩=⟨y,0β‹…0V⟩=0β€‰βŸ¨y,0V⟩=0\langle y,0_{V}\rangle=\langle y,0\cdot 0_{V}\rangle=0\,\langle y,0_{V}\rangle=0 for every y∈Vy\in V, by (V3) and condition 3.

A vector lies in WW exactly when ⟨u,β‹…βŸ©\langle u,\cdot\rangle kills it. If y∈Wy\in W then ⟨u,y⟩=0\langle u,y\rangle=0 because u∈Uu\in U. Conversely suppose ⟨u,y⟩=0\langle u,y\rangle=0 and let cu∈Ucu\in U. By conditions 1 and 3 and claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus,

⟨cu,y⟩=⟨y,cuβŸ©β€Ύ=c⟨y,uβŸ©β€Ύ=cβ€Ύβ€‰βŸ¨y,uβŸ©β€Ύ=cβ€Ύβ€‰βŸ¨u,y⟩=0,\langle cu,y\rangle=\overline{\langle y,cu\rangle}=\overline{c\langle y,u\rangle}=\overline{c}\,\overline{\langle y,u\rangle}=\overline{c}\,\langle u,y\rangle=0 ,

so y∈Wy\in W.

Claim 1. Existence. Let x∈Vx\in V. Apply (I4) to the orthonormal tuple u~\tilde{u} and the vector xx: with p=βˆ‘k=11⟨u,x⟩u=⟨u,x⟩up=\sum_{k=1}^{1}\langle u,x\rangle u=\langle u,x\rangle u by (F1), and w=xβˆ’pw=x-p, one gets x=w+px=w+p and ⟨u,w⟩=0\langle u,w\rangle=0, so w∈Ww\in W by the criterion above and x=⟨u,x⟩u+wx=\langle u,x\rangle u+w.

Uniqueness. Suppose Ξ»u+w=Ξ»β€²u+wβ€²\lambda u+w=\lambda' u+w' with w,wβ€²βˆˆWw,w'\in W and Ξ»,Ξ»β€²\lambda,\lambda' complex. Applying ⟨u,β‹…βŸ©\langle u,\cdot\rangle and using conditions 2 and 3 together with ⟨u,w⟩=⟨u,wβ€²βŸ©=0\langle u,w\rangle=\langle u,w'\rangle=0,

λ⟨u,u⟩=⟨u,Ξ»u+w⟩=⟨u,Ξ»β€²u+wβ€²βŸ©=Ξ»β€²βŸ¨u,u⟩.\lambda\langle u,u\rangle=\langle u,\lambda u+w\rangle=\langle u,\lambda' u+w'\rangle=\lambda'\langle u,u\rangle .

By (I1) applied to u~\tilde{u} with the 11-tuple of coefficients 11 we have ⟨u,u⟩=1\langle u,u\rangle=1, so Ξ»=Ξ»β€²\lambda=\lambda' and hence w=wβ€²w=w'. In particular the pair produced above is the only one, and its first entry is ⟨u,x⟩\langle u,x\rangle.

Claim 2. Let n=1n=1. By the definition of the dimension there is a basis b∈V1b\in V^{1} of VV, so by spanning and (F1) every x∈Vx\in V satisfies x=cb1x=cb_{1} for some complex cc. Also uβ‰ 0Vu\ne 0_{V}: otherwise ⟨u,u⟩=⟨0V,0V⟩=0\langle u,u\rangle=\langle 0_{V},0_{V}\rangle=0 by the record above, contradicting ⟨u,u⟩=1\langle u,u\rangle=1 and 1β‰ 01\ne 0. Write u=cb1u=cb_{1}; then cβ‰ 0c\ne 0, since otherwise u=0 b1=0Vu=0\,b_{1}=0_{V} by (V3). Hence b1=cβˆ’1u∈Ub_{1}=c^{-1}u\in U, so (P3) gives V=span⁑(b)βŠ†UV=\operatorname{span}(b)\subseteq U and therefore U=VU=V.

Now let x∈Wx\in W. Since x∈Ux\in U, the definition of the orthogonal complement gives ⟨x,x⟩=0\langle x,x\rangle=0, so x=0Vx=0_{V} by condition 4. Thus W={0V}W=\{0_{V}\}.

Claim 3. Let n=r+1n=r+1.

Wβ‰ {0V}W\ne\{0_{V}\}. If W={0V}W=\{0_{V}\}, then claim 1 gives x=⟨u,x⟩ux=\langle u,x\rangle u for every x∈Vx\in V, so u~\tilde{u} spans VV; being orthonormal it is linearly independent by (I3), hence a basis of VV of length 11. By claim 2 of Orthonormal Bases and Basis Size in a Finite-Dimensional Inner Product Space and the definition of the dimension, n=1n=1. But n=r+1n=r+1 is a successor and 11 is not a successor, by Natural Numbers, a contradiction.

A spanning tuple of WW. By claim 1 of Orthonormal Bases and Basis Size in a Finite-Dimensional Inner Product Space and the definition of the dimension there is an orthonormal basis a∈Vna\in V^{n} of VV. Let PP assign to each x∈Vx\in V the vector P(x)=xβˆ’βŸ¨u,x⟩uP(x)=x-\langle u,x\rangle u, which lies in WW by claim 1. Conditions 2 and 3, together with the vector space axioms, make PP a linear map from VV to VV. Let g∈Wng\in W^{n} be the tuple with gk=P(ak)g_{k}=P(a_{k}).

By (Q1) the set WW is a vector space under the operations of VV, and by (Q2) finite sums formed in WW agree with those formed in VV. Let y∈Wy\in W. Since aa spans VV there is a tuple cc of complex numbers with y=βˆ‘k=1nckaky=\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}a_{k}, so by (F4) and the linearity of PP,

P(y)=βˆ‘k=1nP(ckak)=βˆ‘k=1nckgk.P(y)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}P(c_{k}a_{k})=\sum_{k=1}^{n}c_{k}g_{k}.

On the other hand ⟨u,y⟩=0\langle u,y\rangle=0, so P(y)=yβˆ’0 u=yP(y)=y-0\,u=y by (V3). Hence gg spans the vector space WW.

An orthonormal basis of WW. Since Wβ‰ {0V}W\ne\{0_{V}\}, A Finite Spanning Family Contains a Basis applied to WW and gg gives a natural number ss and a basis h∈Wsh\in W^{s} of WW. By (Q3) the set WW with the restricted inner product is a complex inner product space, so Gram-Schmidt Orthonormalisation applied to the linearly independent tuple hh gives an orthonormal f∈Wsf\in W^{s} whose span in WW equals that of hh. As hh spans WW, so does ff; and ff is linearly independent by (I3). Hence ff is an orthonormal basis of WW.

Adjoining uu. Let e∈Vs+1e\in V^{s+1} have ek=fke_{k}=f_{k} for k∈[s]k\in[s] and es+1=ue_{s+1}=u. By (Q3) the inner product of WW is the restriction of that of VV, so every component of ff is a unit vector of VV and distinct components of ff are orthogonal in VV; and uu is a unit vector. Let i,j∈[s+1]i,j\in[s+1] be distinct. If both lie in [s][s], then eie_{i} and eje_{j} are orthogonal. Otherwise exactly one of them equals s+1s+1, by claim 5 of Properties of the Order on the Natural Numbers; and for k∈[s]k\in[s] we have fk∈Wf_{k}\in W, so ⟨u,fk⟩=0\langle u,f_{k}\rangle=0, while ⟨fk,u⟩=0β€Ύ=0\langle f_{k},u\rangle=\overline{0}=0 by condition 1 and claim 1 of Properties of Complex Conjugation and Modulus. Hence ee is orthonormal, and linearly independent by (I3).

Let x∈Vx\in V. By claim 1, x=⟨u,x⟩u+wx=\langle u,x\rangle u+w with w∈Ww\in W, and w=βˆ‘k=1sdkfkw=\sum_{k=1}^{s}d_{k}f_{k} for some tuple dd of complex numbers, the sum being the same in WW and in VV by (Q2). Let cc be the tuple of complex numbers on [s+1][s+1] with ck=dkc_{k}=d_{k} for k∈[s]k\in[s] and cs+1=⟨u,x⟩c_{s+1}=\langle u,x\rangle. By the recursion and restriction parts of (F1),

βˆ‘k=1s+1ckek=(βˆ‘k=1sdkfk)+⟨u,x⟩u=w+⟨u,x⟩u=x,\sum_{k=1}^{s+1}c_{k}e_{k}=\Bigl(\sum_{k=1}^{s}d_{k}f_{k}\Bigr)+\langle u,x\rangle u=w+\langle u,x\rangle u=x ,

the last equality by commutativity of addition in VV. So ee spans VV and is therefore an orthonormal basis of VV.

The size. Both a∈Vna\in V^{n} and e∈Vs+1e\in V^{s+1} are bases of VV, so s+1=n=r+1s+1=n=r+1 by claim 2 of Orthonormal Bases and Basis Size in a Finite-Dimensional Inner Product Space. The successor map is injective by Natural Numbers, so s=rs=r. Thus f∈Wrf\in W^{r} and e∈Vr+1e\in V^{r+1} are as asserted.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…