TheoremBase

Pathwise Reduction of the Symmetrised Move Information on the Synthetic Copy: Removed-Clock Likelihoods, the Shifted Family, and the Averaging Bound

Statement

Adopt the setting and notation of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, in particular NN, B~\tilde{B}, η\eta, the Poisson mass functions poiμ\mathrm{poi}_\mu, and the σ\sigma-finite reference measure ρ\rho: the probability space (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P) with the driving variables Uic,jU^{c,j}_i, the σ\sigma-algebras U\mathcal{U} and V\mathcal{V}, the event Ω0U\Omega^{U}_0, the cells Ic,jI_{c,j} with lengths μc,j=∣Ic,j∣>0\mu_{c,j}=|I_{c,j}|>0 indexed by the finite set L\mathsf{L} with dd elements, the cell-count vector K\mathsf{K}, the deterministic-count clocks P(y)\mathsf{P}^{(y)} and the copy clocks P♯\mathsf{P}^{\sharp} (with P♯(ω)=P(K(ω))(ω)\mathsf{P}^{\sharp}(\omega)=\mathsf{P}^{(\mathsf{K}(\omega))}(\omega)), the likelihoods ℓ(y),ω\ell^{(y),\omega} and ℓ♯,ω=ℓ(K(ω)),ω\ell^{\sharp,\omega}=\ell^{(\mathsf{K}(\omega)),\omega}, the observation record space (R,R,ρ)(\mathbf{R},\mathcal{R},\rho) with R(k)\mathbf{R}^{(k)} the records with kk events, the parameter lattice S={y/N:y∈N0L}\mathsf{S}=\{y/\sqrt{N}:y\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}\}, the count mass function p\mathsf{p}, the record kernel ff, and the standard basis vectors ec,je_{c,j} of Rd\mathbb{R}^d; E\mathbb{E} is the expectation on (Ω,F,P)(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P), extended to [0,∞][0,\infty]-valued measurable maps, 1{⋅}\mathbf{1}\{\cdot\} the indicator of an event, and N0={0}∪N\mathbb{N}_0=\{0\}\cup\mathbb{N} with N\mathbb{N} the natural numbers. Fix a natural number m≥1\mathsf{m}\ge1 (the move size) and weights w=(wc,j)(c,j)∈L∈Rdw=(w_{c,j})_{(c,j)\in\mathsf{L}}\in\mathbb{R}^d, and consider the dd moves ac,j=mec,j/Na_{c,j}=\mathsf{m}e_{c,j}/\sqrt{N} ((c,j)∈L(c,j)\in\mathsf{L}), indexed by L\mathsf{L} through its fixed bijection with {1,…,d}\{1,\dots,d\}; by claim 5 of The Synthetic Copy: Independent Cell Structure, Deterministic-Count Clocks, the Copy Measure, and the Smoothed Joint Density of Parameter and Observation Record, x+ac,j∈Sx+a_{c,j}\in\mathsf{S} for all x∈Sx\in\mathsf{S}, and Gaussian Smoothing of a Kernel-Weighted Discrete Family with Countable Support: Joint Density, van Trees Regularity, and the Symmetrised Directional Score Bound applies to (d,η,p,f)(d,\eta,\mathsf{p},f) on (R,R,ρ)(\mathbf{R},\mathcal{R},\rho) with n=dn=d moves a1,…,ada_1,\dots,a_d and weights w1,…,wdw_1,\dots,w_d, the move aqa_q being ac,ja_{c,j} and the weight wqw_q being wc,jw_{c,j} for qq the image of (c,j)(c,j) under the fixed bijection; let pc,j\mathsf{p}_{c,j}, fc,jf_{c,j} be its shifted family and Jsym∈[0,∞]\mathsf{J}^{\mathrm{sym}}\in[0,\infty] its symmetrised kernel-weighted move information, and let Φw:[0,∞)1+d→[0,∞)\Phi_w:[0,\infty)^{1+d}\to[0,\infty) be the symmetrised score functional for the weights ww (its last dd arguments indexed by L\mathsf{L}).

For (c,j)∈L(c,j)\in\mathsf{L} let ϱc,j=ϱμc,jm:N0→[0,∞)\varrho_{c,j}=\varrho^{\mathsf{m}}_{\mu_{c,j}}:\mathbb{N}_0\to[0,\infty) be the removal ratio with parameter μc,j\mu_{c,j} and move size m\mathsf{m}, so that ϱc,j(k)=poiμc,j(k−m)/poiμc,j(k)\varrho_{c,j}(k)=\mathrm{poi}_{\mu_{c,j}}(k-\mathsf{m})/\mathrm{poi}_{\mu_{c,j}}(k) for k≥mk\ge\mathsf{m} and ϱc,j(k)=0\varrho_{c,j}(k)=0 for k<mk<\mathsf{m} (the symbol ϱ\varrho is distinct from the reference measure ρ\rho, and the cell lengths μc,j\mu_{c,j} from the copy measure μ♯\mu^{\sharp}). The removed-clock likelihood for the cell (c,j)(c,j) is the map (r,ω)↦ℓ−(c,j),ω(r)(r,\omega)\mapsto\ell^{-(c,j),\omega}(r) on R×Ω\mathbf{R}\times\Omega given by ℓ−(c,j),ω=ℓ(K(ω)−mec,j),ω  if Kc,j(ω)≥m,ℓ−(c,j),ω=0  otherwise.\ell^{-(c,j),\omega}=\ell^{(\mathsf{K}(\omega)-\mathsf{m}e_{c,j}),\omega}\ \text{ if }\mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega)\ge\mathsf{m},\qquad \ell^{-(c,j),\omega}=0\ \text{ otherwise}.

1. (Removed clocks) Let (c,j)∈L(c,j)\in\mathsf{L} and ω∈Ω\omega\in\Omega with Kc,j(ω)≥m\mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega)\ge\mathsf{m}, and put y=K(ω)−mec,j∈N0Ly=\mathsf{K}(\omega)-\mathsf{m}e_{c,j}\in\mathbb{N}_0^{\mathsf{L}}. Then Pu♯,c′(ω)=Pu(y),c′(ω)\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c'}_u(\omega)=\mathsf{P}^{(y),c'}_u(\omega) for every label c′≠cc'\neq c and every u≥0u\ge0, and Pu♯,c(ω)=Pu(y),c(ω)+1Ω0U(ω)∑i=Kc,j(ω)−m+1Kc,j(ω)1{Uic,j(ω)≤u}(u≥0):\mathsf{P}^{\sharp,c}_u(\omega)=\mathsf{P}^{(y),c}_u(\omega)+\mathbf{1}_{\Omega^{U}_0}(\omega)\sum_{i=\mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega)-\mathsf{m}+1}^{\mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega)}\mathbf{1}\{U^{c,j}_i(\omega)\le u\}\qquad(u\ge0): the copy clocks are the clocks P(y)(ω)\mathsf{P}^{(y)}(\omega) with the m\mathsf{m} points Uic,j(ω)U^{c,j}_i(\omega), Kc,j(ω)−m<i≤Kc,j(ω)\mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega)-\mathsf{m}<i\le\mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega), inserted into the cell Ic,jI_{c,j} of the clock cc; on Ω0U\Omega^{U}_0 these points lie in Ic,jI_{c,j}, are pairwise distinct, and differ from every point Ui′c,j′(ω)U^{c,j'}_{i'}(\omega) with 1≤j′≤Jc1\le j'\le J_c and 1≤i′≤yc,j′1\le i'\le y_{c,j'}. The likelihood ℓ−(c,j),ω=ℓ(y),ω\ell^{-(c,j),\omega}=\ell^{(y),\omega} is the record-driven likelihood of The Record-Driven Causal Intensity of the Open-Loop Aggregate Solution: Joint Measurability of the Record-Frozen Control, the Regularised Recursion Path, Non-Anticipation, and Measurability of the Likelihood for the clock family P(y)(ω)\mathsf{P}^{(y)}(\omega).

2. (Measurability and moments) For every (c,j)∈L(c,j)\in\mathsf{L}: the map (r,ω)↦ℓ−(c,j),ω(r)(r,\omega)\mapsto\ell^{-(c,j),\omega}(r) is measurable with respect to the product σ\sigma-algebra R⊗F\mathcal{R}\otimes\mathcal{F} and takes values in [0,(NB~)k][0,(N\tilde{B})^{k}] on R(k)×Ω\mathbf{R}^{(k)}\times\Omega (with (NB~)0=1(N\tilde{B})^{0}=1); ϱc,j(Kc,j)\varrho_{c,j}(\mathsf{K}_{c,j}) is a V\mathcal{V}-measurable random variable with E[ϱc,j(Kc,j)]=1,E[ϱc,j(Kc,j)2]=∑i=0m(mi)2 i! μc,j−i;\mathbb{E}\bigl[\varrho_{c,j}(\mathsf{K}_{c,j})\bigr]=1,\qquad \mathbb{E}\bigl[\varrho_{c,j}(\mathsf{K}_{c,j})^{2}\bigr]=\sum_{i=0}^{\mathsf{m}}\binom{\mathsf{m}}{i}^{2}\,i!\,\mu_{c,j}^{-i}; and the pathwise score map Ψ(r,ω)=Φw(ℓ♯,ω(r), (ϱc,j(Kc,j(ω)) ℓ−(c,j),ω(r))(c,j)∈L)((r,ω)∈R×Ω)\Psi(r,\omega)=\Phi_w\Bigl(\ell^{\sharp,\omega}(r),\ \bigl(\varrho_{c,j}(\mathsf{K}_{c,j}(\omega))\,\ell^{-(c,j),\omega}(r)\bigr)_{(c,j)\in\mathsf{L}}\Bigr)\qquad((r,\omega)\in\mathbf{R}\times\Omega) is R⊗F\mathcal{R}\otimes\mathcal{F}-measurable with values in [0,∞)[0,\infty); consequently r↦E[Ψ(r,⋅)]r\mapsto\mathbb{E}[\Psi(r,\cdot)] is R\mathcal{R}-measurable and ω↦∫RΨ(r,ω) ρ(dr)\omega\mapsto\int_{\mathbf{R}}\Psi(r,\omega)\,\rho(dr) is F\mathcal{F}-measurable, both with values in [0,∞][0,\infty] (by the Tonelli theorem, ρ\rho being σ\sigma-finite and PP finite).

3. (The shifted family on the copy) For every x=y/N∈Sx=y/\sqrt{N}\in\mathsf{S}, every r∈Rr\in\mathbf{R} and every (c,j)∈L(c,j)\in\mathsf{L}, p(x)f(x,r)=E[1{K=y} ℓ♯,⋅(r)],pc,j(x)fc,j(x,r)=E[1{K=y} ϱc,j(Kc,j) ℓ−(c,j),⋅(r)].\mathsf{p}(x)f(x,r)=\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}\{\mathsf{K}=y\}\,\ell^{\sharp,\cdot}(r)\bigr],\qquad \mathsf{p}_{c,j}(x)f_{c,j}(x,r)=\mathbb{E}\bigl[\mathbf{1}\{\mathsf{K}=y\}\,\varrho_{c,j}(\mathsf{K}_{c,j})\,\ell^{-(c,j),\cdot}(r)\bigr].

4. (Pathwise reduction) In [0,∞][0,\infty], Jsym ≤ E[∫RΨ(r,⋅) ρ(dr)]=∫RE[Ψ(r,⋅)] ρ(dr).\mathsf{J}^{\mathrm{sym}}\ \le\ \mathbb{E}\Bigl[\int_{\mathbf{R}}\Psi(r,\cdot)\,\rho(dr)\Bigr]=\int_{\mathbf{R}}\mathbb{E}\bigl[\Psi(r,\cdot)\bigr]\,\rho(dr).

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…