TheoremBase

A minimising sequence is Cauchy by the parallelogram law and convexity, so it converges in the complete space to a point of the closed set K; uniqueness and the variational inequality follow from the parallelogram law and a first-variation argument, and nonexpansiveness by adding the two variational inequalities.

Proof

We use the notation and claims of Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space and The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity; d(x,y)=∣x−y∣d(x,y)=|x-y| is the metric of HH. Real-number facts are taken from Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field and Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field. The proof uses countable choice in claim 1 to select a minimising sequence.

Claim 1. Fix x∈Hx\in H. The set S={∣x−y∣:y∈K}S=\{|x-y|:y\in K\} of real numbers is nonempty since KK is, and bounded below by 00; let δ=inf⁡S\delta=\inf S, which exists by Existence of the Infimum of a Nonempty Subset of R\mathbb{R} Bounded Below and satisfies 0≤δ0\le\delta (a lower bound is at most the greatest one).

A minimising sequence. For m∈Nm\in\mathbb{N} put ηm=min⁡(1, (m(2δ+1))−1)\eta_{m}=\min\bigl(1,\ (m(2\delta+1))^{-1}\bigr), a positive number (Minimum of Two Elements of a Totally Ordered Set; positivity of mm and 2δ+12\delta+1 and claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field). By claim 4 of Approximation Property of the Supremum and the Infimum in R\mathbb{R} there is ym∈Ky_{m}\in K with ∣x−ym∣<δ+ηm|x-y_{m}|<\delta+\eta_{m}; fix one such ymy_{m} for every mm (countable choice). Since 0≤∣x−ym∣0\le|x-y_{m}|, claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field gives ∣x−ym∣2≤(δ+ηm)2=δ2+ηm(2δ+ηm)≤δ2+ηm(2δ+1)≤δ2+m−1|x-y_{m}|^{2}\le(\delta+\eta_{m})^{2}=\delta^{2}+\eta_{m}(2\delta+\eta_{m})\le\delta^{2}+\eta_{m}(2\delta+1)\le\delta^{2}+m^{-1}, using ηm≤1\eta_{m}\le 1 and ηm≤(m(2δ+1))−1\eta_{m}\le(m(2\delta+1))^{-1}. Also δ≤∣x−ym∣\delta\le|x-y_{m}|, so δ2≤∣x−ym∣2\delta^{2}\le|x-y_{m}|^{2}.

The sequence is Cauchy. Let m,n∈Nm,n\in\mathbb{N} and put u=x−ymu=x-y_{m}, v=x−ynv=x-y_{n}. By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (vi), ∣u−v∣2=2∣u∣2+2∣v∣2−∣u+v∣2|u-v|^{2}=2|u|^{2}+2|v|^{2}-|u+v|^{2}. Here u−v=yn−ymu-v=y_{n}-y_{m} and u+v=2(x−12(ym+yn))u+v=2\bigl(x-\tfrac12(y_{m}+y_{n})\bigr), where 12(ym+yn)=12ym+(1−12)yn∈K\tfrac12(y_{m}+y_{n})=\tfrac12 y_{m}+(1-\tfrac12)y_{n}\in K by convexity; hence ∣u+v∣2=4 ∣x−12(ym+yn)∣2≥4δ2|u+v|^{2}=4\,|x-\tfrac12(y_{m}+y_{n})|^{2}\ge 4\delta^{2} by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv) and the definition of δ\delta as a lower bound of SS (squaring by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field). Therefore

∣yn−ym∣2≤2(δ2+m−1)+2(δ2+n−1)−4δ2=2m−1+2n−1.|y_{n}-y_{m}|^{2}\le 2(\delta^{2}+m^{-1})+2(\delta^{2}+n^{-1})-4\delta^{2}=2m^{-1}+2n^{-1}.

We note that for m,N∈Nm,N\in\mathbb{N} with N≤mN\le m one has m−1≤N−1m^{-1}\le N^{-1} in R\mathbb{R} (natural numbers being read in R\mathbb{R} through the canonical map as in The Real Numbers and Standard Notation): 0<N0<N and 0<m0<m in R\mathbb{R} by claim 3 of Properties of the Canonical Map from the Natural Numbers to an Ordered Field, and N≤mN\le m holds in R\mathbb{R} by claim 6 there when N≠mN\ne m and trivially when N=mN=m; both inverses exist and are positive by claim 7 of Elementary Order Arithmetic in an Ordered Field, and multiplying N≤mN\le m by the nonnegative number m−1N−1m^{-1}N^{-1} (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives m−1=m−1N−1N≤m−1N−1m=N−1m^{-1}=m^{-1}N^{-1}N\le m^{-1}N^{-1}m=N^{-1}. Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose by claim 3 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers an N∈NN\in\mathbb{N} with N−1<ε2/4N^{-1}<\varepsilon^{2}/4; for m,n≥Nm,n\ge N we have m−1≤N−1m^{-1}\le N^{-1} and n−1≤N−1n^{-1}\le N^{-1}, so ∣yn−ym∣2<ε2|y_{n}-y_{m}|^{2}<\varepsilon^{2} and hence ∣yn−ym∣<ε|y_{n}-y_{m}|<\varepsilon by claim 1 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Thus (ym)(y_{m}) is a Cauchy sequence in (H,d)(H,d).

Its limit is a nearest point. Since (H,d)(H,d) is complete by Real Hilbert Spaces (i), (ym)(y_{m}) converges to some z∈Hz\in H, and z∈Kz\in K because KK is closed, by Sequential Characterization of Closed Subsets of a Metric Space. By The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (iv) and The Norm Metric of a Real Inner Product Space: Triangle Inequalities, Limits and Continuity (v), the real sequence (∣x−ym∣)(|x-y_{m}|) converges to ∣x−z∣|x-z|, hence (∣x−ym∣2)(|x-y_{m}|^{2}) converges to ∣x−z∣2|x-z|^{2} by claim 2 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences. The real sequence (m−1)(m^{-1}) converges to 00: given ε>0\varepsilon>0, claim 3 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers gives NN with 0<N−1<ε0<N^{-1}<\varepsilon, and ∣m−1−0∣=m−1≤N−1<ε|m^{-1}-0|=m^{-1}\le N^{-1}<\varepsilon for m≥Nm\ge N by the monotonicity noted above. Hence (δ2+m−1)(\delta^{2}+m^{-1}) converges to δ2\delta^{2} by claim 1 of Arithmetic of Limits of Real Sequences (the constant sequence (δ2)(\delta^{2}) converging to δ2\delta^{2}). Since δ2≤∣x−ym∣2≤δ2+m−1\delta^{2}\le|x-y_{m}|^{2}\le\delta^{2}+m^{-1} for all mm, claim 2 of Order Properties of Limits of Real Sequences shows that (∣x−ym∣2)(|x-y_{m}|^{2}) converges to δ2\delta^{2}, and by claim 1 of Uniqueness of Limits and Boundedness of Convergent Real Sequences its limit ∣x−z∣2|x-z|^{2} equals δ2\delta^{2}; then ∣x−z∣=δ|x-z|=\delta by claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, both numbers being nonnegative. As δ\delta is a lower bound of SS, ∣x−z∣≤∣x−y∣|x-z|\le|x-y| for every y∈Ky\in K.

Uniqueness. Let z,z′∈Kz,z'\in K both satisfy the nearest-point property. Any nearest point zz satisfies ∣x−z∣≤∣x−y∣|x-z|\le|x-y| for all y∈Ky\in K, so ∣x−z∣|x-z| is a lower bound of SS that belongs to SS; being a lower bound it is at most δ\delta, and being an element of SS it is at least δ\delta, so ∣x−z∣=δ|x-z|=\delta, and likewise ∣x−z′∣=δ|x-z'|=\delta. The parallelogram law with u=x−zu=x-z, v=x−z′v=x-z' and convexity give, exactly as above, ∣z−z′∣2=2δ2+2δ2−4∣x−12(z+z′)∣2≤4δ2−4δ2=0|z-z'|^{2}=2\delta^{2}+2\delta^{2}-4|x-\tfrac12(z+z')|^{2}\le 4\delta^{2}-4\delta^{2}=0; together with 0≤∣z−z′∣20\le|z-z'|^{2} this gives ∣z−z′∣2=0=02|z-z'|^{2}=0=0^{2}, hence ∣z−z′∣=0|z-z'|=0 by claim 3 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field, and z=z′z=z' by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iii). We denote the unique nearest point by PKxP_{K}x.

Claim 2. Let x∈Hx\in H and z∈Kz\in K.

Suppose first that z=PKxz=P_{K}x, and let y∈Ky\in K. For real tt with 0<t≤10<t\le 1 the point yt=z+t(y−z)=t y+(1−t) zy_{t}=z+t(y-z)=t\,y+(1-t)\,z lies in KK by convexity, so ∣x−z∣2≤∣x−yt∣2|x-z|^{2}\le|x-y_{t}|^{2} (squaring the nearest-point inequality). By Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (v), Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i) and Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv),

∣x−yt∣2=∣(x−z)−t(y−z)∣2=∣x−z∣2−2t⟨x−z,y−z⟩+t2∣y−z∣2,|x-y_{t}|^{2}=|(x-z)-t(y-z)|^{2}=|x-z|^{2}-2t\langle x-z,y-z\rangle+t^{2}|y-z|^{2},

so 2t⟨x−z,y−z⟩≤t2∣y−z∣22t\langle x-z,y-z\rangle\le t^{2}|y-z|^{2}, and dividing by 2t>02t>0 (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field with the positive multiplier (2t)−1(2t)^{-1}) yields ⟨x−z,y−z⟩≤t2∣y−z∣2\langle x-z,y-z\rangle\le\tfrac{t}{2}|y-z|^{2} for every tt with 0<t≤10<t\le 1. If we had ⟨x−z,y−z⟩>0\langle x-z,y-z\rangle>0, then choosing such a tt with t2∣y−z∣2<⟨x−z,y−z⟩\tfrac{t}{2}|y-z|^{2}<\langle x-z,y-z\rangle (possible by claim 3 of The Archimedean Property of the Real Numbers applied to ε=⟨x−z,y−z⟩/(∣y−z∣2+1)\varepsilon=\langle x-z,y-z\rangle/(|y-z|^{2}+1) and t=n−1t=n^{-1}, since t2∣y−z∣2≤t(∣y−z∣2+1)\tfrac{t}{2}|y-z|^{2}\le t(|y-z|^{2}+1)) would contradict this. Hence ⟨x−z,y−z⟩≤0\langle x-z,y-z\rangle\le 0.

Conversely suppose ⟨x−z,y−z⟩≤0\langle x-z,y-z\rangle\le 0 for every y∈Ky\in K. For y∈Ky\in K, by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (v),

∣x−y∣2=∣(x−z)−(y−z)∣2=∣x−z∣2−2⟨x−z,y−z⟩+∣y−z∣2≥∣x−z∣2,|x-y|^{2}=|(x-z)-(y-z)|^{2}=|x-z|^{2}-2\langle x-z,y-z\rangle+|y-z|^{2}\ge|x-z|^{2},

so ∣x−z∣≤∣x−y∣|x-z|\le|x-y| by claim 2 of Monotonicity of Squaring on the Nonnegative Elements of an Ordered Field. Thus zz has the nearest-point property, and z=PKxz=P_{K}x by the uniqueness in claim 1.

Claim 3. If x∈Kx\in K, then ∣x−x∣=0≤∣x−y∣|x-x|=0\le|x-y| for every y∈Ky\in K, so xx has the nearest-point property and PKx=xP_{K}x=x by uniqueness. Conversely PKx∈KP_{K}x\in K by definition.

Claim 4. Let x,x′∈Hx,x'\in H, z=PKxz=P_{K}x and z′=PKx′z'=P_{K}x'. By claim 2 applied to xx with y=z′y=z' and to x′x' with y=zy=z: ⟨x−z,z′−z⟩≤0\langle x-z,z'-z\rangle\le 0 and ⟨x′−z′,z−z′⟩≤0\langle x'-z',z-z'\rangle\le 0. Since z−z′=−(z′−z)z-z'=-(z'-z), the second reads −⟨x′−z′,z′−z⟩≤0-\langle x'-z',z'-z\rangle\le 0 by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (i). Adding the two inequalities (compatibility of the order with addition, an axiom of Ordered Field, applied twice, and transitivity) and using bilinearity,

0≥⟨(x−z)−(x′−z′), z′−z⟩=⟨x−x′,z′−z⟩+⟨z′−z,z′−z⟩=⟨x−x′,z′−z⟩+∣z−z′∣2,0\ge\langle(x-z)-(x'-z'),\,z'-z\rangle=\langle x-x',z'-z\rangle+\langle z'-z,z'-z\rangle=\langle x-x',z'-z\rangle+|z-z'|^{2},

where ∣z′−z∣=∣z−z′∣|z'-z|=|z-z'| by Elementary Identities in a Real Inner Product Space (iv). Hence ∣z−z′∣2≤−⟨x−x′,z′−z⟩=⟨x−x′,z−z′⟩≤∣x−x′∣ ∣z−z′∣|z-z'|^{2}\le-\langle x-x',z'-z\rangle=\langle x-x',z-z'\rangle\le|x-x'|\,|z-z'| by claim 3 of Properties of the Absolute Value in an Ordered Field and The Cauchy–Schwarz Inequality in a Real Inner Product Space. If ∣z−z′∣=0|z-z'|=0 the claim holds since 0≤∣x−x′∣0\le|x-x'|. Otherwise ∣z−z′∣>0|z-z'|>0 and multiplying by its inverse (claim 5 of Elementary Arithmetic in an Ordered Field) gives ∣z−z′∣≤∣x−x′∣|z-z'|\le|x-x'|.

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Uses0

Loading…

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…