Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named here.
Conventions. For k ∈ N k\in\mathbb{N} k ∈ N we write N = N k N=N_{k} N = N k when k k k is fixed, Σ k = Σ N k ( P k ) = ∇ P N + a N ξ P k \Sigma_{k}=\Sigma_{N_{k}}(P_{k})=\nabla P_{N}+a_{N}\xi_{P_{k}} Σ k = Σ N k ( P k ) = ∇ P N + a N ξ P k , ⟨ ⋅ , ⋅ ⟩ k \langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{k} ⟨ ⋅ , ⋅ ⟩ k and ∥ ⋅ ∥ k \lVert\cdot\rVert_{k} ∥ ⋅ ∥ k for the inner product and norm of L 2 ( P k ; R N ) L^{2}(P_{k};\mathbb{R}^{N}) L 2 ( P k ; R N ) , and δ k = ∫ R N W 2 ( μ x N , μ ^ ) 2 P k ( d x ) \delta_{k}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}W_{2}(\mu^{N}_{x},\hat{\mu})^{2}\,P_{k}(dx) δ k = ∫ R N W 2 ( μ x N , μ ^ ) 2 P k ( d x ) , so that δ k → 0 \delta_{k}\to0 δ k → 0 . As ( N k ) (N_{k}) ( N k ) is strictly increasing, N k ≥ k N_{k}\ge k N k ≥ k , so N k → ∞ N_{k}\to\infty N k → ∞ , a N k → 0 a_{N_{k}}\to0 a N k → 0 and 1 / ( N k − 1 ) → 0 1/(N_{k}-1)\to0 1/ ( N k − 1 ) → 0 . Since P k ∈ D N Σ P_{k}\in\mathcal{D}^{\Sigma}_{N} P k ∈ D N Σ , clauses The Relative Free Energy and the Relative Score of a Probability Measure for a Potential on an Open Set §energy and The Relative Free Energy and the Relative Score of a Probability Measure for a Potential on an Open Set §score give P k ( W N ) = 1 P_{k}(W_{N})=1 P k ( W N ) = 1 , P k ∈ P 2 I ( R N ) P_{k}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{N}) P k ∈ P 2 I ( R N ) with score ξ P k \xi_{P_{k}} ξ P k , and ∫ ∥ ∇ P N ∥ 2 d P k < ∞ \int\lVert\nabla P_{N}\rVert^{2}\,dP_{k}<\infty ∫ ∥ ∇ P N ∥ 2 d P k < ∞ . Also A ≥ 0 A\ge0 A ≥ 0 , being an upper bound of a nonnegative number. By The Confined Logarithmic-Energy Pair on the Wasserstein Space of the Real Line §pair and The Logarithmic Energy of a Probability Measure on the Real Line §energy , μ ^ ∈ D ⊆ D log ⊆ P 2 ( R ) \hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{D}_{\log}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) μ ^ ∈ D ⊆ D l o g ⊆ P 2 ( R ) . By The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability §hypotheses , V V V is of class C 2 C^{2} C 2 with V ′ ′ ≥ 0 V''\ge0 V ′′ ≥ 0 and has regular growth; V ′ V' V ′ is continuous and Borel by A Confining Potential and Its Derivative are Continuous and Borel §continuous and A Confining Potential and Its Derivative are Continuous and Borel §borel , and V ′ ′ V'' V ′′ is continuous by Confining Potentials on the Real Line §confining . Inner products in L 2 ( P k ; R N ) L^{2}(P_{k};\mathbb{R}^{N}) L 2 ( P k ; R N ) and L 2 ( μ ^ ; R ) L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}) L 2 ( μ ^ ; R ) are integrals of dot products by Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu and One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §scalars ; these are real Hilbert spaces, and "Cauchy-Schwarz" refers to The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space in them. The letter g g g of The N-Particle Dyson Game and its Mean-Field Limit: Standing Data and Equations is not used below.
Call φ : R → R \varphi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} φ : R → R admissible if it is differentiable at every point with continuous derivative φ ′ \varphi' φ ′ and both φ \varphi φ and φ ′ \varphi' φ ′ are bounded; let L φ L_{\varphi} L φ be a bound for ∣ φ ′ ∣ |\varphi'| ∣ φ ′ ∣ , let φ ⊕ ( x ) = ( φ ( x 1 ) , … , φ ( x N ) ) \varphi^{\oplus}(x)=(\varphi(x_{1}),\dots,\varphi(x_{N})) φ ⊕ ( x ) = ( φ ( x 1 ) , … , φ ( x N )) (Borel and bounded, hence in L 2 ( P k ; R N ) L^{2}(P_{k};\mathbb{R}^{N}) L 2 ( P k ; R N ) ), and let Q φ : R 2 → R Q_{\varphi}:\mathbb{R}^{2}\to\mathbb{R} Q φ : R 2 → R be Q φ ( s , t ) = φ ( s ) − φ ( t ) s − t Q_{\varphi}(s,t)=\frac{\varphi(s)-\varphi(t)}{s-t} Q φ ( s , t ) = s − t φ ( s ) − φ ( t ) for s ≠ t s\ne t s = t and Q φ ( s , s ) = φ ′ ( s ) Q_{\varphi}(s,s)=\varphi'(s) Q φ ( s , s ) = φ ′ ( s ) . By The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane §bound , The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane §continuous and The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane §measurable , Q φ Q_{\varphi} Q φ is symmetric, continuous, Borel and bounded by L φ L_{\varphi} L φ . For ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) \psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) , ψ ′ \psi' ψ ′ is admissible and Q ψ ′ = F ψ Q_{\psi'}=F_{\psi} Q ψ ′ = F ψ , by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives (( ψ ′ ) ′ = Δ ψ (\psi')'=\Delta\psi ( ψ ′ ) ′ = Δ ψ is continuous and bounded) and the definition of F ψ F_{\psi} F ψ there.
Step 0 (Averages against empirical measures). Let h : R → R h:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} h : R → R and G : R 2 → R G:\mathbb{R}^{2}\to\mathbb{R} G : R 2 → R be bounded and Lipschitz with constant L L L (Euclidean distance on R 2 \mathbb{R}^{2} R 2 ). We claim: (a) for x ∈ R N x\in\mathbb{R}^{N} x ∈ R N ,
∫ R h d μ x N = 1 N ∑ i = 1 N h ( x i ) , ∫ R 2 G d ( μ x N ⊠ μ x N ) = 1 N 2 ∑ i = 1 N ∑ j = 1 N G ( x i , x j ) , \int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,d\mu^{N}_{x}=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N}h(x_{i}),\qquad\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}G\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})=\frac{1}{N^{2}}\sum_{i=1}^{N}\sum_{j=1}^{N}G(x_{i},x_{j}), ∫ R h d μ x N = N 1 i = 1 ∑ N h ( x i ) , ∫ R 2 G d ( μ x N ⊠ μ x N ) = N 2 1 i = 1 ∑ N j = 1 ∑ N G ( x i , x j ) ,
the first identity holding for every Borel h h h and the second for every bounded Borel G G G ; and (b)
∣ ∫ R N ∫ R h d μ x N P k ( d x ) − ∫ R h d μ ^ ∣ ≤ L δ k 1 / 2 , ∣ ∫ R N ∫ R 2 G d ( μ x N ⊠ μ x N ) P k ( d x ) − ∫ R 2 G d ( μ ^ ⊠ μ ^ ) ∣ ≤ 2 L δ k 1 / 2 . \Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,d\mu^{N}_{x}\,P_{k}(dx)-\int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,d\hat{\mu}\Bigr|\le L\,\delta_{k}^{1/2},\qquad\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}G\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})\,P_{k}(dx)-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}G\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu})\Bigr|\le2L\,\delta_{k}^{1/2}. ∫ R N ∫ R h d μ x N P k ( d x ) − ∫ R h d μ ^ ≤ L δ k 1/2 , ∫ R N ∫ R 2 G d ( μ x N ⊠ μ x N ) P k ( d x ) − ∫ R 2 G d ( μ ^ ⊠ μ ^ ) ≤ 2 L δ k 1/2 .
The first identity of (a) is Basic Properties of Empirical Measures: Values, Integrals, Push-Forwards, Second Moment, and Lipschitz Dependence on the Configuration §integral (with d = 1 d=1 d = 1 the i i i -th particle of x x x is x i x_{i} x i ). For bounded Borel G G G and μ , ν ∈ P ( R ) \mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}) μ , ν ∈ P ( R ) , applying Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product and the Tonelli part of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems to the positive and negative parts of G G G gives, with all integrals finite,
∫ R 2 G d ( μ ⊠ ν ) = ∫ R ( ∫ R G ( s , t ) ν ( d t ) ) μ ( d s ) = ∫ R ( ∫ R G ( s , t ) μ ( d s ) ) ν ( d t ) ; ( ∗ ) \int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}G\,d(\mu\boxtimes\nu)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}}G(s,t)\,\nu(dt)\Bigr)\mu(ds)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}}G(s,t)\,\mu(ds)\Bigr)\nu(dt);\tag{$*$} ∫ R 2 G d ( μ ⊠ ν ) = ∫ R ( ∫ R G ( s , t ) ν ( d t ) ) μ ( d s ) = ∫ R ( ∫ R G ( s , t ) μ ( d s ) ) ν ( d t ) ; ( ∗ )
with μ = ν = μ x N \mu=\nu=\mu^{N}_{x} μ = ν = μ x N and the first identity twice this gives the second. For (b), let μ , ν ∈ P 2 ( R ) \mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) μ , ν ∈ P 2 ( R ) ; Existence of an Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment gives π ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) \pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) π ∈ Π ( μ , ν ) with I ( π ) = W 2 ( μ , ν ) 2 I(\pi)=W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2} I ( π ) = W 2 ( μ , ν ) 2 , and Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz gives ∣ ∫ h d μ − ∫ h d ν ∣ ≤ L W 2 ( μ , ν ) |\int h\,d\mu-\int h\,d\nu|\le L\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu) ∣ ∫ h d μ − ∫ h d ν ∣ ≤ L W 2 ( μ , ν ) . For fixed s s s the function t ↦ G ( s , t ) t\mapsto G(s,t) t ↦ G ( s , t ) is bounded and Lipschitz with constant L L L , and likewise s ↦ G ( s , t ) s\mapsto G(s,t) s ↦ G ( s , t ) for fixed t t t ; hence by ( ∗ ) (*) ( ∗ ) , integrating first in t t t and then first in s s s ,
∣ ∫ G d ( μ ⊠ μ ) − ∫ G d ( μ ⊠ ν ) ∣ ≤ L W 2 ( μ , ν ) , ∣ ∫ G d ( μ ⊠ ν ) − ∫ G d ( ν ⊠ ν ) ∣ ≤ L W 2 ( μ , ν ) . \Bigl|\int G\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)-\int G\,d(\mu\boxtimes\nu)\Bigr|\le L\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu),\qquad\Bigl|\int G\,d(\mu\boxtimes\nu)-\int G\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)\Bigr|\le L\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu). ∫ G d ( μ ⊠ μ ) − ∫ G d ( μ ⊠ ν ) ≤ L W 2 ( μ , ν ) , ∫ G d ( μ ⊠ ν ) − ∫ G d ( ν ⊠ ν ) ≤ L W 2 ( μ , ν ) .
Apply these with μ = μ x N \mu=\mu^{N}_{x} μ = μ x N , which lies in P 2 ( R ) \mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) P 2 ( R ) by Basic Properties of Empirical Measures: Values, Integrals, Push-Forwards, Second Moment, and Lipschitz Dependence on the Configuration §moment , and ν = μ ^ \nu=\hat{\mu} ν = μ ^ , and integrate against P k P_{k} P k : the functions of x x x involved are Borel by (a) and Basic Properties of Empirical Measures: Values, Integrals, Push-Forwards, Second Moment, and Lipschitz Dependence on the Configuration §distance . Finally, for every positive t t t , W ≤ 1 2 ( t + W 2 / t ) W\le\frac{1}{2}(t+W^{2}/t) W ≤ 2 1 ( t + W 2 / t ) for W ≥ 0 W\ge0 W ≥ 0 , so ∫ W 2 ( μ x N , μ ^ ) P k ( d x ) ≤ 1 2 ( t + δ k / t ) \int W_{2}(\mu^{N}_{x},\hat{\mu})\,P_{k}(dx)\le\frac{1}{2}(t+\delta_{k}/t) ∫ W 2 ( μ x N , μ ^ ) P k ( d x ) ≤ 2 1 ( t + δ k / t ) ; taking t = δ k 1 / 2 t=\delta_{k}^{1/2} t = δ k 1/2 if δ k > 0 \delta_{k}>0 δ k > 0 and letting t → 0 t\to0 t → 0 otherwise gives the bound δ k 1 / 2 \delta_{k}^{1/2} δ k 1/2 , which proves (b).
(c) For ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) \psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) the functions ( ψ ′ ) 2 (\psi')^{2} ( ψ ′ ) 2 and V ′ ψ ′ V'\psi' V ′ ψ ′ on R \mathbb{R} R and F ψ F_{\psi} F ψ on R 2 \mathbb{R}^{2} R 2 are bounded and Lipschitz. Indeed, ψ \psi ψ being smooth with compact support, ψ ′ , ψ ′ ′ , ψ ′ ′ ′ \psi',\psi'',\psi''' ψ ′ , ψ ′′ , ψ ′′′ are continuous and vanish outside a compact set K K K , hence are bounded, say ∣ ψ ′ ′ ′ ∣ ≤ L 3 |\psi'''|\le L_{3} ∣ ψ ′′′ ∣ ≤ L 3 . ( ψ ′ ) 2 (\psi')^{2} ( ψ ′ ) 2 and V ′ ψ ′ V'\psi' V ′ ψ ′ are differentiable with derivatives 2 ψ ′ ψ ′ ′ 2\psi'\psi'' 2 ψ ′ ψ ′′ and V ′ ′ ψ ′ + V ′ ψ ′ ′ V''\psi'+V'\psi'' V ′′ ψ ′ + V ′ ψ ′′ by Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives ; these and the functions themselves are continuous and vanish off K K K , hence are bounded, and bounded derivatives give Lipschitz bounds by Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval . For s ≠ t s\ne t s = t the function r ↦ ψ ′ ( t + r ( s − t ) ) r\mapsto\psi'(t+r(s-t)) r ↦ ψ ′ ( t + r ( s − t )) is an antiderivative of r ↦ ( s − t ) ψ ′ ′ ( t + r ( s − t ) ) r\mapsto(s-t)\psi''(t+r(s-t)) r ↦ ( s − t ) ψ ′′ ( t + r ( s − t )) by Chain Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives , the latter being continuous and hence Riemann integrable on [ 0 , 1 ] [0,1] [ 0 , 1 ] , so Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II, on a Closed Real Interval on [ 0 , 1 ] [0,1] [ 0 , 1 ] gives
F ψ ( s , t ) = ∫ 0 1 ψ ′ ′ ( t + r ( s − t ) ) d r , F_{\psi}(s,t)=\int_{0}^{1}\psi''\bigl(t+r(s-t)\bigr)\,dr, F ψ ( s , t ) = ∫ 0 1 ψ ′′ ( t + r ( s − t ) ) d r ,
which also holds for s = t s=t s = t , the integrand then being the constant Δ ψ ( t ) = ψ ′ ′ ( t ) \Delta\psi(t)=\psi''(t) Δ ψ ( t ) = ψ ′′ ( t ) . As ∣ ψ ′ ′ ( u ) − ψ ′ ′ ( u ′ ) ∣ ≤ L 3 ∣ u − u ′ ∣ |\psi''(u)-\psi''(u')|\le L_{3}|u-u'| ∣ ψ ′′ ( u ) − ψ ′′ ( u ′ ) ∣ ≤ L 3 ∣ u − u ′ ∣ by Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval and ∣ ( t + r ( s − t ) ) − ( t ′ + r ( s ′ − t ′ ) ) ∣ ≤ ( 1 − r ) ∣ t − t ′ ∣ + r ∣ s − s ′ ∣ ≤ ∥ ( s , t ) − ( s ′ , t ′ ) ∥ |(t+r(s-t))-(t'+r(s'-t'))|\le(1-r)|t-t'|+r|s-s'|\le\lVert(s,t)-(s',t')\rVert ∣ ( t + r ( s − t )) − ( t ′ + r ( s ′ − t ′ )) ∣ ≤ ( 1 − r ) ∣ t − t ′ ∣ + r ∣ s − s ′ ∣ ≤ ∥( s , t ) − ( s ′ , t ′ )∥ for r ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] r\in[0,1] r ∈ [ 0 , 1 ] , F ψ F_{\psi} F ψ is Lipschitz with constant L 3 L_{3} L 3 ; it is bounded by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §quotient .
Step 1 (Particle pairing identity). Let φ \varphi φ be admissible and k ∈ N k\in\mathbb{N} k ∈ N , N = N k N=N_{k} N = N k . We claim that
J φ ( x ) = ∑ i = 1 N V ′ ( x i ) φ ( x i ) − b N 2 ∑ i ≠ j Q φ ( x i , x j ) − a N ∑ i = 1 N φ ′ ( x i ) ( x ∈ R N ) J_{\varphi}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{N}V'(x_{i})\varphi(x_{i})-\frac{b_{N}}{2}\sum_{i\ne j}Q_{\varphi}(x_{i},x_{j})-a_{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N}\varphi'(x_{i})\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{N}) J φ ( x ) = i = 1 ∑ N V ′ ( x i ) φ ( x i ) − 2 b N i = j ∑ Q φ ( x i , x j ) − a N i = 1 ∑ N φ ′ ( x i ) ( x ∈ R N )
is P k P_{k} P k -integrable and
⟨ Σ k , φ ⊕ ⟩ k = ∫ R N J φ d P k . (E1) \langle\Sigma_{k},\varphi^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}J_{\varphi}\,dP_{k}.\tag{E1} ⟨ Σ k , φ ⊕ ⟩ k = ∫ R N J φ d P k . ( E1 )
By The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability §hypotheses , P N P_{N} P N is the function P P P of The Confined Logarithmic Energy on the Weyl Chamber: Regularity, Penalty Property, Monotone Gradient and the Dissipation Inequality with strength b N b_{N} b N and V 1 = V V_{1}=V V 1 = V ; comparing The Confined Logarithmic Energy on the Weyl Chamber: Regularity, Penalty Property, Monotone Gradient and the Dissipation Inequality §regularity with The Logarithmic Energy on the Weyl Chamber: Derivatives, Monotone Gradient, the Calogero Identity and the Euler Identity §derivatives (strength b N b_{N} b N ) gives ∂ i P N ( x ) = V ′ ( x i ) + ∂ i H b N ( x ) \partial_{i}P_{N}(x)=V'(x_{i})+\partial_{i}H_{b_{N}}(x) ∂ i P N ( x ) = V ′ ( x i ) + ∂ i H b N ( x ) for x ∈ W N x\in W_{N} x ∈ W N . Hence The Logarithmic Energy on the Weyl Chamber: Derivatives, Monotone Gradient, the Calogero Identity and the Euler Identity §symmetrisation , with strength b N b_{N} b N and z = φ ⊕ ( x ) z=\varphi^{\oplus}(x) z = φ ⊕ ( x ) , gives for x ∈ W N x\in W_{N} x ∈ W N , since a i i = 0 a_{ii}=0 a ii = 0 and a i j ( x ) ( φ ( x i ) − φ ( x j ) ) = Q φ ( x i , x j ) a_{ij}(x)(\varphi(x_{i})-\varphi(x_{j}))=Q_{\varphi}(x_{i},x_{j}) a ij ( x ) ( φ ( x i ) − φ ( x j )) = Q φ ( x i , x j ) for i ≠ j i\ne j i = j ,
∇ P N ( x ) ⋅ φ ⊕ ( x ) = ∑ i = 1 N V ′ ( x i ) φ ( x i ) − b N 2 ∑ i ≠ j Q φ ( x i , x j ) . \nabla P_{N}(x)\cdot\varphi^{\oplus}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{N}V'(x_{i})\varphi(x_{i})-\frac{b_{N}}{2}\sum_{i\ne j}Q_{\varphi}(x_{i},x_{j}). ∇ P N ( x ) ⋅ φ ⊕ ( x ) = i = 1 ∑ N V ′ ( x i ) φ ( x i ) − 2 b N i = j ∑ Q φ ( x i , x j ) .
The left side is P k P_{k} P k -integrable (∇ P N , φ ⊕ ∈ L 2 ( P k ; R N ) \nabla P_{N},\varphi^{\oplus}\in L^{2}(P_{k};\mathbb{R}^{N}) ∇ P N , φ ⊕ ∈ L 2 ( P k ; R N ) ), P k ( W N ) = 1 P_{k}(W_{N})=1 P k ( W N ) = 1 , ∣ Q φ ∣ ≤ L φ |Q_{\varphi}|\le L_{\varphi} ∣ Q φ ∣ ≤ L φ and V ′ V' V ′ is Borel; hence x ↦ ∑ i V ′ ( x i ) φ ( x i ) x\mapsto\sum_{i}V'(x_{i})\varphi(x_{i}) x ↦ ∑ i V ′ ( x i ) φ ( x i ) is P k P_{k} P k -integrable and ⟨ ∇ P N , φ ⊕ ⟩ k = ∫ [ ∑ i V ′ ( x i ) φ ( x i ) − b N 2 ∑ i ≠ j Q φ ( x i , x j ) ] P k ( d x ) \langle\nabla P_{N},\varphi^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}=\int\bigl[\sum_{i}V'(x_{i})\varphi(x_{i})-\frac{b_{N}}{2}\sum_{i\ne j}Q_{\varphi}(x_{i},x_{j})\bigr]P_{k}(dx) ⟨ ∇ P N , φ ⊕ ⟩ k = ∫ [ ∑ i V ′ ( x i ) φ ( x i ) − 2 b N ∑ i = j Q φ ( x i , x j ) ] P k ( d x ) .
For the score, let χ R \chi_{R} χ R (R > 0 R>0 R > 0 ) and M 1 M_{1} M 1 be the cutoffs and the constant of Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §cutoff with q = N q=N q = N . The field χ R φ ⊕ \chi_{R}\varphi^{\oplus} χ R φ ⊕ , with components x ↦ χ R ( x ) φ ( x i ) x\mapsto\chi_{R}(x)\varphi(x_{i}) x ↦ χ R ( x ) φ ( x i ) , is of class C 1 C^{1} C 1 on R N \mathbb{R}^{N} R N and compactly supported, with divergence ∑ i ∂ i χ R ( x ) φ ( x i ) + χ R ( x ) ∑ i φ ′ ( x i ) \sum_{i}\partial_{i}\chi_{R}(x)\varphi(x_{i})+\chi_{R}(x)\sum_{i}\varphi'(x_{i}) ∑ i ∂ i χ R ( x ) φ ( x i ) + χ R ( x ) ∑ i φ ′ ( x i ) . By The Score Integrates by Parts Against Every Compactly Supported Continuously Differentiable Vector Field §parts , applied at the configuration level to P k P_{k} P k ,
∫ R N χ R ξ P k ⋅ φ ⊕ d P k = − ∫ R N [ ∑ i = 1 N ∂ i χ R ( x ) φ ( x i ) + χ R ( x ) ∑ i = 1 N φ ′ ( x i ) ] P k ( d x ) . \int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\chi_{R}\,\xi_{P_{k}}\cdot\varphi^{\oplus}\,dP_{k}=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\Bigl[\sum_{i=1}^{N}\partial_{i}\chi_{R}(x)\varphi(x_{i})+\chi_{R}(x)\sum_{i=1}^{N}\varphi'(x_{i})\Bigr]P_{k}(dx). ∫ R N χ R ξ P k ⋅ φ ⊕ d P k = − ∫ R N [ i = 1 ∑ N ∂ i χ R ( x ) φ ( x i ) + χ R ( x ) i = 1 ∑ N φ ′ ( x i ) ] P k ( d x ) .
Take R = m ∈ N R=m\in\mathbb{N} R = m ∈ N and let m → ∞ m\to\infty m → ∞ : χ m ( x ) = 1 \chi_{m}(x)=1 χ m ( x ) = 1 once m ≥ ∥ x ∥ m\ge\lVert x\rVert m ≥ ∥ x ∥ , ∣ χ m ξ P k ⋅ φ ⊕ ∣ ≤ ∣ ξ P k ⋅ φ ⊕ ∣ |\chi_{m}\xi_{P_{k}}\cdot\varphi^{\oplus}|\le|\xi_{P_{k}}\cdot\varphi^{\oplus}| ∣ χ m ξ P k ⋅ φ ⊕ ∣ ≤ ∣ ξ P k ⋅ φ ⊕ ∣ , which is integrable, ∣ ∑ i ∂ i χ m ( x ) φ ( x i ) ∣ ≤ N M 1 sup ∣ φ ∣ / m |\sum_{i}\partial_{i}\chi_{m}(x)\varphi(x_{i})|\le NM_{1}\sup|\varphi|/m ∣ ∑ i ∂ i χ m ( x ) φ ( x i ) ∣ ≤ N M 1 sup ∣ φ ∣/ m and ∣ χ m ∑ i φ ′ ( x i ) ∣ ≤ N L φ |\chi_{m}\sum_{i}\varphi'(x_{i})|\le NL_{\varphi} ∣ χ m ∑ i φ ′ ( x i ) ∣ ≤ N L φ . By Dominated Convergence Theorem , ⟨ ξ P k , φ ⊕ ⟩ k = − ∫ ∑ i φ ′ ( x i ) P k ( d x ) \langle\xi_{P_{k}},\varphi^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}=-\int\sum_{i}\varphi'(x_{i})\,P_{k}(dx) ⟨ ξ P k , φ ⊕ ⟩ k = − ∫ ∑ i φ ′ ( x i ) P k ( d x ) . Adding a N a_{N} a N times this to the previous display gives (E1).
Normalised form. By Step 0(a), ∑ i ≠ j Q φ ( x i , x j ) = N 2 ∫ Q φ d ( μ x N ⊠ μ x N ) − ∑ i φ ′ ( x i ) \sum_{i\ne j}Q_{\varphi}(x_{i},x_{j})=N^{2}\int Q_{\varphi}\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})-\sum_{i}\varphi'(x_{i}) ∑ i = j Q φ ( x i , x j ) = N 2 ∫ Q φ d ( μ x N ⊠ μ x N ) − ∑ i φ ′ ( x i ) and ∑ i V ′ ( x i ) φ ( x i ) = N ∫ V ′ φ d μ x N \sum_{i}V'(x_{i})\varphi(x_{i})=N\int V'\varphi\,d\mu^{N}_{x} ∑ i V ′ ( x i ) φ ( x i ) = N ∫ V ′ φ d μ x N ; since b N 2 N N 2 = β N 4 ( N − 1 ) \frac{b_{N}}{2N}N^{2}=\frac{\beta N}{4(N-1)} 2 N b N N 2 = 4 ( N − 1 ) βN , (E1) becomes
1 N ⟨ Σ k , φ ⊕ ⟩ k = ∫ R N [ ∫ R V ′ φ d μ x N − β N 4 ( N − 1 ) ∫ R 2 Q φ d ( μ x N ⊠ μ x N ) ] P k ( d x ) + e k ( φ ) , (E2) \frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\varphi^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\Bigl[\int_{\mathbb{R}}V'\varphi\,d\mu^{N}_{x}-\frac{\beta N}{4(N-1)}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}Q_{\varphi}\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})\Bigr]P_{k}(dx)+e_{k}(\varphi),\tag{E2} N 1 ⟨ Σ k , φ ⊕ ⟩ k = ∫ R N [ ∫ R V ′ φ d μ x N − 4 ( N − 1 ) βN ∫ R 2 Q φ d ( μ x N ⊠ μ x N ) ] P k ( d x ) + e k ( φ ) , ( E2 )
with e k ( φ ) = ( β 4 N ( N − 1 ) − a N N ) ∫ ∑ i φ ′ ( x i ) P k ( d x ) e_{k}(\varphi)=\bigl(\frac{\beta}{4N(N-1)}-\frac{a_{N}}{N}\bigr)\int\sum_{i}\varphi'(x_{i})\,P_{k}(dx) e k ( φ ) = ( 4 N ( N − 1 ) β − N a N ) ∫ ∑ i φ ′ ( x i ) P k ( d x ) , so that ∣ e k ( φ ) ∣ ≤ L φ ( β 4 ( N − 1 ) + a N ) → 0 |e_{k}(\varphi)|\le L_{\varphi}\bigl(\frac{\beta}{4(N-1)}+a_{N}\bigr)\to0 ∣ e k ( φ ) ∣ ≤ L φ ( 4 ( N − 1 ) β + a N ) → 0 as k → ∞ k\to\infty k → ∞ .
Step 2 (Limits along test functions). For ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) \psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) let ℓ ( ψ ) = ∫ V ′ ψ ′ d μ ^ − β 4 ∫ F ψ d ( μ ^ ⊠ μ ^ ) \ell(\psi)=\int V'\psi'\,d\hat{\mu}-\frac{\beta}{4}\int F_{\psi}\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu}) ℓ ( ψ ) = ∫ V ′ ψ ′ d μ ^ − 4 β ∫ F ψ d ( μ ^ ⊠ μ ^ ) (both integrands bounded Borel). We claim
1 N k ⟨ Σ k , ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k → ℓ ( ψ ) , 1 N k ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 → ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ 2 , ∣ ℓ ( ψ ) ∣ ≤ A 1 / 2 ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ . \frac{1}{N_{k}}\langle\Sigma_{k},\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}\to\ell(\psi),\qquad\frac{1}{N_{k}}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2}\to\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2},\qquad|\ell(\psi)|\le A^{1/2}\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}. N k 1 ⟨ Σ k , ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k → ℓ ( ψ ) , N k 1 ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 → ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ 2 , ∣ ℓ ( ψ ) ∣ ≤ A 1/2 ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ .
Apply (E2) to φ = ψ ′ \varphi=\psi' φ = ψ ′ , for which Q ψ ′ = F ψ Q_{\psi'}=F_{\psi} Q ψ ′ = F ψ . By Step 0(b),(c), ∫ ∫ V ′ ψ ′ d μ x N P k ( d x ) → ∫ V ′ ψ ′ d μ ^ \int\int V'\psi'\,d\mu^{N}_{x}\,P_{k}(dx)\to\int V'\psi'\,d\hat{\mu} ∫∫ V ′ ψ ′ d μ x N P k ( d x ) → ∫ V ′ ψ ′ d μ ^ and c k = ∫ ∫ F ψ d ( μ x N ⊠ μ x N ) P k ( d x ) → ∫ F ψ d ( μ ^ ⊠ μ ^ ) c_{k}=\int\int F_{\psi}\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})\,P_{k}(dx)\to\int F_{\psi}\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu}) c k = ∫∫ F ψ d ( μ x N ⊠ μ x N ) P k ( d x ) → ∫ F ψ d ( μ ^ ⊠ μ ^ ) ; as ( c k ) (c_{k}) ( c k ) is bounded (One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §quotient ) and N N − 1 → 1 \frac{N}{N-1}\to1 N − 1 N → 1 , and e k ( ψ ′ ) → 0 e_{k}(\psi')\to0 e k ( ψ ′ ) → 0 , the first limit follows. Next ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ( x ) ∥ 2 = ∑ i ψ ′ ( x i ) 2 = N ∫ ( ψ ′ ) 2 d μ x N \lVert\psi'^{\oplus}(x)\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i}\psi'(x_{i})^{2}=N\int(\psi')^{2}\,d\mu^{N}_{x} ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ( x ) ∥ 2 = ∑ i ψ ′ ( x i ) 2 = N ∫ ( ψ ′ ) 2 d μ x N , so the second limit is Step 0(b),(c) together with ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ 2 = ∫ ( ψ ′ ) 2 d μ ^ \lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}=\int(\psi')^{2}\,d\hat{\mu} ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ 2 = ∫ ( ψ ′ ) 2 d μ ^ (One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives ). Finally, by Cauchy-Schwarz and the hypothesis,
∣ 1 N ⟨ Σ k , ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k ∣ ≤ ( 1 N ∥ Σ k ∥ k 2 ) 1 / 2 ( 1 N ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 ) 1 / 2 ≤ A 1 / 2 ( 1 N ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 ) 1 / 2 , \Bigl|\frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}\Bigr|\le\Bigl(\frac{1}{N}\lVert\Sigma_{k}\rVert_{k}^{2}\Bigr)^{1/2}\Bigl(\frac{1}{N}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2}\Bigr)^{1/2}\le A^{1/2}\Bigl(\frac{1}{N}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2}\Bigr)^{1/2}, N 1 ⟨ Σ k , ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k ≤ ( N 1 ∥ Σ k ∥ k 2 ) 1/2 ( N 1 ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 ) 1/2 ≤ A 1/2 ( N 1 ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 ) 1/2 ,
and letting k → ∞ k\to\infty k → ∞ gives the third claim.
Step 3 (V ′ V' V ′ is square-integrable under μ ^ \hat{\mu} μ ^ ). By regular growth (The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability §hypotheses ) with η = 1 / β \eta=1/\beta η = 1/ β there is C ′ C' C ′ with V ′ ′ ≤ C ′ + V ′ 2 / β V''\le C'+V'^{2}/\beta V ′′ ≤ C ′ + V ′ 2 / β ; let C = max ( C ′ , 0 ) C=\max(C',0) C = max ( C ′ , 0 ) . For m ∈ N m\in\mathbb{N} m ∈ N let Θ m ( s ) = s ( 1 + s 2 / m 2 ) − 1 / 2 \Theta_{m}(s)=s\,(1+s^{2}/m^{2})^{-1/2} Θ m ( s ) = s ( 1 + s 2 / m 2 ) − 1/2 and φ m = Θ m ∘ V ′ \varphi_{m}=\Theta_{m}\circ V' φ m = Θ m ∘ V ′ . Elementary calculus gives: Θ m \Theta_{m} Θ m is differentiable with continuous derivative Θ m ′ ( s ) = ( 1 + s 2 / m 2 ) − 3 / 2 ∈ ( 0 , 1 ] \Theta_{m}'(s)=(1+s^{2}/m^{2})^{-3/2}\in(0,1] Θ m ′ ( s ) = ( 1 + s 2 / m 2 ) − 3/2 ∈ ( 0 , 1 ] ; Θ m ( s ) 2 = m 2 s 2 m 2 + s 2 ≤ m 2 \Theta_{m}(s)^{2}=\frac{m^{2}s^{2}}{m^{2}+s^{2}}\le m^{2} Θ m ( s ) 2 = m 2 + s 2 m 2 s 2 ≤ m 2 ; Θ m ( s ) 2 = s 2 1 + s 2 / m 2 ≤ s 2 ( 1 + s 2 / m 2 ) 1 / 2 = s Θ m ( s ) \Theta_{m}(s)^{2}=\frac{s^{2}}{1+s^{2}/m^{2}}\le\frac{s^{2}}{(1+s^{2}/m^{2})^{1/2}}=s\,\Theta_{m}(s) Θ m ( s ) 2 = 1 + s 2 / m 2 s 2 ≤ ( 1 + s 2 / m 2 ) 1/2 s 2 = s Θ m ( s ) ; and Θ m ( s ) 2 \Theta_{m}(s)^{2} Θ m ( s ) 2 is nondecreasing in m m m with limit s 2 s^{2} s 2 . By Chain Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives , φ m \varphi_{m} φ m is differentiable with continuous derivative φ m ′ = Θ m ′ ( V ′ ) V ′ ′ \varphi_{m}'=\Theta_{m}'(V')\,V'' φ m ′ = Θ m ′ ( V ′ ) V ′′ , and by V ′ ′ ≥ 0 V''\ge0 V ′′ ≥ 0 and ( 1 + u ) − 3 / 2 ≤ ( 1 + u ) − 1 (1+u)^{-3/2}\le(1+u)^{-1} ( 1 + u ) − 3/2 ≤ ( 1 + u ) − 1 for u ≥ 0 u\ge0 u ≥ 0 ,
0 ≤ φ m ′ ≤ ( C + V ′ 2 β ) ( 1 + V ′ 2 m 2 ) − 1 ≤ C + φ m 2 β ≤ C + m 2 β . (E3) 0\le\varphi_{m}'\le\Bigl(C+\frac{V'^{2}}{\beta}\Bigr)\Bigl(1+\frac{V'^{2}}{m^{2}}\Bigr)^{-1}\le C+\frac{\varphi_{m}^{2}}{\beta}\le C+\frac{m^{2}}{\beta}.\tag{E3} 0 ≤ φ m ′ ≤ ( C + β V ′ 2 ) ( 1 + m 2 V ′ 2 ) − 1 ≤ C + β φ m 2 ≤ C + β m 2 . ( E3 )
Thus φ m \varphi_{m} φ m is admissible with L φ m = C + m 2 / β L_{\varphi_{m}}=C+m^{2}/\beta L φ m = C + m 2 / β , and nondecreasing by Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval . For s ≠ t s\ne t s = t the same theorem gives r r r between s s s and t t t with Q φ m ( s , t ) = φ m ′ ( r ) Q_{\varphi_{m}}(s,t)=\varphi_{m}'(r) Q φ m ( s , t ) = φ m ′ ( r ) , and φ m ( r ) \varphi_{m}(r) φ m ( r ) lies between φ m ( s ) \varphi_{m}(s) φ m ( s ) and φ m ( t ) \varphi_{m}(t) φ m ( t ) , so φ m ( r ) 2 ≤ φ m ( s ) 2 + φ m ( t ) 2 \varphi_{m}(r)^{2}\le\varphi_{m}(s)^{2}+\varphi_{m}(t)^{2} φ m ( r ) 2 ≤ φ m ( s ) 2 + φ m ( t ) 2 ; with (E3), also on the diagonal,
0 ≤ Q φ m ( s , t ) ≤ C + φ m ( s ) 2 + φ m ( t ) 2 β ( s , t ∈ R ) . (E4) 0\le Q_{\varphi_{m}}(s,t)\le C+\frac{\varphi_{m}(s)^{2}+\varphi_{m}(t)^{2}}{\beta}\qquad(s,t\in\mathbb{R}).\tag{E4} 0 ≤ Q φ m ( s , t ) ≤ C + β φ m ( s ) 2 + φ m ( t ) 2 ( s , t ∈ R ) . ( E4 )
Fix k k k , N = N k N=N_{k} N = N k , and let X k = 1 N ∫ ∑ i φ m ( x i ) 2 P k ( d x ) = 1 N ∥ φ m ⊕ ∥ k 2 X_{k}=\frac{1}{N}\int\sum_{i}\varphi_{m}(x_{i})^{2}\,P_{k}(dx)=\frac{1}{N}\lVert\varphi_{m}^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2} X k = N 1 ∫ ∑ i φ m ( x i ) 2 P k ( d x ) = N 1 ∥ φ m ⊕ ∥ k 2 . Since V ′ φ m = V ′ Θ m ( V ′ ) ≥ φ m 2 V'\varphi_{m}=V'\Theta_{m}(V')\ge\varphi_{m}^{2} V ′ φ m = V ′ Θ m ( V ′ ) ≥ φ m 2 , (E1), (E4) and (E3) give
N X k ≤ ∫ ∑ i V ′ ( x i ) φ m ( x i ) d P k ≤ ⟨ Σ k , φ m ⊕ ⟩ k + b N 2 [ N ( N − 1 ) C + 2 ( N − 1 ) β N X k ] + a N N ( C + m 2 β ) . NX_{k}\le\int\sum_{i}V'(x_{i})\varphi_{m}(x_{i})\,dP_{k}\le\langle\Sigma_{k},\varphi_{m}^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}+\frac{b_{N}}{2}\Bigl[N(N-1)C+\frac{2(N-1)}{\beta}NX_{k}\Bigr]+a_{N}N\Bigl(C+\frac{m^{2}}{\beta}\Bigr). N X k ≤ ∫ i ∑ V ′ ( x i ) φ m ( x i ) d P k ≤ ⟨ Σ k , φ m ⊕ ⟩ k + 2 b N [ N ( N − 1 ) C + β 2 ( N − 1 ) N X k ] + a N N ( C + β m 2 ) .
As b N ( N − 1 ) 2 = β 4 \frac{b_{N}(N-1)}{2}=\frac{\beta}{4} 2 b N ( N − 1 ) = 4 β , dividing by N N N and using Cauchy-Schwarz as in Step 2, 1 N ⟨ Σ k , φ m ⊕ ⟩ k ≤ ( A X k ) 1 / 2 ≤ A + X k 4 \frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\varphi_{m}^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}\le(AX_{k})^{1/2}\le A+\frac{X_{k}}{4} N 1 ⟨ Σ k , φ m ⊕ ⟩ k ≤ ( A X k ) 1/2 ≤ A + 4 X k , we get X k ≤ A + X k 4 + β C 4 + X k 2 + a N ( C + m 2 β ) X_{k}\le A+\frac{X_{k}}{4}+\frac{\beta C}{4}+\frac{X_{k}}{2}+a_{N}(C+\frac{m^{2}}{\beta}) X k ≤ A + 4 X k + 4 βC + 2 X k + a N ( C + β m 2 ) , that is,
X k ≤ 4 A + β C + 4 a N k ( C + m 2 β ) . X_{k}\le4A+\beta C+4a_{N_{k}}\Bigl(C+\frac{m^{2}}{\beta}\Bigr). X k ≤ 4 A + βC + 4 a N k ( C + β m 2 ) .
As a N k → 0 a_{N_{k}}\to0 a N k → 0 , X k ≤ C ∗ : = 4 A + β C + 1 X_{k}\le C^{*}:=4A+\beta C+1 X k ≤ C ∗ := 4 A + βC + 1 for all large k k k , with C ∗ C^{*} C ∗ independent of m m m . The function φ m 2 \varphi_{m}^{2} φ m 2 is bounded by m 2 m^{2} m 2 and Lipschitz (its derivative 2 φ m φ m ′ 2\varphi_{m}\varphi_{m}' 2 φ m φ m ′ is bounded by 2 m ( C + m 2 / β ) 2m(C+m^{2}/\beta) 2 m ( C + m 2 / β ) ; Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval ), and X k = ∫ ∫ φ m 2 d μ x N P k ( d x ) X_{k}=\int\int\varphi_{m}^{2}\,d\mu^{N}_{x}\,P_{k}(dx) X k = ∫∫ φ m 2 d μ x N P k ( d x ) by Step 0(a); so Step 0(b) gives ∫ φ m 2 d μ ^ = lim k X k ≤ C ∗ \int\varphi_{m}^{2}\,d\hat{\mu}=\lim_{k}X_{k}\le C^{*} ∫ φ m 2 d μ ^ = lim k X k ≤ C ∗ for every m m m . Since φ m 2 = Θ m ( V ′ ) 2 \varphi_{m}^{2}=\Theta_{m}(V')^{2} φ m 2 = Θ m ( V ′ ) 2 increases in m m m to V ′ 2 V'^{2} V ′ 2 pointwise, Monotone Convergence Theorem gives ∫ V ′ 2 d μ ^ ≤ C ∗ < ∞ \int V'^{2}\,d\hat{\mu}\le C^{*}<\infty ∫ V ′ 2 d μ ^ ≤ C ∗ < ∞ .
Step 4 (Clause 1, the limit has a score). For ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) \psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) , by the definition of ℓ \ell ℓ , Cauchy-Schwarz in L 2 ( μ ^ ; R ) L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}) L 2 ( μ ^ ; R ) (where V ′ V' V ′ lies by Step 3) and Step 2,
β 4 ∣ ∫ F ψ d ( μ ^ ⊠ μ ^ ) ∣ = ∣ ∫ V ′ ψ ′ d μ ^ − ℓ ( ψ ) ∣ ≤ ( ∥ V ′ ∥ μ ^ + A 1 / 2 ) ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ , \frac{\beta}{4}\Bigl|\int F_{\psi}\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu})\Bigr|=\Bigl|\int V'\psi'\,d\hat{\mu}-\ell(\psi)\Bigr|\le\bigl(\lVert V'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}+A^{1/2}\bigr)\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}, 4 β ∫ F ψ d ( μ ^ ⊠ μ ^ ) = ∫ V ′ ψ ′ d μ ^ − ℓ ( ψ ) ≤ ( ∥ V ′ ∥ μ ^ + A 1/2 ) ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ ,
and ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ = ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ \lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}=\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ = ∥ ∇ ψ ∥ μ ^ by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives . So μ ^ ∈ P 2 ( R ) \hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) μ ^ ∈ P 2 ( R ) has finite free Fisher information , with constant 4 β ( ∥ V ′ ∥ μ ^ + A 1 / 2 ) \frac{4}{\beta}(\lVert V'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}+A^{1/2}) β 4 (∥ V ′ ∥ μ ^ + A 1/2 ) ; with μ ^ ∈ D \hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D} μ ^ ∈ D and Step 3, μ ^ ∈ D Σ \hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} μ ^ ∈ D Σ by The Confined Logarithmic-Energy Pair on the Wasserstein Space of the Real Line §pair . By that clause, Finite Free Fisher Information, the Free Score and the Free Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Real Line §score and One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives , for every ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) \psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R )
⟨ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ψ ′ ⟩ μ ^ = ∫ V ′ ψ ′ d μ ^ − β 4 ⟨ Ξ μ ^ , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ = ℓ ( ψ ) . (E5) \langle\Sigma(\hat{\mu}),\psi'\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}=\int V'\psi'\,d\hat{\mu}-\frac{\beta}{4}\langle\Xi_{\hat{\mu}},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}=\ell(\psi).\tag{E5} ⟨ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ψ ′ ⟩ μ ^ = ∫ V ′ ψ ′ d μ ^ − 4 β ⟨ Ξ μ ^ , ∇ ψ ⟩ μ ^ = ℓ ( ψ ) . ( E5 )
By The Confined Logarithmic-Energy Pair on the Wasserstein Space of the Real Line §pair , Σ ( μ ^ ) ∈ T μ ^ \Sigma(\hat{\mu})\in T_{\hat{\mu}} Σ ( μ ^ ) ∈ T μ ^ , which is the closure of the set of classes of the ∇ ψ = ψ ′ \nabla\psi=\psi' ∇ ψ = ψ ′ by The Tangent Space of the Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §gradients and The Tangent Space of the Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §tangent . Choose ψ n ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) \psi_{n}\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) ψ n ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) with ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) − ψ n ′ ∥ μ ^ → 0 \lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})-\psi_{n}'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\to0 ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) − ψ n ′ ∥ μ ^ → 0 ; then ⟨ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ψ n ′ ⟩ μ ^ → ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ 2 \langle\Sigma(\hat{\mu}),\psi_{n}'\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}\to\lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2} ⟨ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ψ n ′ ⟩ μ ^ → ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ 2 and ∥ ψ n ′ ∥ μ ^ → ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ \lVert\psi_{n}'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\to\lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} ∥ ψ n ′ ∥ μ ^ → ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ , while by (E5) and Step 2 ⟨ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ψ n ′ ⟩ μ ^ = ℓ ( ψ n ) ≤ A 1 / 2 ∥ ψ n ′ ∥ μ ^ \langle\Sigma(\hat{\mu}),\psi_{n}'\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}=\ell(\psi_{n})\le A^{1/2}\lVert\psi_{n}'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} ⟨ Σ ( μ ^ ) , ψ n ′ ⟩ μ ^ = ℓ ( ψ n ) ≤ A 1/2 ∥ ψ n ′ ∥ μ ^ . Hence ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ 2 ≤ A 1 / 2 ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ \lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}\le A^{1/2}\lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ 2 ≤ A 1/2 ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ , so ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ ≤ A 1 / 2 \lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\le A^{1/2} ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ ≤ A 1/2 and ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ 2 ≤ A \lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}\le A ∥ Σ ( μ ^ ) ∥ μ ^ 2 ≤ A .
Step 5 (Clause 2, convergence of pairings). Write S = Σ ( μ ^ ) S=\Sigma(\hat{\mu}) S = Σ ( μ ^ ) . Given positive ε \varepsilon ε , take ψ \psi ψ and k 0 k_{0} k 0 as in the hypothesis. For k ≥ k 0 k\ge k_{0} k ≥ k 0 , by bilinearity, (E5), Cauchy-Schwarz, the bound on 1 N ∥ Σ k ∥ k 2 \frac{1}{N}\lVert\Sigma_{k}\rVert_{k}^{2} N 1 ∥ Σ k ∥ k 2 and Step 4,
∣ 1 N ⟨ Σ k , G k ⟩ k − ⟨ S , q ⟩ μ ^ ∣ ≤ 1 N ∣ ⟨ Σ k , G k − ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k ∣ + ∣ 1 N ⟨ Σ k , ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k − ℓ ( ψ ) ∣ + ∣ ⟨ S , ψ ′ − q ⟩ μ ^ ∣ ≤ 2 A 1 / 2 ε + ∣ 1 N ⟨ Σ k , ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k − ℓ ( ψ ) ∣ . \Bigl|\frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},G_{k}\rangle_{k}-\langle S,q\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}\Bigr|\le\frac{1}{N}\bigl|\langle\Sigma_{k},G_{k}-\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}\bigr|+\Bigl|\frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}-\ell(\psi)\Bigr|+\bigl|\langle S,\psi'-q\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}\bigr|\le2A^{1/2}\varepsilon+\Bigl|\frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}-\ell(\psi)\Bigr|. N 1 ⟨ Σ k , G k ⟩ k − ⟨ S , q ⟩ μ ^ ≤ N 1 ⟨ Σ k , G k − ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k + N 1 ⟨ Σ k , ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k − ℓ ( ψ ) + ⟨ S , ψ ′ − q ⟩ μ ^ ≤ 2 A 1/2 ε + N 1 ⟨ Σ k , ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k − ℓ ( ψ ) .
The last term tends to 0 0 0 by Step 2, so the upper limit of the left side is at most 2 A 1 / 2 ε 2A^{1/2}\varepsilon 2 A 1/2 ε ; ε \varepsilon ε being arbitrary, the first sequence converges to ⟨ S , q ⟩ μ ^ \langle S,q\rangle_{\hat{\mu}} ⟨ S , q ⟩ μ ^ . For the norms let n k = ( 1 N ∥ G k ∥ k 2 ) 1 / 2 n_{k}=(\frac{1}{N}\lVert G_{k}\rVert_{k}^{2})^{1/2} n k = ( N 1 ∥ G k ∥ k 2 ) 1/2 . For k ≥ k 0 k\ge k_{0} k ≥ k 0 the triangle inequality in L 2 ( P k ; R N ) L^{2}(P_{k};\mathbb{R}^{N}) L 2 ( P k ; R N ) gives ∣ n k − ( 1 N ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 ) 1 / 2 ∣ ≤ ( 1 N ∥ G k − ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 ) 1 / 2 < ε |n_{k}-(\frac{1}{N}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2})^{1/2}|\le(\frac{1}{N}\lVert G_{k}-\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2})^{1/2}<\varepsilon ∣ n k − ( N 1 ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 ) 1/2 ∣ ≤ ( N 1 ∥ G k − ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 ) 1/2 < ε , that in L 2 ( μ ^ ; R ) L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}) L 2 ( μ ^ ; R ) gives ∣ ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ − ∥ q ∥ μ ^ ∣ < ε |\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}-\lVert q\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}|<\varepsilon ∣ ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ − ∥ q ∥ μ ^ ∣ < ε , and ( 1 N ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 ) 1 / 2 → ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ (\frac{1}{N}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2})^{1/2}\to\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} ( N 1 ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 ) 1/2 → ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ by Step 2. So the upper limit of ∣ n k − ∥ q ∥ μ ^ ∣ |n_{k}-\lVert q\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}| ∣ n k − ∥ q ∥ μ ^ ∣ is at most 2 ε 2\varepsilon 2 ε for every ε \varepsilon ε ; hence n k → ∥ q ∥ μ ^ n_{k}\to\lVert q\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} n k → ∥ q ∥ μ ^ and n k 2 → ∥ q ∥ μ ^ 2 n_{k}^{2}\to\lVert q\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2} n k 2 → ∥ q ∥ μ ^ 2 .
Step 6 (Clause 3, lower limit of the Fisher term). Given positive ε \varepsilon ε , choose as in Step 4 some ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) \psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) ψ ∈ C c ∞ ( R ) with ∥ S − ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ 2 < ε / 2 \lVert S-\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}<\varepsilon/2 ∥ S − ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ 2 < ε /2 . For every k k k , expanding 0 ≤ ∥ Σ k − ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 0\le\lVert\Sigma_{k}-\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2} 0 ≤ ∥ Σ k − ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 ,
1 N ∥ Σ k ∥ k 2 ≥ r k : = 2 N ⟨ Σ k , ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k − 1 N ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 . \frac{1}{N}\lVert\Sigma_{k}\rVert_{k}^{2}\ge r_{k}:=\frac{2}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}-\frac{1}{N}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2}. N 1 ∥ Σ k ∥ k 2 ≥ r k := N 2 ⟨ Σ k , ψ ′ ⊕ ⟩ k − N 1 ∥ ψ ′ ⊕ ∥ k 2 .
By Step 2 and (E5), r k → 2 ⟨ S , ψ ′ ⟩ μ ^ − ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ 2 = ∥ S ∥ μ ^ 2 − ∥ S − ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ 2 > ∥ S ∥ μ ^ 2 − ε / 2 r_{k}\to2\langle S,\psi'\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}-\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}=\lVert S\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}-\lVert S-\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}>\lVert S\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}-\varepsilon/2 r k → 2 ⟨ S , ψ ′ ⟩ μ ^ − ∥ ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ 2 = ∥ S ∥ μ ^ 2 − ∥ S − ψ ′ ∥ μ ^ 2 > ∥ S ∥ μ ^ 2 − ε /2 . Hence there is k 0 k_{0} k 0 with r k > ∥ S ∥ μ ^ 2 − ε r_{k}>\lVert S\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}-\varepsilon r k > ∥ S ∥ μ ^ 2 − ε for k ≥ k 0 k\ge k_{0} k ≥ k 0 , and then ∥ S ∥ μ ^ 2 ≤ 1 N k ∥ Σ N k ( P k ) ∥ P k 2 + ε \lVert S\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}\le\frac{1}{N_{k}}\lVert\Sigma_{N_{k}}(P_{k})\rVert_{P_{k}}^{2}+\varepsilon ∥ S ∥ μ ^ 2 ≤ N k 1 ∥ Σ N k ( P k ) ∥ P k 2 + ε .