Throughout, vector identities are those of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space , real arithmetic and order facts are those of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background , and 1 2 \tfrac12 2 1 is 2 − 1 2^{-1} 2 − 1 . For x ∈ V x\in V x ∈ V we use ∣ x ∣ H ≤ ∣ x ∣ V |x|_{H}\le|x|_{V} ∣ x ∣ H ≤ ∣ x ∣ V (Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background §triple ), and for t ∈ R t\in\mathbb{R} t ∈ R and z ∈ V z\in V z ∈ V we use ∣ t z ∣ V = ∣ t ∣ ∣ z ∣ V |tz|_{V}=|t|\,|z|_{V} ∣ t z ∣ V = ∣ t ∣ ∣ z ∣ V and ∣ t z ∣ H = ∣ t ∣ ∣ z ∣ H |tz|_{H}=|t|\,|z|_{H} ∣ t z ∣ H = ∣ t ∣ ∣ z ∣ H (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity ), together with h ( t z ) = 1 2 ∣ t z ∣ V 2 = 1 2 t 2 ∣ z ∣ V 2 h(tz)=\tfrac12|tz|_{V}^{2}=\tfrac12 t^{2}|z|_{V}^{2} h ( t z ) = 2 1 ∣ t z ∣ V 2 = 2 1 t 2 ∣ z ∣ V 2 , since ∣ t ∣ 2 = ∣ t ⋅ t ∣ = ∣ t 2 ∣ = t 2 |t|^{2}=|t\cdot t|=|t^{2}|=t^{2} ∣ t ∣ 2 = ∣ t ⋅ t ∣ = ∣ t 2 ∣ = t 2 by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field , 0 ≤ t 2 0\le t^{2} 0 ≤ t 2 (claim 5 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field ) and the definition of the absolute value .
Claim 1. By Local Maximum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space , applied in the metric space ( H , d H ) (H,d_{H}) ( H , d H ) to the function ψ − λ h \psi-\lambda h ψ − λh on the subset V ∩ U V\cap U V ∩ U , there is a real ρ 1 > 0 \rho_{1}>0 ρ 1 > 0 such that
ψ ( y ) − λ h ( y ) ≤ ψ ( x ^ ) − λ h ( x ^ ) for every y ∈ V ∩ U with d H ( x ^ , y ) < ρ 1 . (1) \psi(y)-\lambda h(y)\le\psi(\hat{x})-\lambda h(\hat{x})\qquad\text{for every }y\in V\cap U\text{ with }d_{H}(\hat{x},y)<\rho_{1}. \tag{1} ψ ( y ) − λh ( y ) ≤ ψ ( x ^ ) − λh ( x ^ ) for every y ∈ V ∩ U with d H ( x ^ , y ) < ρ 1 . ( 1 )
Fix z ∈ V z\in V z ∈ V with z ≠ 0 H z\ne0_{H} z = 0 H , so that ∣ z ∣ V > 0 |z|_{V}>0 ∣ z ∣ V > 0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §vanishing , and put
a = ⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , z ⟩ H − λ ⟨ x ^ , z ⟩ V , b = D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( z , z ) − λ ∣ z ∣ V 2 . a=\langle D\psi(\hat{x}),z\rangle_{H}-\lambda\langle\hat{x},z\rangle_{V},\qquad b=D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(z,z)-\lambda|z|_{V}^{2}. a = ⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , z ⟩ H − λ ⟨ x ^ , z ⟩ V , b = D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( z , z ) − λ ∣ z ∣ V 2 .
Step A: the basic inequality. Let ε > 0 \varepsilon>0 ε > 0 . By Segment Derivatives, the Second-Order Taylor Expansion, and the Second-Order Condition at a Local Extremum §taylor , applied to ψ ∈ C 2 ( U ) \psi\in C^{2}(U) ψ ∈ C 2 ( U ) at x ^ \hat{x} x ^ in the space H H H , there is a real η > 0 \eta>0 η > 0 such that every w ∈ H w\in H w ∈ H with ∣ w ∣ H < η |w|_{H}<\eta ∣ w ∣ H < η satisfies x ^ + w ∈ U \hat{x}+w\in U x ^ + w ∈ U and
∣ ψ ( x ^ + w ) − ψ ( x ^ ) − ⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , w ⟩ H − 1 2 D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( w , w ) ∣ ≤ ε ∣ w ∣ H 2 . \bigl|\psi(\hat{x}+w)-\psi(\hat{x})-\langle D\psi(\hat{x}),w\rangle_{H}-\tfrac12 D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(w,w)\bigr|\le\varepsilon|w|_{H}^{2}. ψ ( x ^ + w ) − ψ ( x ^ ) − ⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , w ⟩ H − 2 1 D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( w , w ) ≤ ε ∣ w ∣ H 2 .
Let θ \theta θ be the lesser of ρ 1 \rho_{1} ρ 1 and η \eta η (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ) and put τ ε = θ / ∣ z ∣ V \tau_{\varepsilon}=\theta/|z|_{V} τ ε = θ /∣ z ∣ V , a positive real number. Let t ∈ R t\in\mathbb{R} t ∈ R satisfy 0 < ∣ t ∣ < τ ε 0<|t|<\tau_{\varepsilon} 0 < ∣ t ∣ < τ ε , and put w = t z w=tz w = t z . Then w ∈ V w\in V w ∈ V and x ^ + w ∈ V \hat{x}+w\in V x ^ + w ∈ V , because V V V is a linear subspace of H H H (Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background §triple ), and ∣ w ∣ H ≤ ∣ w ∣ V = ∣ t ∣ ∣ z ∣ V < θ |w|_{H}\le|w|_{V}=|t|\,|z|_{V}<\theta ∣ w ∣ H ≤ ∣ w ∣ V = ∣ t ∣ ∣ z ∣ V < θ (multiplying ∣ t ∣ < τ ε |t|<\tau_{\varepsilon} ∣ t ∣ < τ ε by ∣ z ∣ V > 0 |z|_{V}>0 ∣ z ∣ V > 0 , claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ). Hence x ^ + t z ∈ U \hat{x}+tz\in U x ^ + t z ∈ U by the choice of η \eta η ; moreover d H ( x ^ , x ^ + t z ) = ∣ t z ∣ H < θ ≤ ρ 1 d_{H}(\hat{x},\hat{x}+tz)=|tz|_{H}<\theta\le\rho_{1} d H ( x ^ , x ^ + t z ) = ∣ t z ∣ H < θ ≤ ρ 1 by Real Inner Product Space §distance and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §homogeneity . So (1) applies to y = x ^ + t z y=\hat{x}+tz y = x ^ + t z . By The Penalty Function h = 1 2 ∣ ⋅ ∣ V 2 h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 h = 2 1 ∣ ⋅ ∣ V 2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds §expansion-v with x = x ^ x=\hat{x} x = x ^ and y = x ^ + t z y=\hat{x}+tz y = x ^ + t z , for which y − x = t z y-x=tz y − x = t z ,
h ( x ^ + t z ) = h ( x ^ ) + t ⟨ x ^ , z ⟩ V + 1 2 t 2 ∣ z ∣ V 2 , h(\hat{x}+tz)=h(\hat{x})+t\langle\hat{x},z\rangle_{V}+\tfrac12 t^{2}|z|_{V}^{2}, h ( x ^ + t z ) = h ( x ^ ) + t ⟨ x ^ , z ⟩ V + 2 1 t 2 ∣ z ∣ V 2 ,
using Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear for ⟨ x ^ , t z ⟩ V = t ⟨ x ^ , z ⟩ V \langle\hat{x},tz\rangle_{V}=t\langle\hat{x},z\rangle_{V} ⟨ x ^ , t z ⟩ V = t ⟨ x ^ , z ⟩ V . By the Taylor bound with w = t z w=tz w = t z , claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field , and the bilinearity of the inner product and of the form D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) D^{2}\psi(\hat{x}) D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) (Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §form ), which give ⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , t z ⟩ H = t ⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , z ⟩ H \langle D\psi(\hat{x}),tz\rangle_{H}=t\langle D\psi(\hat{x}),z\rangle_{H} ⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , t z ⟩ H = t ⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , z ⟩ H and D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( t z , t z ) = t 2 D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( z , z ) D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(tz,tz)=t^{2}D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(z,z) D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( t z , t z ) = t 2 D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( z , z ) ,
ψ ( x ^ + t z ) − ψ ( x ^ ) ≥ t ⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , z ⟩ H + 1 2 t 2 D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( z , z ) − ε t 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 . \psi(\hat{x}+tz)-\psi(\hat{x})\ge t\langle D\psi(\hat{x}),z\rangle_{H}+\tfrac12 t^{2}D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(z,z)-\varepsilon t^{2}|z|_{H}^{2}. ψ ( x ^ + t z ) − ψ ( x ^ ) ≥ t ⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , z ⟩ H + 2 1 t 2 D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( z , z ) − ε t 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 .
Subtracting λ \lambda λ times the expansion of h h h and using (1), we obtain
t a + 1 2 t 2 b − ε t 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 ≤ ( ψ ( x ^ + t z ) − λ h ( x ^ + t z ) ) − ( ψ ( x ^ ) − λ h ( x ^ ) ) ≤ 0 , ta+\tfrac12 t^{2}b-\varepsilon t^{2}|z|_{H}^{2}\le\bigl(\psi(\hat{x}+tz)-\lambda h(\hat{x}+tz)\bigr)-\bigl(\psi(\hat{x})-\lambda h(\hat{x})\bigr)\le0, t a + 2 1 t 2 b − ε t 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 ≤ ( ψ ( x ^ + t z ) − λh ( x ^ + t z ) ) − ( ψ ( x ^ ) − λh ( x ^ ) ) ≤ 0 ,
that is,
t a + 1 2 t 2 b ≤ ε t 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 whenever 0 < ∣ t ∣ < τ ε . (2) ta+\tfrac12 t^{2}b\le\varepsilon t^{2}|z|_{H}^{2}\qquad\text{whenever }0<|t|<\tau_{\varepsilon}. \tag{2} t a + 2 1 t 2 b ≤ ε t 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 whenever 0 < ∣ t ∣ < τ ε . ( 2 )
Step B: a = 0 a=0 a = 0 . Suppose a ≠ 0 a\ne0 a = 0 . By the trichotomy of the order, either a > 0 a>0 a > 0 or a < 0 a<0 a < 0 ; let σ \sigma σ be 1 1 1 in the first case and − 1 -1 − 1 in the second, so that σ a = ∣ a ∣ > 0 \sigma a=|a|>0 σa = ∣ a ∣ > 0 by the definition of the absolute value and claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field . Apply Step A with ε = 1 \varepsilon=1 ε = 1 and put K = ∣ z ∣ H 2 − 1 2 b K=|z|_{H}^{2}-\tfrac12 b K = ∣ z ∣ H 2 − 2 1 b . For every real τ \tau τ with 0 < τ < τ 1 0<\tau<\tau_{1} 0 < τ < τ 1 , the number t = σ τ t=\sigma\tau t = σ τ satisfies 0 < ∣ t ∣ = τ < τ 1 0<|t|=\tau<\tau_{1} 0 < ∣ t ∣ = τ < τ 1 and t 2 = τ 2 t^{2}=\tau^{2} t 2 = τ 2 , so (2) gives τ ∣ a ∣ + 1 2 τ 2 b ≤ τ 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 \tau|a|+\tfrac12\tau^{2}b\le\tau^{2}|z|_{H}^{2} τ ∣ a ∣ + 2 1 τ 2 b ≤ τ 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 , that is, τ ∣ a ∣ ≤ τ 2 K \tau|a|\le\tau^{2}K τ ∣ a ∣ ≤ τ 2 K (claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ); multiplying by τ − 1 ≥ 0 \tau^{-1}\ge0 τ − 1 ≥ 0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , the inverse of a positive number being positive by claim 4 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ) yields ∣ a ∣ ≤ τ K |a|\le\tau K ∣ a ∣ ≤ τ K . If K ≤ 0 K\le0 K ≤ 0 , take τ = 1 2 τ 1 \tau=\tfrac12\tau_{1} τ = 2 1 τ 1 , positive and less than τ 1 \tau_{1} τ 1 by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ; then ∣ a ∣ ≤ τ K ≤ 0 |a|\le\tau K\le0 ∣ a ∣ ≤ τ K ≤ 0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ), contradicting ∣ a ∣ > 0 |a|>0 ∣ a ∣ > 0 . If K > 0 K>0 K > 0 , let m m m be the lesser of τ 1 \tau_{1} τ 1 and ∣ a ∣ / K |a|/K ∣ a ∣/ K (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ) and take τ = 1 2 m \tau=\tfrac12 m τ = 2 1 m , so that 0 < τ < τ 1 0<\tau<\tau_{1} 0 < τ < τ 1 and τ < ∣ a ∣ / K \tau<|a|/K τ < ∣ a ∣/ K ; then τ K < ∣ a ∣ \tau K<|a| τ K < ∣ a ∣ by claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field , again a contradiction. Hence a = 0 a=0 a = 0 .
Step C: b ≤ 0 b\le0 b ≤ 0 . Let ε ′ > 0 \varepsilon'>0 ε ′ > 0 and put ε = ε ′ / ( 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 + 1 ) \varepsilon=\varepsilon'/(2|z|_{H}^{2}+1) ε = ε ′ / ( 2∣ z ∣ H 2 + 1 ) , which is positive because 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 + 1 ≥ 1 > 0 2|z|_{H}^{2}+1\ge1>0 2∣ z ∣ H 2 + 1 ≥ 1 > 0 . Apply Step A with this ε \varepsilon ε and the number t = 1 2 τ ε t=\tfrac12\tau_{\varepsilon} t = 2 1 τ ε , which satisfies 0 < ∣ t ∣ < τ ε 0<|t|<\tau_{\varepsilon} 0 < ∣ t ∣ < τ ε by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field . Since a = 0 a=0 a = 0 , (2) reads 1 2 t 2 b ≤ ε t 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 \tfrac12 t^{2}b\le\varepsilon t^{2}|z|_{H}^{2} 2 1 t 2 b ≤ ε t 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 ; as t 2 > 0 t^{2}>0 t 2 > 0 (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field ), multiplying by the nonnegative number 2 t − 2 2t^{-2} 2 t − 2 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ) gives b ≤ 2 ε ∣ z ∣ H 2 ≤ ε ( 2 ∣ z ∣ H 2 + 1 ) = ε ′ b\le2\varepsilon|z|_{H}^{2}\le\varepsilon(2|z|_{H}^{2}+1)=\varepsilon' b ≤ 2 ε ∣ z ∣ H 2 ≤ ε ( 2∣ z ∣ H 2 + 1 ) = ε ′ , the middle inequality because 0 ≤ ε 0\le\varepsilon 0 ≤ ε . Since ε ′ > 0 \varepsilon'>0 ε ′ > 0 was arbitrary, Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-above gives b ≤ 0 b\le0 b ≤ 0 .
Step D: conclusion. Steps B and C show that for every z ∈ V z\in V z ∈ V with z ≠ 0 H z\ne0_{H} z = 0 H ,
⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , z ⟩ H = λ ⟨ x ^ , z ⟩ V and D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( z , z ) ≤ λ ∣ z ∣ V 2 . (3) \langle D\psi(\hat{x}),z\rangle_{H}=\lambda\langle\hat{x},z\rangle_{V}\qquad\text{and}\qquad D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(z,z)\le\lambda|z|_{V}^{2}. \tag{3} ⟨ D ψ ( x ^ ) , z ⟩ H = λ ⟨ x ^ , z ⟩ V and D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( z , z ) ≤ λ ∣ z ∣ V 2 . ( 3 )
Both relations also hold for z = 0 H z=0_{H} z = 0 H : each side of the equality is 0 0 0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §zero , and D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( 0 H , 0 H ) = 0 D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(0_{H},0_{H})=0 D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( 0 H , 0 H ) = 0 by the bilinearity of the form (write 0 H = 0 ⋅ 0 H 0_{H}=0\cdot0_{H} 0 H = 0 ⋅ 0 H and use homogeneity), while λ ∣ 0 H ∣ V 2 = 0 \lambda|0_{H}|_{V}^{2}=0 λ ∣ 0 H ∣ V 2 = 0 . So (3) holds for every z ∈ V z\in V z ∈ V .
Dividing the equality in (3) by λ > 0 \lambda>0 λ > 0 and using Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space §bilinear together with the symmetry of the inner product, ⟨ x ^ , z ⟩ V = ⟨ λ − 1 D ψ ( x ^ ) , z ⟩ H \langle\hat{x},z\rangle_{V}=\langle\lambda^{-1}D\psi(\hat{x}),z\rangle_{H} ⟨ x ^ , z ⟩ V = ⟨ λ − 1 D ψ ( x ^ ) , z ⟩ H for every z ∈ V z\in V z ∈ V . By Hilbert Triple: a Densely and Continuously Embedded Hilbert Space and Its Form Operator §operator , this says precisely that x ^ ∈ D ( A ) \hat{x}\in D(A) x ^ ∈ D ( A ) with A x ^ = λ − 1 D ψ ( x ^ ) A\hat{x}=\lambda^{-1}D\psi(\hat{x}) A x ^ = λ − 1 D ψ ( x ^ ) , whence λ A x ^ = D ψ ( x ^ ) \lambda A\hat{x}=D\psi(\hat{x}) λ A x ^ = D ψ ( x ^ ) . As x ^ ∈ U \hat{x}\in U x ^ ∈ U , also x ^ ∈ D ( A ) ∩ U = W \hat{x}\in D(A)\cap U=W x ^ ∈ D ( A ) ∩ U = W .
For the second assertion, D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V ( z , z ) = D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( z , z ) D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V}(z,z)=D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(z,z) D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V ( z , z ) = D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ( z , z ) for z ∈ V z\in V z ∈ V by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §restriction , and ( λ I V ) ( z , z ) = λ ⟨ z , z ⟩ V = λ ∣ z ∣ V 2 (\lambda I_{V})(z,z)=\lambda\langle z,z\rangle_{V}=\lambda|z|_{V}^{2} ( λ I V ) ( z , z ) = λ ⟨ z , z ⟩ V = λ ∣ z ∣ V 2 by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §identity and Real Inner Product Space §norm . Thus the inequality in (3) says D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V ( z , z ) ≤ ( λ I V ) ( z , z ) D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V}(z,z)\le(\lambda I_{V})(z,z) D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V ( z , z ) ≤ ( λ I V ) ( z , z ) for every z ∈ V z\in V z ∈ V , which is D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V ⪯ λ I V D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V}\preceq\lambda I_{V} D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V ⪯ λ I V by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §order .
Claim 2. Put ψ ′ = − ψ \psi'=-\psi ψ ′ = − ψ , the function ( − 1 ) ψ (-1)\psi ( − 1 ) ψ . By Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space §scalar , ψ ′ ∈ C 2 ( U ) \psi'\in C^{2}(U) ψ ′ ∈ C 2 ( U ) with D ψ ′ ( x ^ ) = − D ψ ( x ^ ) D\psi'(\hat{x})=-D\psi(\hat{x}) D ψ ′ ( x ^ ) = − D ψ ( x ^ ) and D 2 ψ ′ ( x ^ ) = − D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) D^{2}\psi'(\hat{x})=-D^{2}\psi(\hat{x}) D 2 ψ ′ ( x ^ ) = − D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) . By Local Minimum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space there is a real ρ > 0 \rho>0 ρ > 0 with ψ ( x ^ ) + λ h ( x ^ ) ≤ ψ ( y ) + λ h ( y ) \psi(\hat{x})+\lambda h(\hat{x})\le\psi(y)+\lambda h(y) ψ ( x ^ ) + λh ( x ^ ) ≤ ψ ( y ) + λh ( y ) for every y ∈ V ∩ U y\in V\cap U y ∈ V ∩ U with d H ( x ^ , y ) < ρ d_{H}(\hat{x},y)<\rho d H ( x ^ , y ) < ρ ; multiplying by − 1 -1 − 1 (claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field ) gives ψ ′ ( y ) − λ h ( y ) ≤ ψ ′ ( x ^ ) − λ h ( x ^ ) \psi'(y)-\lambda h(y)\le\psi'(\hat{x})-\lambda h(\hat{x}) ψ ′ ( y ) − λh ( y ) ≤ ψ ′ ( x ^ ) − λh ( x ^ ) for the same y y y , so ψ ′ − λ h \psi'-\lambda h ψ ′ − λh has a local maximum at x ^ \hat{x} x ^ relative to V ∩ U V\cap U V ∩ U . Since claim 1 holds for every member of C 2 ( U ) C^{2}(U) C 2 ( U ) in the role of ψ \psi ψ , it applies to ψ ′ \psi' ψ ′ and gives x ^ ∈ D ( A ) \hat{x}\in D(A) x ^ ∈ D ( A ) , hence x ^ ∈ W \hat{x}\in W x ^ ∈ W ; λ A x ^ = D ψ ′ ( x ^ ) = − D ψ ( x ^ ) \lambda A\hat{x}=D\psi'(\hat{x})=-D\psi(\hat{x}) λ A x ^ = D ψ ′ ( x ^ ) = − D ψ ( x ^ ) ; and ( − D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ) ∣ V ⪯ λ I V (-D^{2}\psi(\hat{x}))|_{V}\preceq\lambda I_{V} ( − D 2 ψ ( x ^ )) ∣ V ⪯ λ I V . By Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity §restriction , ( − D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ) ∣ V = − ( D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V ) (-D^{2}\psi(\hat{x}))|_{V}=-(D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V}) ( − D 2 ψ ( x ^ )) ∣ V = − ( D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V ) , and multiplying the last relation by − 1 -1 − 1 (Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity §order-compatible ), with ( − 1 ) ( − ( D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V ) ) = D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V (-1)(-(D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V}))=D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V} ( − 1 ) ( − ( D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V )) = D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V by Elementary Identities in a Vector Space in S y m ( V ) \mathrm{Sym}(V) Sym ( V ) , gives − λ I V ⪯ D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V -\lambda I_{V}\preceq D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V} − λ I V ⪯ D 2 ψ ( x ^ ) ∣ V , where − λ I V = ( − 1 ) ( λ I V ) -\lambda I_{V}=(-1)(\lambda I_{V}) − λ I V = ( − 1 ) ( λ I V ) by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction §identity and the vector space structure of S y m ( V ) \mathrm{Sym}(V) Sym ( V ) (Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity §vector-space ).