TheoremBase

Comparison and Uniqueness for the Linear-Quadratic HJB Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws

For bounded Lipschitz drift coefficients and a bounded uniformly continuous running cost, penalised sub- and supersolutions of the linear-quadratic equation compare on the domain of the wall-confined free energy, and solutions are unique there.

Statement

In the setting of The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation, let ff, the affine data bμ=(A(μ),c(μ))b_{\mu}=(A(\mu),c(\mu)) (μ∈Σd2)(\mu\in\Sigma^{2}_{d}) and HLQ\mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{LQ}} be as in The Linear-Quadratic Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws §data, let (ELQ)(\mathrm{E}^{\mathrm{LQ}}) be the equation of The Linear-Quadratic Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws §equation, which is the equation of The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws §score-form with the Hamiltonian H=HLQ\mathcal{H}=\mathcal{H}^{\mathrm{LQ}}, and let D\mathcal{D} be the domain of the wall-confined free energy as in The Discounted Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation with Free Langevin Noise in a Wall on Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §free-energy. Assume that there are reals a≥0a\ge0 and L≥0L\ge0 such that, for all μ,ν∈Σd2\mu,\nu\in\Sigma^{2}_{d} and i,j∈[d]i,j\in[d],

∣A(μ)ij∣≤a,∣c(μ)i∣≤a,∣A(μ)ij−A(ν)ij∣≤L W^2(μ,ν),∣c(μ)i−c(ν)i∣≤L W^2(μ,ν),|A(\mu)_{ij}|\le a,\qquad|c(\mu)_{i}|\le a,\qquad|A(\mu)_{ij}-A(\nu)_{ij}|\le L\,\widehat{W}_{2}(\mu,\nu),\qquad|c(\mu)_{i}-c(\nu)_{i}|\le L\,\widehat{W}_{2}(\mu,\nu),

and that ff is bounded and uniformly continuous on Σd2\Sigma^{2}_{d} with the metric of Plan Jets and Hamiltonians on Square-Integrable Noncommutative Laws: Standing Notation §metrics.

1. (Comparison) Let u,v:Σd2→Ru,v:\Sigma^{2}_{d}\to\mathbb{R} be bounded; let uu be weak-star upper semicontinuous on bounded laws and a free-energy-penalised viscosity subsolution of (ELQ)(\mathrm{E}^{\mathrm{LQ}}), and let vv be weak-star lower semicontinuous on bounded laws and a free-energy-penalised viscosity supersolution of (ELQ)(\mathrm{E}^{\mathrm{LQ}}). Then u(κd(μ))≤v(κd(μ))u(\kappa_{d}(\mu))\le v(\kappa_{d}(\mu)) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

2. (Uniqueness) Any two bounded functions Σd2→R\Sigma^{2}_{d}\to\mathbb{R} that are weak-star continuous on bounded laws and free-energy-penalised viscosity solutions of (ELQ)(\mathrm{E}^{\mathrm{LQ}}) agree at κd(μ)\kappa_{d}(\mu) for every μ∈D\mu\in\mathcal{D}.

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…