Throughout, sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values and maxima of F \mathcal{F} F -measurable real-valued maps are F \mathcal{F} F -measurable by claims 2, 3 and 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions , and constants and indicators of events by claim 1 there; expectations of nonnegative random variables are monotone and additive by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral , and E [ 1 A ] = P ( A ) \mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_A]=P(A) E [ 1 A ] = P ( A ) by The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set . We use the elementary inequalities ( a + b ) 2 ≤ 2 a 2 + 2 b 2 (a+b)^{2}\le2a^{2}+2b^{2} ( a + b ) 2 ≤ 2 a 2 + 2 b 2 (recorded in Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product ), hence ( a + b ) 4 ≤ 8 ( a 4 + b 4 ) (a+b)^{4}\le8(a^{4}+b^{4}) ( a + b ) 4 ≤ 8 ( a 4 + b 4 ) (apply it twice), and s + t ≤ s + t \sqrt{s+t}\le\sqrt{s}+\sqrt{t} s + t ≤ s + t for real s , t ≥ 0 s,t\ge0 s , t ≥ 0 (square both sides), together with the monotonicity of t ↦ t 1 / 2 t\mapsto t^{1/2} t ↦ t 1/2 on [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) (if 0 ≤ s ≤ t 0\le s\le t 0 ≤ s ≤ t and s > t \sqrt{s}>\sqrt{t} s > t then s > t s>t s > t ), hence also of t ↦ t 1 / 4 = ( t 1 / 2 ) 1 / 2 t\mapsto t^{1/4}=(t^{1/2})^{1/2} t ↦ t 1/4 = ( t 1/2 ) 1/2 , and the identity s t = s t \sqrt{st}=\sqrt{s}\sqrt{t} s t = s t for s , t ≥ 0 s,t\ge0 s , t ≥ 0 (both sides are nonnegative with equal squares). For ω ∈ Ω \omega\in\Omega ω ∈ Ω and a transition label c c c write p ω = P ♯ , c ( ω ) p_\omega=\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}(\omega) p ω = P ♯ , c ( ω ) for the counting path u ↦ P u ♯ , c ( ω ) u\mapsto\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u(\omega) u ↦ P u ♯ , c ( ω ) ; each P u ♯ , c \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u P u ♯ , c is F \mathcal{F} F -measurable by claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record .
A crude bound on every window discrepancy. Let p p p be a counting path and w ≥ 0 w\ge0 w ≥ 0 . For 0 ≤ u ≤ u ′ ≤ R 0\le u\le u'\le R 0 ≤ u ≤ u ′ ≤ R , conditions 1 and 2 of Counting Path and Its Jump Times give 0 ≤ p ( u ) ≤ p ( u ′ ) ≤ p ( R ) 0\le p(u)\le p(u')\le p(R) 0 ≤ p ( u ) ≤ p ( u ′ ) ≤ p ( R ) , hence 0 ≤ p ( u ′ ) − p ( u ) ≤ p ( R ) 0\le p(u')-p(u)\le p(R) 0 ≤ p ( u ′ ) − p ( u ) ≤ p ( R ) , and 0 ≤ u ′ − u ≤ R 0\le u'-u\le R 0 ≤ u ′ − u ≤ R ; for nonnegative reals a , b a,b a , b one has ∣ a − b ∣ ≤ max ( a , b ) ≤ a + b |a-b|\le\max(a,b)\le a+b ∣ a − b ∣ ≤ max ( a , b ) ≤ a + b , so ∣ p ( u ′ ) − p ( u ) − ( u ′ − u ) ∣ ≤ p ( R ) + R |p(u')-p(u)-(u'-u)|\le p(R)+R ∣ p ( u ′ ) − p ( u ) − ( u ′ − u ) ∣ ≤ p ( R ) + R . Thus p ( R ) + R p(R)+R p ( R ) + R is an upper bound of the set whose least upper bound is D i s c w ( p ) \mathrm{Disc}_w(p) Disc w ( p ) (as also recorded in Cell-Count Form of a Compensated Counting-Path Functional Along a Time Change: Window-Discrepancy Bounds for the Time-Change and Partial-Cell Errors ), and D i s c w ( p ) ≤ p ( R ) + R \mathrm{Disc}_w(p)\le p(R)+R Disc w ( p ) ≤ p ( R ) + R .
Claim 1. Assume R ∈ N R\in\mathbb{N} R ∈ N , fix c c c , w ≥ 0 w\ge0 w ≥ 0 , x > 0 x>0 x > 0 and n = ⌈ w ⌉ ∈ N \mathsf{n}=\lceil w\rceil\in\mathbb{N} n = ⌈ w ⌉ ∈ N , so that w ≤ n w\le\mathsf{n} w ≤ n . By claim 3 of The Copy Clocks Have Independent Poisson Increments on the Clock Interval: Law Identity with the Uniform Poisson Path and Applicability of the Window Discrepancy Bound , applied with R R R in the role of the natural number called n n n there (admissible since R ≤ R R\le R R ≤ R ), with n \mathsf{n} n in the role of the window length called m m m there, and with the real number x x x , the process P ♯ , c \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c} P ♯ , c satisfies the hypotheses of Uniform Window Discrepancy Bound for a Counting Process with Poisson Increments on the Integer Grid . That lemma provides an event G = G w , x c G=G^{c}_{w,x} G = G w , x c belonging to the σ \sigma σ -algebra generated by P 0 ♯ , c , … , P R ♯ , c \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_0,\dots,\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R P 0 ♯ , c , … , P R ♯ , c (a sub-σ \sigma σ -algebra of F \mathcal{F} F by that definition, these random variables being F \mathcal{F} F -measurable; so G ∈ F G\in\mathcal{F} G ∈ F ), with
P ( Ω ∖ G ) ≤ 2 ( R + 1 ) ( n + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ n + 2 ( x ) ) , P(\Omega\setminus G)\le2\,(R+1)(\mathsf{n}+3)\exp\bigl(-\varpi_{\mathsf{n}+2}(x)\bigr), P ( Ω ∖ G ) ≤ 2 ( R + 1 ) ( n + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ n + 2 ( x ) ) ,
such that for every ω ∈ G \omega\in G ω ∈ G and all real 0 ≤ u ≤ u ′ ≤ R 0\le u\le u'\le R 0 ≤ u ≤ u ′ ≤ R with u ′ − u ≤ n u'-u\le\mathsf{n} u ′ − u ≤ n , ∣ P u ′ ♯ , c ( ω ) − P u ♯ , c ( ω ) − ( u ′ − u ) ∣ ≤ x + 2 |\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_{u'}(\omega)-\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u(\omega)-(u'-u)|\le x+2 ∣ P u ′ ♯ , c ( ω ) − P u ♯ , c ( ω ) − ( u ′ − u ) ∣ ≤ x + 2 .
Majorisation. Let ω ∈ G \omega\in G ω ∈ G . Every pair ( u , u ′ ) (u,u') ( u , u ′ ) in the index set of D i s c w ( p ω ) \mathrm{Disc}_w(p_\omega) Disc w ( p ω ) satisfies 0 ≤ u ≤ u ′ ≤ R 0\le u\le u'\le R 0 ≤ u ≤ u ′ ≤ R and u ′ − u ≤ w ≤ n u'-u\le w\le\mathsf{n} u ′ − u ≤ w ≤ n , so every element of that set is at most x + 2 x+2 x + 2 , and D i s c w ( p ω ) ≤ x + 2 = Ξ w , x c ( ω ) \mathrm{Disc}_w(p_\omega)\le x+2=\Xi^{c}_{w,x}(\omega) Disc w ( p ω ) ≤ x + 2 = Ξ w , x c ( ω ) . Let ω ∉ G \omega\notin G ω ∈ / G . By the crude bound, D i s c w ( p ω ) ≤ p ω ( R ) + R = P R ♯ , c ( ω ) + R = Ξ w , x c ( ω ) \mathrm{Disc}_w(p_\omega)\le p_\omega(R)+R=\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R(\omega)+R=\Xi^{c}_{w,x}(\omega) Disc w ( p ω ) ≤ p ω ( R ) + R = P R ♯ , c ( ω ) + R = Ξ w , x c ( ω ) . Hence D i s c w ( p ω ) ≤ Ξ w , x c ( ω ) \mathrm{Disc}_w(p_\omega)\le\Xi^{c}_{w,x}(\omega) Disc w ( p ω ) ≤ Ξ w , x c ( ω ) for every ω ∈ Ω \omega\in\Omega ω ∈ Ω . The map Ξ w , x c \Xi^{c}_{w,x} Ξ w , x c is F \mathcal{F} F -measurable (indicators of G G G and Ω ∖ G \Omega\setminus G Ω ∖ G , the measurable P R ♯ , c \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R P R ♯ , c , constants, products and sums) with values in [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) , since x + 2 > 0 x+2>0 x + 2 > 0 and P R ♯ , c ≥ 0 \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R\ge0 P R ♯ , c ≥ 0 .
The Poisson law and the fourth moment. By claim 2 of The Copy Clocks Have Independent Poisson Increments on the Clock Interval: Law Identity with the Uniform Poisson Path and Applicability of the Window Discrepancy Bound , P 0 ♯ , c ( ω ) = 0 \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_0(\omega)=0 P 0 ♯ , c ( ω ) = 0 for every ω \omega ω and the increment P R ♯ , c − P 0 ♯ , c = P R ♯ , c \mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R-\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_0=\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R P R ♯ , c − P 0 ♯ , c = P R ♯ , c has the Poisson distribution with parameter R − 0 = R R-0=R R − 0 = R . By claim (b) of Factorial Moments and Moments of Every Order of the Poisson Distribution in order 4 4 4 , ( P R ♯ , c ) 4 (\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R)^{4} ( P R ♯ , c ) 4 is integrable with E [ ( P R ♯ , c ) 4 ] ≤ 8 4 + 2 4 R 4 = 4096 + 16 R 4 \mathbb{E}[(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R)^{4}]\le8^{4}+2^{4}R^{4}=4096+16R^{4} E [( P R ♯ , c ) 4 ] ≤ 8 4 + 2 4 R 4 = 4096 + 16 R 4 . Hence, by ( a + b ) 4 ≤ 8 ( a 4 + b 4 ) (a+b)^{4}\le8(a^{4}+b^{4}) ( a + b ) 4 ≤ 8 ( a 4 + b 4 ) and monotonicity and linearity of the expectation,
E [ ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 4 ] ≤ 8 ( 4096 + 16 R 4 + R 4 ) = 8 ( 4096 + 17 R 4 ) = M 4 ( R ) 4 . \mathbb{E}\bigl[(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{4}\bigr]\le8\bigl(4096+16R^{4}+R^{4}\bigr)=8\,(4096+17R^{4})=\mathsf{M}_4(R)^{4}. E [ ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 4 ] ≤ 8 ( 4096 + 16 R 4 + R 4 ) = 8 ( 4096 + 17 R 4 ) = M 4 ( R ) 4 .
In particular ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 2 (\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{2} ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 2 is square-integrable.
The mean-square norm. Since 1 G 1 Ω ∖ G = 0 \mathbf{1}_G\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G}=0 1 G 1 Ω ∖ G = 0 and 1 G 2 = 1 G \mathbf{1}_G^{2}=\mathbf{1}_G 1 G 2 = 1 G , 1 Ω ∖ G 2 = 1 Ω ∖ G \mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G}^{2}=\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G} 1 Ω ∖ G 2 = 1 Ω ∖ G , one has pointwise
( Ξ w , x c ) 2 = ( x + 2 ) 2 1 G + ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 2 1 Ω ∖ G . (\Xi^{c}_{w,x})^{2}=(x+2)^{2}\,\mathbf{1}_G+(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{2}\,\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G}. ( Ξ w , x c ) 2 = ( x + 2 ) 2 1 G + ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 2 1 Ω ∖ G .
Taking expectations, using E [ 1 G ] = P ( G ) ≤ 1 \mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_G]=P(G)\le1 E [ 1 G ] = P ( G ) ≤ 1 and the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality (claim 1 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm ) for the square-integrable random variables ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 2 (\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{2} ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 2 and 1 Ω ∖ G \mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G} 1 Ω ∖ G ,
E [ ( Ξ w , x c ) 2 ] ≤ ( x + 2 ) 2 + ( E [ ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 4 ] ) 1 / 2 ( P ( Ω ∖ G ) ) 1 / 2 < ∞ , \mathbb{E}\bigl[(\Xi^{c}_{w,x})^{2}\bigr]\le(x+2)^{2}+\Bigl(\mathbb{E}\bigl[(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{4}\bigr]\Bigr)^{1/2}\bigl(P(\Omega\setminus G)\bigr)^{1/2}<\infty , E [ ( Ξ w , x c ) 2 ] ≤ ( x + 2 ) 2 + ( E [ ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 4 ] ) 1/2 ( P ( Ω ∖ G ) ) 1/2 < ∞ ,
so Ξ w , x c \Xi^{c}_{w,x} Ξ w , x c is square-integrable, and by s + t ≤ s + t \sqrt{s+t}\le\sqrt{s}+\sqrt{t} s + t ≤ s + t , the monotonicity of the square root and the bounds just proved,
∥ Ξ w , x c ∥ 2 ≤ x + 2 + ( E [ ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 4 ] ) 1 / 4 ( P ( Ω ∖ G ) ) 1 / 4 ≤ x + 2 + M 4 ( R ) ( 2 ( R + 1 ) ( n + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ n + 2 ( x ) ) ) 1 / 4 . \lVert\Xi^{c}_{w,x}\rVert_2\le x+2+\Bigl(\mathbb{E}\bigl[(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{4}\bigr]\Bigr)^{1/4}\bigl(P(\Omega\setminus G)\bigr)^{1/4}\le x+2+\mathsf{M}_4(R)\Bigl(2\,(R+1)(\mathsf{n}+3)\exp\bigl(-\varpi_{\mathsf{n}+2}(x)\bigr)\Bigr)^{1/4}. ∥ Ξ w , x c ∥ 2 ≤ x + 2 + ( E [ ( P R ♯ , c + R ) 4 ] ) 1/4 ( P ( Ω ∖ G ) ) 1/4 ≤ x + 2 + M 4 ( R ) ( 2 ( R + 1 ) ( n + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ n + 2 ( x ) ) ) 1/4 .
This proves claim 1.
Claim 2. Fix c c c and events G w i , x i c G^{c}_{w_i,x_i} G w i , x i c as furnished by claim 1 with the corresponding maps Ξ w i , x i c \Xi^{c}_{w_i,x_i} Ξ w i , x i c (i = 1 , 2 i=1,2 i = 1 , 2 ). By claim 1 applied to each, Ξ c = Ξ w 1 , x 1 c + Ξ w 2 , x 2 c \Xi^{c}=\Xi^{c}_{w_1,x_1}+\Xi^{c}_{w_2,x_2} Ξ c = Ξ w 1 , x 1 c + Ξ w 2 , x 2 c is a sum of two F \mathcal{F} F -measurable, [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) -valued, square-integrable maps, hence is F \mathcal{F} F -measurable, [ 0 , ∞ ) [0,\infty) [ 0 , ∞ ) -valued and square-integrable (closure of square-integrability under sums, Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product ); for every ω \omega ω , D i s c w 1 ( p ω ) + D i s c w 2 ( p ω ) ≤ Ξ w 1 , x 1 c ( ω ) + Ξ w 2 , x 2 c ( ω ) = Ξ c ( ω ) \mathrm{Disc}_{w_1}(p_\omega)+\mathrm{Disc}_{w_2}(p_\omega)\le\Xi^{c}_{w_1,x_1}(\omega)+\Xi^{c}_{w_2,x_2}(\omega)=\Xi^{c}(\omega) Disc w 1 ( p ω ) + Disc w 2 ( p ω ) ≤ Ξ w 1 , x 1 c ( ω ) + Ξ w 2 , x 2 c ( ω ) = Ξ c ( ω ) ; and by the triangle inequality (claim 2 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm ) and the bound of claim 1 for each summand,
∥ Ξ c ∥ 2 ≤ ∥ Ξ w 1 , x 1 c ∥ 2 + ∥ Ξ w 2 , x 2 c ∥ 2 ≤ x 1 + x 2 + 4 + M 4 ( R ) ∑ i = 1 2 ( 2 ( R + 1 ) ( ⌈ w i ⌉ + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ ⌈ w i ⌉ + 2 ( x i ) ) ) 1 / 4 . \lVert\Xi^{c}\rVert_2\le\lVert\Xi^{c}_{w_1,x_1}\rVert_2+\lVert\Xi^{c}_{w_2,x_2}\rVert_2\le x_1+x_2+4+\mathsf{M}_4(R)\sum_{i=1}^{2}\Bigl(2\,(R+1)(\lceil w_i\rceil+3)\exp\bigl(-\varpi_{\lceil w_i\rceil+2}(x_i)\bigr)\Bigr)^{1/4}. ∥ Ξ c ∥ 2 ≤ ∥ Ξ w 1 , x 1 c ∥ 2 + ∥ Ξ w 2 , x 2 c ∥ 2 ≤ x 1 + x 2 + 4 + M 4 ( R ) i = 1 ∑ 2 ( 2 ( R + 1 ) (⌈ w i ⌉ + 3 ) exp ( − ϖ ⌈ w i ⌉ + 2 ( x i ) ) ) 1/4 .
In an instance of Mean-Square Assembly of the Estimand Linearisation on the Synthetic Copy: Approximation of the Recentred Copy Endpoint by an Affine Function of the Parameter as described in the statement, hypothesis (DM) there asks, for every label c c c , for an F \mathcal{F} F -measurable map Ω → [ 0 , ∞ ) \Omega\to[0,\infty) Ω → [ 0 , ∞ ) with finite second moment that majorises D i s c w c l k ( p ω ) + D i s c μ max ( p ω ) \mathrm{Disc}_{\mathsf{w}^{\mathrm{clk}}}(p_\omega)+\mathrm{Disc}_{\mu_{\max}}(p_\omega) Disc w clk ( p ω ) + Disc μ m a x ( p ω ) for every ω \omega ω in its event G G G , where w c l k = N ( Λ 1 T ε S + ε c t l ) ≥ 0 \mathsf{w}^{\mathrm{clk}}=N(\Lambda_1T\varepsilon_S+\varepsilon_{\mathrm{ctl}})\ge0 w clk = N ( Λ 1 T ε S + ε ctl ) ≥ 0 is a real number, μ max \mu_{\max} μ m a x is the maximal cell length of the same cells, and the window discrepancies there are those of Cell-Count Form of a Compensated Counting-Path Functional Along a Time Change: Window-Discrepancy Bounds for the Time-Change and Partial-Cell Errors formed with the same clock horizon R R R and the same copy clocks; with w 1 = w c l k w_1=\mathsf{w}^{\mathrm{clk}} w 1 = w clk and w 2 = μ max w_2=\mu_{\max} w 2 = μ m a x (both ≥ 0 \ge0 ≥ 0 , so admissible in claim 1), the family ( Ξ c ) c (\Xi^{c})_c ( Ξ c ) c has these properties for every ω ∈ Ω \omega\in\Omega ω ∈ Ω , hence for every ω ∈ G \omega\in G ω ∈ G whatever the event G G G . This proves claim 2.
Claim 3. Law and independence of the cell counts. By claim 1 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record , each K q \mathsf{K}_q K q is a random variable with values in N 0 \mathbb{N}_0 N 0 , and P ( K = y ) = ∏ q ∈ L p o i μ q ( y q ) P(\mathsf{K}=y)=\prod_{q\in\mathsf{L}}\mathrm{poi}_{\mu_q}(y_q) P ( K = y ) = ∏ q ∈ L poi μ q ( y q ) for every y ∈ N 0 L y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}} y ∈ N 0 L , where, for a real s ≥ 0 s\ge0 s ≥ 0 and k ∈ N 0 k\in\mathbb{N}_0 k ∈ N 0 , p o i s ( k ) = exp ( − s ) s k / k ! \mathrm{poi}_{s}(k)=\exp(-s)s^{k}/k! poi s ( k ) = exp ( − s ) s k / k ! is the mass function of the Poisson distribution with parameter s s s (the notation of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record ), with values in [ 0 , 1 ] [0,1] [ 0 , 1 ] since p o i s ( k ) = P s ( { k } ) \mathrm{poi}_{s}(k)=P_{s}(\{k\}) poi s ( k ) = P s ({ k }) for the Poisson probability measure P s P_{s} P s of Poisson Distribution . Moreover, for q = ( c , j ) q=(c,j) q = ( c , j ) the cell count K c , j \mathsf{K}_{c,j} K c , j is the cell count C j C_j C j of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion for the data of the label c c c (so identified in The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record ), which by claim 2 of that lemma has the Poisson distribution with parameter ∣ I c , j ∣ = μ q |I_{c,j}|=\mu_q ∣ I c , j ∣ = μ q . By Poisson Distribution , the masses p o i μ q ( k ) \mathrm{poi}_{\mu_q}(k) poi μ q ( k ) , k ∈ N 0 k\in\mathbb{N}_0 k ∈ N 0 , sum to 1 1 1 (the total mass of the Poisson distribution); this can also be read off claim 1 of Series Formula, Exponential Moments, and Chernoff Tail Bounds for the Poisson Distribution applied to K q \mathsf{K}_q K q with the constant map g ≡ 1 g\equiv1 g ≡ 1 , which gives ∑ k ∈ N 0 p o i μ q ( k ) = E [ 1 ] = 1 \sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}_0}\mathrm{poi}_{\mu_q}(k)=\mathbb{E}[1]=1 ∑ k ∈ N 0 poi μ q ( k ) = E [ 1 ] = 1 . Hence, indexing L \mathsf{L} L by { 1 , … , d } \{1,\dots,d\} { 1 , … , d } through the fixed bijection, the random variables K 1 , … , K d \mathsf{K}_1,\dots,\mathsf{K}_d K 1 , … , K d satisfy the hypotheses of Factorized Joint Probability Mass Function Implies Independence with g q = p o i μ q g_q=\mathrm{poi}_{\mu_q} g q = poi μ q (the event { K = y } \{\mathsf{K}=y\} { K = y } being ⋂ q { K q = y q } \bigcap_q\{\mathsf{K}_q=y_q\} ⋂ q { K q = y q } ), and its claim 2 shows that K 1 , … , K d \mathsf{K}_1,\dots,\mathsf{K}_d K 1 , … , K d are independent.
Moments of a centred Poisson variable. Let K K K be Poisson with parameter λ ≥ 0 \lambda\ge0 λ ≥ 0 (a scalar; the letter μ \mu μ is reserved for the vector of cell lengths, and the bare letter λ \lambda λ here is unrelated to the Lebesgue measure λ d \lambda_d λ d and to the intensities λ ♯ , ω \lambda^{\sharp,\omega} λ ♯ , ω of the adopted setting) and put Y = K − λ Y=K-\lambda Y = K − λ . By claim (b) of Factorial Moments and Moments of Every Order of the Poisson Distribution , K i K^{i} K i is integrable for i ∈ { 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 } i\in\{1,2,3,4\} i ∈ { 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 } , hence so is every polynomial in K K K of degree at most 4 4 4 , in particular Y i Y^{i} Y i for i ≤ 4 i\le4 i ≤ 4 ; and by claim (a) there, E [ K ] = λ \mathbb{E}[K]=\lambda E [ K ] = λ , E [ K ( K − 1 ) ] = λ 2 \mathbb{E}[K(K-1)]=\lambda^{2} E [ K ( K − 1 )] = λ 2 , E [ K ( K − 1 ) ( K − 2 ) ] = λ 3 \mathbb{E}[K(K-1)(K-2)]=\lambda^{3} E [ K ( K − 1 ) ( K − 2 )] = λ 3 and E [ K ( K − 1 ) ( K − 2 ) ( K − 3 ) ] = λ 4 \mathbb{E}[K(K-1)(K-2)(K-3)]=\lambda^{4} E [ K ( K − 1 ) ( K − 2 ) ( K − 3 )] = λ 4 . Since K ( K − 1 ) = K 2 − K K(K-1)=K^{2}-K K ( K − 1 ) = K 2 − K , K ( K − 1 ) ( K − 2 ) = K 3 − 3 K 2 + 2 K K(K-1)(K-2)=K^{3}-3K^{2}+2K K ( K − 1 ) ( K − 2 ) = K 3 − 3 K 2 + 2 K and K ( K − 1 ) ( K − 2 ) ( K − 3 ) = K 4 − 6 K 3 + 11 K 2 − 6 K K(K-1)(K-2)(K-3)=K^{4}-6K^{3}+11K^{2}-6K K ( K − 1 ) ( K − 2 ) ( K − 3 ) = K 4 − 6 K 3 + 11 K 2 − 6 K , linearity of the expectation gives successively
E [ K 2 ] = λ 2 + λ , E [ K 3 ] = λ 3 + 3 λ 2 + λ , E [ K 4 ] = λ 4 + 6 λ 3 + 7 λ 2 + λ . \mathbb{E}[K^{2}]=\lambda^{2}+\lambda,\qquad\mathbb{E}[K^{3}]=\lambda^{3}+3\lambda^{2}+\lambda,\qquad\mathbb{E}[K^{4}]=\lambda^{4}+6\lambda^{3}+7\lambda^{2}+\lambda . E [ K 2 ] = λ 2 + λ , E [ K 3 ] = λ 3 + 3 λ 2 + λ , E [ K 4 ] = λ 4 + 6 λ 3 + 7 λ 2 + λ .
Expanding Y 2 = K 2 − 2 λ K + λ 2 Y^{2}=K^{2}-2\lambda K+\lambda^{2} Y 2 = K 2 − 2 λ K + λ 2 and Y 4 = K 4 − 4 λ K 3 + 6 λ 2 K 2 − 4 λ 3 K + λ 4 Y^{4}=K^{4}-4\lambda K^{3}+6\lambda^{2}K^{2}-4\lambda^{3}K+\lambda^{4} Y 4 = K 4 − 4 λ K 3 + 6 λ 2 K 2 − 4 λ 3 K + λ 4 and inserting these values,
E [ Y ] = 0 , E [ Y 2 ] = λ , E [ Y 4 ] = ( λ 4 + 6 λ 3 + 7 λ 2 + λ ) − 4 λ ( λ 3 + 3 λ 2 + λ ) + 6 λ 2 ( λ 2 + λ ) − 4 λ 4 + λ 4 = 3 λ 2 + λ . \mathbb{E}[Y]=0,\qquad\mathbb{E}[Y^{2}]=\lambda,\qquad\mathbb{E}[Y^{4}]=(\lambda^{4}+6\lambda^{3}+7\lambda^{2}+\lambda)-4\lambda(\lambda^{3}+3\lambda^{2}+\lambda)+6\lambda^{2}(\lambda^{2}+\lambda)-4\lambda^{4}+\lambda^{4}=3\lambda^{2}+\lambda . E [ Y ] = 0 , E [ Y 2 ] = λ , E [ Y 4 ] = ( λ 4 + 6 λ 3 + 7 λ 2 + λ ) − 4 λ ( λ 3 + 3 λ 2 + λ ) + 6 λ 2 ( λ 2 + λ ) − 4 λ 4 + λ 4 = 3 λ 2 + λ .
These apply to K = K q K=\mathsf{K}_q K = K q with λ = μ q \lambda=\mu_q λ = μ q for every q ∈ L q\in\mathsf{L} q ∈ L .
Induction over the summands. Put Y q = K q − μ q Y_q=\mathsf{K}_q-\mu_q Y q = K q − μ q and, for k ∈ { 0 , 1 , … , d } k\in\{0,1,\dots,d\} k ∈ { 0 , 1 , … , d } , S k = ∑ q = 1 k α q Y q S_k=\sum_{q=1}^{k}\alpha_qY_q S k = ∑ q = 1 k α q Y q (so S 0 = 0 S_0=0 S 0 = 0 ) and v k = ∑ q = 1 k α q 2 μ q v_k=\sum_{q=1}^{k}\alpha_q^{2}\mu_q v k = ∑ q = 1 k α q 2 μ q , F k = ∑ q = 1 k α q 4 μ q \mathsf{F}_k=\sum_{q=1}^{k}\alpha_q^{4}\mu_q F k = ∑ q = 1 k α q 4 μ q . We show by induction on k k k that S k 4 S_k^{4} S k 4 is integrable and
E [ S k ] = 0 , E [ S k 2 ] = v k , E [ S k 4 ] ≤ 3 v k 2 + F k . ( H k ) \mathbb{E}[S_k]=0,\qquad\mathbb{E}[S_k^{2}]=v_k,\qquad\mathbb{E}[S_k^{4}]\le3v_k^{2}+\mathsf{F}_k .\qquad(\mathrm{H}_k) E [ S k ] = 0 , E [ S k 2 ] = v k , E [ S k 4 ] ≤ 3 v k 2 + F k . ( H k )
For k = 0 k=0 k = 0 all quantities vanish. Let 0 ≤ k < d 0\le k<d 0 ≤ k < d , assume ( H k ) (\mathrm{H}_k) ( H k ) , and write S = S k S=S_k S = S k , a = α k + 1 a=\alpha_{k+1} a = α k + 1 , Y = Y k + 1 Y=Y_{k+1} Y = Y k + 1 , λ ′ = μ k + 1 \lambda'=\mu_{k+1} λ ′ = μ k + 1 , so that S k + 1 = S + a Y S_{k+1}=S+aY S k + 1 = S + aY . Factorisation of the mixed moments. We claim that for i , j ∈ { 1 , 2 , 3 } i,j\in\{1,2,3\} i , j ∈ { 1 , 2 , 3 } the product S i Y j S^{i}Y^{j} S i Y j has finite expectation equal to E [ S i ] E [ Y j ] \mathbb{E}[S^{i}]\,\mathbb{E}[Y^{j}] E [ S i ] E [ Y j ] . If k = 0 k=0 k = 0 then S = 0 S=0 S = 0 , so S i Y j = 0 S^{i}Y^{j}=0 S i Y j = 0 identically and both sides vanish. Let k ≥ 1 k\ge1 k ≥ 1 , and let G 1 = σ ( K 1 , … , K k ) \mathcal{G}_1=\sigma(\mathsf{K}_1,\dots,\mathsf{K}_k) G 1 = σ ( K 1 , … , K k ) and G 2 = σ ( K k + 1 ) \mathcal{G}_2=\sigma(\mathsf{K}_{k+1}) G 2 = σ ( K k + 1 ) be the generated σ \sigma σ -algebras . Each K q \mathsf{K}_q K q with q ≤ k q\le k q ≤ k is G 1 \mathcal{G}_1 G 1 -measurable, since by that definition every K q − 1 ( B ) \mathsf{K}_q^{-1}(B) K q − 1 ( B ) with B B B Borel and q ≤ k q\le k q ≤ k belongs to G 1 \mathcal{G}_1 G 1 ; so S S S , S 2 S^{2} S 2 and S 3 S^{3} S 3 (linear combinations, with the constants μ q \mu_q μ q , and powers) are G 1 \mathcal{G}_1 G 1 -measurable by claims 1, 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions applied on the measurable space ( Ω , G 1 ) (\Omega,\mathcal{G}_1) ( Ω , G 1 ) ; likewise Y Y Y , Y 2 Y^{2} Y 2 and Y 3 Y^{3} Y 3 are G 2 \mathcal{G}_2 G 2 -measurable. Grouping Lemma for Independent Random Variables , applied to the independent family ( K q ) 1 ≤ q ≤ d (\mathsf{K}_q)_{1\le q\le d} ( K q ) 1 ≤ q ≤ d and the disjoint nonempty index sets I 1 = { 1 , … , k } I_1=\{1,\dots,k\} I 1 = { 1 , … , k } , I 2 = { k + 1 } I_2=\{k+1\} I 2 = { k + 1 } , shows that G 1 \mathcal{G}_1 G 1 and G 2 \mathcal{G}_2 G 2 are independent and hence that any G 1 \mathcal{G}_1 G 1 -measurable random variable is independent of any G 2 \mathcal{G}_2 G 2 -measurable one; in particular S i S^{i} S i and Y j Y^{j} Y j are independent, and, both having finite expectation (see below), Expectation of a Product of Independent Random Variables gives the claim. Expansion. Pointwise,
( S + a Y ) 4 = S 4 + 4 a S 3 Y + 6 a 2 S 2 Y 2 + 4 a 3 S Y 3 + a 4 Y 4 , ( S + a Y ) 2 = S 2 + 2 a S Y + a 2 Y 2 . (S+aY)^{4}=S^{4}+4a\,S^{3}Y+6a^{2}\,S^{2}Y^{2}+4a^{3}\,SY^{3}+a^{4}\,Y^{4},\qquad(S+aY)^{2}=S^{2}+2a\,SY+a^{2}Y^{2}. ( S + aY ) 4 = S 4 + 4 a S 3 Y + 6 a 2 S 2 Y 2 + 4 a 3 S Y 3 + a 4 Y 4 , ( S + aY ) 2 = S 2 + 2 a S Y + a 2 Y 2 .
By ( H k ) (\mathrm{H}_k) ( H k ) and the integrability of Y 4 Y^{4} Y 4 , every power S i S^{i} S i and Y j Y^{j} Y j with i , j ≤ 4 i,j\le4 i , j ≤ 4 has finite expectation (as ∣ t ∣ i ≤ 1 + t 4 |t|^{i}\le1+t^{4} ∣ t ∣ i ≤ 1 + t 4 for i ≤ 4 i\le4 i ≤ 4 ), so the factorisation of the mixed moments applies. Using E [ S ] = 0 \mathbb{E}[S]=0 E [ S ] = 0 and E [ Y ] = 0 \mathbb{E}[Y]=0 E [ Y ] = 0 , E [ S 2 ] = v k \mathbb{E}[S^{2}]=v_k E [ S 2 ] = v k , E [ Y 2 ] = λ ′ \mathbb{E}[Y^{2}]=\lambda' E [ Y 2 ] = λ ′ and E [ Y 4 ] = 3 λ ′ 2 + λ ′ \mathbb{E}[Y^{4}]=3\lambda'^{2}+\lambda' E [ Y 4 ] = 3 λ ′ 2 + λ ′ , linearity of the expectation gives that S k + 1 4 S_{k+1}^{4} S k + 1 4 is integrable, E [ S k + 1 ] = E [ S ] + a E [ Y ] = 0 \mathbb{E}[S_{k+1}]=\mathbb{E}[S]+a\mathbb{E}[Y]=0 E [ S k + 1 ] = E [ S ] + a E [ Y ] = 0 , E [ S k + 1 2 ] = v k + 0 + a 2 λ ′ = v k + 1 \mathbb{E}[S_{k+1}^{2}]=v_k+0+a^{2}\lambda'=v_{k+1} E [ S k + 1 2 ] = v k + 0 + a 2 λ ′ = v k + 1 , and
E [ S k + 1 4 ] = E [ S 4 ] + 0 + 6 a 2 v k λ ′ + 0 + a 4 ( 3 λ ′ 2 + λ ′ ) ≤ 3 v k 2 + F k + 6 a 2 λ ′ v k + 3 a 4 λ ′ 2 + a 4 λ ′ = 3 ( v k + a 2 λ ′ ) 2 + F k + a 4 λ ′ = 3 v k + 1 2 + F k + 1 , \mathbb{E}[S_{k+1}^{4}]=\mathbb{E}[S^{4}]+0+6a^{2}v_k\lambda'+0+a^{4}(3\lambda'^{2}+\lambda')\le3v_k^{2}+\mathsf{F}_k+6a^{2}\lambda'v_k+3a^{4}\lambda'^{2}+a^{4}\lambda'=3\,(v_k+a^{2}\lambda')^{2}+\mathsf{F}_k+a^{4}\lambda'=3v_{k+1}^{2}+\mathsf{F}_{k+1}, E [ S k + 1 4 ] = E [ S 4 ] + 0 + 6 a 2 v k λ ′ + 0 + a 4 ( 3 λ ′ 2 + λ ′ ) ≤ 3 v k 2 + F k + 6 a 2 λ ′ v k + 3 a 4 λ ′ 2 + a 4 λ ′ = 3 ( v k + a 2 λ ′ ) 2 + F k + a 4 λ ′ = 3 v k + 1 2 + F k + 1 ,
which is ( H k + 1 ) (\mathrm{H}_{k+1}) ( H k + 1 ) . Taking k = d k=d k = d gives the three assertions of claim 3 for α ⋅ ( K − μ ) = S d \alpha\cdot(\mathsf{K}-\mu)=S_d α ⋅ ( K − μ ) = S d . The final consequence for k 4 \mathsf{k}_4 k 4 of Mean-Square Assembly of the Estimand Linearisation on the Synthetic Copy: Approximation of the Recentred Copy Endpoint by an Affine Function of the Parameter follows because, in an instance as described in the statement, k 4 4 = E [ ( α ⋅ ( K − μ ) ) 4 ] \mathsf{k}_4^{4}=\mathbb{E}[(\alpha\cdot(\mathsf{K}-\mu))^{4}] k 4 4 = E [( α ⋅ ( K − μ ) ) 4 ] there with the same cell-count vector and cell lengths, and its vector α \alpha α of cell coefficients is an element of R d \mathbb{R}^d R d , to which the bound just proved applies. ■ \blacksquare ■