TheoremBase

Proof

Fix x,y∈Cx,y\in C and t∈Rt\in\mathbb{R} with 0≤t0\le t and t≤1t\le1, and put z=t x+(1−t) yz=t\,x+(1-t)\,y, a point of CC because CC is convex. Translating t≤1t\le1 by −t-t using claim 3 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field gives 0≤1−t0\le 1-t. Claim 5 of that lemma is used for multiplication of an inequality by a nonnegative element, and claim 3 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field for adding two inequalities; the field axioms of the field R\mathbb{R} are used for regrouping, together with the identity t c+(1−t) c=(t+(1−t))c=ct\,c+(1-t)\,c=\bigl(t+(1-t)\bigr)c=c valid for every c∈Rc\in\mathbb{R}.

Claim 1. By claim 5 of Bilinearity and Symmetry of the Dot Product on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, applied to the sum and then to each scalar multiple,

p⋅z=p⋅(t x)+p⋅((1−t) y)=t (p⋅x)+(1−t) (p⋅y).p\cdot z=p\cdot\bigl(t\,x\bigr)+p\cdot\bigl((1-t)\,y\bigr)=t\,(p\cdot x)+(1-t)\,(p\cdot y).

Adding c=t c+(1−t) cc=t\,c+(1-t)\,c and regrouping gives

ℓ(z)=t (p⋅x+c)+(1−t) (p⋅y+c)=t ℓ(x)+(1−t) ℓ(y),\ell(z)=t\,\bigl(p\cdot x+c\bigr)+(1-t)\,\bigl(p\cdot y+c\bigr)=t\,\ell(x)+(1-t)\,\ell(y),

and an equality is in particular an inequality ≤\le, so ℓ\ell is convex on CC.

Claim 2. Convexity of ff and of gg gives f(z)≤t f(x)+(1−t) f(y)f(z)\le t\,f(x)+(1-t)\,f(y) and g(z)≤t g(x)+(1−t) g(y)g(z)\le t\,g(x)+(1-t)\,g(y). Adding the two inequalities and regrouping with distributivity,

(f+g)(z)=f(z)+g(z)≤t (f(x)+g(x))+(1−t) (f(y)+g(y))=t (f+g)(x)+(1−t) (f+g)(y).(f+g)(z)=f(z)+g(z)\le t\,\bigl(f(x)+g(x)\bigr)+(1-t)\,\bigl(f(y)+g(y)\bigr)=t\,(f+g)(x)+(1-t)\,(f+g)(y).

Claim 3. Multiplying f(z)≤t f(x)+(1−t) f(y)f(z)\le t\,f(x)+(1-t)\,f(y) by the nonnegative element μ\mu and regrouping with distributivity, commutativity and associativity of multiplication,

(μf)(z)=μ f(z)≤t (μ f(x))+(1−t) (μ f(y))=t (μf)(x)+(1−t) (μf)(y).(\mu f)(z)=\mu\,f(z)\le t\,\bigl(\mu\,f(x)\bigr)+(1-t)\,\bigl(\mu\,f(y)\bigr)=t\,(\mu f)(x)+(1-t)\,(\mu f)(y).

Claim 4. For each x∈Cx\in C the set {f(x):f∈F}\{f(x):f\in\mathcal{F}\} is nonempty, because F\mathcal{F} is nonempty, and is bounded above by hypothesis, so it has a least upper bound by the least upper bound property of The Real Numbers; that least upper bound is unique by Uniqueness of the Supremum and of the Infimum, so FF is well defined.

Let f∈Ff\in\mathcal{F}. Since F(x)F(x) and F(y)F(y) are upper bounds of the respective sets, f(x)≤F(x)f(x)\le F(x) and f(y)≤F(y)f(y)\le F(y) in the sense of Upper Bound and Least Upper Bound. Multiplying these by the nonnegative elements tt and 1−t1-t and adding gives

t f(x)+(1−t) f(y)≤t F(x)+(1−t) F(y),t\,f(x)+(1-t)\,f(y)\le t\,F(x)+(1-t)\,F(y),

and convexity of ff together with transitivity of ≤\le gives f(z)≤t F(x)+(1−t) F(y)f(z)\le t\,F(x)+(1-t)\,F(y). As f∈Ff\in\mathcal{F} was arbitrary, t F(x)+(1−t) F(y)t\,F(x)+(1-t)\,F(y) is an upper bound of {f(z):f∈F}\{f(z):f\in\mathcal{F}\}, so the least upper bound F(z)F(z) of that set satisfies

F(z)≤t F(x)+(1−t) F(y).F(z)\le t\,F(x)+(1-t)\,F(y).

Hence FF is convex on CC.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…