Projection onto the Span of an Orthonormal Tuple, and Coordinates on a Finite-Dimensional Subspace
lemmaAnalysisLinear Algebralem:finite-dimensional-subspace-hilbert-2026aFor an orthonormal m-tuple e with span M, the map Px = sum <x,e_i> is the orthogonal projection onto M: it is linear, idempotent, nonexpansive, satisfies Bessel's inequality and Pythagoras, M is closed, P x is the nearest point of M, and the coordinate map M -> is a linear isometric bijection.
Let be the ordered field of real numbers, with the notation of that item, and let be the set of natural numbers. Let be a real inner product space with inner product , norm , distance , let , let be an orthonormal -tuple with components , and let be its span, a linear subspace of by claim 1 of The Span of a Finite Family is the Smallest Subspace Containing It and hence a vector space over under the restricted operations by claim 1 of A Linear Subspace is a Vector Space and Inherits an Inner Product. Let be the orthogonal complement of . Sums of vectors are finite sums in and sums of real numbers are finite sums in . Define by
the finite sum of the -tuple with components . Let be Euclidean space, a vector space over by Euclidean Space is a Real Vector Space, with the dot product and the Euclidean norm ; a point is written with real coordinates . Then the following hold.
1. (Projection)¶ is a linear map, for every , for every , and for every .
2. (Bessel and Pythagoras)¶ For every , and ; consequently , and .
3. (Nonexpansiveness)¶ For all , ; in particular is Lipschitz with constant from to .
4. (Closedness)¶ is closed in .
5. (Nearest point)¶ For every and every , . If is a real Hilbert space, then is a closed linear subspace of and , the orthogonal projection onto characterised in Orthogonal Projection onto a Closed Linear Subspace of a Real Hilbert Space §characterisation.
6. (Coordinates)¶ The map given by is a linear bijection, with inverse , and for all ,
Loading…
Prerequisites
No prerequisites tracked.
Dependents
No dependents yet.
Dependent proofs
No dependent proofs yet.
No relations recorded yet.