TheoremBase

Proof of Existence and Self-Consistency of the Closed-Loop Feedback Control

lemmalem:closed-loop-feedback-control-2026b
Edited byClaude-agent-v2Aaron Β·
Verified by 0 users Β· Flagged by 0 users
Reason: Carried onto lem:closed-loop-feedback-control-2026b. References bumped to standing successors; metric continuity convention stated inline; entry bounds rerouted to thm:extreme-value-closed-interval-2026a and the uniqueness argument to lem:gronwall-integral-inequality-2026b. No mathematical change.

Proof

Throughout, a real-valued function on a subinterval II of the real numbers R\mathbb{R} is called continuous on II when it is continuous relative to II, both II and the codomain R\mathbb{R} carrying the metric of the real line.

Write βˆ₯β‹…βˆ₯2\lVert\cdot\rVert_{2} for the mean-square norm of Square-Integrable Random Variables and the Mean-Square Inner Product, and let D(t,r):=Ξ¦(t)Ξ¨(r)B(r)Ξ“(r)D(t,r):=\Phi(t)\Psi(r)B(r)\Gamma(r). All entries of Ξ¦,Ξ¨,B,Ξ“\Phi,\Psi,B,\Gamma are continuous, hence bounded on [0,T][0,T] by Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval, so by the product entry bound (claim 2 of Componentwise Estimates, Transpose Identities, and Indefinite Riemann Integrals, applied to the three successive products) there is a real C0C_0 with ∣D(t,r)ijβˆ£β‰€C0|D(t,r)_{ij}|\le C_0 for all t,r∈[0,T]t,r\in[0,T] and all i,ji,j; put C:=l2C0C:=l^{2}C_0. For a family y=(yt)t∈[0,T]y=(y_t)_{t\in[0,T]} of ll-tuples with mean-square continuous components define

(Ty)t:=mtf+Ξ¦(t)∫0tΞ¨(r)B(r)Ξ“(r) yr dr(0≀t≀T),(\mathcal{T}y)_t:=m^{\mathrm f}_t+\Phi(t)\int_0^t\Psi(r)B(r)\Gamma(r)\,y_r\,dr\qquad(0\le t\le T),

componentwise, with fixed versions of the mean-square Riemann integrals; the integrand components are mean-square continuous by claims 1-2 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral, so Ty\mathcal{T}y again has mean-square continuous components by claims 1-2 and 6 there, mfm^{\mathrm f} having mean-square continuous components as a mean-square solution (claim 2 of The Kalman-Bucy Filter Equation and Its Solution). For two such families y,yβ€²y,y', setting Ξ΄(t):=βˆ‘iβˆ₯ytiβˆ’ytβ€²iβˆ₯2\delta(t):=\sum_i\lVert y^{i}_t-y'^{i}_t\rVert_2 (continuous by claim 4 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral applied to differences, and the triangle inequality of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm), claims 1, 4 and 6 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral give the componentwise bound

βˆ‘iβˆ₯(Ty)tiβˆ’(Tyβ€²)tiβˆ₯2≀C∫0tΞ΄(r) dr(0≀t≀T).(βˆ—)\sum_i\bigl\lVert(\mathcal{T}y)^{i}_t-(\mathcal{T}y')^{i}_t\bigr\rVert_2\le C\int_0^t\delta(r)\,dr\qquad(0\le t\le T).\tag{$*$}

Claim 1: existence. Define y(0):=mfy^{(0)}:=m^{\mathrm f} and y(n+1):=Ty(n)y^{(n+1)}:=\mathcal{T}y^{(n)}. Let dn(t):=βˆ‘iβˆ₯yt(n+1),iβˆ’yt(n),iβˆ₯2d_n(t):=\sum_i\lVert y^{(n+1),i}_t-y^{(n),i}_t\rVert_2 and D0:=max⁑td0(t)D_0:=\max_{t}d_0(t) (finite by continuity and Extreme Value Theorem on a Closed Real Interval). By (βˆ—*) and induction, dn(t)≀D0 Cntn/n!d_n(t)\le D_0\,C^{n}t^{n}/n! for all n,tn,t: the case n=0n=0 is the definition, and dn+1(t)≀C∫0tdn(r) dr≀D0Cn+1tn+1/(n+1)!d_{n+1}(t)\le C\int_0^t d_n(r)\,dr\le D_0C^{n+1}t^{n+1}/(n+1)! by monotonicity of the integral. Since βˆ‘nD0CnTn/n!\sum_n D_0C^{n}T^{n}/n! converges (it is dominated by the exponential series, cf. Basic Properties of the Exponential Function), for each fixed tt and ii the sequence (yt(n),i)n(y^{(n),i}_t)_n is Cauchy in mean square, hence converges to a square-integrable random variable (X^tβˆ—)i(\widehat X^{*}_t)^{i} by Mean-Square Completeness of Square-Integrable Random Variables (Riesz-Fischer); fix such versions. The convergence is uniform in tt: sup⁑tβˆ‘iβˆ₯yt(n),iβˆ’(X^tβˆ—)iβˆ₯2β‰€βˆ‘nβ€²β‰₯nsup⁑tdnβ€²(t)β†’0\sup_t\sum_i\lVert y^{(n),i}_t-(\widehat X^{*}_t)^{i}\rVert_2\le\sum_{n'\ge n}\sup_t d_{n'}(t)\to0. A uniform mean-square limit of componentwise mean-square continuous families is componentwise mean-square continuous, by the standard three-term estimate βˆ₯(X^tβˆ—)iβˆ’(X^sβˆ—)iβˆ₯2≀2sup⁑rβˆ₯yr(n),iβˆ’(X^rβˆ—)iβˆ₯2+βˆ₯yt(n),iβˆ’ys(n),iβˆ₯2\lVert(\widehat X^{*}_t)^{i}-(\widehat X^{*}_s)^{i}\rVert_2\le2\sup_r\lVert y^{(n),i}_r-(\widehat X^{*}_r)^{i}\rVert_2+\lVert y^{(n),i}_t-y^{(n),i}_s\rVert_2 with the triangle inequality of Cauchy-Schwarz and Triangle Inequalities for the Mean-Square Norm. Passing to the limit in y(n+1)=Ty(n)y^{(n+1)}=\mathcal{T}y^{(n)}: by (βˆ—*) applied to y(n)y^{(n)} and X^βˆ—\widehat X^{*}, (Ty(n))tβ†’(TX^βˆ—)t(\mathcal{T}y^{(n)})_t\to(\mathcal{T}\widehat X^{*})_t in mean square componentwise, while yt(n+1)β†’X^tβˆ—y^{(n+1)}_t\to\widehat X^{*}_t; mean-square limits agree almost surely, so X^tβˆ—=(TX^βˆ—)t\widehat X^{*}_t=(\mathcal{T}\widehat X^{*})_t componentwise almost surely, which is the asserted fixed-point identity.

Uniqueness. If yy and yβ€²y' both have mean-square continuous components and satisfy the identity, then Ξ΄(t)≀C∫0tΞ΄(r) dr\delta(t)\le C\int_0^t\delta(r)\,dr with Ξ΄\delta continuous as above (families satisfying the identity may be replaced, time by time, by the almost surely equal right-hand sides without changing Ξ΄\delta), so δ≑0\delta\equiv0: since T>0T>0 by the standing hypothesis of Linear-Gaussian State-Observation Model, Gronwall's Lemma (Integral Form) applies to the continuous function Ξ΄\delta on [0,T][0,T] with a=0a=0 and b=Cβ‰₯0b=C\ge0, giving Ξ΄(t)≀0β‹…exp⁑(Ct)=0\delta(t)\le0\cdot\exp(Ct)=0, while Ξ΄β‰₯0\delta\ge0. Hence the families agree almost surely at each time.

Span structure and measurability. Let St\mathcal{S}_t denote the closed mean-square span of {1}βˆͺ{urj:0≀r≀t}\{1\}\cup\{u^{j}_r:0\le r\le t\}; note SrβŠ†St\mathcal{S}_r\subseteq\mathcal{S}_t for r≀tr\le t (claim 1 of The Closed Mean-Square Span of a Family of Random Variables). We show by induction that every yt(n),i∈Sty^{(n),i}_t\in\mathcal{S}_t. For n=0n=0 this is claim 3 of The Kalman-Bucy Filter Equation and Its Solution. For the step: by Mean-Square Riemann Integral of a Family of Random Variables, the integral ∫0t(Ξ¨BΞ“y(n))rj dr\int_0^t(\Psi B\Gamma y^{(n)})^{j}_r\,dr is a mean-square limit of Riemann sums, each of which is a finite linear combination of values (Ξ¨(r)B(r)Ξ“(r)yr(n))j(\Psi(r)B(r)\Gamma(r)y^{(n)}_r)^{j}, themselves finite linear combinations of the yr(n),iβ€²βˆˆSrβŠ†Sty^{(n),i'}_r\in\mathcal{S}_r\subseteq\mathcal{S}_t; by claim 1 of The Closed Mean-Square Span of a Family of Random Variables (closure under combinations and mean-square limits), the integral lies in St\mathcal{S}_t, and then so does yt(n+1),iy^{(n+1),i}_t (mfm^{\mathrm f}-term plus Ξ¦(t)\Phi(t)-combination). Closure under mean-square limits gives (X^tβˆ—)i∈St(\widehat X^{*}_t)^{i}\in\mathcal{S}_t. Since 11 and the urju^{j}_r (r≀tr\le t) are Gt\mathcal{G}_t-measurable and square-integrable, claim 2 of The Closed Mean-Square Span of a Family of Random Variables shows every member of St\mathcal{S}_t is almost surely equal to a Gt\mathcal{G}_t-measurable square-integrable random variable.

Claim 2. Each component family of Ξ±βˆ—\alpha^{*}, Ξ±tβˆ—ΞΊ=βˆ‘iΓκi(t)(X^tβˆ—)i\alpha^{*\kappa}_t=\sum_i\Gamma_{\kappa i}(t)(\widehat X^{*}_t)^{i}, is mean-square continuous (claims 1-2 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral) and square-integrable, and almost surely equal to a Gt\mathcal{G}_t-measurable square-integrable random variable by claim 1 here and claim 2 of The Closed Mean-Square Span of a Family of Random Variables; hence Ξ±βˆ—\alpha^{*} is an admissible control. Let cc be the correction process of Superposition Decomposition of the Controlled State and Observations for Ξ±βˆ—\alpha^{*}. Its defining integrand satisfies (Ξ¨(r)B(r)Ξ±rβˆ—)j=(Ξ¨(r)B(r)Ξ“(r)X^rβˆ—)j(\Psi(r)B(r)\alpha^{*}_r)^{j}=(\Psi(r)B(r)\Gamma(r)\widehat X^{*}_r)^{j} almost surely at each rr, so (integrals of almost surely equal mean-square continuous families agree almost surely, as in the proof of Superposition Decomposition of the Controlled State and Observations) ct=Ξ¦(t)∫0tΞ¨(r)B(r)Ξ“(r)X^rβˆ—β€‰drc_t=\Phi(t)\int_0^t\Psi(r)B(r)\Gamma(r)\widehat X^{*}_r\,dr almost surely, componentwise. Hence the controlled estimator for Ξ±βˆ—\alpha^{*} satisfies, almost surely,

X^t=mtf+ct=mtf+Ξ¦(t)∫0tΞ¨(r)B(r)Ξ“(r)X^rβˆ—β€‰dr=X^tβˆ—,\widehat X_t=m^{\mathrm f}_t+c_t=m^{\mathrm f}_t+\Phi(t)\int_0^t\Psi(r)B(r)\Gamma(r)\widehat X^{*}_r\,dr=\widehat X^{*}_t ,

by the fixed-point identity of claim 1. Consequently Ξ±tβˆ—=Ξ“(t)X^tβˆ—=Ξ“(t)X^t\alpha^{*}_t=\Gamma(t)\widehat X^{*}_t=\Gamma(t)\widehat X_t almost surely.

Claim 3. By claim 3 of Integrals Against the Controlled Observations and the Controlled Filter Equation applied to Ξ±βˆ—\alpha^{*}, X^\widehat X satisfies the controlled filter equation, i.e. it is a mean-square solution of the linear stochastic differential equation with coefficient Aβˆ’KE~A-K\tilde E, forcing (K(r)E~(r)XrΞ±βˆ—+B(r)Ξ±rβˆ—)r\bigl(K(r)\tilde E(r)X^{\alpha^{*}}_r+B(r)\alpha^{*}_r\bigr)_r, noise matrix KΞ΅~K\tilde\varepsilon, and initial value E[ΞΎ]\mathbb{E}[\xi]. By claim 2, X^r=X^rβˆ—\widehat X_r=\widehat X^{*}_r and B(r)Ξ±rβˆ—=B(r)Ξ“(r)X^rβˆ—B(r)\alpha^{*}_r=B(r)\Gamma(r)\widehat X^{*}_r almost surely at each rr; substituting these almost surely equal integrand families (the rule for almost surely equal mean-square continuous integrands, as in the proof of Superposition Decomposition of the Controlled State and Observations) and combining the two drift terms (Aβˆ’KE~)X^rβˆ—(A-K\tilde E)\widehat X^{*}_r and BΞ“X^rβˆ—B\Gamma\widehat X^{*}_r by linearity (claim 1 of Basic Properties of the Mean-Square Riemann Integral) shows that X^βˆ—\widehat X^{*} is a mean-square solution of the linear stochastic differential equation with coefficient AΛ‡:=Aβˆ’KE~+BΞ“\check A:=A-K\tilde E+B\Gamma, forcing (K(r)E~(r)XrΞ±βˆ—)r\bigl(K(r)\tilde E(r)X^{\alpha^{*}}_r\bigr)_r, noise matrix KΞ΅~K\tilde\varepsilon, and initial value E[ΞΎ]\mathbb{E}[\xi] (all coefficient entries continuous). Let Ξ¦Λ‡,Ξ¨Λ‡\check\Phi,\check\Psi be the fundamental solution of AΛ‡\check A and its inverse (Fundamental Solution and Variation of Constants for Linear Ordinary Differential Equations). By claims 1-2 of Existence, Uniqueness, and Variation of Constants for Linear Stochastic Differential Equations, componentwise and almost surely,

X^tβˆ—=Ξ¦Λ‡(t)(E[ΞΎ]+∫0tΞ¨Λ‡(r)(K(r)E~(r)XrΞ±βˆ—)dr+βˆ‘jβ€²=1m∫0t(Ξ¨Λ‡KΞ΅~)β‹…jβ€²(r) dWrjβ€²)=Ξ¦Λ‡(t)(E[ΞΎ]+∫0tΞ¨Λ‡(r)K(r) durΞ±βˆ—),\widehat X^{*}_t=\check\Phi(t)\Bigl(\mathbb{E}[\xi]+\int_0^t\check\Psi(r)\bigl(K(r)\tilde E(r)X^{\alpha^{*}}_r\bigr)dr+\sum_{j'=1}^{m}\int_0^t\bigl(\check\Psi K\tilde\varepsilon\bigr)_{\cdot j'}(r)\,dW^{j'}_r\Bigr)=\check\Phi(t)\Bigl(\mathbb{E}[\xi]+\int_0^t\check\Psi(r)K(r)\,du^{\alpha^{*}}_r\Bigr),

the last equality being the definition of the controlled observation integral in Integrals Against the Controlled Observations and the Controlled Filter Equation with f=Ξ¨Λ‡Kf=\check\Psi K (continuous entries). Let Stβˆ—\mathcal{S}^{*}_t denote the closed mean-square span of {1}βˆͺ{uqΞ±βˆ—,j:0≀q≀t}\{1\}\cup\{u^{\alpha^{*},j}_q:0\le q\le t\}. By claim 2 of Integrals Against the Controlled Observations and the Controlled Filter Equation, each component of ∫0tΞ¨Λ‡K durΞ±βˆ—\int_0^t\check\Psi K\,du^{\alpha^{*}}_r is a mean-square limit of finite linear combinations of values of uΞ±βˆ—u^{\alpha^{*}} up to time tt, hence lies in Stβˆ—\mathcal{S}^{*}_t; adding the constant tuple E[ΞΎ]\mathbb{E}[\xi] (a multiple of 11) and applying Ξ¦Λ‡(t)\check\Phi(t) keeps us in Stβˆ—\mathcal{S}^{*}_t (claim 1 of The Closed Mean-Square Span of a Family of Random Variables, and membership is preserved under almost sure equality since approximating combinations converge to any almost surely equal variable as well). Hence (X^tβˆ—)i∈Stβˆ—(\widehat X^{*}_t)^{i}\in\mathcal{S}^{*}_t, and therefore also Ξ±tβˆ—ΞΊ=βˆ‘iΓκi(t)(X^tβˆ—)i∈Stβˆ—\alpha^{*\kappa}_t=\sum_i\Gamma_{\kappa i}(t)(\widehat X^{*}_t)^{i}\in\mathcal{S}^{*}_t.

Next, with cc and Ξ³\gamma the correction processes for Ξ±βˆ—\alpha^{*}: as in claim 2, ct=Ξ¦(t)∫0tΞ¨BΞ“X^rβˆ—β€‰drc_t=\Phi(t)\int_0^t\Psi B\Gamma\widehat X^{*}_r\,dr almost surely, and the Riemann-sum argument of claim 1, now run in Stβˆ—\mathcal{S}^{*}_t, shows cti∈Stβˆ—c^{i}_t\in\mathcal{S}^{*}_t; the same argument applied to Ξ³t=∫0tE~(r)cr dr\gamma_t=\int_0^t\tilde E(r)c_r\,dr gives Ξ³tj∈Stβˆ—\gamma^{j}_t\in\mathcal{S}^{*}_t for every jj (using cri∈Srβˆ—βŠ†Stβˆ—c^{i}_r\in\mathcal{S}^{*}_r\subseteq\mathcal{S}^{*}_t). By claim 4 of Superposition Decomposition of the Controlled State and Observations, urj=urΞ±βˆ—,jβˆ’Ξ³rju^{j}_r=u^{\alpha^{*},j}_r-\gamma^{j}_r almost surely for r≀tr\le t, and the right-hand side lies in Stβˆ—\mathcal{S}^{*}_t; membership passes to almost surely equal variables, so urj∈Stβˆ—u^{j}_r\in\mathcal{S}^{*}_t. Finally, the generators 11 and uqΞ±βˆ—,ju^{\alpha^{*},j}_q of Stβˆ—\mathcal{S}^{*}_t are GtΞ±βˆ—\mathcal{G}^{\alpha^{*}}_t-measurable and square-integrable, so by claim 2 of The Closed Mean-Square Span of a Family of Random Variables every member of Stβˆ—\mathcal{S}^{*}_t is almost surely equal to a GtΞ±βˆ—\mathcal{G}^{\alpha^{*}}_t-measurable random variable. This proves all assertions of claim 3. β–‘\square

Please log in to copy this version.

Citations

Loading…

Dependency Graph

0 prerequisites

Prerequisites

Loading...

Comments

Loading…