TheoremBase

Proof of The Mean-Field Limit of the Relative Score of Laws of Dyson Particles Concentrating at a Measure

lemmalem:dyson-particle-score-limit-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 20,129 chars · 29 deps · depth 45 Reason: Proof of the particle score limit: pairing identity, V' in L^2 by truncation, finite free Fisher information, pairing and liminf.

A particle pairing identity (score integration by parts plus the symmetrisation of the logarithmic gradient) and W2−averagedW_2-averaged convergence of empirical integrals identify the limits of the normalised pairings with test-function derivatives; a truncation of V' bounds the second moment of V' under the limit, which gives finite free Fisher information, and density of test-function derivatives yields the three clauses.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement, and is applied to the data named here.

Conventions. For k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N} we write N=NkN=N_{k} when kk is fixed, Σk=ΣNk(Pk)=∇PN+aNξPk\Sigma_{k}=\Sigma_{N_{k}}(P_{k})=\nabla P_{N}+a_{N}\xi_{P_{k}}, ⟨⋅,⋅⟩k\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{k} and ∥⋅∥k\lVert\cdot\rVert_{k} for the inner product and norm of L2(Pk;RN)L^{2}(P_{k};\mathbb{R}^{N}), and δk=∫RNW2(μxN,μ^)2 Pk(dx)\delta_{k}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}W_{2}(\mu^{N}_{x},\hat{\mu})^{2}\,P_{k}(dx), so that δk→0\delta_{k}\to0. As (Nk)(N_{k}) is strictly increasing, Nk≥kN_{k}\ge k, so Nk→∞N_{k}\to\infty, aNk→0a_{N_{k}}\to0 and 1/(Nk−1)→01/(N_{k}-1)\to0. Since Pk∈DNΣP_{k}\in\mathcal{D}^{\Sigma}_{N}, clauses The Relative Free Energy and the Relative Score of a Probability Measure for a Potential on an Open Set §energy and The Relative Free Energy and the Relative Score of a Probability Measure for a Potential on an Open Set §score give Pk(WN)=1P_{k}(W_{N})=1, Pk∈P2I(RN)P_{k}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}^{\mathcal{I}}(\mathbb{R}^{N}) with score ξPk\xi_{P_{k}}, and ∫∥∇PN∥2 dPk<∞\int\lVert\nabla P_{N}\rVert^{2}\,dP_{k}<\infty. Also A≥0A\ge0, being an upper bound of a nonnegative number. By The Confined Logarithmic-Energy Pair on the Wasserstein Space of the Real Line §pair and The Logarithmic Energy of a Probability Measure on the Real Line §energy, μ^∈D⊆Dlog⁡⊆P2(R)\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}\subseteq\mathcal{D}_{\log}\subseteq\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}). By The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability §hypotheses, VV is of class C2C^{2} with V′′≥0V''\ge0 and has regular growth; V′V' is continuous and Borel by A Confining Potential and Its Derivative are Continuous and Borel §continuous and A Confining Potential and Its Derivative are Continuous and Borel §borel, and V′′V'' is continuous by Confining Potentials on the Real Line §confining. Inner products in L2(Pk;RN)L^{2}(P_{k};\mathbb{R}^{N}) and L2(μ^;R)L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}) are integrals of dot products by Square-Integrable Vector Fields Against a Probability Measure on Euclidean Space, and Test Functions: Standing Notation §l2mu and One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §scalars; these are real Hilbert spaces, and "Cauchy-Schwarz" refers to The Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space in them. The letter gg of The N-Particle Dyson Game and its Mean-Field Limit: Standing Data and Equations is not used below.

Call φ:R→R\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} admissible if it is differentiable at every point with continuous derivative φ′\varphi' and both φ\varphi and φ′\varphi' are bounded; let LφL_{\varphi} be a bound for ∣φ′∣|\varphi'|, let φ⊕(x)=(φ(x1),…,φ(xN))\varphi^{\oplus}(x)=(\varphi(x_{1}),\dots,\varphi(x_{N})) (Borel and bounded, hence in L2(Pk;RN)L^{2}(P_{k};\mathbb{R}^{N})), and let Qφ:R2→RQ_{\varphi}:\mathbb{R}^{2}\to\mathbb{R} be Qφ(s,t)=φ(s)−φ(t)s−tQ_{\varphi}(s,t)=\frac{\varphi(s)-\varphi(t)}{s-t} for s≠ts\ne t and Qφ(s,s)=φ′(s)Q_{\varphi}(s,s)=\varphi'(s). By The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane §bound, The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane §continuous and The Difference Quotient of a Function with Bounded Continuous Derivative is Bounded, Symmetric and Continuous on the Plane §measurable, QφQ_{\varphi} is symmetric, continuous, Borel and bounded by LφL_{\varphi}. For ψ∈Cc∞(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}), ψ′\psi' is admissible and Qψ′=FψQ_{\psi'}=F_{\psi}, by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives ((ψ′)′=Δψ(\psi')'=\Delta\psi is continuous and bounded) and the definition of FψF_{\psi} there.

Step 0 (Averages against empirical measures). Let h:R→Rh:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} and G:R2→RG:\mathbb{R}^{2}\to\mathbb{R} be bounded and Lipschitz with constant LL (Euclidean distance on R2\mathbb{R}^{2}). We claim: (a) for x∈RNx\in\mathbb{R}^{N},

∫Rh dμxN=1N∑i=1Nh(xi),∫R2G d(μxN⊠μxN)=1N2∑i=1N∑j=1NG(xi,xj),\int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,d\mu^{N}_{x}=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N}h(x_{i}),\qquad\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}G\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})=\frac{1}{N^{2}}\sum_{i=1}^{N}\sum_{j=1}^{N}G(x_{i},x_{j}),

the first identity holding for every Borel hh and the second for every bounded Borel GG; and (b)

∣∫RN∫Rh dμxN Pk(dx)−∫Rh dμ^∣≤L δk1/2,∣∫RN∫R2G d(μxN⊠μxN) Pk(dx)−∫R2G d(μ^⊠μ^)∣≤2L δk1/2.\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,d\mu^{N}_{x}\,P_{k}(dx)-\int_{\mathbb{R}}h\,d\hat{\mu}\Bigr|\le L\,\delta_{k}^{1/2},\qquad\Bigl|\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}G\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})\,P_{k}(dx)-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}G\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu})\Bigr|\le2L\,\delta_{k}^{1/2}.

The first identity of (a) is Basic Properties of Empirical Measures: Values, Integrals, Push-Forwards, Second Moment, and Lipschitz Dependence on the Configuration §integral (with d=1d=1 the ii-th particle of xx is xix_{i}). For bounded Borel GG and μ,ν∈P(R)\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{R}), applying Pairs of Euclidean Points: Coordinate Projections, Pairings, the Product Measure on a Euclidean Space, Borel Norm Functions and Finite Sets §product and the Tonelli part of Tonelli and Fubini Theorems to the positive and negative parts of GG gives, with all integrals finite,

∫R2G d(μ⊠ν)=∫R(∫RG(s,t) ν(dt))μ(ds)=∫R(∫RG(s,t) μ(ds))ν(dt);(∗)\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}G\,d(\mu\boxtimes\nu)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}}G(s,t)\,\nu(dt)\Bigr)\mu(ds)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}\Bigl(\int_{\mathbb{R}}G(s,t)\,\mu(ds)\Bigr)\nu(dt);\tag{$*$}

with μ=ν=μxN\mu=\nu=\mu^{N}_{x} and the first identity twice this gives the second. For (b), let μ,ν∈P2(R)\mu,\nu\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}); Existence of an Optimal Coupling of Two Probability Measures with Finite Second Moment gives π∈Π(μ,ν)\pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu) with I(π)=W2(μ,ν)2I(\pi)=W_{2}(\mu,\nu)^{2}, and Couplings on Euclidean Space: Product Coupling, Swap, Finiteness of the Cost, Push-Forward Couplings, Modifying One Marginal, Quantisation, Gluing over a Finitely Supported Measure, and the Lipschitz Bound §lipschitz gives ∣∫h dμ−∫h dν∣≤L W2(μ,ν)|\int h\,d\mu-\int h\,d\nu|\le L\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu). For fixed ss the function t↦G(s,t)t\mapsto G(s,t) is bounded and Lipschitz with constant LL, and likewise s↦G(s,t)s\mapsto G(s,t) for fixed tt; hence by (∗)(*), integrating first in tt and then first in ss,

∣∫G d(μ⊠μ)−∫G d(μ⊠ν)∣≤L W2(μ,ν),∣∫G d(μ⊠ν)−∫G d(ν⊠ν)∣≤L W2(μ,ν).\Bigl|\int G\,d(\mu\boxtimes\mu)-\int G\,d(\mu\boxtimes\nu)\Bigr|\le L\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu),\qquad\Bigl|\int G\,d(\mu\boxtimes\nu)-\int G\,d(\nu\boxtimes\nu)\Bigr|\le L\,W_{2}(\mu,\nu).

Apply these with μ=μxN\mu=\mu^{N}_{x}, which lies in P2(R)\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) by Basic Properties of Empirical Measures: Values, Integrals, Push-Forwards, Second Moment, and Lipschitz Dependence on the Configuration §moment, and ν=μ^\nu=\hat{\mu}, and integrate against PkP_{k}: the functions of xx involved are Borel by (a) and Basic Properties of Empirical Measures: Values, Integrals, Push-Forwards, Second Moment, and Lipschitz Dependence on the Configuration §distance. Finally, for every positive tt, W≤12(t+W2/t)W\le\frac{1}{2}(t+W^{2}/t) for W≥0W\ge0, so ∫W2(μxN,μ^) Pk(dx)≤12(t+δk/t)\int W_{2}(\mu^{N}_{x},\hat{\mu})\,P_{k}(dx)\le\frac{1}{2}(t+\delta_{k}/t); taking t=δk1/2t=\delta_{k}^{1/2} if δk>0\delta_{k}>0 and letting t→0t\to0 otherwise gives the bound δk1/2\delta_{k}^{1/2}, which proves (b).

(c) For ψ∈Cc∞(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) the functions (ψ′)2(\psi')^{2} and V′ψ′V'\psi' on R\mathbb{R} and FψF_{\psi} on R2\mathbb{R}^{2} are bounded and Lipschitz. Indeed, ψ\psi being smooth with compact support, ψ′,ψ′′,ψ′′′\psi',\psi'',\psi''' are continuous and vanish outside a compact set KK, hence are bounded, say ∣ψ′′′∣≤L3|\psi'''|\le L_{3}. (ψ′)2(\psi')^{2} and V′ψ′V'\psi' are differentiable with derivatives 2ψ′ψ′′2\psi'\psi'' and V′′ψ′+V′ψ′′V''\psi'+V'\psi'' by Sum, Constant Multiple, and Product Rules for One-Dimensional Derivatives; these and the functions themselves are continuous and vanish off KK, hence are bounded, and bounded derivatives give Lipschitz bounds by Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval. For s≠ts\ne t the function r↦ψ′(t+r(s−t))r\mapsto\psi'(t+r(s-t)) is an antiderivative of r↦(s−t)ψ′′(t+r(s−t))r\mapsto(s-t)\psi''(t+r(s-t)) by Chain Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives, the latter being continuous and hence Riemann integrable on [0,1][0,1], so Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part II, on a Closed Real Interval on [0,1][0,1] gives

Fψ(s,t)=∫01ψ′′(t+r(s−t)) dr,F_{\psi}(s,t)=\int_{0}^{1}\psi''\bigl(t+r(s-t)\bigr)\,dr,

which also holds for s=ts=t, the integrand then being the constant Δψ(t)=ψ′′(t)\Delta\psi(t)=\psi''(t). As ∣ψ′′(u)−ψ′′(u′)∣≤L3∣u−u′∣|\psi''(u)-\psi''(u')|\le L_{3}|u-u'| by Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval and ∣(t+r(s−t))−(t′+r(s′−t′))∣≤(1−r)∣t−t′∣+r∣s−s′∣≤∥(s,t)−(s′,t′)∥|(t+r(s-t))-(t'+r(s'-t'))|\le(1-r)|t-t'|+r|s-s'|\le\lVert(s,t)-(s',t')\rVert for r∈[0,1]r\in[0,1], FψF_{\psi} is Lipschitz with constant L3L_{3}; it is bounded by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §quotient.

Step 1 (Particle pairing identity). Let φ\varphi be admissible and k∈Nk\in\mathbb{N}, N=NkN=N_{k}. We claim that

Jφ(x)=∑i=1NV′(xi)φ(xi)−bN2∑i≠jQφ(xi,xj)−aN∑i=1Nφ′(xi)(x∈RN)J_{\varphi}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{N}V'(x_{i})\varphi(x_{i})-\frac{b_{N}}{2}\sum_{i\ne j}Q_{\varphi}(x_{i},x_{j})-a_{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N}\varphi'(x_{i})\qquad(x\in\mathbb{R}^{N})

is PkP_{k}-integrable and

⟨Σk,φ⊕⟩k=∫RNJφ dPk.(E1)\langle\Sigma_{k},\varphi^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}J_{\varphi}\,dP_{k}.\tag{E1}

By The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability §hypotheses, PNP_{N} is the function PP of The Confined Logarithmic Energy on the Weyl Chamber: Regularity, Penalty Property, Monotone Gradient and the Dissipation Inequality with strength bNb_{N} and V1=VV_{1}=V; comparing The Confined Logarithmic Energy on the Weyl Chamber: Regularity, Penalty Property, Monotone Gradient and the Dissipation Inequality §regularity with The Logarithmic Energy on the Weyl Chamber: Derivatives, Monotone Gradient, the Calogero Identity and the Euler Identity §derivatives (strength bNb_{N}) gives ∂iPN(x)=V′(xi)+∂iHbN(x)\partial_{i}P_{N}(x)=V'(x_{i})+\partial_{i}H_{b_{N}}(x) for x∈WNx\in W_{N}. Hence The Logarithmic Energy on the Weyl Chamber: Derivatives, Monotone Gradient, the Calogero Identity and the Euler Identity §symmetrisation, with strength bNb_{N} and z=φ⊕(x)z=\varphi^{\oplus}(x), gives for x∈WNx\in W_{N}, since aii=0a_{ii}=0 and aij(x)(φ(xi)−φ(xj))=Qφ(xi,xj)a_{ij}(x)(\varphi(x_{i})-\varphi(x_{j}))=Q_{\varphi}(x_{i},x_{j}) for i≠ji\ne j,

∇PN(x)⋅φ⊕(x)=∑i=1NV′(xi)φ(xi)−bN2∑i≠jQφ(xi,xj).\nabla P_{N}(x)\cdot\varphi^{\oplus}(x)=\sum_{i=1}^{N}V'(x_{i})\varphi(x_{i})-\frac{b_{N}}{2}\sum_{i\ne j}Q_{\varphi}(x_{i},x_{j}).

The left side is PkP_{k}-integrable (∇PN,φ⊕∈L2(Pk;RN)\nabla P_{N},\varphi^{\oplus}\in L^{2}(P_{k};\mathbb{R}^{N})), Pk(WN)=1P_{k}(W_{N})=1, ∣Qφ∣≤Lφ|Q_{\varphi}|\le L_{\varphi} and V′V' is Borel; hence x↦∑iV′(xi)φ(xi)x\mapsto\sum_{i}V'(x_{i})\varphi(x_{i}) is PkP_{k}-integrable and ⟨∇PN,φ⊕⟩k=∫[∑iV′(xi)φ(xi)−bN2∑i≠jQφ(xi,xj)]Pk(dx)\langle\nabla P_{N},\varphi^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}=\int\bigl[\sum_{i}V'(x_{i})\varphi(x_{i})-\frac{b_{N}}{2}\sum_{i\ne j}Q_{\varphi}(x_{i},x_{j})\bigr]P_{k}(dx).

For the score, let χR\chi_{R} (R>0R>0) and M1M_{1} be the cutoffs and the constant of Scaled Cutoffs and the Second-Moment Test Functions: Uniform Derivative Bounds and Agreement on a Ball §cutoff with q=Nq=N. The field χRφ⊕\chi_{R}\varphi^{\oplus}, with components x↦χR(x)φ(xi)x\mapsto\chi_{R}(x)\varphi(x_{i}), is of class C1C^{1} on RN\mathbb{R}^{N} and compactly supported, with divergence ∑i∂iχR(x)φ(xi)+χR(x)∑iφ′(xi)\sum_{i}\partial_{i}\chi_{R}(x)\varphi(x_{i})+\chi_{R}(x)\sum_{i}\varphi'(x_{i}). By The Score Integrates by Parts Against Every Compactly Supported Continuously Differentiable Vector Field §parts, applied at the configuration level to PkP_{k},

∫RNχR ξPk⋅φ⊕ dPk=−∫RN[∑i=1N∂iχR(x)φ(xi)+χR(x)∑i=1Nφ′(xi)]Pk(dx).\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\chi_{R}\,\xi_{P_{k}}\cdot\varphi^{\oplus}\,dP_{k}=-\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\Bigl[\sum_{i=1}^{N}\partial_{i}\chi_{R}(x)\varphi(x_{i})+\chi_{R}(x)\sum_{i=1}^{N}\varphi'(x_{i})\Bigr]P_{k}(dx).

Take R=m∈NR=m\in\mathbb{N} and let m→∞m\to\infty: χm(x)=1\chi_{m}(x)=1 once m≥∥x∥m\ge\lVert x\rVert, ∣χmξPk⋅φ⊕∣≤∣ξPk⋅φ⊕∣|\chi_{m}\xi_{P_{k}}\cdot\varphi^{\oplus}|\le|\xi_{P_{k}}\cdot\varphi^{\oplus}|, which is integrable, ∣∑i∂iχm(x)φ(xi)∣≤NM1sup⁡∣φ∣/m|\sum_{i}\partial_{i}\chi_{m}(x)\varphi(x_{i})|\le NM_{1}\sup|\varphi|/m and ∣χm∑iφ′(xi)∣≤NLφ|\chi_{m}\sum_{i}\varphi'(x_{i})|\le NL_{\varphi}. By Dominated Convergence Theorem, ⟨ξPk,φ⊕⟩k=−∫∑iφ′(xi) Pk(dx)\langle\xi_{P_{k}},\varphi^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}=-\int\sum_{i}\varphi'(x_{i})\,P_{k}(dx). Adding aNa_{N} times this to the previous display gives (E1).

Normalised form. By Step 0(a), ∑i≠jQφ(xi,xj)=N2∫Qφ d(μxN⊠μxN)−∑iφ′(xi)\sum_{i\ne j}Q_{\varphi}(x_{i},x_{j})=N^{2}\int Q_{\varphi}\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})-\sum_{i}\varphi'(x_{i}) and ∑iV′(xi)φ(xi)=N∫V′φ dμxN\sum_{i}V'(x_{i})\varphi(x_{i})=N\int V'\varphi\,d\mu^{N}_{x}; since bN2NN2=βN4(N−1)\frac{b_{N}}{2N}N^{2}=\frac{\beta N}{4(N-1)}, (E1) becomes

1N⟨Σk,φ⊕⟩k=∫RN[∫RV′φ dμxN−βN4(N−1)∫R2Qφ d(μxN⊠μxN)]Pk(dx)+ek(φ),(E2)\frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\varphi^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{N}}\Bigl[\int_{\mathbb{R}}V'\varphi\,d\mu^{N}_{x}-\frac{\beta N}{4(N-1)}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2}}Q_{\varphi}\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})\Bigr]P_{k}(dx)+e_{k}(\varphi),\tag{E2}

with ek(φ)=(β4N(N−1)−aNN)∫∑iφ′(xi) Pk(dx)e_{k}(\varphi)=\bigl(\frac{\beta}{4N(N-1)}-\frac{a_{N}}{N}\bigr)\int\sum_{i}\varphi'(x_{i})\,P_{k}(dx), so that ∣ek(φ)∣≤Lφ(β4(N−1)+aN)→0|e_{k}(\varphi)|\le L_{\varphi}\bigl(\frac{\beta}{4(N-1)}+a_{N}\bigr)\to0 as k→∞k\to\infty.

Step 2 (Limits along test functions). For ψ∈Cc∞(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) let ℓ(ψ)=∫V′ψ′ dμ^−β4∫Fψ d(μ^⊠μ^)\ell(\psi)=\int V'\psi'\,d\hat{\mu}-\frac{\beta}{4}\int F_{\psi}\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu}) (both integrands bounded Borel). We claim

1Nk⟨Σk,ψ′⊕⟩k→ℓ(ψ),1Nk∥ψ′⊕∥k2→∥ψ′∥μ^2,∣ℓ(ψ)∣≤A1/2∥ψ′∥μ^.\frac{1}{N_{k}}\langle\Sigma_{k},\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}\to\ell(\psi),\qquad\frac{1}{N_{k}}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2}\to\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2},\qquad|\ell(\psi)|\le A^{1/2}\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}.

Apply (E2) to φ=ψ′\varphi=\psi', for which Qψ′=FψQ_{\psi'}=F_{\psi}. By Step 0(b),(c), ∫∫V′ψ′ dμxN Pk(dx)→∫V′ψ′ dμ^\int\int V'\psi'\,d\mu^{N}_{x}\,P_{k}(dx)\to\int V'\psi'\,d\hat{\mu} and ck=∫∫Fψ d(μxN⊠μxN) Pk(dx)→∫Fψ d(μ^⊠μ^)c_{k}=\int\int F_{\psi}\,d(\mu^{N}_{x}\boxtimes\mu^{N}_{x})\,P_{k}(dx)\to\int F_{\psi}\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu}); as (ck)(c_{k}) is bounded (One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §quotient) and NN−1→1\frac{N}{N-1}\to1, and ek(ψ′)→0e_{k}(\psi')\to0, the first limit follows. Next ∥ψ′⊕(x)∥2=∑iψ′(xi)2=N∫(ψ′)2 dμxN\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}(x)\rVert^{2}=\sum_{i}\psi'(x_{i})^{2}=N\int(\psi')^{2}\,d\mu^{N}_{x}, so the second limit is Step 0(b),(c) together with ∥ψ′∥μ^2=∫(ψ′)2 dμ^\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}=\int(\psi')^{2}\,d\hat{\mu} (One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives). Finally, by Cauchy-Schwarz and the hypothesis,

∣1N⟨Σk,ψ′⊕⟩k∣≤(1N∥Σk∥k2)1/2(1N∥ψ′⊕∥k2)1/2≤A1/2(1N∥ψ′⊕∥k2)1/2,\Bigl|\frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}\Bigr|\le\Bigl(\frac{1}{N}\lVert\Sigma_{k}\rVert_{k}^{2}\Bigr)^{1/2}\Bigl(\frac{1}{N}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2}\Bigr)^{1/2}\le A^{1/2}\Bigl(\frac{1}{N}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2}\Bigr)^{1/2},

and letting k→∞k\to\infty gives the third claim.

Step 3 (V′V' is square-integrable under μ^\hat{\mu}). By regular growth (The N-Particle Dyson Potential on the Weyl Chamber: Penalty, Monotone Gradient, Dissipation with Constants Uniform in N, and Gibbs Integrability §hypotheses) with η=1/β\eta=1/\beta there is C′C' with V′′≤C′+V′2/βV''\le C'+V'^{2}/\beta; let C=max⁡(C′,0)C=\max(C',0). For m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} let Θm(s)=s (1+s2/m2)−1/2\Theta_{m}(s)=s\,(1+s^{2}/m^{2})^{-1/2} and φm=Θm∘V′\varphi_{m}=\Theta_{m}\circ V'. Elementary calculus gives: Θm\Theta_{m} is differentiable with continuous derivative Θm′(s)=(1+s2/m2)−3/2∈(0,1]\Theta_{m}'(s)=(1+s^{2}/m^{2})^{-3/2}\in(0,1]; Θm(s)2=m2s2m2+s2≤m2\Theta_{m}(s)^{2}=\frac{m^{2}s^{2}}{m^{2}+s^{2}}\le m^{2}; Θm(s)2=s21+s2/m2≤s2(1+s2/m2)1/2=s Θm(s)\Theta_{m}(s)^{2}=\frac{s^{2}}{1+s^{2}/m^{2}}\le\frac{s^{2}}{(1+s^{2}/m^{2})^{1/2}}=s\,\Theta_{m}(s); and Θm(s)2\Theta_{m}(s)^{2} is nondecreasing in mm with limit s2s^{2}. By Chain Rule for One-Dimensional Derivatives, φm\varphi_{m} is differentiable with continuous derivative φm′=Θm′(V′) V′′\varphi_{m}'=\Theta_{m}'(V')\,V'', and by V′′≥0V''\ge0 and (1+u)−3/2≤(1+u)−1(1+u)^{-3/2}\le(1+u)^{-1} for u≥0u\ge0,

0≤φm′≤(C+V′2β)(1+V′2m2)−1≤C+φm2β≤C+m2β.(E3)0\le\varphi_{m}'\le\Bigl(C+\frac{V'^{2}}{\beta}\Bigr)\Bigl(1+\frac{V'^{2}}{m^{2}}\Bigr)^{-1}\le C+\frac{\varphi_{m}^{2}}{\beta}\le C+\frac{m^{2}}{\beta}.\tag{E3}

Thus φm\varphi_{m} is admissible with Lφm=C+m2/βL_{\varphi_{m}}=C+m^{2}/\beta, and nondecreasing by Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval. For s≠ts\ne t the same theorem gives rr between ss and tt with Qφm(s,t)=φm′(r)Q_{\varphi_{m}}(s,t)=\varphi_{m}'(r), and φm(r)\varphi_{m}(r) lies between φm(s)\varphi_{m}(s) and φm(t)\varphi_{m}(t), so φm(r)2≤φm(s)2+φm(t)2\varphi_{m}(r)^{2}\le\varphi_{m}(s)^{2}+\varphi_{m}(t)^{2}; with (E3), also on the diagonal,

0≤Qφm(s,t)≤C+φm(s)2+φm(t)2β(s,t∈R).(E4)0\le Q_{\varphi_{m}}(s,t)\le C+\frac{\varphi_{m}(s)^{2}+\varphi_{m}(t)^{2}}{\beta}\qquad(s,t\in\mathbb{R}).\tag{E4}

Fix kk, N=NkN=N_{k}, and let Xk=1N∫∑iφm(xi)2 Pk(dx)=1N∥φm⊕∥k2X_{k}=\frac{1}{N}\int\sum_{i}\varphi_{m}(x_{i})^{2}\,P_{k}(dx)=\frac{1}{N}\lVert\varphi_{m}^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2}. Since V′φm=V′Θm(V′)≥φm2V'\varphi_{m}=V'\Theta_{m}(V')\ge\varphi_{m}^{2}, (E1), (E4) and (E3) give

NXk≤∫∑iV′(xi)φm(xi) dPk≤⟨Σk,φm⊕⟩k+bN2[N(N−1)C+2(N−1)βNXk]+aNN(C+m2β).NX_{k}\le\int\sum_{i}V'(x_{i})\varphi_{m}(x_{i})\,dP_{k}\le\langle\Sigma_{k},\varphi_{m}^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}+\frac{b_{N}}{2}\Bigl[N(N-1)C+\frac{2(N-1)}{\beta}NX_{k}\Bigr]+a_{N}N\Bigl(C+\frac{m^{2}}{\beta}\Bigr).

As bN(N−1)2=β4\frac{b_{N}(N-1)}{2}=\frac{\beta}{4}, dividing by NN and using Cauchy-Schwarz as in Step 2, 1N⟨Σk,φm⊕⟩k≤(AXk)1/2≤A+Xk4\frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\varphi_{m}^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}\le(AX_{k})^{1/2}\le A+\frac{X_{k}}{4}, we get Xk≤A+Xk4+βC4+Xk2+aN(C+m2β)X_{k}\le A+\frac{X_{k}}{4}+\frac{\beta C}{4}+\frac{X_{k}}{2}+a_{N}(C+\frac{m^{2}}{\beta}), that is,

Xk≤4A+βC+4aNk(C+m2β).X_{k}\le4A+\beta C+4a_{N_{k}}\Bigl(C+\frac{m^{2}}{\beta}\Bigr).

As aNk→0a_{N_{k}}\to0, Xk≤C∗:=4A+βC+1X_{k}\le C^{*}:=4A+\beta C+1 for all large kk, with C∗C^{*} independent of mm. The function φm2\varphi_{m}^{2} is bounded by m2m^{2} and Lipschitz (its derivative 2φmφm′2\varphi_{m}\varphi_{m}' is bounded by 2m(C+m2/β)2m(C+m^{2}/\beta); Mean Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval), and Xk=∫∫φm2 dμxN Pk(dx)X_{k}=\int\int\varphi_{m}^{2}\,d\mu^{N}_{x}\,P_{k}(dx) by Step 0(a); so Step 0(b) gives ∫φm2 dμ^=lim⁡kXk≤C∗\int\varphi_{m}^{2}\,d\hat{\mu}=\lim_{k}X_{k}\le C^{*} for every mm. Since φm2=Θm(V′)2\varphi_{m}^{2}=\Theta_{m}(V')^{2} increases in mm to V′2V'^{2} pointwise, Monotone Convergence Theorem gives ∫V′2 dμ^≤C∗<∞\int V'^{2}\,d\hat{\mu}\le C^{*}<\infty.

Step 4 (Clause 1, the limit has a score). For ψ∈Cc∞(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}), by the definition of ℓ\ell, Cauchy-Schwarz in L2(μ^;R)L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}) (where V′V' lies by Step 3) and Step 2,

β4∣∫Fψ d(μ^⊠μ^)∣=∣∫V′ψ′ dμ^−ℓ(ψ)∣≤(∥V′∥μ^+A1/2)∥ψ′∥μ^,\frac{\beta}{4}\Bigl|\int F_{\psi}\,d(\hat{\mu}\boxtimes\hat{\mu})\Bigr|=\Bigl|\int V'\psi'\,d\hat{\mu}-\ell(\psi)\Bigr|\le\bigl(\lVert V'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}+A^{1/2}\bigr)\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}},

and ∥ψ′∥μ^=∥∇ψ∥μ^\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}=\lVert\nabla\psi\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} by One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives. So μ^∈P2(R)\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{P}_{2}(\mathbb{R}) has finite free Fisher information, with constant 4β(∥V′∥μ^+A1/2)\frac{4}{\beta}(\lVert V'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}+A^{1/2}); with μ^∈D\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D} and Step 3, μ^∈DΣ\hat{\mu}\in\mathcal{D}_{\Sigma} by The Confined Logarithmic-Energy Pair on the Wasserstein Space of the Real Line §pair. By that clause, Finite Free Fisher Information, the Free Score and the Free Fisher Information of a Probability Measure on the Real Line §score and One-Dimensional Test Functions: Scalars, Derivatives, and the Difference Quotient of the Derivative §derivatives, for every ψ∈Cc∞(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R})

⟨Σ(μ^),ψ′⟩μ^=∫V′ψ′ dμ^−β4⟨Ξμ^,∇ψ⟩μ^=ℓ(ψ).(E5)\langle\Sigma(\hat{\mu}),\psi'\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}=\int V'\psi'\,d\hat{\mu}-\frac{\beta}{4}\langle\Xi_{\hat{\mu}},\nabla\psi\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}=\ell(\psi).\tag{E5}

By The Confined Logarithmic-Energy Pair on the Wasserstein Space of the Real Line §pair, Σ(μ^)∈Tμ^\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\in T_{\hat{\mu}}, which is the closure of the set of classes of the ∇ψ=ψ′\nabla\psi=\psi' by The Tangent Space of the Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §gradients and The Tangent Space of the Wasserstein Space at a Probability Measure §tangent. Choose ψn∈Cc∞(R)\psi_{n}\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) with ∥Σ(μ^)−ψn′∥μ^→0\lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})-\psi_{n}'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\to0; then ⟨Σ(μ^),ψn′⟩μ^→∥Σ(μ^)∥μ^2\langle\Sigma(\hat{\mu}),\psi_{n}'\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}\to\lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2} and ∥ψn′∥μ^→∥Σ(μ^)∥μ^\lVert\psi_{n}'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\to\lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}, while by (E5) and Step 2 ⟨Σ(μ^),ψn′⟩μ^=ℓ(ψn)≤A1/2∥ψn′∥μ^\langle\Sigma(\hat{\mu}),\psi_{n}'\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}=\ell(\psi_{n})\le A^{1/2}\lVert\psi_{n}'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}. Hence ∥Σ(μ^)∥μ^2≤A1/2∥Σ(μ^)∥μ^\lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}\le A^{1/2}\lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}, so ∥Σ(μ^)∥μ^≤A1/2\lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}\le A^{1/2} and ∥Σ(μ^)∥μ^2≤A\lVert\Sigma(\hat{\mu})\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}\le A.

Step 5 (Clause 2, convergence of pairings). Write S=Σ(μ^)S=\Sigma(\hat{\mu}). Given positive ε\varepsilon, take ψ\psi and k0k_{0} as in the hypothesis. For k≥k0k\ge k_{0}, by bilinearity, (E5), Cauchy-Schwarz, the bound on 1N∥Σk∥k2\frac{1}{N}\lVert\Sigma_{k}\rVert_{k}^{2} and Step 4,

∣1N⟨Σk,Gk⟩k−⟨S,q⟩μ^∣≤1N∣⟨Σk,Gk−ψ′⊕⟩k∣+∣1N⟨Σk,ψ′⊕⟩k−ℓ(ψ)∣+∣⟨S,ψ′−q⟩μ^∣≤2A1/2ε+∣1N⟨Σk,ψ′⊕⟩k−ℓ(ψ)∣.\Bigl|\frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},G_{k}\rangle_{k}-\langle S,q\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}\Bigr|\le\frac{1}{N}\bigl|\langle\Sigma_{k},G_{k}-\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}\bigr|+\Bigl|\frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}-\ell(\psi)\Bigr|+\bigl|\langle S,\psi'-q\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}\bigr|\le2A^{1/2}\varepsilon+\Bigl|\frac{1}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}-\ell(\psi)\Bigr|.

The last term tends to 00 by Step 2, so the upper limit of the left side is at most 2A1/2ε2A^{1/2}\varepsilon; ε\varepsilon being arbitrary, the first sequence converges to ⟨S,q⟩μ^\langle S,q\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}. For the norms let nk=(1N∥Gk∥k2)1/2n_{k}=(\frac{1}{N}\lVert G_{k}\rVert_{k}^{2})^{1/2}. For k≥k0k\ge k_{0} the triangle inequality in L2(Pk;RN)L^{2}(P_{k};\mathbb{R}^{N}) gives ∣nk−(1N∥ψ′⊕∥k2)1/2∣≤(1N∥Gk−ψ′⊕∥k2)1/2<ε|n_{k}-(\frac{1}{N}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2})^{1/2}|\le(\frac{1}{N}\lVert G_{k}-\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2})^{1/2}<\varepsilon, that in L2(μ^;R)L^{2}(\hat{\mu};\mathbb{R}) gives ∣∥ψ′∥μ^−∥q∥μ^∣<ε|\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}-\lVert q\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}|<\varepsilon, and (1N∥ψ′⊕∥k2)1/2→∥ψ′∥μ^(\frac{1}{N}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2})^{1/2}\to\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} by Step 2. So the upper limit of ∣nk−∥q∥μ^∣|n_{k}-\lVert q\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}| is at most 2ε2\varepsilon for every ε\varepsilon; hence nk→∥q∥μ^n_{k}\to\lVert q\rVert_{\hat{\mu}} and nk2→∥q∥μ^2n_{k}^{2}\to\lVert q\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}.

Step 6 (Clause 3, lower limit of the Fisher term). Given positive ε\varepsilon, choose as in Step 4 some ψ∈Cc∞(R)\psi\in C_{c}^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) with ∥S−ψ′∥μ^2<ε/2\lVert S-\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}<\varepsilon/2. For every kk, expanding 0≤∥Σk−ψ′⊕∥k20\le\lVert\Sigma_{k}-\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2},

1N∥Σk∥k2≥rk:=2N⟨Σk,ψ′⊕⟩k−1N∥ψ′⊕∥k2.\frac{1}{N}\lVert\Sigma_{k}\rVert_{k}^{2}\ge r_{k}:=\frac{2}{N}\langle\Sigma_{k},\psi'^{\oplus}\rangle_{k}-\frac{1}{N}\lVert\psi'^{\oplus}\rVert_{k}^{2}.

By Step 2 and (E5), rk→2⟨S,ψ′⟩μ^−∥ψ′∥μ^2=∥S∥μ^2−∥S−ψ′∥μ^2>∥S∥μ^2−ε/2r_{k}\to2\langle S,\psi'\rangle_{\hat{\mu}}-\lVert\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}=\lVert S\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}-\lVert S-\psi'\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}>\lVert S\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}-\varepsilon/2. Hence there is k0k_{0} with rk>∥S∥μ^2−εr_{k}>\lVert S\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}-\varepsilon for k≥k0k\ge k_{0}, and then ∥S∥μ^2≤1Nk∥ΣNk(Pk)∥Pk2+ε\lVert S\rVert_{\hat{\mu}}^{2}\le\frac{1}{N_{k}}\lVert\Sigma_{N_{k}}(P_{k})\rVert_{P_{k}}^{2}+\varepsilon.

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…