TheoremBase

The Record-Frozen Control as a Measurable Map into the Weakly Metrized Control Set, and the Record-Frozen Mean-Field Flow: Joint Measurability, Flow Equation, and Measurability in the Record

Statement

Adopt the setting and notation of the flow stability lemma: an affine-controlled transition-rate family (β0,β1)(\beta_0,\beta_1) on ll states with control set A⊆Rm\mathcal{A}\subseteq\mathbb{R}^m (nonempty, convex and compact as part of those data) and Lipschitz constant Λ\Lambda; its transition-rate family β\beta with rate bound BB, together with the bound R=sup⁡α∈A∣α∣R=\sup_{\alpha\in\mathcal{A}}|\alpha|, the constants K1K_1 and Λb\Lambda_b, the aggregate state drift bb and the projected drift b^\hat{b} of that lemma; a horizon T>0T>0; the constants Kb=2l (l−1)BK_b=2\sqrt{l}\,(l-1)B and K2=2l (l−1)K1K_2=2\sqrt{l}\,(l-1)K_1 of the flow stability lemma; the probability simplex Δl\Delta^l; the notation of the Lebesgue space L2([0,T];Rm)L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{m}), including the pairing ⟨⋅,⋅⟩L2\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle_{L^{2}} and the convention of claim 5 there by which an element of that space is denoted by the same symbol as a representative of it; the set UA\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}} of A\mathcal{A}-valued controls, its admissible representatives, and the mean-field flow S(x0,ξ)S(x_0,\xi) of claim 2 of the flow stability lemma, with values St(x0,ξ)∈ΔlS_t(x_0,\xi)\in\Delta^l; and the metric ρ\rho on UA\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}} of claim 1 of the weak metrizability and compactness theorem, formed from a fixed sequence (wn)n∈N(w_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}} in L2([0,T];Rm)L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{m}) whose set of terms is dense there (the index of that sequence, written rr in that theorem, is written nn here, the letter rr being reserved for records), with Borel σ\sigma-algebra B(UA,ρ)\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}},\rho).

Write ∣⋅∣|\cdot| for the Euclidean norm, x⋅yx\cdot y for the dot product, B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}) for the Borel σ\sigma-algebra of the real line, B[0,T]\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]} and λ[0,T]\lambda_{[0,T]} for the trace Borel σ\sigma-algebra and restricted Lebesgue measure on [0,T][0,T], ∫[0,T]⋅ du\int_{[0,T]}\cdot\,du for the Lebesgue integral of a nonnegative function and, for signed integrands, for the Lebesgue integral of an integrable function, both with respect to λ[0,T]\lambda_{[0,T]}, Bk\mathcal{B}_k and λk\lambda_k for the kk-fold Borel σ\sigma-algebra and product Lebesgue measure on Rk\mathbb{R}^k, and ⊗\otimes for the product σ\sigma-algebra. A real-valued map on a measurable space is called measurable when it is measurable with respect to the named σ\sigma-algebra and B(R)\mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}).

Let l~≥1\tilde{l}\ge1 be a natural number and let (R,R)=(R(T,l~),R(T,l~))(\mathbf{R},\mathcal{R})=(\mathbf{R}(T,\tilde{l}),\mathcal{R}(T,\tilde{l})) be the observation record space with horizon TT and l~\tilde{l} channels together with its record σ\sigma-algebra; its reference measure, denoted ρ(T,l~)\rho(T,\tilde{l}) in that definition, is written ϱ\varrho here to keep it apart from the metric ρ\rho. Records are written r=(k,t,v)r=(k,\mathbf{t},v) with t=(t1,…,tk)\mathbf{t}=(t_1,\dots,t_k) and v=(v1,…,vk)v=(v_1,\dots,v_k), and C∅C_\emptyset, Ck,vC_{k,v} are the cells. Let h=(hk)k≥0h=(h_k)_{k\ge0} be an observation-driven control policy with horizon TT, control dimension mm and l~\tilde{l} channels that is A\mathcal{A}-valued, and for r∈Rr\in\mathbf{R} let ar:[0,T]→Rma^{r}:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^m be its record-frozen control path at rr, with event count kr(s)k_r(s) as defined there. Fix x0∈Δlx_0\in\Delta^l. Then the following hold.

1. (Joint measurability and admissibility.) Each component of the map (s,r)↦ar(s)(s,r)\mapsto a^{r}(s) on [0,T]×R[0,T]\times\mathbf{R} is measurable with respect to B[0,T]⊗R\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}\otimes\mathcal{R}. For every r∈Rr\in\mathbf{R} the path ara^{r} is square-integrable in the sense of claim 1 of The Lebesgue Space of Square-Integrable Vector-Valued Functions on a Compact Interval, every one of its values lies in A\mathcal{A}, and ∣ar(s)∣≤R|a^{r}(s)|\le R for every s∈[0,T]s\in[0,T]; writing ara^{r} also for the element of L2([0,T];Rm)L^{2}([0,T];\mathbb{R}^{m}) it represents, one has ar∈UAa^{r}\in\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}}, and the path ara^{r} is an admissible representative of it.

2. (Weak distances are measurable in the record.) For every ζ∈UA\zeta\in\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}} the map r↦ρ(ar,ζ)r\mapsto\rho(a^{r},\zeta) on R\mathbf{R} is measurable with respect to R\mathcal{R}.

3. (The record-frozen control is a measurable map into the control set.) The map r↦arr\mapsto a^{r} from R\mathbf{R} to UA\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}} is measurable with respect to R\mathcal{R} and B(UA,ρ)\mathcal{B}(\mathcal{U}_{\mathcal{A}},\rho).

4. (The record-frozen flow.) For r∈Rr\in\mathbf{R} and t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] put

Φtr=St(x0,ar)∈Δl,\Phi^{r}_t=S_t(x_0,a^{r})\in\Delta^l ,

with components Φtr,γ\Phi^{r,\gamma}_t (the record-frozen flow). Then for every r∈Rr\in\mathbf{R}: Φ0r=x0\Phi^{r}_0=x_0; ∣Φtr−Φur∣≤Kb∣t−u∣|\Phi^{r}_t-\Phi^{r}_u|\le K_b|t-u| for all t,u∈[0,T]t,u\in[0,T]; for every γ∈{1,…,l}\gamma\in\{1,\dots,l\} the map u↦bγ(Φur,ar(u))u\mapsto b^\gamma(\Phi^{r}_u,a^{r}(u)) on [0,T][0,T] is measurable with respect to B[0,T]\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}; ∣b(Φur,ar(u))∣≤Kb|b(\Phi^{r}_u,a^{r}(u))|\le K_b for every u∈[0,T]u\in[0,T]; and

Φtr,γ=x0γ+∫[0,t]bγ(Φur,ar(u)) dufor all t∈[0,T] and γ∈{1,…,l},\Phi^{r,\gamma}_t=x^{\gamma}_0+\int_{[0,t]}b^\gamma\bigl(\Phi^{r}_u,a^{r}(u)\bigr)\,du\qquad\text{for all }t\in[0,T]\text{ and }\gamma\in\{1,\dots,l\},

the integral over [0,t][0,t] being that of the integrand multiplied by the indicator of [0,t][0,t]. Thus Φr:[0,T]→Δl\Phi^{r}:[0,T]\to\Delta^l is a map with continuous components satisfying the displayed componentwise identity for every tt and γ\gamma; reading integrals of Rl\mathbb{R}^l-valued maps componentwise, this is Φtr=x0+∫[0,t]b(Φur,ar(u)) du\Phi^{r}_t=x_0+\int_{[0,t]}b(\Phi^{r}_u,a^{r}(u))\,du.

5. (Measurability of the flow in the record.) For every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] and every γ∈{1,…,l}\gamma\in\{1,\dots,l\} the map r↦Φtr,γr\mapsto\Phi^{r,\gamma}_t on R\mathbf{R} is measurable with respect to R\mathcal{R}, and the map (t,r)↦Φtr,γ(t,r)\mapsto\Phi^{r,\gamma}_t on [0,T]×R[0,T]\times\mathbf{R} is measurable with respect to B[0,T]⊗R\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}\otimes\mathcal{R}.

6. (Integrated deviation from a reference path.) Let S∗:[0,T]→RlS^{*}:[0,T]\to\mathbb{R}^l be a map whose components are measurable with respect to B[0,T]\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}, and let K∗≥0K^{*}\ge0 be a real number with ∣St∗∣≤K∗|S^{*}_t|\le K^{*} for every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T]. Then the map (t,r)↦∣Φtr−St∗∣(t,r)\mapsto|\Phi^{r}_t-S^{*}_t| on [0,T]×R[0,T]\times\mathbf{R} is measurable with respect to B[0,T]⊗R\mathcal{B}_{[0,T]}\otimes\mathcal{R} with values in [0,1+K∗][0,1+K^{*}], and the map

r↦∫[0,T]∣Φur−Su∗∣ dur\mapsto\int_{[0,T]}|\Phi^{r}_u-S^{*}_u|\,du

on R\mathbf{R} is measurable with respect to R\mathcal{R} with values in [0,(1+K∗)T][0,(1+K^{*})T].

Proofs

Log in to submit a proof.

Loading...

Citations

Loading…

Dependencies

Loading…

Related

0 relations

Curated associations between results. These are editable and subjective — they do not replace the dependency graph, which is derived from the references in the text.

No relations recorded yet.

Comments

Log in to comment.

Loading…