TheoremBase

Proof of Plan Jets at a Common Realisation: Superdifferential and Subdifferential Momenta are Close, and the Plan Jets of a Constant

lemmalem:nc-plan-jets-graph-constants-2026a
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron ·
Verified by 0 users · Flagged by 0 users
· 3,372 chars · 9 deps · depth 36 Reason: F2b: proof of the common-realisation jet lemma.

Test both jet inequalities along X + t(G - P); for constants test along X -/+ tP and use Cauchy-Schwarz.

Proof

Each result cited is universally quantified over the data in its own statement. For L2L^{2} dd-tuples of one tracial W*-probability space, sums and real multiples are those of HdH^{d} and ⟨⋅,⋅⟩2\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{2} is the inner product of HdH^{d} with norm ∥⋅∥2\lVert\cdot\rVert_{2} (Sums, Real Multiples and the Pairing of Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space §operations, Sums, Real Multiples and the Pairing of Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space §pairing); so bilinearity over R\mathbb{R} and the Cauchy--Schwarz inequality ∣⟨Y,Z⟩2∣≤∥Y∥2∥Z∥2|\langle Y,Z\rangle_{2}|\le\lVert Y\rVert_{2}\lVert Z\rVert_{2} hold (Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in a Complex Inner Product Space). Lifts satisfy uM(Y)=u(law(Y))u_{M}(Y)=u(\mathrm{law}(Y)) (Lifts of Functions on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws to Square-Integrable Tuples §lift).

Claim 1. Put D=G−PD=G-P and fix η>0\eta>0. By Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §super and Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §sub there are r1,r2>0r_{1},r_{2}>0 such that, for every L2L^{2} dd-tuple X′X' of (H,M,Ω)(H,M,\Omega) with ∥X′−X∥2<min⁡{r1,r2}\lVert X'-X\rVert_{2}<\min\{r_{1},r_{2}\} (the realisations (X,P,X′)(X,P,X') and (X,G,X′)(X,G,X') being admissible, since law(X,P)\mathrm{law}(X,P) and law(X,G)\mathrm{law}(X,G) are the given plans),

uM(X′)≤u(μ)+⟨P,X′−X⟩2+(δ+η)∥X′−X∥2,uM(X′)≥u(μ)+⟨G,X′−X⟩2−(δ′+η)∥X′−X∥2.u_{M}(X')\le u(\mu)+\langle P,X'-X\rangle_{2}+(\delta+\eta)\lVert X'-X\rVert_{2},\qquad u_{M}(X')\ge u(\mu)+\langle G,X'-X\rangle_{2}-(\delta'+\eta)\lVert X'-X\rVert_{2}.

If D=0D=0 there is nothing to prove. Otherwise take X′=X+tDX'=X+tD with real t>0t>0 and t∥D∥2<min⁡{r1,r2}t\lVert D\rVert_{2}<\min\{r_{1},r_{2}\}. Subtracting the two inequalities gives t⟨G−P,D⟩2≤(δ+δ′+2η)t∥D∥2t\langle G-P,D\rangle_{2}\le(\delta+\delta'+2\eta)t\lVert D\rVert_{2}, i.e. ∥D∥22≤(δ+δ′+2η)∥D∥2\lVert D\rVert_{2}^{2}\le(\delta+\delta'+2\eta)\lVert D\rVert_{2}, hence ∥D∥2≤δ+δ′+2η\lVert D\rVert_{2}\le\delta+\delta'+2\eta. As η>0\eta>0 was arbitrary, ∥P−G∥2≤δ+δ′\lVert P-G\rVert_{2}\le\delta+\delta' by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-above.

Claim 2. Let π\pi be a plan at μ\mu. For every realisation (X,P)(X,P) of π\pi in any tracial W*-probability space, ∥P∥22=M^(law(P))=M^(pr#2π)\lVert P\rVert_{2}^{2}=\widehat{M}(\mathrm{law}(P))=\widehat{M}(\mathrm{pr}^{2}_{\#}\pi) by Calculus of Laws of Square-Integrable Tuples: Bounded Tuples, the Lipschitz Bound, Moments, Affine Push-Forwards, Couplings and Embeddings §moments and Calculus of Laws of Square-Integrable Tuples: Bounded Tuples, the Lipschitz Bound, Moments, Affine Push-Forwards, Couplings and Embeddings §push-forward (the entries of pr2(X,P)\mathrm{pr}^{2}(X,P) being those of PP, Square-Integrable Tuples in a Tracial W*-Probability Space: Their Norm, Affine Images, Pairs, Embedded Images and Laws §operations). So the third condition says ∥P∥2≤δ\lVert P\rVert_{2}\le\delta for every realisation (Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field).

Third ⇒\Rightarrow first and second. If ∥P∥2≤δ\lVert P\rVert_{2}\le\delta, then for every X′X', by Cauchy--Schwarz, uM(X′)=c=u(μ)u_{M}(X')=c=u(\mu) lies between c+⟨P,X′−X⟩2−δ∥X′−X∥2c+\langle P,X'-X\rangle_{2}-\delta\lVert X'-X\rVert_{2} and c+⟨P,X′−X⟩2+δ∥X′−X∥2c+\langle P,X'-X\rangle_{2}+\delta\lVert X'-X\rVert_{2}; so π\pi satisfies both defining inequalities with any η>0\eta>0 and any r>0r>0.

First ⇒\Rightarrow third. By Every Square-Integrable Noncommutative Law is the Law of a Square-Integrable Tuple; Realisation of Couplings and of Almost Optimal Pairs §coupling there is a realisation (X,P)(X,P) of π\pi. Fix η>0\eta>0, let rr be as in Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §super, and suppose P≠0P\ne0. With X′=X−tPX'=X-tP, 0<t∥P∥2<r0<t\lVert P\rVert_{2}<r, the superdifferential inequality reads c≤c−t∥P∥22+(δ+η)t∥P∥2c\le c-t\lVert P\rVert_{2}^{2}+(\delta+\eta)t\lVert P\rVert_{2}, so ∥P∥2≤δ+η\lVert P\rVert_{2}\le\delta+\eta. Hence ∥P∥2≤δ\lVert P\rVert_{2}\le\delta by Comparison of Real Numbers with Arbitrary Positive Slack §slack-above; this also holds if P=0P=0.

Second ⇒\Rightarrow third. The same argument with X′=X+tPX'=X+tP and Plan Superdifferentials, Plan Subdifferentials and Plan Jets with Slack on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws §sub gives c≥c+t∥P∥22−(δ+η)t∥P∥2c\ge c+t\lVert P\rVert_{2}^{2}-(\delta+\eta)t\lVert P\rVert_{2}, hence again ∥P∥2≤δ\lVert P\rVert_{2}\le\delta (trivially so if P=0P=0).

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Comments

Loading…