TheoremBase

Proof of Moment Toolkit for the Synthetic Copy: Square-Integrable Majorants of the Window Discrepancies of the Copy Clocks and the Fourth Moment of a Weighted Centred Cell-Count Sum

lemmalem:copy-clock-discrepancy-cell-count-moments-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Proof of P7.4c: window-lemma construction of the majorants with the Poisson fourth-moment tail, and the independence-based induction for the second and fourth moments of the weighted centred cell-count sum.

Proof

Throughout, sums, scalar multiples, products, absolute values and maxima of F\mathcal{F}-measurable real-valued maps are F\mathcal{F}-measurable by claims 2, 3 and 4 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions, and constants and indicators of events by claim 1 there; expectations of nonnegative random variables are monotone and additive by Linearity and Monotonicity of the Lebesgue Integral, and E[1A]=P(A)\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_A]=P(A) by The Integral of an Indicator Function is the Measure of the Set. We use the elementary inequalities (a+b)22a2+2b2(a+b)^{2}\le2a^{2}+2b^{2} (recorded in Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product), hence (a+b)48(a4+b4)(a+b)^{4}\le8(a^{4}+b^{4}) (apply it twice), and s+ts+t\sqrt{s+t}\le\sqrt{s}+\sqrt{t} for real s,t0s,t\ge0 (square both sides), together with the monotonicity of tt1/2t\mapsto t^{1/2} on [0,)[0,\infty) (if 0st0\le s\le t and s>t\sqrt{s}>\sqrt{t} then s>ts>t), hence also of tt1/4=(t1/2)1/2t\mapsto t^{1/4}=(t^{1/2})^{1/2}, and the identity st=st\sqrt{st}=\sqrt{s}\sqrt{t} for s,t0s,t\ge0 (both sides are nonnegative with equal squares). For ωΩ\omega\in\Omega and a transition label cc write pω=P,c(ω)p_\omega=\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}(\omega) for the counting path uPu,c(ω)u\mapsto\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u(\omega); each Pu,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u is F\mathcal{F}-measurable by claim 2 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record.

A crude bound on every window discrepancy. Let pp be a counting path and w0w\ge0. For 0uuR0\le u\le u'\le R, conditions 1 and 2 of Counting Path and Its Jump Times give 0p(u)p(u)p(R)0\le p(u)\le p(u')\le p(R), hence 0p(u)p(u)p(R)0\le p(u')-p(u)\le p(R), and 0uuR0\le u'-u\le R; for nonnegative reals a,ba,b one has abmax(a,b)a+b|a-b|\le\max(a,b)\le a+b, so p(u)p(u)(uu)p(R)+R|p(u')-p(u)-(u'-u)|\le p(R)+R. Thus p(R)+Rp(R)+R is an upper bound of the set whose least upper bound is Discw(p)\mathrm{Disc}_w(p) (as also recorded in Cell-Count Form of a Compensated Counting-Path Functional Along a Time Change: Window-Discrepancy Bounds for the Time-Change and Partial-Cell Errors), and Discw(p)p(R)+R\mathrm{Disc}_w(p)\le p(R)+R.

Claim 1. Assume RNR\in\mathbb{N}, fix cc, w0w\ge0, x>0x>0 and n=wN\mathsf{n}=\lceil w\rceil\in\mathbb{N}, so that wnw\le\mathsf{n}. By claim 3 of The Copy Clocks Have Independent Poisson Increments on the Clock Interval: Law Identity with the Uniform Poisson Path and Applicability of the Window Discrepancy Bound, applied with RR in the role of the natural number called nn there (admissible since RRR\le R), with n\mathsf{n} in the role of the window length called mm there, and with the real number xx, the process P,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c} satisfies the hypotheses of Uniform Window Discrepancy Bound for a Counting Process with Poisson Increments on the Integer Grid. That lemma provides an event G=Gw,xcG=G^{c}_{w,x} belonging to the σ\sigma-algebra generated by P0,c,,PR,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_0,\dots,\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R (a sub-σ\sigma-algebra of F\mathcal{F} by that definition, these random variables being F\mathcal{F}-measurable; so GFG\in\mathcal{F}), with

P(ΩG)2(R+1)(n+3)exp(ϖn+2(x)),P(\Omega\setminus G)\le2\,(R+1)(\mathsf{n}+3)\exp\bigl(-\varpi_{\mathsf{n}+2}(x)\bigr),

such that for every ωG\omega\in G and all real 0uuR0\le u\le u'\le R with uunu'-u\le\mathsf{n}, Pu,c(ω)Pu,c(ω)(uu)x+2|\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_{u'}(\omega)-\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u(\omega)-(u'-u)|\le x+2.

Majorisation. Let ωG\omega\in G. Every pair (u,u)(u,u') in the index set of Discw(pω)\mathrm{Disc}_w(p_\omega) satisfies 0uuR0\le u\le u'\le R and uuwnu'-u\le w\le\mathsf{n}, so every element of that set is at most x+2x+2, and Discw(pω)x+2=Ξw,xc(ω)\mathrm{Disc}_w(p_\omega)\le x+2=\Xi^{c}_{w,x}(\omega). Let ωG\omega\notin G. By the crude bound, Discw(pω)pω(R)+R=PR,c(ω)+R=Ξw,xc(ω)\mathrm{Disc}_w(p_\omega)\le p_\omega(R)+R=\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R(\omega)+R=\Xi^{c}_{w,x}(\omega). Hence Discw(pω)Ξw,xc(ω)\mathrm{Disc}_w(p_\omega)\le\Xi^{c}_{w,x}(\omega) for every ωΩ\omega\in\Omega. The map Ξw,xc\Xi^{c}_{w,x} is F\mathcal{F}-measurable (indicators of GG and ΩG\Omega\setminus G, the measurable PR,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R, constants, products and sums) with values in [0,)[0,\infty), since x+2>0x+2>0 and PR,c0\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R\ge0.

The Poisson law and the fourth moment. By claim 2 of The Copy Clocks Have Independent Poisson Increments on the Clock Interval: Law Identity with the Uniform Poisson Path and Applicability of the Window Discrepancy Bound, P0,c(ω)=0\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_0(\omega)=0 for every ω\omega and the increment PR,cP0,c=PR,c\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R-\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_0=\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R has the Poisson distribution with parameter R0=RR-0=R. By claim (b) of Factorial Moments and Moments of Every Order of the Poisson Distribution in order 44, (PR,c)4(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R)^{4} is integrable with E[(PR,c)4]84+24R4=4096+16R4\mathbb{E}[(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R)^{4}]\le8^{4}+2^{4}R^{4}=4096+16R^{4}. Hence, by (a+b)48(a4+b4)(a+b)^{4}\le8(a^{4}+b^{4}) and monotonicity and linearity of the expectation,

E[(PR,c+R)4]8(4096+16R4+R4)=8(4096+17R4)=M4(R)4.\mathbb{E}\bigl[(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{4}\bigr]\le8\bigl(4096+16R^{4}+R^{4}\bigr)=8\,(4096+17R^{4})=\mathsf{M}_4(R)^{4}.

In particular (PR,c+R)2(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{2} is square-integrable.

The mean-square norm. Since 1G1ΩG=0\mathbf{1}_G\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G}=0 and 1G2=1G\mathbf{1}_G^{2}=\mathbf{1}_G, 1ΩG2=1ΩG\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G}^{2}=\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G}, one has pointwise

(Ξw,xc)2=(x+2)21G+(PR,c+R)21ΩG.(\Xi^{c}_{w,x})^{2}=(x+2)^{2}\,\mathbf{1}_G+(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{2}\,\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G}.

Taking expectations, using E[1G]=P(G)1\mathbb{E}[\mathbf{1}_G]=P(G)\le1 and the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality (claim 1 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm) for the square-integrable random variables (PR,c+R)2(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{2} and 1ΩG\mathbf{1}_{\Omega\setminus G},

E[(Ξw,xc)2](x+2)2+(E[(PR,c+R)4])1/2(P(ΩG))1/2<,\mathbb{E}\bigl[(\Xi^{c}_{w,x})^{2}\bigr]\le(x+2)^{2}+\Bigl(\mathbb{E}\bigl[(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{4}\bigr]\Bigr)^{1/2}\bigl(P(\Omega\setminus G)\bigr)^{1/2}<\infty ,

so Ξw,xc\Xi^{c}_{w,x} is square-integrable, and by s+ts+t\sqrt{s+t}\le\sqrt{s}+\sqrt{t}, the monotonicity of the square root and the bounds just proved,

Ξw,xc2x+2+(E[(PR,c+R)4])1/4(P(ΩG))1/4x+2+M4(R)(2(R+1)(n+3)exp(ϖn+2(x)))1/4.\lVert\Xi^{c}_{w,x}\rVert_2\le x+2+\Bigl(\mathbb{E}\bigl[(\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_R+R)^{4}\bigr]\Bigr)^{1/4}\bigl(P(\Omega\setminus G)\bigr)^{1/4}\le x+2+\mathsf{M}_4(R)\Bigl(2\,(R+1)(\mathsf{n}+3)\exp\bigl(-\varpi_{\mathsf{n}+2}(x)\bigr)\Bigr)^{1/4}.

This proves claim 1.

Claim 2. Fix cc and events Gwi,xicG^{c}_{w_i,x_i} as furnished by claim 1 with the corresponding maps Ξwi,xic\Xi^{c}_{w_i,x_i} (i=1,2i=1,2). By claim 1 applied to each, Ξc=Ξw1,x1c+Ξw2,x2c\Xi^{c}=\Xi^{c}_{w_1,x_1}+\Xi^{c}_{w_2,x_2} is a sum of two F\mathcal{F}-measurable, [0,)[0,\infty)-valued, square-integrable maps, hence is F\mathcal{F}-measurable, [0,)[0,\infty)-valued and square-integrable (closure of square-integrability under sums, Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product); for every ω\omega, Discw1(pω)+Discw2(pω)Ξw1,x1c(ω)+Ξw2,x2c(ω)=Ξc(ω)\mathrm{Disc}_{w_1}(p_\omega)+\mathrm{Disc}_{w_2}(p_\omega)\le\Xi^{c}_{w_1,x_1}(\omega)+\Xi^{c}_{w_2,x_2}(\omega)=\Xi^{c}(\omega); and by the triangle inequality (claim 2 of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm) and the bound of claim 1 for each summand,

Ξc2Ξw1,x1c2+Ξw2,x2c2x1+x2+4+M4(R)i=12(2(R+1)(wi+3)exp(ϖwi+2(xi)))1/4.\lVert\Xi^{c}\rVert_2\le\lVert\Xi^{c}_{w_1,x_1}\rVert_2+\lVert\Xi^{c}_{w_2,x_2}\rVert_2\le x_1+x_2+4+\mathsf{M}_4(R)\sum_{i=1}^{2}\Bigl(2\,(R+1)(\lceil w_i\rceil+3)\exp\bigl(-\varpi_{\lceil w_i\rceil+2}(x_i)\bigr)\Bigr)^{1/4}.

In an instance of Mean-Square Assembly of the Estimand Linearisation on the Synthetic Copy: Approximation of the Recentred Copy Endpoint by an Affine Function of the Parameter as described in the statement, hypothesis (DM) there asks, for every label cc, for an F\mathcal{F}-measurable map Ω[0,)\Omega\to[0,\infty) with finite second moment that majorises Discwclk(pω)+Discμmax(pω)\mathrm{Disc}_{\mathsf{w}^{\mathrm{clk}}}(p_\omega)+\mathrm{Disc}_{\mu_{\max}}(p_\omega) for every ω\omega in its event GG, where wclk=N(Λ1TεS+εctl)0\mathsf{w}^{\mathrm{clk}}=N(\Lambda_1T\varepsilon_S+\varepsilon_{\mathrm{ctl}})\ge0 is a real number, μmax\mu_{\max} is the maximal cell length of the same cells, and the window discrepancies there are those of Cell-Count Form of a Compensated Counting-Path Functional Along a Time Change: Window-Discrepancy Bounds for the Time-Change and Partial-Cell Errors formed with the same clock horizon RR and the same copy clocks; with w1=wclkw_1=\mathsf{w}^{\mathrm{clk}} and w2=μmaxw_2=\mu_{\max} (both 0\ge0, so admissible in claim 1), the family (Ξc)c(\Xi^{c})_c has these properties for every ωΩ\omega\in\Omega, hence for every ωG\omega\in G whatever the event GG. This proves claim 2.

Claim 3. Law and independence of the cell counts. By claim 1 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, each Kq\mathsf{K}_q is a random variable with values in N0\mathbb{N}_0, and P(K=y)=qLpoiμq(yq)P(\mathsf{K}=y)=\prod_{q\in\mathsf{L}}\mathrm{poi}_{\mu_q}(y_q) for every yN0Ly\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}, where, for a real s0s\ge0 and kN0k\in\mathbb{N}_0, pois(k)=exp(s)sk/k!\mathrm{poi}_{s}(k)=\exp(-s)s^{k}/k! is the mass function of the Poisson distribution with parameter ss (the notation of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record), with values in [0,1][0,1] since pois(k)=Ps({k})\mathrm{poi}_{s}(k)=P_{s}(\{k\}) for the Poisson probability measure PsP_{s} of Poisson Distribution. Moreover, for q=(c,j)q=(c,j) the cell count Kc,j\mathsf{K}_{c,j} is the cell count CjC_j of Uniform Representation of the Rate-One Poisson Counting Path on a Bounded Interval: Distinct Points, Poisson Increments, Conditional Law Given the Cell Counts, and Point Insertion for the data of the label cc (so identified in The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record), which by claim 2 of that lemma has the Poisson distribution with parameter Ic,j=μq|I_{c,j}|=\mu_q. By Poisson Distribution, the masses poiμq(k)\mathrm{poi}_{\mu_q}(k), kN0k\in\mathbb{N}_0, sum to 11 (the total mass of the Poisson distribution); this can also be read off claim 1 of Series Formula, Exponential Moments, and Chernoff Tail Bounds for the Poisson Distribution applied to Kq\mathsf{K}_q with the constant map g1g\equiv1, which gives kN0poiμq(k)=E[1]=1\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}_0}\mathrm{poi}_{\mu_q}(k)=\mathbb{E}[1]=1. Hence, indexing L\mathsf{L} by {1,,d}\{1,\dots,d\} through the fixed bijection, the random variables K1,,Kd\mathsf{K}_1,\dots,\mathsf{K}_d satisfy the hypotheses of Factorized Joint Probability Mass Function Implies Independence with gq=poiμqg_q=\mathrm{poi}_{\mu_q} (the event {K=y}\{\mathsf{K}=y\} being q{Kq=yq}\bigcap_q\{\mathsf{K}_q=y_q\}), and its claim 2 shows that K1,,Kd\mathsf{K}_1,\dots,\mathsf{K}_d are independent.

Moments of a centred Poisson variable. Let KK be Poisson with parameter λ0\lambda\ge0 (a scalar; the letter μ\mu is reserved for the vector of cell lengths, and the bare letter λ\lambda here is unrelated to the Lebesgue measure λd\lambda_d and to the intensities λ,ω\lambda^{\sharp,\omega} of the adopted setting) and put Y=KλY=K-\lambda. By claim (b) of Factorial Moments and Moments of Every Order of the Poisson Distribution, KiK^{i} is integrable for i{1,2,3,4}i\in\{1,2,3,4\}, hence so is every polynomial in KK of degree at most 44, in particular YiY^{i} for i4i\le4; and by claim (a) there, E[K]=λ\mathbb{E}[K]=\lambda, E[K(K1)]=λ2\mathbb{E}[K(K-1)]=\lambda^{2}, E[K(K1)(K2)]=λ3\mathbb{E}[K(K-1)(K-2)]=\lambda^{3} and E[K(K1)(K2)(K3)]=λ4\mathbb{E}[K(K-1)(K-2)(K-3)]=\lambda^{4}. Since K(K1)=K2KK(K-1)=K^{2}-K, K(K1)(K2)=K33K2+2KK(K-1)(K-2)=K^{3}-3K^{2}+2K and K(K1)(K2)(K3)=K46K3+11K26KK(K-1)(K-2)(K-3)=K^{4}-6K^{3}+11K^{2}-6K, linearity of the expectation gives successively

E[K2]=λ2+λ,E[K3]=λ3+3λ2+λ,E[K4]=λ4+6λ3+7λ2+λ.\mathbb{E}[K^{2}]=\lambda^{2}+\lambda,\qquad\mathbb{E}[K^{3}]=\lambda^{3}+3\lambda^{2}+\lambda,\qquad\mathbb{E}[K^{4}]=\lambda^{4}+6\lambda^{3}+7\lambda^{2}+\lambda .

Expanding Y2=K22λK+λ2Y^{2}=K^{2}-2\lambda K+\lambda^{2} and Y4=K44λK3+6λ2K24λ3K+λ4Y^{4}=K^{4}-4\lambda K^{3}+6\lambda^{2}K^{2}-4\lambda^{3}K+\lambda^{4} and inserting these values,

E[Y]=0,E[Y2]=λ,E[Y4]=(λ4+6λ3+7λ2+λ)4λ(λ3+3λ2+λ)+6λ2(λ2+λ)4λ4+λ4=3λ2+λ.\mathbb{E}[Y]=0,\qquad\mathbb{E}[Y^{2}]=\lambda,\qquad\mathbb{E}[Y^{4}]=(\lambda^{4}+6\lambda^{3}+7\lambda^{2}+\lambda)-4\lambda(\lambda^{3}+3\lambda^{2}+\lambda)+6\lambda^{2}(\lambda^{2}+\lambda)-4\lambda^{4}+\lambda^{4}=3\lambda^{2}+\lambda .

These apply to K=KqK=\mathsf{K}_q with λ=μq\lambda=\mu_q for every qLq\in\mathsf{L}.

Induction over the summands. Put Yq=KqμqY_q=\mathsf{K}_q-\mu_q and, for k{0,1,,d}k\in\{0,1,\dots,d\}, Sk=q=1kαqYqS_k=\sum_{q=1}^{k}\alpha_qY_q (so S0=0S_0=0) and vk=q=1kαq2μqv_k=\sum_{q=1}^{k}\alpha_q^{2}\mu_q, Fk=q=1kαq4μq\mathsf{F}_k=\sum_{q=1}^{k}\alpha_q^{4}\mu_q. We show by induction on kk that Sk4S_k^{4} is integrable and

E[Sk]=0,E[Sk2]=vk,E[Sk4]3vk2+Fk.(Hk)\mathbb{E}[S_k]=0,\qquad\mathbb{E}[S_k^{2}]=v_k,\qquad\mathbb{E}[S_k^{4}]\le3v_k^{2}+\mathsf{F}_k .\qquad(\mathrm{H}_k)

For k=0k=0 all quantities vanish. Let 0k<d0\le k<d, assume (Hk)(\mathrm{H}_k), and write S=SkS=S_k, a=αk+1a=\alpha_{k+1}, Y=Yk+1Y=Y_{k+1}, λ=μk+1\lambda'=\mu_{k+1}, so that Sk+1=S+aYS_{k+1}=S+aY. Factorisation of the mixed moments. We claim that for i,j{1,2,3}i,j\in\{1,2,3\} the product SiYjS^{i}Y^{j} has finite expectation equal to E[Si]E[Yj]\mathbb{E}[S^{i}]\,\mathbb{E}[Y^{j}]. If k=0k=0 then S=0S=0, so SiYj=0S^{i}Y^{j}=0 identically and both sides vanish. Let k1k\ge1, and let G1=σ(K1,,Kk)\mathcal{G}_1=\sigma(\mathsf{K}_1,\dots,\mathsf{K}_k) and G2=σ(Kk+1)\mathcal{G}_2=\sigma(\mathsf{K}_{k+1}) be the generated σ\sigma-algebras. Each Kq\mathsf{K}_q with qkq\le k is G1\mathcal{G}_1-measurable, since by that definition every Kq1(B)\mathsf{K}_q^{-1}(B) with BB Borel and qkq\le k belongs to G1\mathcal{G}_1; so SS, S2S^{2} and S3S^{3} (linear combinations, with the constants μq\mu_q, and powers) are G1\mathcal{G}_1-measurable by claims 1, 2 and 3 of Arithmetic, Absolute Values, and Pointwise Limits of Measurable Real-Valued Functions applied on the measurable space (Ω,G1)(\Omega,\mathcal{G}_1); likewise YY, Y2Y^{2} and Y3Y^{3} are G2\mathcal{G}_2-measurable. Grouping Lemma for Independent Random Variables, applied to the independent family (Kq)1qd(\mathsf{K}_q)_{1\le q\le d} and the disjoint nonempty index sets I1={1,,k}I_1=\{1,\dots,k\}, I2={k+1}I_2=\{k+1\}, shows that G1\mathcal{G}_1 and G2\mathcal{G}_2 are independent and hence that any G1\mathcal{G}_1-measurable random variable is independent of any G2\mathcal{G}_2-measurable one; in particular SiS^{i} and YjY^{j} are independent, and, both having finite expectation (see below), Expectation of a Product of Independent Random Variables gives the claim. Expansion. Pointwise,

(S+aY)4=S4+4aS3Y+6a2S2Y2+4a3SY3+a4Y4,(S+aY)2=S2+2aSY+a2Y2.(S+aY)^{4}=S^{4}+4a\,S^{3}Y+6a^{2}\,S^{2}Y^{2}+4a^{3}\,SY^{3}+a^{4}\,Y^{4},\qquad(S+aY)^{2}=S^{2}+2a\,SY+a^{2}Y^{2}.

By (Hk)(\mathrm{H}_k) and the integrability of Y4Y^{4}, every power SiS^{i} and YjY^{j} with i,j4i,j\le4 has finite expectation (as ti1+t4|t|^{i}\le1+t^{4} for i4i\le4), so the factorisation of the mixed moments applies. Using E[S]=0\mathbb{E}[S]=0 and E[Y]=0\mathbb{E}[Y]=0, E[S2]=vk\mathbb{E}[S^{2}]=v_k, E[Y2]=λ\mathbb{E}[Y^{2}]=\lambda' and E[Y4]=3λ2+λ\mathbb{E}[Y^{4}]=3\lambda'^{2}+\lambda', linearity of the expectation gives that Sk+14S_{k+1}^{4} is integrable, E[Sk+1]=E[S]+aE[Y]=0\mathbb{E}[S_{k+1}]=\mathbb{E}[S]+a\mathbb{E}[Y]=0, E[Sk+12]=vk+0+a2λ=vk+1\mathbb{E}[S_{k+1}^{2}]=v_k+0+a^{2}\lambda'=v_{k+1}, and

E[Sk+14]=E[S4]+0+6a2vkλ+0+a4(3λ2+λ)3vk2+Fk+6a2λvk+3a4λ2+a4λ=3(vk+a2λ)2+Fk+a4λ=3vk+12+Fk+1,\mathbb{E}[S_{k+1}^{4}]=\mathbb{E}[S^{4}]+0+6a^{2}v_k\lambda'+0+a^{4}(3\lambda'^{2}+\lambda')\le3v_k^{2}+\mathsf{F}_k+6a^{2}\lambda'v_k+3a^{4}\lambda'^{2}+a^{4}\lambda'=3\,(v_k+a^{2}\lambda')^{2}+\mathsf{F}_k+a^{4}\lambda'=3v_{k+1}^{2}+\mathsf{F}_{k+1},

which is (Hk+1)(\mathrm{H}_{k+1}). Taking k=dk=d gives the three assertions of claim 3 for α(Kμ)=Sd\alpha\cdot(\mathsf{K}-\mu)=S_d. The final consequence for k4\mathsf{k}_4 of Mean-Square Assembly of the Estimand Linearisation on the Synthetic Copy: Approximation of the Recentred Copy Endpoint by an Affine Function of the Parameter follows because, in an instance as described in the statement, k44=E[(α(Kμ))4]\mathsf{k}_4^{4}=\mathbb{E}[(\alpha\cdot(\mathsf{K}-\mu))^{4}] there with the same cell-count vector and cell lengths, and its vector α\alpha of cell coefficients is an element of Rd\mathbb{R}^d, to which the bound just proved applies. \blacksquare

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…