TheoremBase

Restrict to the lines x̂ + tz with z in V: the exact expansion of h and the second-order Taylor expansion of ψ give ta + (t²/2)b ≤ εt²|z|_H² for small t, which forces a = 0 and b ≤ 0; the first-order identity for all z in V is the defining property of D(A), and the second-order inequality is the form inequality on V. Claim 2 is claim 1 for −ψ.

Proof

Throughout, vector identities are those of Elementary Identities in a Vector Space, real arithmetic and order facts are those of The Real Numbers: Standing Notation and Background, and 12\tfrac12 is 2−12^{-1}. For x∈Vx\in V we use ∣x∣H≤∣x∣V|x|_{H}\le|x|_{V} (Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (i)), and for t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} and z∈Vz\in V we use ∣tz∣V=∣t∣ ∣z∣V|tz|_{V}=|t|\,|z|_{V} and ∣tz∣H=∣t∣ ∣z∣H|tz|_{H}=|t|\,|z|_{H} (Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv)), together with h(tz)=12∣tz∣V2=12t2∣z∣V2h(tz)=\tfrac12|tz|_{V}^{2}=\tfrac12 t^{2}|z|_{V}^{2}, since ∣t∣2=∣t⋅t∣=∣t2∣=t2|t|^{2}=|t\cdot t|=|t^{2}|=t^{2} by claim 4 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, 0≤t20\le t^{2} (claim 5 of Properties of Natural Number Powers in a Field) and the definition of the absolute value.

Claim 1. By Local Maximum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space, applied in the metric space (H,dH)(H,d_{H}) to the function ψ−λh\psi-\lambda h on the subset V∩UV\cap U, there is a real ρ1>0\rho_{1}>0 such that

ψ(y)−λh(y)≤ψ(x^)−λh(x^)for every y∈V∩U with dH(x^,y)<ρ1.(1)\psi(y)-\lambda h(y)\le\psi(\hat{x})-\lambda h(\hat{x})\qquad\text{for every }y\in V\cap U\text{ with }d_{H}(\hat{x},y)<\rho_{1}. \tag{1}

Fix z∈Vz\in V with z≠0Hz\ne0_{H}, so that ∣z∣V>0|z|_{V}>0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iii), and put

a=⟨Dψ(x^),z⟩H−λ⟨x^,z⟩V,b=D2ψ(x^)(z,z)−λ∣z∣V2.a=\langle D\psi(\hat{x}),z\rangle_{H}-\lambda\langle\hat{x},z\rangle_{V},\qquad b=D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(z,z)-\lambda|z|_{V}^{2}.

Step A: the basic inequality. Let ε>0\varepsilon>0. By Segment Derivatives, the Second-Order Taylor Expansion, and the Second-Order Condition at a Local Extremum (ii), applied to ψ∈C2(U)\psi\in C^{2}(U) at x^\hat{x} in the space HH, there is a real η>0\eta>0 such that every w∈Hw\in H with ∣w∣H<η|w|_{H}<\eta satisfies x^+w∈U\hat{x}+w\in U and

∣ψ(x^+w)−ψ(x^)−⟨Dψ(x^),w⟩H−12D2ψ(x^)(w,w)∣≤ε∣w∣H2.\bigl|\psi(\hat{x}+w)-\psi(\hat{x})-\langle D\psi(\hat{x}),w\rangle_{H}-\tfrac12 D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(w,w)\bigr|\le\varepsilon|w|_{H}^{2}.

Let θ\theta be the lesser of ρ1\rho_{1} and η\eta (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and put τε=θ/∣z∣V\tau_{\varepsilon}=\theta/|z|_{V}, a positive real number. Let t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} satisfy 0<∣t∣<τε0<|t|<\tau_{\varepsilon}, and put w=tzw=tz. Then w∈Vw\in V and x^+w∈V\hat{x}+w\in V, because VV is a linear subspace of HH (Hilbert Triples: Standing Notation and Background (i)), and ∣w∣H≤∣w∣V=∣t∣ ∣z∣V<θ|w|_{H}\le|w|_{V}=|t|\,|z|_{V}<\theta (multiplying ∣t∣<τε|t|<\tau_{\varepsilon} by ∣z∣V>0|z|_{V}>0, claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). Hence x^+tz∈U\hat{x}+tz\in U by the choice of η\eta; moreover dH(x^,x^+tz)=∣tz∣H<θ≤ρ1d_{H}(\hat{x},\hat{x}+tz)=|tz|_{H}<\theta\le\rho_{1} by Real Inner Product Spaces (iii) and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv). So (1) applies to y=x^+tzy=\hat{x}+tz. By The Penalty Function h=12∣⋅∣V2h=\tfrac12|\cdot|_V^2 of a Hilbert Triple: Expansion Identities, Closed Sublevel Sets, Density and Local Bounds (ii) with x=x^x=\hat{x} and y=x^+tzy=\hat{x}+tz, for which y−x=tzy-x=tz,

h(x^+tz)=h(x^)+t⟨x^,z⟩V+12t2∣z∣V2,h(\hat{x}+tz)=h(\hat{x})+t\langle\hat{x},z\rangle_{V}+\tfrac12 t^{2}|z|_{V}^{2},

using Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i) for ⟨x^,tz⟩V=t⟨x^,z⟩V\langle\hat{x},tz\rangle_{V}=t\langle\hat{x},z\rangle_{V}. By the Taylor bound with w=tzw=tz, claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field, and the bilinearity of the inner product and of the form D2ψ(x^)D^{2}\psi(\hat{x}) (Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (i)), which give ⟨Dψ(x^),tz⟩H=t⟨Dψ(x^),z⟩H\langle D\psi(\hat{x}),tz\rangle_{H}=t\langle D\psi(\hat{x}),z\rangle_{H} and D2ψ(x^)(tz,tz)=t2D2ψ(x^)(z,z)D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(tz,tz)=t^{2}D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(z,z),

ψ(x^+tz)−ψ(x^)≥t⟨Dψ(x^),z⟩H+12t2D2ψ(x^)(z,z)−εt2∣z∣H2.\psi(\hat{x}+tz)-\psi(\hat{x})\ge t\langle D\psi(\hat{x}),z\rangle_{H}+\tfrac12 t^{2}D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(z,z)-\varepsilon t^{2}|z|_{H}^{2}.

Subtracting λ\lambda times the expansion of hh and using (1), we obtain

ta+12t2b−εt2∣z∣H2≤(ψ(x^+tz)−λh(x^+tz))−(ψ(x^)−λh(x^))≤0,ta+\tfrac12 t^{2}b-\varepsilon t^{2}|z|_{H}^{2}\le\bigl(\psi(\hat{x}+tz)-\lambda h(\hat{x}+tz)\bigr)-\bigl(\psi(\hat{x})-\lambda h(\hat{x})\bigr)\le0,

that is,

ta+12t2b≤εt2∣z∣H2whenever 0<∣t∣<τε.(2)ta+\tfrac12 t^{2}b\le\varepsilon t^{2}|z|_{H}^{2}\qquad\text{whenever }0<|t|<\tau_{\varepsilon}. \tag{2}

Step B: a=0a=0. Suppose a≠0a\ne0. By the trichotomy of the order, either a>0a>0 or a<0a<0; let σ\sigma be 11 in the first case and −1-1 in the second, so that σa=∣a∣>0\sigma a=|a|>0 by the definition of the absolute value and claim 1 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. Apply Step A with ε=1\varepsilon=1 and put K=∣z∣H2−12bK=|z|_{H}^{2}-\tfrac12 b. For every real τ\tau with 0<τ<τ10<\tau<\tau_{1}, the number t=στt=\sigma\tau satisfies 0<∣t∣=τ<τ10<|t|=\tau<\tau_{1} and t2=τ2t^{2}=\tau^{2}, so (2) gives τ∣a∣+12τ2b≤τ2∣z∣H2\tau|a|+\tfrac12\tau^{2}b\le\tau^{2}|z|_{H}^{2}, that is, τ∣a∣≤τ2K\tau|a|\le\tau^{2}K (claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field); multiplying by τ−1≥0\tau^{-1}\ge0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, the inverse of a positive number being positive by claim 4 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) yields ∣a∣≤τK|a|\le\tau K. If K≤0K\le0, take τ=12τ1\tau=\tfrac12\tau_{1}, positive and less than τ1\tau_{1} by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field; then ∣a∣≤τK≤0|a|\le\tau K\le0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field), contradicting ∣a∣>0|a|>0. If K>0K>0, let mm be the lesser of τ1\tau_{1} and ∣a∣/K|a|/K (claim 9 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) and take τ=12m\tau=\tfrac12 m, so that 0<τ<τ10<\tau<\tau_{1} and τ<∣a∣/K\tau<|a|/K; then τK<∣a∣\tau K<|a| by claim 10 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, again a contradiction. Hence a=0a=0.

Step C: b≤0b\le0. Let ε′>0\varepsilon'>0 and put ε=ε′/(2∣z∣H2+1)\varepsilon=\varepsilon'/(2|z|_{H}^{2}+1), which is positive because 2∣z∣H2+1≥1>02|z|_{H}^{2}+1\ge1>0. Apply Step A with this ε\varepsilon and the number t=12τεt=\tfrac12\tau_{\varepsilon}, which satisfies 0<∣t∣<τε0<|t|<\tau_{\varepsilon} by claim 8 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field. Since a=0a=0, (2) reads 12t2b≤εt2∣z∣H2\tfrac12 t^{2}b\le\varepsilon t^{2}|z|_{H}^{2}; as t2>0t^{2}>0 (claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field), multiplying by the nonnegative number 2t−22t^{-2} (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives b≤2ε∣z∣H2≤ε(2∣z∣H2+1)=ε′b\le2\varepsilon|z|_{H}^{2}\le\varepsilon(2|z|_{H}^{2}+1)=\varepsilon', the middle inequality because 0≤ε0\le\varepsilon. Since ε′>0\varepsilon'>0 was arbitrary, Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack (i) gives b≤0b\le0.

Step D: conclusion. Steps B and C show that for every z∈Vz\in V with z≠0Hz\ne0_{H},

⟨Dψ(x^),z⟩H=λ⟨x^,z⟩VandD2ψ(x^)(z,z)≤λ∣z∣V2.(3)\langle D\psi(\hat{x}),z\rangle_{H}=\lambda\langle\hat{x},z\rangle_{V}\qquad\text{and}\qquad D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(z,z)\le\lambda|z|_{V}^{2}. \tag{3}

Both relations also hold for z=0Hz=0_{H}: each side of the equality is 00 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (ii), and D2ψ(x^)(0H,0H)=0D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(0_{H},0_{H})=0 by the bilinearity of the form (write 0H=0⋅0H0_{H}=0\cdot0_{H} and use homogeneity), while λ∣0H∣V2=0\lambda|0_{H}|_{V}^{2}=0. So (3) holds for every z∈Vz\in V.

Dividing the equality in (3) by λ>0\lambda>0 and using Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i) together with the symmetry of the inner product, ⟨x^,z⟩V=⟨λ−1Dψ(x^),z⟩H\langle\hat{x},z\rangle_{V}=\langle\lambda^{-1}D\psi(\hat{x}),z\rangle_{H} for every z∈Vz\in V. By Hilbert Triple: a Densely and Continuously Embedded Hilbert Space and Its Form Operator (iv), this says precisely that x^∈D(A)\hat{x}\in D(A) with Ax^=λ−1Dψ(x^)A\hat{x}=\lambda^{-1}D\psi(\hat{x}), whence λAx^=Dψ(x^)\lambda A\hat{x}=D\psi(\hat{x}). As x^∈U\hat{x}\in U, also x^∈D(A)∩U=W\hat{x}\in D(A)\cap U=W.

For the second assertion, D2ψ(x^)∣V(z,z)=D2ψ(x^)(z,z)D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V}(z,z)=D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})(z,z) for z∈Vz\in V by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (v), and (λIV)(z,z)=λ⟨z,z⟩V=λ∣z∣V2(\lambda I_{V})(z,z)=\lambda\langle z,z\rangle_{V}=\lambda|z|_{V}^{2} by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (iv) and Real Inner Product Spaces (ii). Thus the inequality in (3) says D2ψ(x^)∣V(z,z)≤(λIV)(z,z)D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V}(z,z)\le(\lambda I_{V})(z,z) for every z∈Vz\in V, which is D2ψ(x^)∣V⪯λIVD^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V}\preceq\lambda I_{V} by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (iii).

Claim 2. Put ψ′=−ψ\psi'=-\psi, the function (−1)ψ(-1)\psi. By Constants, Sums, Scalar Multiples and Differences of Differentiable Functions on an Open Subset of a Real Inner Product Space (iii), ψ′∈C2(U)\psi'\in C^{2}(U) with Dψ′(x^)=−Dψ(x^)D\psi'(\hat{x})=-D\psi(\hat{x}) and D2ψ′(x^)=−D2ψ(x^)D^{2}\psi'(\hat{x})=-D^{2}\psi(\hat{x}). By Local Minimum of a Function Relative to a Subset of a Metric Space there is a real ρ>0\rho>0 with ψ(x^)+λh(x^)≤ψ(y)+λh(y)\psi(\hat{x})+\lambda h(\hat{x})\le\psi(y)+\lambda h(y) for every y∈V∩Uy\in V\cap U with dH(x^,y)<ρd_{H}(\hat{x},y)<\rho; multiplying by −1-1 (claim 4 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives ψ′(y)−λh(y)≤ψ′(x^)−λh(x^)\psi'(y)-\lambda h(y)\le\psi'(\hat{x})-\lambda h(\hat{x}) for the same yy, so ψ′−λh\psi'-\lambda h has a local maximum at x^\hat{x} relative to V∩UV\cap U. Since claim 1 holds for every member of C2(U)C^{2}(U) in the role of ψ\psi, it applies to ψ′\psi' and gives x^∈D(A)\hat{x}\in D(A), hence x^∈W\hat{x}\in W; λAx^=Dψ′(x^)=−Dψ(x^)\lambda A\hat{x}=D\psi'(\hat{x})=-D\psi(\hat{x}); and (−D2ψ(x^))∣V⪯λIV(-D^{2}\psi(\hat{x}))|_{V}\preceq\lambda I_{V}. By Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity (x), (−D2ψ(x^))∣V=−(D2ψ(x^)∣V)(-D^{2}\psi(\hat{x}))|_{V}=-(D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V}), and multiplying the last relation by −1-1 (Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity (viii)), with (−1)(−(D2ψ(x^)∣V))=D2ψ(x^)∣V(-1)(-(D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V}))=D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V} by Elementary Identities in a Vector Space in Sym(V)\mathrm{Sym}(V), gives −λIV⪯D2ψ(x^)∣V-\lambda I_{V}\preceq D^{2}\psi(\hat{x})|_{V}, where −λIV=(−1)(λIV)-\lambda I_{V}=(-1)(\lambda I_{V}) by Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms on a Real Inner Product Space: Norm, Order, Identity Form and Restriction (iv) and the vector space structure of Sym(V)\mathrm{Sym}(V) (Elementary Properties of Bounded Symmetric Bilinear Forms: Norm, Quadratic Form, Order and Continuity (i)).

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…